Theme: Coercion

  • Return To Rule By Rule Of Law, Markets In Everything, And The Continuous Evolution Of The Animal Man.

    We are the masters of the first asset: violence. Violence like any asset can be put to good, or to ill. We can return to the continuous domestication and husbandry of humans, animals, machines, and this earth – if not the universe. And in doing so evolve ourselves and man into gods. Or we can be victims of those who lack that ability.
  • Return To Rule By Rule Of Law, Markets In Everything, And The Continuous Evolution Of The Animal Man.

    We are the masters of the first asset: violence. Violence like any asset can be put to good, or to ill. We can return to the continuous domestication and husbandry of humans, animals, machines, and this earth – if not the universe. And in doing so evolve ourselves and man into gods. Or we can be victims of those who lack that ability.
  • RETURN TO RULE BY RULE OF LAW, MARKETS IN EVERYTHING, AND THE CONTINUOUS EVOLUTI

    RETURN TO RULE BY RULE OF LAW, MARKETS IN EVERYTHING, AND THE CONTINUOUS EVOLUTION OF THE ANIMAL MAN.

    We are the masters of the first asset: violence. Violence like any asset can be put to good, or to ill. We can return to the continuous domestication and husbandry of humans, animals, machines, and this earth – if not the universe. And in doing so evolve ourselves and man into gods. Or we can be victims of those who lack that ability.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 13:00:00 UTC

  • Supreme Court: Bakers and Gays. (sorry, just had to crank this one out at 2:45am

    Supreme Court: Bakers and Gays. (sorry, just had to crank this one out at 2:45am) Arguments before the court are incorrect. There is a vast difference between personal conviction, small business between individuals, enterprise policy, and practical monopoly. There is no practical monopoly of cake bakers, there is no enterprise policy forcing interpersonal rejection, and so this is an interpersonal matter of a difference in ethics. I mean, I wouldn’t ask a jew to make a nazi cake. I just wouldn’t because that would VIOLATE RECIPROCITY. And I wouldn’t confuse my personal conviction with corporate policy, nor near monopoly policy depriving choice in a market, nor political policy determining rights under rule of law before the courts. I don’t let certain people service me in stores because I do not want to reward their manner of dress or speech or behavior, or ‘attire of separatism’. But I am happy to simply move on to someone else, and aside from utilities, I don’t see any commerce I can conduct that is a near monopoly. So this has been a travesty since the beginning. Voluntary Reciprocity provides the answer to everything.
  • Supreme Court: Bakers and Gays. (sorry, just had to crank this one out at 2:45am

    Supreme Court: Bakers and Gays. (sorry, just had to crank this one out at 2:45am) Arguments before the court are incorrect. There is a vast difference between personal conviction, small business between individuals, enterprise policy, and practical monopoly. There is no practical monopoly of cake bakers, there is no enterprise policy forcing interpersonal rejection, and so this is an interpersonal matter of a difference in ethics. I mean, I wouldn’t ask a jew to make a nazi cake. I just wouldn’t because that would VIOLATE RECIPROCITY. And I wouldn’t confuse my personal conviction with corporate policy, nor near monopoly policy depriving choice in a market, nor political policy determining rights under rule of law before the courts. I don’t let certain people service me in stores because I do not want to reward their manner of dress or speech or behavior, or ‘attire of separatism’. But I am happy to simply move on to someone else, and aside from utilities, I don’t see any commerce I can conduct that is a near monopoly. So this has been a travesty since the beginning. Voluntary Reciprocity provides the answer to everything.
  • Supreme Court: Bakers and Gays. (sorry, just had to crank this one out at 2:45am

    Supreme Court: Bakers and Gays.

    (sorry, just had to crank this one out at 2:45am)

    Arguments before the court are incorrect. There is a vast difference between personal conviction, small business between individuals, enterprise policy, and practical monopoly.

    There is no practical monopoly of cake bakers, there is no enterprise policy forcing interpersonal rejection, and so this is an interpersonal matter of a difference in ethics.

    I mean, I wouldn’t ask a jew to make a nazi cake. I just wouldn’t because that would VIOLATE RECIPROCITY.

    And I wouldn’t confuse my personal conviction with corporate policy, nor near monopoly policy depriving choice in a market, nor political policy determining rights under rule of law before the courts.

    I don’t let certain people service me in stores because I do not want to reward their manner of dress or speech or behavior, or ‘attire of separatism’. But I am happy to simply move on to someone else, and aside from utilities, I don’t see any commerce I can conduct that is a near monopoly.

    So this has been a travesty since the beginning.

    Voluntary Reciprocity provides the answer to everything.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 02:45:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24129711_10155930842717264_4650

    photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24129711_10155930842717264_4650

    photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24129711_10155930842717264_4650432493491203055_n_10155930842717264.jpg HKP7 the best technology so far.Matthew VölkischI always like wooden handles, for some reason!Dec 03, 2017 6:09pm


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-03 11:11:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24231950_10155930834512264_4117

    photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24231950_10155930834512264_4117

    photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24231950_10155930834512264_4117567172167560539_n_10155930834512264.jpg Melted 45 by Clark Custom


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-03 11:07:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24293924_10155930822797264_4850

    photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24293924_10155930822797264_4850

    photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24293924_10155930822797264_4850489246951836048_n_10155930822797264.jpg Walther PPK.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-03 11:04:00 UTC