Theme: Coercion

  • the last 20 years

    October 26th, 2018 11:11 AM

    —“All of the fighting age men in the US have spent the last 20 years watching a third world insurgent force using almost entirely small arms go toe-to-toe with the worlds greatest military. Only difference over here is we have more trees.”— Luke Weinhagen

    (priceless) Revolution Comes.

  • The the Debts of Ignoble Savages

    October 27th, 2018 8:16 AM THE MYTH OF THE NOBLE SAVAGES VS THE THE DEBTS OF IGNOBLE SAVAGES (unpleasant)(insensitivity warning)

    —“Violence is a precious resource. We civilised the whole world using violence. That’s the history of civilisation: the incremental suppression of parasitism through the organised application of violence.”–Curt Doolittle —“Thoughts?”– Joel Harvey —“If by “parasitism” you mean “the extermination of indigenous people who had a reciprocal relationship with the world and then the forced conversion of there children, theft of there resources and obliteration of there memories so the could end up fat useless consumers” then yeah brother, We are lovely”— Damien Woodgate

    Yes, we dragged them out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and endemic violence – and we did it for profit, and we did it against their will; and they fought us kicking and screaming, all the way; and they are unthankful for it. And other than profiting from it, and having a great european civil war over the profitability of it, and leaving the job unfinished, so rather than continue our work, that we had to fight the communists and now the islamists in their attempts at reversal of our work, while fighting the jews and puritans within our societies undermining our work, it seems to have done us no good – because they make up fantasy stories of the noble savage living peaceful lives in harmony with nature, instead of half domesticated animals at malthusian limits relentlessly preying upon one another in endemic competition, corruption, violence, and warfare. So yes, we failed to complete our program of profiting from the domestication of barely humane humans, and enforcing farming, industry, technology, science, medicine, plenty, literacy, relative peace, charity to women, and long lives upon them, and they are resentful, because they cannot bear the thought of thanking us when we succeeded, or thanking us for exterminating those who were the most primitive, the most work, and who were dedicated out failure. We are not equals as individuals as classes, as groups, polities, nations, civilizations, or “races” if that means anything more than ‘civilizations’. We dragged all of mankind out of barbarism. No man is a hero to his debtors. That said, none of us should expect respect or appreciation from our debtors. Our project was incomplete. However, in retrospect, we could have and perhaps should have treated white man’s burden as Pragmatic Heathen rather than Utopian Christian and instead of converting (educating) them, and improving their condition, simply engaged in organized replacement of them. Because history shows we always ‘lose’ when we are tolerant, ruling, or colonizing, and we have always ‘won’ and advanced ourselves and mankind rapidly whenever we conduct replacement. And that is the lesson that our ungrateful ‘Debtors’ have taught us (yet again). The evidence is rather glaringly obvious: Replacement of less domesticated (evolved) peoples is the dominant force in developmental history, and produces the optimum results for not only us, but for all mankind. Hence the necessity of separatism. That is the lesson of history.

  • the last 20 years

    October 26th, 2018 11:11 AM

    —“All of the fighting age men in the US have spent the last 20 years watching a third world insurgent force using almost entirely small arms go toe-to-toe with the worlds greatest military. Only difference over here is we have more trees.”— Luke Weinhagen

    (priceless) Revolution Comes.

  • “Those who can destroy a thing, own a thing.” I silly little quote that expresse

    “Those who can destroy a thing, own a thing.” I silly little quote that expresses a logical necessity and empirical fact. Revolution Comes. There is no longer need to tolerate our replacement.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-26 18:32:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055889892859957249

    Reply addressees: @1963Kelli @washingtonpost

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055888022439309312


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055888022439309312

  • It’s morally wrong to engage in genocide by immigration and you are a criminal

    It’s morally wrong to engage in genocide by immigration and you are a criminal.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-26 18:11:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055884533105639425

    Reply addressees: @1963Kelli @washingtonpost

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055883985073582081


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055883985073582081

  • I don’t deal in SHOULD. I deal in Rational Choice, and actions. Men decide. Men

    I don’t deal in SHOULD. I deal in Rational Choice, and actions. Men decide. Men will always decide. Because in the end, it is a minority of men willing and able to overturn the status quo that determines all. Women ride on men’s permission. That is why you are privileged: Men.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-26 17:51:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055879646007517185

    Reply addressees: @1963Kelli @washingtonpost

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055864113585283072


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055864113585283072

  • “All of the fighting age men in the US have spent the last 20 years watching a t

    —“All of the fighting age men in the US have spent the last 20 years watching a third world insurgent force using almost entirely small arms go toe-to-toe with the worlds greatest military. Only difference over here is we have more trees.”— Luke Weinhagen

    (priceless)

    Revolution Comes.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-26 11:11:00 UTC

  • ON THE EXISTENCE, SCARCITY, OBJECTIVITY OF VIOLENCE —“The ability to act viole

    ON THE EXISTENCE, SCARCITY, OBJECTIVITY OF VIOLENCE

    —“The ability to act violently is a resource, yes.”—Richard Elliott

    —“I suppose you could call violence a skill and classify it as a human resource”—Joel Harvey

    –“Absolutely. An army is a resource of violence.”—Richard Elliott

    ^Ok. Y’all got there without me.

    —“An act is not an object.”– Richard Elliott

    This is mistake. An object exists independent of action. An action exists for the duration of the action and its consequences. An idea exists during the experience.

    Possible Objects have asset value (potential), Possible Actions have asset value. Possible Reconstructed Experience (Knowledge) has asset value.

    We use the term “Human Capital” for a reason: existential potential, potential action, and potential knowledge.

    —“Violence, an act of physical force that causes or is intended to cause harm.”— Brian Minsk

    This is a mistake.

    Violence is merely a resource that can be put to good (suppression of imposition of costs upon the interests of others, thereby driving people into the market for cooperation in order to survive), utility (restitution and punishment), or ill (imposition of costs upon the interests of others.)

    —“i’m not sure scarce is the appropriate word to describe a non material thing tbh.”– Joel Harvey

    That’s a mistake.

    Is knowledge scarce? It is. it’s costly to produce and costly to transfer. Scarcity, lie “speed” is merely a statement of contrast. How fast or how scarce. one thing is faster/slower than another one more scarce/plentiful than another. I’ve tried to address Hoppe’s error on scarcity elsewhere, although you can search for “hoppe error” and find it there.

    That one thing is more scarce than another is actually quite difficult to know. We can know costs to obtain. So scarcity of any good, service, or information is a measure of our costs of obtaining it. Ergo, scarcity like value can be misrepresented as universal rather than subjective.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-26 10:58:00 UTC

  • I am not confused. I work on the evolution of deception and its means of eradica

    I am not confused. I work on the evolution of deception and its means of eradication by law. The technique used by marxists and postmodernists and the abrahamists and platonists before them uses obscurantism to construct a pretense of knowledge, from which to criticize&undermine.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 23:36:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055604065286152192

    Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055558405501452289


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Jonas_Ceika

    @curtdoolittle @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN The main confusion seems to be that you think I’m only talking about intent, I’m not. I’m literally showing how Hicks is misinterpreting the relevant theory and backing it up with sources. Again, you’re not addressing my points. You’re also not making arguments for your case.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055558405501452289

  • These are not serious attacks and never had any chance of success, nor were the

    These are not serious attacks and never had any chance of success, nor were the bombs constructed to do more than ceremonial damage. They are a ‘message’ for the purpose of gaining publicity. A threat in advance of future promise.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 19:03:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055535419633397760

    Reply addressees: @catoletters

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055534949690826752


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055534949690826752