Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • MORE ON THE FRAUD OF TOLERANCE AND THE PAYMENT OF FORBEARANCE —“The centre hol

    MORE ON THE FRAUD OF TOLERANCE AND THE PAYMENT OF FORBEARANCE

    —“The centre holds onto tolerance because tolerance is passive. Those lacking agency can participate in tolerance while ignoring limits, because they don’t have the agency to enforce limits, and by ignoring limits they can stay in denial of their lack of agency. Forebearance includes tolerance AND limits (until the cost one was willing carried has been exceeded), AND active participation – its a choice which one can boycott/defect based on the cost carried.” —- @[655376421:2048:Bill Joslin]

    “FORBEARANCE”

    —-“I use Tolerance to mean allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs. It is a passive state. No agency. …. I use Forbearance to mean I intentionally take responsibility for the cost to allow someone else not to (ex. my children, my disabled kin, my employee that has not matured fully yet). It is an active state. Allows agency.” – @[1013719133:2048:Luke Weinhagen]

    CD: This is great line of original thinking. I don’t know where it’s coming from but it’s an example of how we are all increasing precision and measurement.

    (thanks to Brandon Hayes for looping me in)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 11:49:00 UTC

  • China Has Succeeded with National Socialism

    October 19th, 2018 10:11 AM CHINA HAS SUCCEEDED WITH NATIONAL SOCIALISM(I’m gonna ride this wave for a bit) [S]tate Capitalism with zero tolerance for opposition is simply National Socialism – something that the intelligentsia (“The Commentariat of the Proletariat”) will have a hard time swallowing. It’s as important as the NPC meme. All states are turning to fascism (intolerant nationalism), and mixed economies, with the state investing in core industries, using fiat money (shares in the economy) as a money substitute, and therefore a means of providing incentive (pull) rather than direction (push). THE NAZIS WON – No one is yet willing to admit it.

  • China Has Succeeded with National Socialism

    October 19th, 2018 10:11 AM CHINA HAS SUCCEEDED WITH NATIONAL SOCIALISM(I’m gonna ride this wave for a bit) [S]tate Capitalism with zero tolerance for opposition is simply National Socialism – something that the intelligentsia (“The Commentariat of the Proletariat”) will have a hard time swallowing. It’s as important as the NPC meme. All states are turning to fascism (intolerant nationalism), and mixed economies, with the state investing in core industries, using fiat money (shares in the economy) as a money substitute, and therefore a means of providing incentive (pull) rather than direction (push). THE NAZIS WON – No one is yet willing to admit it.

  • Rawls (left) vs Doolittle (right)

    October 19th, 2018 3:13 PM RAWLS (LEFT) VS DOOLITTLE (RIGHT)Rawls:The Beggars Veil of Ignorance: We should treat others as though we could be swapped at birth! Result? Recursive Dysgenic Parasitism and demographic, institutional, cultural, and economic collapse. Doolittle:The Warrior’s Chainsaw of Knowledge: Why should me and my kin, having a history of superior choices, not enslave you and take your stuff (or worse)? Result? Eugenic Evolution by Fully informed, productive, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of imposition upon others by externality.

  • Rawls (left) vs Doolittle (right)

    October 19th, 2018 3:13 PM RAWLS (LEFT) VS DOOLITTLE (RIGHT)Rawls:The Beggars Veil of Ignorance: We should treat others as though we could be swapped at birth! Result? Recursive Dysgenic Parasitism and demographic, institutional, cultural, and economic collapse. Doolittle:The Warrior’s Chainsaw of Knowledge: Why should me and my kin, having a history of superior choices, not enslave you and take your stuff (or worse)? Result? Eugenic Evolution by Fully informed, productive, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of imposition upon others by externality.

  • (this is said in the context of understanding my attack on the methods of coerci

    (this is said in the context of understanding my attack on the methods of coercion in the abrahamic religions)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 23:22:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053063806614732801

    Reply addressees: @charmantmaries

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053007358643847168

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Mariesees

    @curtdoolittle Wow.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053007358643847168

  • The Only Solution Is Separation

    October 18th, 2018 9:54 AM THE ONLY SOLUTION IS SEPARATION [L]eft and Right is simply the problem of reproductively desirable for the purpose of intergenerational families, businesses and polities, versus the desire for satisfaction of sexual impulses, independent of family, industry, and polity. IN other words: “The competition between european paternal, familial, commercial, and political families, and semitic maternal, individual, subsistence, anarchy. Those with agency (orderly masculine) vs those lacking it (anarchic feminine). We cannot fix this problem because under prosperity people pursue their interests. It’s in the intersets of those with lower sexual, social, economic, political, military market value – they are less domesticated OR less desirable: “politics is the entertainment business for ugly people, and media is the occupation for those who cannot produce, and the academy the occupation for those who cannot materially compete.” THE ONLY SOLUTION IS SEPARATION“Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.”

  • THE ONLY SOLUTION IS SEPARATION Left and Right is simply the problem of reproduc

    THE ONLY SOLUTION IS SEPARATION

    Left and Right is simply the problem of reproductively desirable for the purpose of intergenrational families, businesses and polities, versus the desire for satisfaction of sexual impulses, independent of family, industry, and polity. IN other words: “The competition between european paternal, familial, commercial, and political families, and semitic maternal, individual, subsistence, anarchy.

    Those with agency (orderly masculine) vs those lacking it (anarchic feminine).

    We cannot fix this problem because under prosperity people pursue their interests. It’s in the intersets of those with lower sexual, social, economic, political, military market value – they are less domesticated OR less desirable: “politics is the entertainment business for ugly people, and media is the occupation for those who cannot produce, and the academy the occupation for those who cannot materially compete.”

    THE ONLY SOLUTION IS SEPARATION

    “Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 09:54:00 UTC

  • Definitions: Tolerance vs Forbearance (core)

    October 17th, 2018 4:30 PM DEFINITIONS: TOLERANCE VS FORBEARANCE by Luke Weinhagen The distinction between tolerance and forbearance.

    TOLERANCE: allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs. – It is a passive state. – No agency. FORBEARANCE: intentionally taking responsibility for a cost to allow someone else not to. (example: my children, my disabled kin, my employee that has not matured fully yet). – It is an active state. – Allows agency.

  • DEFINITIONS: TOLERANCE VS FORBEARANCE by Luke Weinhagen The distinction between

    DEFINITIONS: TOLERANCE VS FORBEARANCE

    by Luke Weinhagen

    The distinction between tolerance and forbearance.

    TOLERANCE: allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs.

    – It is a passive state.

    – No agency.

    FORBEARANCE: intentionally taking responsibility for a cost to allow someone else not to. (example: my children, my disabled kin, my employee that has not matured fully yet).

    – It is an active state.

    – Allows agency.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-17 16:30:00 UTC