October 23rd, 2018 3:56 PM THE CHALLENGE OF ACTING AS PROSECUTOR
—I may seem like kind of an asshole but my REAL problem is generally not going hard enough. I give people too much benefit of the doubt. I give them too many chances. As a result. They hurt others.”— Ely Harman
—“People confuse you being right with you being an asshole.”— Alba Rising
[W]e don’t need prosecutors to be nice. We need them to produce justice: Restitution, Correction, and Prevention.
October 23rd, 2018 2:57 PM THE HISTORY OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching#History The French Revolution Popularized The Practice (Really)
—“Every society has had forms of extrajudicial punishments, including murder. The legal and cultural antecedents of American lynching were carried across the Atlantic by migrants from the British Isles to colonial North America. Collective violence was a familiar aspect of the early modern Anglo-American legal landscape. Group violence in the British Atlantic was usually nonlethal in intention and result. In the seventeenth century, in the context of political turmoil in England and unsettled social and political conditions in the American colonies, there arose rebellions and riots that took multiple lives.”—
In Anglo Saxon Culture, The MILITIA solved problems of enemies of the people. Judicial Resolution of disputes was meant to resolve conflicts between members of the polity in order to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds). The “Politicization” of extra-judicial punishment was a product of the French Revolution and then spread to the Antebellum era in the states.
October 23rd, 2018 2:57 PM THE HISTORY OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching#History The French Revolution Popularized The Practice (Really)
—“Every society has had forms of extrajudicial punishments, including murder. The legal and cultural antecedents of American lynching were carried across the Atlantic by migrants from the British Isles to colonial North America. Collective violence was a familiar aspect of the early modern Anglo-American legal landscape. Group violence in the British Atlantic was usually nonlethal in intention and result. In the seventeenth century, in the context of political turmoil in England and unsettled social and political conditions in the American colonies, there arose rebellions and riots that took multiple lives.”—
In Anglo Saxon Culture, The MILITIA solved problems of enemies of the people. Judicial Resolution of disputes was meant to resolve conflicts between members of the polity in order to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds). The “Politicization” of extra-judicial punishment was a product of the French Revolution and then spread to the Antebellum era in the states.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44737078_10156728338182264_4914342588430942208_n_10156728338177264.jpg THE HISTORY OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching#History
The French Revolution Popularized The Practice (Really)
—“Every society has had forms of extrajudicial punishments, including murder. The legal and cultural antecedents of American lynching were carried across the Atlantic by migrants from the British Isles to colonial North America. Collective violence was a familiar aspect of the early modern Anglo-American legal landscape. Group violence in the British Atlantic was usually nonlethal in intention and result. In the seventeenth century, in the context of political turmoil in England and unsettled social and political conditions in the American colonies, there arose rebellions and riots that took multiple lives.”—
In Anglo Saxon Culture, The MILITIA solved problems of enemies of the people. Judicial Resolution of disputes was meant to resolve conflicts between members of the polity in order to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds).
The “Politicization” of extra-judicial punishment was a product of the French Revolution and then spread to the Antebellum era in the states.James SantagataStar Chamber.Oct 23, 2018, 2:58 PMJoffre CrossThat does look to be a rather exceptional branch for the purpose at handOct 23, 2018, 3:02 PMCorbus AureliusLiterally lesson learned.Oct 23, 2018, 3:08 PMCurt Doolittle( That’s the best response to any post. thanks. Some people ‘get’ the idea I’m putting across, and some don’t. Happiest when you (they) do. ) -hugsOct 23, 2018, 3:11 PMCorbus AureliusCurt Doolittle And thank you for all your effort and creativity. I become a bit more nuanced in my ability to explain positions I think are valuable every post you make.Oct 23, 2018, 3:31 PMMicah PezdirtzMight be worth discussing the extrajudicial function of the MSM in prosecuting noncompliance with the given narrative through shame, obstinance, violence, vandalism, etcOct 23, 2018, 3:56 PMCurt Doolittleok. now THAT is smart. You wanna take a cut at it? no?Oct 23, 2018, 3:56 PMMicah PezdirtzI might enjoy stumbling through itOct 23, 2018, 3:57 PMMicah PezdirtzJournalists (and so called comedians, actors, celebrities) utilize praise and blame to implant positive and negative sentiments in those who lack agency and cannot determine the validity of the claims. E.g. “Orange man bad” or “let the refugees in”.
Their audience then either pushes directly for formal legal action, or indirectly for acceptance of new (typically inverted) social norms.
(Sorry I don’t have the time to elaborate more, my attention is limited at work)Oct 23, 2018, 4:11 PMMicah PezdirtzThe point being non legal entities decide (judge) what behavior to accept or reject(verdict), and how to respond (sentence) without reference to legal process or precident. Their oligarchical process aims for the most totalitarian, profitable outcome as possible and it does so at direct cost to our commonsOct 23, 2018, 4:21 PMSkogi Brevikgood afternoon, daily reminder that the available data on lynchings indicate that the current justice system “targets” blacks more than “racist” former slave owning southerners did per capita and that, if this is oppression, freed slaves being lynched were less oppressed than blacks are now.Oct 23, 2018, 5:03 PMSolomon VolodymyrIf you want to see the definition of failure to prevent feuds, check out Albania…Oct 23, 2018, 6:04 PMBrett StevensEverything from the French Revolution is toxic.Oct 24, 2018, 10:17 AMTHE HISTORY OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching#History
The French Revolution Popularized The Practice (Really)
—“Every society has had forms of extrajudicial punishments, including murder. The legal and cultural antecedents of American lynching were carried across the Atlantic by migrants from the British Isles to colonial North America. Collective violence was a familiar aspect of the early modern Anglo-American legal landscape. Group violence in the British Atlantic was usually nonlethal in intention and result. In the seventeenth century, in the context of political turmoil in England and unsettled social and political conditions in the American colonies, there arose rebellions and riots that took multiple lives.”—
In Anglo Saxon Culture, The MILITIA solved problems of enemies of the people. Judicial Resolution of disputes was meant to resolve conflicts between members of the polity in order to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds).
The “Politicization” of extra-judicial punishment was a product of the French Revolution and then spread to the Antebellum era in the states.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-23 14:57:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/44737078_10156728338182264_4914342588430942208_n_10156728338177264.jpg THE HISTORY OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching#History
The French Revolution Popularized The Practice (Really)
—“Every society has had forms of extrajudicial punishments, including murder. The legal and cultural antecedents of American lynching were carried across the Atlantic by migrants from the British Isles to colonial North America. Collective violence was a familiar aspect of the early modern Anglo-American legal landscape. Group violence in the British Atlantic was usually nonlethal in intention and result. In the seventeenth century, in the context of political turmoil in England and unsettled social and political conditions in the American colonies, there arose rebellions and riots that took multiple lives.”—
In Anglo Saxon Culture, The MILITIA solved problems of enemies of the people. Judicial Resolution of disputes was meant to resolve conflicts between members of the polity in order to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds).
The “Politicization” of extra-judicial punishment was a product of the French Revolution and then spread to the Antebellum era in the states.James SantagataStar Chamber.Oct 23, 2018 2:58pmJoffre CrossThat does look to be a rather exceptional branch for the purpose at handOct 23, 2018 3:02pmCorbus AureliusLiterally lesson learned.Oct 23, 2018 3:08pmCurt Doolittle( That’s the best response to any post. thanks. Some people ‘get’ the idea I’m putting across, and some don’t. Happiest when you (they) do. ) -hugsOct 23, 2018 3:11pmCorbus Aurelius@[741197263:2048:Curt Doolittle] And thank you for all your effort and creativity. I become a bit more nuanced in my ability to explain positions I think are valuable every post you make.Oct 23, 2018 3:31pmMicah PezdirtzMight be worth discussing the extrajudicial function of the MSM in prosecuting noncompliance with the given narrative through shame, obstinance, violence, vandalism, etcOct 23, 2018 3:56pmCurt Doolittleok. now THAT is smart. You wanna take a cut at it? no?Oct 23, 2018 3:56pmMicah PezdirtzI might enjoy stumbling through itOct 23, 2018 3:57pmMicah PezdirtzJournalists (and so called comedians, actors, celebrities) utilize praise and blame to implant positive and negative sentiments in those who lack agency and cannot determine the validity of the claims. E.g. “Orange man bad” or “let the refugees in”.
Their audience then either pushes directly for formal legal action, or indirectly for acceptance of new (typically inverted) social norms.
(Sorry I don’t have the time to elaborate more, my attention is limited at work)Oct 23, 2018 4:11pmMicah PezdirtzThe point being non legal entities decide (judge) what behavior to accept or reject(verdict), and how to respond (sentence) without reference to legal process or precident. Their oligarchical process aims for the most totalitarian, profitable outcome as possible and it does so at direct cost to our commonsOct 23, 2018 4:21pmSkogi Brevikgood afternoon, daily reminder that the available data on lynchings indicate that the current justice system “targets” blacks more than “racist” former slave owning southerners did per capita and that, if this is oppression, freed slaves being lynched were less oppressed than blacks are now.Oct 23, 2018 5:03pmSolomon VolodymyrIf you want to see the definition of failure to prevent feuds, check out Albania…Oct 23, 2018 6:04pmBrett StevensEverything from the French Revolution is toxic.Oct 24, 2018 10:17amTHE HISTORY OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching#History
The French Revolution Popularized The Practice (Really)
—“Every society has had forms of extrajudicial punishments, including murder. The legal and cultural antecedents of American lynching were carried across the Atlantic by migrants from the British Isles to colonial North America. Collective violence was a familiar aspect of the early modern Anglo-American legal landscape. Group violence in the British Atlantic was usually nonlethal in intention and result. In the seventeenth century, in the context of political turmoil in England and unsettled social and political conditions in the American colonies, there arose rebellions and riots that took multiple lives.”—
In Anglo Saxon Culture, The MILITIA solved problems of enemies of the people. Judicial Resolution of disputes was meant to resolve conflicts between members of the polity in order to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds).
The “Politicization” of extra-judicial punishment was a product of the French Revolution and then spread to the Antebellum era in the states.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-23 14:57:00 UTC
1) CLOSE the border. 2) Declare a National Emergency and CLear and Present Danger and Militarize and MINE the border, 3) Cut all south american aid. 3) End all wire transfer activity to South America. 4) Nationalize and Close Western Union.
@POTUS #realDonaldTrump #Trump
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 18:17:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1054436612527046656
—“The relative inequality that causes violence is much more likely a deep seated sense of unfairness (manifesting in the world as inequality) but actually the result of policy being unfair [unjust is the issue, not unequal; or unjust application]. Unduly favoring certain people over others within the same geographic space [most likely differences in enforcement due to class].”— Brandon Hayes
IMO Violence = Proximity + Inequality = Signal Deprivation.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 11:55:00 UTC
October 21st, 2018 11:19 AM THE OPPORTUNITY COST OF DEFENDING OUR COMMONS by Bill Joslin (perfect example of economics and law of the commons) “When deciding upon defense of the social commons, We must continuously calculate “should I bear an opportunity cost (to crush the other) to maintain peace, trust, and cooperation, and therefore to preserve the status quo” versus “the opportunity cost of maintaining the status quo is too high to sustain trust, peace, and cooperation, because the property damages are too high- now we must defect or fight” “Our issue today is that our media, academia and state are forcing us to bear the opportunity cost (to not fight) while we watch our properties (decency, culture, transgenerational values, trust) are being dismantled by the mob. We’re at war, but its hard to identify because it is a war of demographics… an ill-defined group which IMO is why identitarianism is on the rise. We’re attempting to identify who, as a group (or army if you will) is under attack and who is attacking. We’re attempting to distinguish friend from foe.” And the media, academia and state are obscuring our personal interests under the moral ideal of “tolerance”. If we change the narrative to forbearance, then costs must be defined. If costs are defined, limits to tolerance must be discussed. If limits to tolerance are discussed then it becomes clear we have crossed the limit which demands tolerant to become intolerant ages ago… and if this is clear, then heads will roll.”
October 21st, 2018 11:19 AM THE OPPORTUNITY COST OF DEFENDING OUR COMMONS by Bill Joslin (perfect example of economics and law of the commons) “When deciding upon defense of the social commons, We must continuously calculate “should I bear an opportunity cost (to crush the other) to maintain peace, trust, and cooperation, and therefore to preserve the status quo” versus “the opportunity cost of maintaining the status quo is too high to sustain trust, peace, and cooperation, because the property damages are too high- now we must defect or fight” “Our issue today is that our media, academia and state are forcing us to bear the opportunity cost (to not fight) while we watch our properties (decency, culture, transgenerational values, trust) are being dismantled by the mob. We’re at war, but its hard to identify because it is a war of demographics… an ill-defined group which IMO is why identitarianism is on the rise. We’re attempting to identify who, as a group (or army if you will) is under attack and who is attacking. We’re attempting to distinguish friend from foe.” And the media, academia and state are obscuring our personal interests under the moral ideal of “tolerance”. If we change the narrative to forbearance, then costs must be defined. If costs are defined, limits to tolerance must be discussed. If limits to tolerance are discussed then it becomes clear we have crossed the limit which demands tolerant to become intolerant ages ago… and if this is clear, then heads will roll.”
October 20th, 2018 11:49 AM MORE ON THE FRAUD OF TOLERANCE AND THE PAYMENT OF FORBEARANCE
—“The centre holds onto tolerance because tolerance is passive. Those lacking agency can participate in tolerance while ignoring limits, because they don’t have the agency to enforce limits, and by ignoring limits they can stay in denial of their lack of agency. Forbearance includes tolerance AND limits (until the cost one was willing carried has been exceeded), AND active participation – its a choice which one can boycott/defect based on the cost carried.” —- @[655376421:2048:Bill Joslin]
“FORBEARANCE”
—-“I use Tolerance to mean allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs. It is a passive state. No agency. …. I use Forbearance to mean I intentionally take responsibility for the cost to allow someone else not to (ex. my children, my disabled kin, my employee that has not matured fully yet). It is an active state. Allows agency.”— @[1013719133:2048:Luke Weinhagen]
CD: This is great line of original thinking. I don’t know where it’s coming from but it’s an example of how we are all increasing precision and measurement. (thanks to Brandon Hayes for looping me in)