Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Speech is less effective than gallows, pikes, and pyres

    Speech is less effective than gallows, pikes, and pyres.

  • by Eli Harman 1 – ROYALTY: the sovereignty. 2 – NOBILITY: intergenerationally ex

    by Eli Harman 1 – ROYALTY: the sovereignty. 2 – NOBILITY: intergenerationally exceptional families. 3 – ARISTOCRACY: the martial elite. 4 – CITIZENS: productive, self-supporting, stakeholders who perform militial service. 5 – COMMONERS: productive, self-supporting, individuals subsidiary to the above. 6 – PEASANTS: dependent underclasses.

  • by Eli Harman 1 – ROYALTY: the sovereignty. 2 – NOBILITY: intergenerationally ex

    by Eli Harman 1 – ROYALTY: the sovereignty. 2 – NOBILITY: intergenerationally exceptional families. 3 – ARISTOCRACY: the martial elite. 4 – CITIZENS: productive, self-supporting, stakeholders who perform militial service. 5 – COMMONERS: productive, self-supporting, individuals subsidiary to the above. 6 – PEASANTS: dependent underclasses.

  • It Runs In The Family….

    On intelligence agencies….. Summary The Doolittle Report advocated policies not usually associated with democratic countries. The tense security fears of the Cold War were reflected on a domestic level, exemplified by McCarthyism. Americans were seized by a fear of communism. Doolittle echoed this sentiment in his report: “We must develop effective espionage and counterespionage services and must learn to subvert, sabotage and destroy our enemies by more clever, more sophisticated and more effective methods than those used against us. It may become necessary that the American people be acquainted with, understand and support this fundamentally repugnant philosophy.”[2] This mindset is present throughout Doolittle’s general observations about the CIA’s role and its impact on American society. He also produced specific recommendations for changes in the CIA. (CURT: Intelligence as a military force.) Personnel The Doolittle Report stated that the most important element of covert operations was personnel. It argued that the CIA should dismiss operatives and analysts who were not highly competent. Doolittle argued that “there is no place in the C.I.A. for mediocrity.”[2] In order to raise standards in the agency the report suggested that recruiting be improved. Doolittle also urged intensified training of those already in the agency, and policies to assure that personnel would only be assigned to duties and locations for which they were highly qualified. His report recommended a smaller but more effective workforce and urged that the CIA director should be “above political considerations”. ( CURT: Intelligence as an ‘elite’ force. ) (CURT: Aristocracy. Runs in the family. lol )

  • It Runs In The Family….

    On intelligence agencies….. Summary The Doolittle Report advocated policies not usually associated with democratic countries. The tense security fears of the Cold War were reflected on a domestic level, exemplified by McCarthyism. Americans were seized by a fear of communism. Doolittle echoed this sentiment in his report: “We must develop effective espionage and counterespionage services and must learn to subvert, sabotage and destroy our enemies by more clever, more sophisticated and more effective methods than those used against us. It may become necessary that the American people be acquainted with, understand and support this fundamentally repugnant philosophy.”[2] This mindset is present throughout Doolittle’s general observations about the CIA’s role and its impact on American society. He also produced specific recommendations for changes in the CIA. (CURT: Intelligence as a military force.) Personnel The Doolittle Report stated that the most important element of covert operations was personnel. It argued that the CIA should dismiss operatives and analysts who were not highly competent. Doolittle argued that “there is no place in the C.I.A. for mediocrity.”[2] In order to raise standards in the agency the report suggested that recruiting be improved. Doolittle also urged intensified training of those already in the agency, and policies to assure that personnel would only be assigned to duties and locations for which they were highly qualified. His report recommended a smaller but more effective workforce and urged that the CIA director should be “above political considerations”. ( CURT: Intelligence as an ‘elite’ force. ) (CURT: Aristocracy. Runs in the family. lol )

  • I remember seeing a pre-release demo of Apple Lisa and … my jaw dropped

    I remember seeing a pre-release demo of Apple Lisa and … my jaw dropped.

  • I remember seeing a pre-release demo of Apple Lisa and … my jaw dropped

    I remember seeing a pre-release demo of Apple Lisa and … my jaw dropped.

  • PUTIN. REPLACES “PHYSICAL REMOVAL” AND “HELICOPTER RIDES” WITH “ON THE SPOT LIQU

    PUTIN. REPLACES “PHYSICAL REMOVAL” AND “HELICOPTER RIDES” WITH “ON THE SPOT LIQUIDATION”

  • PUTIN. REPLACES “PHYSICAL REMOVAL” AND “HELICOPTER RIDES” WITH “ON THE SPOT LIQU

    PUTIN. REPLACES “PHYSICAL REMOVAL” AND “HELICOPTER RIDES” WITH “ON THE SPOT LIQUIDATION”

  • Is It Possible A Racialist Really Knows Anything About Communism?

    AN UNPLEASANT BUT TRUTHFUL ANSWER TO A QUESTIONABLE QUESTION

    —-”Is it possible a racialist really knows anything about communism? “—

    I bet I know more about both subjects than anyone else you can find. And it’s not even that hard. Communism is a pseudoscientific restatement of Judaism. And it failed like Judaism failed – and Libertarianism, because neither reflects human behavior, and neither constructs commons. And commons are the means by which agrarians defeated the pastoralists in the ancient world. And commons are the means by which industrialists defeated agrarians in the modern world. Yet Judaism, libertarianism, seek to abandon all commons, and communism seeks to abandon all property. Meanwhile social democracy and classical liberalism seek only to compete over the production of dysgenic underclass or a eugenic middle class commons. Classical liberals understand agency and are willing to suppress underclass reproduction to achieve it. Social democrats understand lack of agency and are will to expand underclass reproduction to subsidize it.

    As for racial realism, people act racially in all circumstances IF THEY CAN AFFORD TO, or can use it to advance their political power or use it to retain their political power, because political power provides control over the production of commons that advance eugenic, dysgenic, and genetic warfare.

    We are no different from any other living organism. We compete on behalf of our genes. We just do a very good job of justifying our actions as moral, rather than warfare on behalf of our genes.

    We have done very poorly under a century of marxist pseudoscience: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Rothbard/Rand, Strauss, and the modern fictionalism (outright lying where pseudoscience failed) of it we call Postmodernism.

    No more lies. People demonstrate their actions in large numbers and they are measurable. That science says nothing but that we act in our rational genetic and self interest at all times, and all our speech is merely attempts to negotiation an advantage via deception (reciprocity) rather than engage in reciprocal trade – meritocracy.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-a-racialist-really-knows-anything-about-communism