—“Many of the guys I served with immediately did security contracting after we got out. I’d much rather have the National Guard disbanded, and a local militia structure for veterans returning home fall into leadership positions, should they chose, for volunteer service at home. I think a lot of veteran dysfunction is from a loss of purpose. When you’re on your own and no longer just a wolf in the pack so to speak, it’s aggravating. That, and the disillusionment when you realize all that toil and suffering was for nothing were the worst parts for me anyway.”—
The other reason is so that we can mobilize en mass in the face of disaster – which we obviously can’t in response to (a) natural disasters, (b) this current epidemic – things which are organizational problems that are best solved through command and control.
Markets discover.
Command is necessary when we are reacting not discovering.
Edit
We spent thousands of years on the incremental suppression of male criminality using politics, our common law and the duel – even domesticating warfare by the westphalian peace, the geneva convention, the charter of human rights, and the evidence that neither russians nor americans would ever ‘press the button’ under mutually assured destruction.
During the peak of our success, as a signal of our virtues, and the justness of our empires, we liberated Women and the Jews at roughly the same time, without awareness that the Jews are the world’s elites at the use of the female strategy of anti-social behavior – ascent by verbal undermining, social construction, free riding, and parasitism, that we call the abrahamic method of deceit. A technology that is a formal methodology of deceit and undermining by that seduction we call ‘false promise and baiting into hazard’, and that is the mirror opposite to the western aristocratic, masculine, aristotelian truth, testimony, reciprocity, and meritocracy.
And we were vulnerable because of our tradition of sovereignty, reciprocity, and truth regardless of cost – whis is the only reason women were ‘free’ in western civilization despite their lack of masculine loyalty, and their bias in favor of consumption, hypergamy, and status, regardless of cost.
So the lesson of this century is that we must either withdraw the enfranchisement and liberty of women and jews (and now muslims), or we must reform our warfare, reform our politics, increase our laws, restore our duels, so that we can suppress the anti-social behavior of women and the jews (and the muslims now), and return to our Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets, Meritocracy, and Class Harmony at the cost of the reproduction of the lower classes, and the direction of surpluses to the production of high-returns commons.
And we must separate, or conquer to do so. Because the end result of the female strategy is always and everywhere decline and conquest by others.
—“Is not the graduated income tax (communist manifesto) that is dysgenic? Also worth noting: the Supreme Court in Pollack v. Farmers Loan Trust Co. in 1895 ruled the income tax unconstitutional.”—Scott De Warren
I. Constitutionality of the Income tax.
… 1. the court did its job by correctly ruling that according to the constitution, the federal government could not enact any tax that was not apportioned to the states by population (a flat tax).
… 2. The constitution did it’s job correctly by forcing the legislature to pass a constitutional amendment permitting the income tax.
… 3. The legislature did its job correctly by passing a constitutional amendment through the amendment process.
… 4. The states did their jobs by passing the constitutional amendment through the amendment process.
I do not see the problem with the income tax per se, but with the amount of it, and the uses that it was put to. So the income tax is a slippery slope. The answer to the slippery slope is quite simple – if it redistributes reproduction downward it’s bad. If it constrains reproduction its bad. But that was exactly what the communists wanted – underclass paradise parasitic extraction from the meritocratic classes thereby reversing the benefits of thousands of years of eugenic practices by our ancestors.
II. Taxes
… 1. a graduated income tax is fine if it’s outside the reproductive cost curve. In other words, if it doesn’t affect reproduction.
… 2. A flat tax regulates taxation best by keeping it low
… 3. Fees rather than taxes eliminate discretion.
… 4. Direct economic voting controls the misuse of fees.
… 5. This combination of taxes forces the construction of voluntary commons (civil society).
a. Commons are by nature always redistributive (flat fees).
b. Income Taxes are by nature redistributive of benefits.
c. Flat taxes by their nature redistribute burden.
d. Fees by nature meritocratic.
The answer is fees.
Keeping an account of all inputs and outputs per person would provide evidence necessary for policy.
Having each generation pay for the rearing of their children, and children paying for the retirement and care of their parents creates eugenic incentives.
Ending false-education and credit-financialization so you (a) pay for children when young, (b) save when mature, (c) are independent when aged, and (d) insured by your children, (e) passed on your inheritance to them in toto as compensation, would restore the intergenerational system of building healthy families of sufficient size and restoring long term thinking to the polity, rather than all this short term consumer consumptionism.
There is a reason that the left suppresses data collection that would show white men > 35 and < 65 support the entirety of the population, and that women consume 70% of resources, and spend 70% of income such that this is an incredibly unequal system of benefits in favor of women.
The P-Constitution does all this.
—“Is not the graduated income tax (communist manifesto) that is dysgenic? Also worth noting: the Supreme Court in Pollack v. Farmers Loan Trust Co. in 1895 ruled the income tax unconstitutional.”—Scott De Warren
I. Constitutionality of the Income tax.
… 1. the court did its job by correctly ruling that according to the constitution, the federal government could not enact any tax that was not apportioned to the states by population (a flat tax).
… 2. The constitution did it’s job correctly by forcing the legislature to pass a constitutional amendment permitting the income tax.
… 3. The legislature did its job correctly by passing a constitutional amendment through the amendment process.
… 4. The states did their jobs by passing the constitutional amendment through the amendment process.
I do not see the problem with the income tax per se, but with the amount of it, and the uses that it was put to. So the income tax is a slippery slope. The answer to the slippery slope is quite simple – if it redistributes reproduction downward it’s bad. If it constrains reproduction its bad. But that was exactly what the communists wanted – underclass paradise parasitic extraction from the meritocratic classes thereby reversing the benefits of thousands of years of eugenic practices by our ancestors.
II. Taxes
… 1. a graduated income tax is fine if it’s outside the reproductive cost curve. In other words, if it doesn’t affect reproduction.
… 2. A flat tax regulates taxation best by keeping it low
… 3. Fees rather than taxes eliminate discretion.
… 4. Direct economic voting controls the misuse of fees.
… 5. This combination of taxes forces the construction of voluntary commons (civil society).
a. Commons are by nature always redistributive (flat fees).
b. Income Taxes are by nature redistributive of benefits.
c. Flat taxes by their nature redistribute burden.
d. Fees by nature meritocratic.
The answer is fees.
Keeping an account of all inputs and outputs per person would provide evidence necessary for policy.
Having each generation pay for the rearing of their children, and children paying for the retirement and care of their parents creates eugenic incentives.
Ending false-education and credit-financialization so you (a) pay for children when young, (b) save when mature, (c) are independent when aged, and (d) insured by your children, (e) passed on your inheritance to them in toto as compensation, would restore the intergenerational system of building healthy families of sufficient size and restoring long term thinking to the polity, rather than all this short term consumer consumptionism.
There is a reason that the left suppresses data collection that would show white men > 35 and < 65 support the entirety of the population, and that women consume 70% of resources, and spend 70% of income such that this is an incredibly unequal system of benefits in favor of women.
The P-Constitution does all this.
Mar 10, 2020, 4:25 PM
by James Santagata
That feeling when you realize that the $20 Trillion in wasted money on Israel, middle east terraforming wars, leftist social engineering, etc, and the wasted time and energy over last 55 years, we could have never opened China, contained it, kept world population from never going about 2 billion, colonized the moon and Mars, built bio defenses against these pathogens, an asteroid shield and each had our own personal oxygen concentrators and ventilators.
CD:
We gotta stop trying to save the world.
It’s not possible.
Save ourselves.
Mar 15, 2020, 11:47 PM
You don’t understand. In western civlization under our ancient laws, we can duel, spectators cannot interfere, and the families cannot retaliate. But if someone cheats, this means families can seek revenge – meaning murder. Our laws evolved to preserve honor, but stop murder, and prevent retaliation spirals (feuds). The luxury of saying ‘there is no cheating in a street fight’ is for slaves, those without kin, and criminals and and those protected by the police.
Mar 15, 2020, 11:47 PM
You don’t understand. In western civlization under our ancient laws, we can duel, spectators cannot interfere, and the families cannot retaliate. But if someone cheats, this means families can seek revenge – meaning murder. Our laws evolved to preserve honor, but stop murder, and prevent retaliation spirals (feuds). The luxury of saying ‘there is no cheating in a street fight’ is for slaves, those without kin, and criminals and and those protected by the police.
Mar 15, 2020, 11:56 PM
Without the experience we are not man enough to understand military discipline or the seriousness of the consequences of it. Men are incompetent robots under duress. Imagine you are exhausted, freezing, hungry, you have wounds, and haven’t slept in days, and you still have to fight. The reason that’s possible is discipline – you don’t think. You don’t feel. You don’t consider. you just do. And there is nothing in the world like knowing you can do that. And that the men around you can do that. And that those who can’t are barely domesticated animals unworthy of your attention, time, or effort. Imagine a generation men like that. And imagine a generation of millennials. That’s the difference between civlization and barbarism.
Mar 15, 2020, 11:56 PM
Without the experience we are not man enough to understand military discipline or the seriousness of the consequences of it. Men are incompetent robots under duress. Imagine you are exhausted, freezing, hungry, you have wounds, and haven’t slept in days, and you still have to fight. The reason that’s possible is discipline – you don’t think. You don’t feel. You don’t consider. you just do. And there is nothing in the world like knowing you can do that. And that the men around you can do that. And that those who can’t are barely domesticated animals unworthy of your attention, time, or effort. Imagine a generation men like that. And imagine a generation of millennials. That’s the difference between civlization and barbarism.
