“Who is secure in all his basic needs? Who has work, spiritual care, medical care, housing, food, occasional entertainment, free clothing, free burial, free everything? The answer might be nuns and monks, but the standard reply is ‘prisoners’”
Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn
Source: Original Site Post
-
Movies Of 2017
All in all a terrible year. (really.) Recommend that you might not have seen: 1 – A Ghost Story (very indy) My Fave. 2 – Get Out (a little indy) Loved it. (Steppford Wives) 3 – Free Fire (very indy) (british + hong kong + LA) I liked but …eh: 1 – Life. (Really.) A production on B movie. Good. 2 – American Made. (Really) Enjoyed it. I wanted to like, but didn’t. 1 – Blade Runner 2049 – omfg lame plot line – horrible. 2 – Alien covenant…. ruined the mythos. 3 – It… Weak. 4 – Dunkirk… He did nothing wrong, sorry. 5 – Dark Tower. Lost Opportunity of the year. Lame. I expected to be horrible and was ok. 1 – Atomic Blonde 2 – The Snowman 3 – Shot Caller 4 – Good Time 5 – You were never really here 6 – A cure for wellness 7 – Wind River 8 – Unlocked I expected to be weak and they were bad: 1 – John Wick … ok. failure to combine western action with hong kong – seems to be a theme of late. Great gun moves, otherwise ridiculous. 2 – Ghost in the shell. a) she isn’t attractive even with the plastic surgery, b) the … oh forget it. it’s horrible. 3 – Valerian. a) casting. b) story. And from Luc Besson? omfg. 4 – Resident Evil …. the undead need to die, and so does every movie after the first. 5 – King Arthur. Ok Interesting actors – absolutely sh–t script, by a director who should know better. 6 – Murder on the Orient Express. 7 – The Circle 8 – Split 9 – Raw I expected to be horrible and didn’t bother: 1 – everything and anything comic-book. Sorry. We had Conan, Epic, Creepy. Superhero Comics were for … well. Criticism earned. 2 – All the usual postmodern character-study dramas…. sorry. Most were unwatchable. I haven:t seen: 1 – disaster whatever 2 – daniel day lewis’ last movie. LESSON OF THE YEAR 1 – Ridley Scott needs to retire. Like, five years ago. 2 – Postmodernism is over when myth returns. They hate myth. Myth requires sacrifice by heroes. -
Movies Of 2017
All in all a terrible year. (really.) Recommend that you might not have seen: 1 – A Ghost Story (very indy) My Fave. 2 – Get Out (a little indy) Loved it. (Steppford Wives) 3 – Free Fire (very indy) (british + hong kong + LA) I liked but …eh: 1 – Life. (Really.) A production on B movie. Good. 2 – American Made. (Really) Enjoyed it. I wanted to like, but didn’t. 1 – Blade Runner 2049 – omfg lame plot line – horrible. 2 – Alien covenant…. ruined the mythos. 3 – It… Weak. 4 – Dunkirk… He did nothing wrong, sorry. 5 – Dark Tower. Lost Opportunity of the year. Lame. I expected to be horrible and was ok. 1 – Atomic Blonde 2 – The Snowman 3 – Shot Caller 4 – Good Time 5 – You were never really here 6 – A cure for wellness 7 – Wind River 8 – Unlocked I expected to be weak and they were bad: 1 – John Wick … ok. failure to combine western action with hong kong – seems to be a theme of late. Great gun moves, otherwise ridiculous. 2 – Ghost in the shell. a) she isn’t attractive even with the plastic surgery, b) the … oh forget it. it’s horrible. 3 – Valerian. a) casting. b) story. And from Luc Besson? omfg. 4 – Resident Evil …. the undead need to die, and so does every movie after the first. 5 – King Arthur. Ok Interesting actors – absolutely sh–t script, by a director who should know better. 6 – Murder on the Orient Express. 7 – The Circle 8 – Split 9 – Raw I expected to be horrible and didn’t bother: 1 – everything and anything comic-book. Sorry. We had Conan, Epic, Creepy. Superhero Comics were for … well. Criticism earned. 2 – All the usual postmodern character-study dramas…. sorry. Most were unwatchable. I haven:t seen: 1 – disaster whatever 2 – daniel day lewis’ last movie. LESSON OF THE YEAR 1 – Ridley Scott needs to retire. Like, five years ago. 2 – Postmodernism is over when myth returns. They hate myth. Myth requires sacrifice by heroes. -
Do You Know The Difference? Religion Vs Ideology Vs Philosophy Vs Logic Vs Mathematics Vs Science
– A RELIGION consists of any set of ideas of justification which require belief in, testimony to, or action according to, one or more falsehoods as a cost of inclusion and use. – AN IDEOLOGY consist of any set of ideas that agitate, motivate, or inspire achievement of political ends under majoritarian (monopoly) democracy. An ideology need not be internally consistent externally correspondent, or existentially possible. It need only motivate individuals to act in furtherance of policy. – A PHILOSOPHY consists of any set of internally consistent ideas of decidability which justify pursuit of personal preferences or group goods. – A LOGIC consists of any deflationary grammar of decidability that assists in the falsification by competition of one or more constant relations between states. (Note that one proves nothing logically other than internal consistency, because all premises of external correspondence are forever contingent.) – MATHEMATICS consists of a deflationary grammar of decidability consisting purely of competition between positional names under the preservation of ratios providing a single axis of decidability: position, but in N dimensions, providing commensurability between any set of positional relations of any number of dimensions. – A SCIENCE consists of any set of ideas that provide decidability independent of personal preference or group goods, by the systematic elimination of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit, by the use of measurement and record of actions – demonstrations versus words. – NATURAL LAW of RECIPROCITY (Tort), was produced scientifically (empirically) by trial and error, through the resolution of disputes across personal preferences, group goods, norms, traditions, and intuitions, cumulating always and everywhere that decidability is provided by property, and property consists in the demonstrated investment of human action or inaction anything whether genetic, material, behavioral, or informational. -
Do You Know The Difference? Religion Vs Ideology Vs Philosophy Vs Logic Vs Mathematics Vs Science
– A RELIGION consists of any set of ideas of justification which require belief in, testimony to, or action according to, one or more falsehoods as a cost of inclusion and use. – AN IDEOLOGY consist of any set of ideas that agitate, motivate, or inspire achievement of political ends under majoritarian (monopoly) democracy. An ideology need not be internally consistent externally correspondent, or existentially possible. It need only motivate individuals to act in furtherance of policy. – A PHILOSOPHY consists of any set of internally consistent ideas of decidability which justify pursuit of personal preferences or group goods. – A LOGIC consists of any deflationary grammar of decidability that assists in the falsification by competition of one or more constant relations between states. (Note that one proves nothing logically other than internal consistency, because all premises of external correspondence are forever contingent.) – MATHEMATICS consists of a deflationary grammar of decidability consisting purely of competition between positional names under the preservation of ratios providing a single axis of decidability: position, but in N dimensions, providing commensurability between any set of positional relations of any number of dimensions. – A SCIENCE consists of any set of ideas that provide decidability independent of personal preference or group goods, by the systematic elimination of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit, by the use of measurement and record of actions – demonstrations versus words. – NATURAL LAW of RECIPROCITY (Tort), was produced scientifically (empirically) by trial and error, through the resolution of disputes across personal preferences, group goods, norms, traditions, and intuitions, cumulating always and everywhere that decidability is provided by property, and property consists in the demonstrated investment of human action or inaction anything whether genetic, material, behavioral, or informational. -
Man In Relation To The Gods
ARYAN: A man must struggle against the forces of man, beast, and nature to become a god (immortal and powerful). PAGAN: Man trades with disinterested gods, (powerful, immortal) and may become a demigod (immortal) thru his actions. PROTESTANT(eternal, omniscient, omnipotent): Man can speak to and seek wisdom from a largely benevolent god – risen beast) CATHOLIC: Man is a serf begging mercy from a petulant god (eternal, omniscient, and omnipotent – free will to be tamed – fallen angel). MUSLIM: Man is a slave of an evil god (eternal, omniscient, omnipotent, deterministic – no free will.) -
Man In Relation To The Gods
ARYAN: A man must struggle against the forces of man, beast, and nature to become a god (immortal and powerful). PAGAN: Man trades with disinterested gods, (powerful, immortal) and may become a demigod (immortal) thru his actions. PROTESTANT(eternal, omniscient, omnipotent): Man can speak to and seek wisdom from a largely benevolent god – risen beast) CATHOLIC: Man is a serf begging mercy from a petulant god (eternal, omniscient, and omnipotent – free will to be tamed – fallen angel). MUSLIM: Man is a slave of an evil god (eternal, omniscient, omnipotent, deterministic – no free will.) -
“When accordingly it is inquired, whence is evil, it must first be inquired, wha
“When accordingly it is inquired, whence is evil, it must first be inquired, what is evil, which is nothing else than corruption, either of the measure, or the form, or the order, that belong to nature.” (Augustine) -
“When accordingly it is inquired, whence is evil, it must first be inquired, wha
“When accordingly it is inquired, whence is evil, it must first be inquired, what is evil, which is nothing else than corruption, either of the measure, or the form, or the order, that belong to nature.” (Augustine) -
If We Recast Ai As Position Rather Than Weight….
Then we probably solve the storage, sum, and calculation problem. Humans do not calculate, they triangulate.