Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • People like you have that luxury because of people like me. I do not begrudge yo

    People like you have that luxury because of people like me. I do not begrudge your free riding. Only the pretense you do not free ride, and that we are not the necessary shoulders that your pretense of liberty stands upon. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 22:53:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057042896019484672

    Reply addressees: @GeolibGeorge @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057027756502978561

    IN REPLY TO:

    @GonzoGeorgism

    @curtdoolittle @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen Well, suffice it to say I disagree on the martial bit. I‘m more of a Light Side of the Force kind of guy myself.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057027756502978561

  • The only way to suppress them is with violence. only martial civilizations can p

    The only way to suppress them is with violence. only martial civilizations can produce enough violence. The more martial the civilization the more easily are rents suppressed. The longer rents are suppressed the longer the middle class grows, the more rents suppressed.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 21:51:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057027101856055296

    Reply addressees: @GeolibGeorge @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057026708002537472

    IN REPLY TO:

    @GonzoGeorgism

    @curtdoolittle @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen I‘m a Georgist; I‘m all about suppressing unnatural market rents that are distorting economic self-interest. Protectionist trade policy also gives rise to such rents and serves the self-interest of protected firms at the expense of consumers (including other businesses).

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057026708002537472

  • The Destruction of Property at All Levels

    October 29th, 2018 10:11 AM MARXISM IN EVERYTHING: THE DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY AT ALL LEVELSMarxism: suppression of private property in the means of production, vs, Libertarianism: suppression of common property as the means of production, vs, Neo-conservatism: suppression of nations as the means of production. All three promote MONOPOLIES (equalities) of the HERD (feminine reproductive strategy and intuition) rather than MARKETS (inequalities) of the PACK (make reproductive strategy and intuition). An expression of:

    —“the psychometric literature indicates, in regards to the masculine vs feminine, and the conservative vs liberal.

    Low openness/high conscientiousness (orderly, sensitive to disgust, will to create borders and demarcate categories, committed to his/her own covenants) High openness/low conscientiousness (imaginative, creative, disorderly, chaotic, tolerant of mess, fickle, temperamental, resistant of borders etc) It’s masculine vs feminine. A noun-use bias is masculine because it’s a label for an actual solid thing (order) A verb-use bias feminine because it’s the label for word describing an occurrence or something happening ie transformative ie chaotic – feminine. Masculine – order (Pack)Feminine – chaos. (Herd)”— Joel Harvey Because of the brain structure variation between female and male brains (although we can, each of us, exist along this spectrum including the middle of it). With Brandon Hayes and Joel Harvey

  • ABRAHAMISM > MARXISM > POSTMODERNISM > FEMINISM: THE DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY IN

    ABRAHAMISM > MARXISM > POSTMODERNISM > FEMINISM: THE DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY IN ALL ITS FORMS AS MEANS OF RESTORING THE HERD (MONOPOLY)

    (important concept)

    Marxism: use of pseudoscience (labor theory of value), sophism (pilpul – Dialectical materialism), gossip and reputation destruction(critique alienation, class warfare) to undermine a social order (trust and cooperation) by the promise of a utopia (for a class), in exchange for allying in numbers.

    1 – Marxism-Communism-Socialism : suppression of private property in the means of production,

    vs,

    2 – Libertarianism: suppression of common property as the means of production,

    vs,

    3 – Neo-conservatism: suppression of nations as the means of production.

    Marxism of 1 – private property, 2 – common property, 3 – institutional property. Covers the Entire Scale. followed by the french contribution: 4 – Postmodernism, identity-race property.

    In other words, suppression of each class of property in order to create a class monopoly (underclass communism, middle class libertarian, political class neo conservatism).

    This requires little more than the academic use of the female reproductive and competitive strategy, which is to:

    DESTROY THE INSTITUTION OF PROPERTY AT DIFFERENT SCALES.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 10:31:00 UTC

  • MARXISM IN EVERYTHING: THE DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY AT ALL LEVELS Marxism: suppre

    MARXISM IN EVERYTHING: THE DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY AT ALL LEVELS

    Marxism: suppression of private property in the means of production, vs, Libertarianism: suppression of common property as the means of production, vs, Neo-conservatism: suppression of nations as the means of production.

    All three promote MONOPOLIES (equalities) of the HERD (feminine reproductive strategy and intuition) rather than MARKETS (inequalities) of the PACK (make reproductive strategy and intuition).

    An expression of:

    —“the psychometric literature indicates, in regards to the masculine vs feminine, and the conservative vs liberal.

    Low openness/high conscientiousness (orderly, sensitive to disgust, will to create borders and demarcate categories, committed to his/her own covenants)

    High openness/low conscientiousness (imaginative, creative, disorderly, chaotic, tolerant of mess, fickle, temperamental, resistant of borders etc)

    It’s masculine vs feminine.

    A noun-use bias is masculine because it’s a label for an actual solid thing (order)

    A verb-use bias feminine because it’s the label for word describing an occurrence or something happening ie transformative ie chaotic – feminine.

    Masculine – order (Pack)

    Feminine – chaos. (Herd)”— Joel Harvey

    Because of the brain structure variation between female and male brains (although we can, each of us, exist along this spectrum including the middle of it).

    With Brandon Hayes and Joel Harvey

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 10:11:00 UTC

  • False Dichotomies

    October 28th, 2018 11:55 AM FALSE DICHOTOMIESViolence vs Pacifism like Socialism vs Captialism is (((another))) fraud by propaganda. The question is only between what end violence is put to, and what end markets are put to. One can use violence to create rule of law, markets and property, or use it to create rule by man, involuntary organization of production distribution and trade, by eliminating property.

  • False Dichotomies

    October 28th, 2018 11:55 AM FALSE DICHOTOMIESViolence vs Pacifism like Socialism vs Captialism is (((another))) fraud by propaganda. The question is only between what end violence is put to, and what end markets are put to. One can use violence to create rule of law, markets and property, or use it to create rule by man, involuntary organization of production distribution and trade, by eliminating property.

  • “When we took violence off the table we invited lies in its place”—Lincoln Thu

    —“When we took violence off the table we invited lies in its place”—Lincoln Thurman

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 14:24:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056552189475180544

  • Violence vs Pacifism like Socialism vs Captialism is (((another))) fraud by prop

    Violence vs Pacifism like Socialism vs Captialism is (((another))) fraud by propaganda. The question is only between what end violence is put to, and what end markets are put to. One can use violence to create rule of law, markets and property, or use it to create rule by man, involuntary organization of production distribution and trade, by eliminating property.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 11:55:00 UTC

  • “When we took violence off the table we invited lies in its place”—Greg Hamilt

    —“When we took violence off the table we invited lies in its place”—Greg Hamilton

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 10:23:00 UTC