May 5, 2020, 11:01 AM by Alex Hill 1.) 4GW makes support personnel primary targets. In fact, that’s the entire basis of it. Militias need to have as much self sufficiency and as little logistical needs as possible. The regular military is bogged down as soon as insurgents lay IEDs aimed at logistics convoys. 2.) a militia is not regular military. We can’t afford dedicated specialization in the same fashion as the regular military’s MOS system. Everyone has to be generally skilled much in the same was a Green Beret ODA team works with specific team roles. This also echoes the urban specialized labor versus the rural generalized labor divide. 3.) there is a direct correlation between the rise of feminism and the rise of women in the military, and the military has repeatedly been used as a social experiment because of its top-down nature. Then they’ll want to be able to exercise political suffrage because of service, which then jeopardizes the polity with the politics of Feels. That would be repeating the same mistakes we’ve made and I won’t have any of it.
Theme: Coercion
-
“do You Condone…?” Stupid Question of The Day (really)
May 6, 2020, 11:03 AM
—“Do you condone the IRA, Mao, Etc?”—
What a stupid question. Really. “Do you condone prosecution of criminals” “Do you condone warfare” “Do you condone market economies” “Do you condone evolutionary necessity” “Do you condone gravity.” What is the market demand for morality(reciprocity) versus immorality (irreciprocity)? What is market demand for peace versus war? What is the limit of the utility of morality? Condone” = approve of, sanction, fail to suppress, fail to resist, fail to act to prevent some display word or deed – especially with reluctance under the presumption of an act of irreciprocity, where amoral, ethical and moral consist of non imposition of costs upon the demonstrated intersets of others with whom one or the group values cooperation within the limits of provoking retaliation. Implication(irreciprocal, harm) = criminal (direct physical), unethical (direct informational), moral (anonymous indirect informational or physical for personal gain or to prevent personal loss), evil (direct or indirect, informational or physical, loss regardless of personal gain or loss). Implication(irreciprocal, population) = scope of cooperation( inter-familial, interpersonal, inter-social, inter-political, universal). There is no morality in war. There is a demand for avoidance of harm in war. There is a market demand for harm in war. The market supplies what is necessary to prevent war, or to conduct war. This is why we are at war 2/3 of the time in human history. War for survival and persistence is the natural state of all creatures – we create political systems to limit war wether criminal, conspiratorial, political, or inter-political. Western man domesticated war largely by the Westphalian peace. We thought we could force the world into adopting the Westphalian peace. Communists ended the Westphalian peace but we nearly restored it because of our asymmetric power. Islamists copied the communists and ended the Westphalian peace. But we are unable due to dependence upon oil to resist their advancement once again after less than a century of suppressing their warfare against all civilization. So that is why we are in 4th Generation Warfare. Its why we lost in the middle east. Its’ why we are losing against china. Because we have domesticated warfare but by failing to complete the colonial program because of our world wars, we have failed to contain warfare to the Westphalian peace, and instead are reverting to natural warfare: a war of all against all where the state has lost control of actors who can create wars. The IRA demonstrated why it was possible at small scale. Mao how it was possible at large scale. The bolsheviks how it was possible from within. The communists how it was possible from within. Now the islamists are imitating the communists and undermining from within. And you wonder why I bother talking to people like you? Because I don’t blame you for intentionally being lied to and made ignorant sot that you were suckers for warfare-from within by marxism-postmodernism-feminism-hbd-denialism that unified pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial to replace christian supernaturalism, sophistry, and denial, so that you could be once again governed and profited from by a parasitic political and financial class intent on reversing a thousand years of eugenics that made possible the european miracle just it had the greek and roman miracles.
-
“do You Condone…?” Stupid Question of The Day (really)
May 6, 2020, 11:03 AM
—“Do you condone the IRA, Mao, Etc?”—
What a stupid question. Really. “Do you condone prosecution of criminals” “Do you condone warfare” “Do you condone market economies” “Do you condone evolutionary necessity” “Do you condone gravity.” What is the market demand for morality(reciprocity) versus immorality (irreciprocity)? What is market demand for peace versus war? What is the limit of the utility of morality? Condone” = approve of, sanction, fail to suppress, fail to resist, fail to act to prevent some display word or deed – especially with reluctance under the presumption of an act of irreciprocity, where amoral, ethical and moral consist of non imposition of costs upon the demonstrated intersets of others with whom one or the group values cooperation within the limits of provoking retaliation. Implication(irreciprocal, harm) = criminal (direct physical), unethical (direct informational), moral (anonymous indirect informational or physical for personal gain or to prevent personal loss), evil (direct or indirect, informational or physical, loss regardless of personal gain or loss). Implication(irreciprocal, population) = scope of cooperation( inter-familial, interpersonal, inter-social, inter-political, universal). There is no morality in war. There is a demand for avoidance of harm in war. There is a market demand for harm in war. The market supplies what is necessary to prevent war, or to conduct war. This is why we are at war 2/3 of the time in human history. War for survival and persistence is the natural state of all creatures – we create political systems to limit war wether criminal, conspiratorial, political, or inter-political. Western man domesticated war largely by the Westphalian peace. We thought we could force the world into adopting the Westphalian peace. Communists ended the Westphalian peace but we nearly restored it because of our asymmetric power. Islamists copied the communists and ended the Westphalian peace. But we are unable due to dependence upon oil to resist their advancement once again after less than a century of suppressing their warfare against all civilization. So that is why we are in 4th Generation Warfare. Its why we lost in the middle east. Its’ why we are losing against china. Because we have domesticated warfare but by failing to complete the colonial program because of our world wars, we have failed to contain warfare to the Westphalian peace, and instead are reverting to natural warfare: a war of all against all where the state has lost control of actors who can create wars. The IRA demonstrated why it was possible at small scale. Mao how it was possible at large scale. The bolsheviks how it was possible from within. The communists how it was possible from within. Now the islamists are imitating the communists and undermining from within. And you wonder why I bother talking to people like you? Because I don’t blame you for intentionally being lied to and made ignorant sot that you were suckers for warfare-from within by marxism-postmodernism-feminism-hbd-denialism that unified pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial to replace christian supernaturalism, sophistry, and denial, so that you could be once again governed and profited from by a parasitic political and financial class intent on reversing a thousand years of eugenics that made possible the european miracle just it had the greek and roman miracles.
-
Amazingly, There Are Still a Few Village Idiots that Countersignal Use of 2 a For Its Primary Intended Purpose
May 7 at 1:10 PM · by John Mark (I found a few in a comment section on someone else’s post.) Timing matters. Plans matter. Even though there is already all the moral authority necessary and then some, “an undeniable excuse” matters. People exhaust all other options. Virus lockdowns in the face of the real data are approaching that undeniable excuse. People who have been hopping mad for decades are targeting their timing around a moment when critical mass is strong (waiting for a particularly good opportunity) because it increases chance of success. It increases the percentage and numbers of the population willing to “support and copy and join” rather than disavowing out of ignorance, comfort, or fear. Accusing high-agency people who are being smart of being “larpers” is simply false. (I’m not saying there is no such thing as a larper, I’m saying there are many who are not, but are being smart in order to maximize chance of success.) Anyone who countersignals using 2A for its primary intended purpose is either a moron or a coward or both. Force can never be off the table, because if you take it off the table, you are guaranteed to be walked all over by your enemies forever. These people that countersignal using 2A for its primary purpose are just showing their cowardice and idiocy. They have no solution to offer. Either they don’t understand the situation – they don’t realize soon the Right will win no more national elections due to immigration (Covid will give us only temporary reprieve if the current system is not upended), and they don’t realize why persuasion doesn’t work on the Left – or they do understand it and are just weak. Even if you yourself can’t or won’t pay the price or take the risk necessary to be “tip of the spear”, why on earth would you countersignal those who are and will? What kind of idiot countersignals those who are willing to risk their own lives to save your ass? (And if you think “it’s impossible to win” you have no understanding of 4G warfare, or the basic numbers of armed people on each “team”, etc.) Ask these countersignalers what their proposed solution is – they have none. If they have any ideas to offer, it’s always either “form white communities” (you’ll have to use force eventually anyway, you’ll just be on defense instead of on offense), or some version of “we can persuade people” which is dead on arrival due to nonwhite immigration. Don’t countersignal the groups that may seem to be “larpers” to you, either. Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference between larpers and those who will do what it takes. Sure, many are normiecons/civnats but that just means that the Smart/Winning Right must lead them. Look around. Normiecons are casually talking about bombing the govorner’s mansion due to these lockdowns. A groundswell of support for “replacing the current system” is building on the Right at a faster and faster rate. Why would someone choose this moment to countersignal using 2A for its main purpose and take force off the table? Silly.
-
Amazingly, There Are Still a Few Village Idiots that Countersignal Use of 2 a For Its Primary Intended Purpose
May 7 at 1:10 PM · by John Mark (I found a few in a comment section on someone else’s post.) Timing matters. Plans matter. Even though there is already all the moral authority necessary and then some, “an undeniable excuse” matters. People exhaust all other options. Virus lockdowns in the face of the real data are approaching that undeniable excuse. People who have been hopping mad for decades are targeting their timing around a moment when critical mass is strong (waiting for a particularly good opportunity) because it increases chance of success. It increases the percentage and numbers of the population willing to “support and copy and join” rather than disavowing out of ignorance, comfort, or fear. Accusing high-agency people who are being smart of being “larpers” is simply false. (I’m not saying there is no such thing as a larper, I’m saying there are many who are not, but are being smart in order to maximize chance of success.) Anyone who countersignals using 2A for its primary intended purpose is either a moron or a coward or both. Force can never be off the table, because if you take it off the table, you are guaranteed to be walked all over by your enemies forever. These people that countersignal using 2A for its primary purpose are just showing their cowardice and idiocy. They have no solution to offer. Either they don’t understand the situation – they don’t realize soon the Right will win no more national elections due to immigration (Covid will give us only temporary reprieve if the current system is not upended), and they don’t realize why persuasion doesn’t work on the Left – or they do understand it and are just weak. Even if you yourself can’t or won’t pay the price or take the risk necessary to be “tip of the spear”, why on earth would you countersignal those who are and will? What kind of idiot countersignals those who are willing to risk their own lives to save your ass? (And if you think “it’s impossible to win” you have no understanding of 4G warfare, or the basic numbers of armed people on each “team”, etc.) Ask these countersignalers what their proposed solution is – they have none. If they have any ideas to offer, it’s always either “form white communities” (you’ll have to use force eventually anyway, you’ll just be on defense instead of on offense), or some version of “we can persuade people” which is dead on arrival due to nonwhite immigration. Don’t countersignal the groups that may seem to be “larpers” to you, either. Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference between larpers and those who will do what it takes. Sure, many are normiecons/civnats but that just means that the Smart/Winning Right must lead them. Look around. Normiecons are casually talking about bombing the govorner’s mansion due to these lockdowns. A groundswell of support for “replacing the current system” is building on the Right at a faster and faster rate. Why would someone choose this moment to countersignal using 2A for its main purpose and take force off the table? Silly.
-
How Did the Uk End up To Be a Multicultural Root-Less Anti White Mess
May 20, 2020, 2:16 PM
—“In your view, how did the UK end up to be a multicultural root-less anti white mess that it is now? How did the police become increasingly militarized?”— Joshua Shalet
1) The socialists were more effective postwar than here because the UK was destroyed by her ‘ahem’ civli war to prevent germany from taking over europe (as she traditionally had and western civlization needed her to. france has always been the enemy of europe.). 2) they failed to shrink the state in response to the loss of empire. 3) They were financially dependent on london in ways the USA is not. And they loved all the free money flowing in from europe by being ‘the other switzerland’. 4) They failed to control immigration into london and are now prisoners of it. We can shut down a NYC because any other major city can pick up the slack. But they can’t shut down london because they haven’t a backup. same for france. not the same for usa, canada, australia, germany or russia. 5) Brits don’t have ‘rights’ like Americans and the parliament can modify the constitution whereas the people have to modify the american constitution. 6) They don’t have sheriffs to compete with the police, they don’t have governors to compete with the federal government, the people don’t have rights to sue the government like we do in the states. And that’s just off the top of my head. ( The fact that the British working class is … a bunch of p—ies, addicted to milking the state… well, you know. )
-
How Did the Uk End up To Be a Multicultural Root-Less Anti White Mess
May 20, 2020, 2:16 PM
—“In your view, how did the UK end up to be a multicultural root-less anti white mess that it is now? How did the police become increasingly militarized?”— Joshua Shalet
1) The socialists were more effective postwar than here because the UK was destroyed by her ‘ahem’ civli war to prevent germany from taking over europe (as she traditionally had and western civlization needed her to. france has always been the enemy of europe.). 2) they failed to shrink the state in response to the loss of empire. 3) They were financially dependent on london in ways the USA is not. And they loved all the free money flowing in from europe by being ‘the other switzerland’. 4) They failed to control immigration into london and are now prisoners of it. We can shut down a NYC because any other major city can pick up the slack. But they can’t shut down london because they haven’t a backup. same for france. not the same for usa, canada, australia, germany or russia. 5) Brits don’t have ‘rights’ like Americans and the parliament can modify the constitution whereas the people have to modify the american constitution. 6) They don’t have sheriffs to compete with the police, they don’t have governors to compete with the federal government, the people don’t have rights to sue the government like we do in the states. And that’s just off the top of my head. ( The fact that the British working class is … a bunch of p—ies, addicted to milking the state… well, you know. )
-
I Can only Unite the Libertarian, Conservative, and Religious if I Restore Respo
I Can only Unite the Libertarian, Conservative, and Religious if I Restore Responsibility of The Militia https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/i-can-only-unite-the-libertarian-conservative-and-religious-if-i-restore-responsibility-of-the-militia/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 03:11:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265843061109788672
-
I Can only Unite the Libertarian, Conservative, and Religious if I Restore Responsibility of The Militia
May 22, 2020, 7:05 AM
—“I can only unite the libertarian, conservative, and religious if I restore responsibility of the militia of every able bodied man to bear the cost of the organized use of violence to enforce our demand for sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, excellence and beauty, jury and law, family and kin, commons and capitalization as the central objects of social organization and political policy. To do that we require an intellectual vanguard. The classical libertarians have always been our intellectual wing, the conservatives decidedly anti-intellectual, and the religious conservatives hostile to the intellectual. I have to deprive the libertarian intellectual class of false promise of freedom from the cost of organized violence in a universal militia of kin, and to together we must bear the cost of depriving the left of freedom from the cost of hyper-consumption and dysgenic reproduction and the hedonism of the individual’s maximization of consumption as the central object of policy and social organization. The left is cancerous growth of man on both this planet, mankind, man’s future, and the possibility of the transcendence of man into the gods we might yet be.”— Curt Doolittle
-
I Can only Unite the Libertarian, Conservative, and Religious if I Restore Responsibility of The Militia
May 22, 2020, 7:05 AM
—“I can only unite the libertarian, conservative, and religious if I restore responsibility of the militia of every able bodied man to bear the cost of the organized use of violence to enforce our demand for sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, excellence and beauty, jury and law, family and kin, commons and capitalization as the central objects of social organization and political policy. To do that we require an intellectual vanguard. The classical libertarians have always been our intellectual wing, the conservatives decidedly anti-intellectual, and the religious conservatives hostile to the intellectual. I have to deprive the libertarian intellectual class of false promise of freedom from the cost of organized violence in a universal militia of kin, and to together we must bear the cost of depriving the left of freedom from the cost of hyper-consumption and dysgenic reproduction and the hedonism of the individual’s maximization of consumption as the central object of policy and social organization. The left is cancerous growth of man on both this planet, mankind, man’s future, and the possibility of the transcendence of man into the gods we might yet be.”— Curt Doolittle