Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Are Some Races More Kind, Gentle, Submissive, Beta, And Respectful Towards Their Elders Than Other Races?

    Well, yes, but it’s terribly impolitic to say so and terribly impolitic to ask. But, my job is answering the ‘impolitic and hard’ questions

    The correct question is, “Do some subraces tribes or clans demonstrate lower clannishness and higher extension of kingroup trust to non-kin?”

    1. The answer is yes. (See research on infants in cribs, and research on babies and very young on those they don’t know).
    2. The answer is yes and appears to be like most things, dependent upon ancestral environments. Homogeneity breeds tolerance and heterogeneity breeds clannishness. And we see this all over the world in every racial, subracial, tribal, clan, and class grouping.
    3. The answer is yes and it appears to be neoteny/pedomorphism, meaning the preservation of adolescent traits into adults.
    4. The answer is yes, and it appears that just like in other animals, the primary means of neoteny is reduction of the rate and depth of maturity.
    5. The answer is yes and it appears that the clannishness (Tolerance) of racial groups is measurable in the races by testosterone levels. (it also appears that most variation in homo-sapiens-sapiens is endocrine and therefore developmental. In this measurement east asians have the lowest testosterone, greatest neoteny, and as a consequence longest lives. Second to east asians are western europeans. Both of these groups could evolve without excessive competition from competing subracies and tribes. (Homogeneity is better in the long run in every sense.)
    6. Whites demonstrate the lowest clannishness (really). East asians and west asians (semites, and turkish) are the most clannish And everyone else is downhill from there. The difference is that east asians are not under threat from immigration and whites are.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-some-races-more-kind-gentle-submissive-beta-and-respectful-towards-their-elders-than-other-races

  • Do Governments Create Wealth And Jobs For Its Citizens?

    THE COMPLETE AND CORRECT ANSWER.

    —-”Do governments create wealth and jobs for citizens?”—-

    First, let’s understand some terms to make sure we know what we’re talking about.

    SERIES: Defense > Rule > Government > Bureaucracy (monopoly) > Institutions (anonymous cooperation at scale) > Markets (speculation, investment, production, distribution, trade) > Norms (friction reduction) > Truth Telling (friction reduction) > Trust (risk taking) > Economic Velocity > Social Order.

    DEFINITIONS:

    – Defense (producing a territorial monopoly on the organization of decidability over uses of assets (property)),
    – Rule (dispute resolution, or resolution of differences),
    – Government (the production and management of commons), and;
    – Bureaucracy (a monopoly that manages daily operations) are four different things.

    Defense secures territory from appropriation by other large organizations capable of physical appropriation. Defense produces possibility of choice of SOCIAL ORDER (portfolio of property, norms, traditions, laws, legislation, regulation, institutions)

    Rule resolves disputes between people given the property allocations (in china, none, in russia, some, in europe some more, in america most.) In most cases norms are produced by the consequences of rulings by kings, judges, priests, and ‘authorities’. This is why laws vary: they must reflect the needs of the current stage of development of the people in the polity. Adjudications of differences produce LAW.

    Government produces commons through charging and maximizing fees (taxes) of members, and directing those fees to the production of commons, that they assume will produce multipliers (greater returns than private sector will) for the simple reason that some commons are extremely expensive. Legislation(contract) or Command(Dictate) produces LAW SUBSTITUTES we call Law but are not. This ‘conflation’ is endemic in discourse.

    Bureaucracy does labor that a market cannot yet perform through competition. In theory, a bureaucracy functions as portfolio (financial) manager of a function that the market cannot yet produce, or produce in sufficient quantity, or produce at a sufficient price. But like all monopolies they pursue self interest and always become corrupt. In a perfect world, states would start multiple competing bureaucracies like startups, and the best one or two would survive.

    WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO

    Governments create the possibility to organize increasingly complex markets with increasingly complex divisions of labor, with increasingly complex concentrations of capital, with increasingly complex abilities to adapt to shifts, changes, and shocks.

    Governments do this by prohibiting rent seeking, corruption, parasitism, theft, murder at the local level, and capturing the gains as taxation, which they then use to pay for the production of commons, that in turn produce multipliers (returns), that in turn increase standards of living – or governments fail to do so, by not suppressing corruption and not producing commons, and not producing multipliers.

    So governments create the possibilty of increasingly productive and rewarding polities. But it is the entire network of people from the monarchy (Rulers) to the peasantry (laborers) that create jobs through constant increases in the velocity of prodcutiion.

    Why? Because our only wealth is time. We are not wealthier than cave men. We simply make everything cheaper by taking less time with more hands in greater coordination to produce everything we desire for less and less of our time.

    Rules make a game. Governments make rules so that we can play economic games – and moreover that we cannot play anti-economic gains.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    https://www.quora.com/Do-governments-create-wealth-and-jobs-for-its-citizens

  • Is It Possible A Racialist Really Knows Anything About Communism?

    AN UNPLEASANT BUT TRUTHFUL ANSWER TO A QUESTIONABLE QUESTION

    —-”Is it possible a racialist really knows anything about communism? “—

    I bet I know more about both subjects than anyone else you can find. And it’s not even that hard. Communism is a pseudoscientific restatement of Judaism. And it failed like Judaism failed – and Libertarianism, because neither reflects human behavior, and neither constructs commons. And commons are the means by which agrarians defeated the pastoralists in the ancient world. And commons are the means by which industrialists defeated agrarians in the modern world. Yet Judaism, libertarianism, seek to abandon all commons, and communism seeks to abandon all property. Meanwhile social democracy and classical liberalism seek only to compete over the production of dysgenic underclass or a eugenic middle class commons. Classical liberals understand agency and are willing to suppress underclass reproduction to achieve it. Social democrats understand lack of agency and are will to expand underclass reproduction to subsidize it.

    As for racial realism, people act racially in all circumstances IF THEY CAN AFFORD TO, or can use it to advance their political power or use it to retain their political power, because political power provides control over the production of commons that advance eugenic, dysgenic, and genetic warfare.

    We are no different from any other living organism. We compete on behalf of our genes. We just do a very good job of justifying our actions as moral, rather than warfare on behalf of our genes.

    We have done very poorly under a century of marxist pseudoscience: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Rothbard/Rand, Strauss, and the modern fictionalism (outright lying where pseudoscience failed) of it we call Postmodernism.

    No more lies. People demonstrate their actions in large numbers and they are measurable. That science says nothing but that we act in our rational genetic and self interest at all times, and all our speech is merely attempts to negotiation an advantage via deception (reciprocity) rather than engage in reciprocal trade – meritocracy.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-a-racialist-really-knows-anything-about-communism

  • Is Warren Buffett Considered Republican Or Democrat? Why?

    THE COMPLETE ANSWER

    From the period between the civil war and the 1970’s, the south held animosity toward the republican party over Lincoln’s civil war. This led to the Democratic and Republican parties having both conservative and classical liberal members.

    Beginning between 76 and 80 this began to change because the democratic party had been captured more aggressively by the radical left and the feminists. Plus the left had used immigration starting in 1964 as a means of achieving the socialist revolution (tearing down the american experiment) through demographic warfare where they had failed by propaganda and pseudoscience (marxism, boazianism, freudianism, cantorian mathematics, and keynesian post marxist economics.)

    By and large the democratic effort has been effective for large business and finance. So many large business owners that serve the unproductive, laboring, working, and lower middle classes (what he invests in), are better off with policy that increases consumption.

    Whereas the republican (Aristocratic) is far more concerned with accumulating capital in Human (eugenic), behavioral (normative), institutional (rule of law by tort reciprocity – not rule BY legislation), and territorial than current consumption which consumes human capital (dysgenic, dysnormative, discretionary rather than reciprocal.)

    So between his AGE, his REGION, and his INTERESTS he votes for conservative democratic policies.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-Warren-Buffett-considered-republican-or-democrat-Why

  • Should White People Pay Reparations For Their Collective, Colonial Pasts?

    UNPLEASANT TRUTHS IN A COMPLETE ANSWER
    I wonder, if white people ( Native Europeans) should collect taxes (Income) for their spread of Aristotelianism (Science), Natural Law under Reciprocity by Tort (Rule of Law), Accounting, Finance, Banking, Credit, and Interest, and The suppression of systemic corruption and in doing so dragging the whole of humanity kicking and screaming, in one revolt after another out of ignorance, superstition, hard physical labor, child labor, poverty, diseases, infanticide, and tyranny in less than 500 years. When beginning with the Abrahamic Dark Age (Judaism, Christianity and Islam, the world had made little caloric progress for almost two thousand years.)

    As far as I know, the only mistake white people have made is entering into a civil war with cousins in Germany, that was initiated by communists, starting in Russia, and spreading like islam today (westward) to the point of internal exhaustion, and therefore leaving the colonial problem incomplete, and therefore leaving so much of the world to struggle through the long process of corruption-suppression, rule of law development, and middle class development, while the only western peoples left standing (Americans, Australians, and Canadians) were geographically isolated from the less developed peoples – all of whom still struggle with corruption, truthfulness, rule of law, moral commerce, and dysgenic reproduction rates.

    WHAT DOES THE WORLD OWE THE GREEKS AND ROMANS?
    WHAT DOES THE WORLD OWE NATIVE NORTHERN EUROPEANS (WHITES)?

    https://www.quora.com/Should-white-people-pay-reparations-for-their-collective-colonial-pasts

  • Are You Racist?

    I ANSWER HARD QUESTIONS – LARGELY IN ORDER TO PREVENT LYING BY STATEMENTS, SUGGESTION OR IMPLICATION.

    Racism is, as I understand it, refers to four behaviors:

    1) the process of treating an individual by the properties of his class (race) rather than waiting to ascertain the properties that he himself demonstrates. In other words, stereotyping. Unfortunately stereotypes are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences. So this is difficult to counteract outside of commercial interactions.

    2) the process of criticizing a class (race) for the costs that they impose on your class (race) rather than taking actions that prevent a class (race) from imposing costs upon your class (race).

    3) the process of denying that there are differences in aggregate class (race) abilities, biases, preferences, and behaviors.

    4) the process of conducting genocidal, political, economic, and kinship warfare by denying that there are differences in aggregate class (race) abilities, biases, preferences, and behaviors.

    Racism is not any of these four behaviors:

    1) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that there are differences in aggregate class (race) abilities, biases, preferences, and behaviors.

    2) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that people (like all creatures) favor their class (kin, tribe, race) group for the simple reason that except as outliers, it is in their status, social, reproductive, economic, and political interests to do so.

    3) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that people vote in democracies heavily by race, gender, and class, thereby competing by EQUAL political vote rather than by unequal economic, intellectual, or military means.

    4) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that people conduct informational and political warfare instead of economic and violent warfare, by the denial of differences in abilities, biases, preferences, behaviors, intentions, and goals.

    That’s simply empirical science.

    And arguing against it is simply lying.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-you-racist-2

  • Do Cryptocurrencies Need To Be Stopped As This Economist States In The Article On The Link?

    The Economist is a very left of center publication whose editors and staff advance the western pursuit of a secular socialism in social democratic form. And private currencies would eliminate vast financial and state rents on citizens. So it threatens the globalist ambitions. Consensus seeking is not only a frailty of the female mind, but one of those attracted to globalism.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-cryptocurrencies-need-to-be-stopped-as-this-economist-states-in-the-article-on-the-link

  • How Is Roman Slavery Different From American Slavery?

    Hmm… Romans considered slavery a process of domesticating wild human animals. American colonialists considered their own a little more charitably, and considered africans far less charitably.

    Roman slavery generally allowed you to progress upward and outward. Slavery began with agrarianism and ended with industrialism. So american slavery began with indentured servitude (contract slavery), and ended with chattel slavery (people as domesticated animal property).

    In the ancient world, man was everywhere primitive and violence and starvation a constant threat. The romans ‘civilized’ people by the developmental sequence ‘wild(barbarian)’ -> Slavery-Child -> Soldier(Serf) -> Freeman(property) -> Citizen (political participation) -> “Peer” or Politician -> Nobility. Some people could make the transition and some could not. (Just like today under market conditions.)

    In the American world, we were very little different from the Roman, but far more domesticated from centuries of manorialism.

    It is too impolitic to answer this question honestly and directly. But in general, there is a very large difference between the late medieval and early modern european who was genetically middle class, and underutilized capital, in a europe where the church had made half of the territory into dead, rent-seeking, capital —-and the industrial world (after 1830) where we were importing people who were not (in the majority) from the genetic middle class, not pent up human capital in large numbers, into a world where capital (land) was freely available.

    We are still struggling with this problem a century and a half later. Race is immaterial outside of politics and marriage, but CLASS IS NOT. And class is a consequence of current and past genetics.

    And the problematic difference between racial groups is how successful or unsuccessful they have been at suppression of underclass reproduction over the past thousand years. Because with that suppression you get east asians, europeans, and ashkenazi jews. But without it you get the entire rest of the world: underclasses so large that it is not possible for their middle and upper classes to create a high trust high velocity socio-political economy.

    You can measure all personality traits, IQ, testosterone levels, and age of onset of puberty. If you measure these traits in all groups you will rapidly see that the differences between the groups is largely demographic: class size.

    https://www.quora.com/How-is-Roman-slavery-different-from-American-slavery

  • What Are Your Thoughts On Politics And Religion?

    THE COMPLETE ANSWER

    I have come to understand that the abrahamic religions are the cause of the dark age, the cause of more deaths than the plagues, and the continuing cause of human suffering, and the greatest threat to human transcendence (evolution).

    RELIGION AND MINDFULNESS

    We all require mindfulness outside of hunter gatherer lifestyles where we know our ‘place’ with everyone around us. We need Personal mindfulness. Interpersonal Mindfulness. And socio-political mindfulness. We evolved as pack animals. A strange mixture of chimp and wolf. We all long for the security of some aspect of the elation, power, comfort, and security of pack. Yet the more advanced our civilizations the more isolated we are as individuals. This was the problem religions solved, and religions solved them by evolving all at about the same time, in response to the needs of living in greater numbers with less certainty in our relations.

    We fail to grasp that religions are vast lies that provide mindfulness. We can achieve mindfulness through intentional discipline, a variety of rituals, participations in feasts, dances, parades, sports, celebrations, and especially in oration, ‘theater’, and Myth.

    But we can obtain that mindfulness by truthful, half truthful, or entirely untruthful means. And there are profound consequences for any people given the means of mindfulness they choose.

    GOVERNMENT AND COMMONS

    As far as I can tell, government is necessary for the production of increasingly complex commons. And mindfulness is necessary for cooperation in those increasingly complex commons.

    But that said, both politics under democracy and religion regardless of political structure are constituted of very little other than utter falsehoods, because both seek power over us and profits from us, by lying.

    If we lived under rule of natural (common) law (of tort), where we extended warraty of due diligence from goods, and services, to political speech, and houses of government were but a market for cooperation between the classes (as in the old english monarchic model) except that we used direct democracy or direct economic democracy, without representatives, and each voted on each issue individually, it is very hard to imagine we would have much use for politics.

    If we were all taught mindfulness like we are taught table manners, reading-writing, arithmetic – even if we had to teach it by half a dozen different means in order to satisfy the needs of peoples with different brain structures, then we would have little need for religion.

    The problem is…. we all love our little lies.

    And in my world, it is the lies that cause all the world’s problems, and justify all the world’s crimes, and encourage all the world’s evil.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    https://www.quora.com/What-are-your-thoughts-on-politics-and-religion

  • How Can We Resolve The Conflict Of Western Ideology (the Compulsion To Success) And Eastern Ideology (playing It Safe)?

    There is no conflict. They are two different strategies. The eastern model finds ‘honor’ in hierarchy and ‘not making waves’ with the hierarchy, while the western strategy finds ‘heroism’ in risk and achievement in disrupting the hierarchy.

    The world needs room for safe people and adventureous people.

    The problem is aventure is more prosperous than safety and so safe people want the advantages of living under the rewards of adventure, AND the safety of hierarchy.

    SO it’s the attempt to reconcile these that’s the problem.

    We dont want to reconcile them. MOVE TO WHERE YOU ARE SATISFIED BY THE ORDER.

    https://www.quora.com/How-can-we-resolve-the-conflict-of-Western-ideology-the-compulsion-to-success-and-Eastern-ideology-playing-it-safe