Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • @DevonshireDan Exactly

    @DevonshireDan Exactly.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-09-05 12:49:34 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106879134920318116

  • DEFINE MINDFULNESS — ” @curtdoolittle Curt, how would you define mindfulness? “

    DEFINE MINDFULNESS

    — ” @curtdoolittle Curt, how would you define mindfulness? ” — @guillem123123

    Mindfulness consists in the opposite of neuroticism. Where neuroticism means worried, imulsive or intrusive thoughts competing for your attention – sometimes so much that you are all but disabled from organized action and behavior.

    So Mindfulness, means calm, unworried, focused on what is actionable. The discipline (training, skill) of control of your auto-association, attention, and reaction to stimuli such that you are least if not fully in self-control of your reaction to the environment.

    Mindfunless is Largely achieved through practice at repetition of breathing, thought, speech (prayer), or ritual actions (tea service), such that such state eventually can be produced at will. (Controlling the automaton that is the neural market for attention.)

    The brain consists of an economy of neurons fighting for attention so that they get ‘fed’. Unfed neurons decline in connectivity. Fed increase in connectivity and influence. So we (attention) can be the victim of that conflict, or we can gain control of that conflict.

    Historically we lived in bands or tribes with continuous saturation of information by tribe members, in display word and deed. So we functioned as a group, and our brains(neural economies) evolved to perceive and use that competitive tribal info. Without it:Negative consequences.

    This is why I say humans evolved to a cognitive load, and a cognitive load of saturation in a family, band, tribal flow of information. So neurologically, idle hands make ill will. Or, more accurately: idle neurons fight for food and attention like bored children.

    Mindfulness is more important for women becasue they evolved to be more attuned to empathy (specific cases of stress) where men evolved to be more attuned to systems (accumulated stresses in the group). Female interpersonal and social. Male Political and Extrapersonal (material, territory, resources).

    Source date (UTC): 2021-09-05 12:49:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106879134056669432

  • The History of European Civilization in 600 Words

    ​ @james smith Ancestral north eurasians. Counter clockwise rotation (climate). hybridization of the spectrum of European hunter gatherers. neolithic european civilization. Anatolian Farmer migration. Hunter gatherer reconquest. Indo European migration and incremental conquest from spain to china. These people diverged into the south (italo-celtic) the central (germanic) and the eastern (balto-slavic) populations. They spread in all directions from the top of the black sea, counter clockwise into greee and anatolia. Their political system was the result of their steppe origins: pirates, and the only possible government for pirates: contractualism. Which we call democracy and rule of law – for the aristocracy. These IE group’s tradition, law, political strategy, surviving in written history only as the Spartans, evolved under the Athenians due to trade, reaching high point under the Athenians. The Romans invented bureaucracy and the administrative state. The romans over-expanded into the middle east as had the greeks, and discovered the same problem – IQ84, low trust, divrse tribal people cannot be as cheaply organized as IQ 100 high trust relatively homogenous europeans. And so the cost of administration per person was too high, despite the ‘addiction’ of north African food production (like we have with china in industrial goods today.). The romans had committed a near genocide against the celts who were cousins, and metalworkers, and competitors. This opened space for rotation of the germanics from the north across the south. The romans could not defeat them. And Christianity like woke today, was an appealing cult for the women and underclasses, who could be governed by cults but not by reason law and duty to one another. In other words, homogenous european rome could not maintain the culture of heterogenous roman empire, nor could it recreate it after the invasion and plauges. However, the group strategy of the Celtics, germanics-scandinavians, and balto-slavics was the same as the group strategy of the itals of rome, and the dorians(?) of Greece. So greece and rome provided new technology that’s affordable with waterborne traide that wasn’t available on the continent, but didn’t alter the group strategy of the west indo europeans that was relatively homogenous across the european plain. We can give our technology to India and china and Africa and the middle east but they still retain their group strategies and largely retain their religions. All our status networks (values) are embedded in that group strategy normst traditions and values. The European group strategy, the strategy of pirates, steppe raiders, vikings, and world conquering europeans is the same: an aristocracy that through force of arms, reciprocally insures the self determination by self determined means by demand for sovereignty in demonstrated interest, reciprocity in display word and deed, and thereby limiting us adversarial markets in all aspects of life, at the cost of the suppression of the reproduction of the unfit to share that burden. It’s the last phrase that terrifies the world who are unfit for that burden. And that burden is the price of rule of law, and the sovereignty, reciprocity, and self determination that result from it. That is the 5000 years of strategy that unites the european people. And it explains the rate of development of the european people versus all other peoples combined in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, interrupted only by semitic Christianity and the dark ages of superstition and ignorance they created by the destruction of the arts, letters, and culture – the technology – of greco roman civilization, and impose mandatory illiteracy and ignorance on our people by force of arms. This is the social order that innovates, adapts, and evolves fatser than all other civilizations combined. Worse, it’s the only social order that didn’t fail stagnate or decline by 800ad. The Great Filter is the underclass.

  • The History of European Civilization in 600 Words

    ​ @james smith Ancestral north eurasians. Counter clockwise rotation (climate). hybridization of the spectrum of European hunter gatherers. neolithic european civilization. Anatolian Farmer migration. Hunter gatherer reconquest. Indo European migration and incremental conquest from spain to china. These people diverged into the south (italo-celtic) the central (germanic) and the eastern (balto-slavic) populations. They spread in all directions from the top of the black sea, counter clockwise into greee and anatolia. Their political system was the result of their steppe origins: pirates, and the only possible government for pirates: contractualism. Which we call democracy and rule of law – for the aristocracy. These IE group’s tradition, law, political strategy, surviving in written history only as the Spartans, evolved under the Athenians due to trade, reaching high point under the Athenians. The Romans invented bureaucracy and the administrative state. The romans over-expanded into the middle east as had the greeks, and discovered the same problem – IQ84, low trust, divrse tribal people cannot be as cheaply organized as IQ 100 high trust relatively homogenous europeans. And so the cost of administration per person was too high, despite the ‘addiction’ of north African food production (like we have with china in industrial goods today.). The romans had committed a near genocide against the celts who were cousins, and metalworkers, and competitors. This opened space for rotation of the germanics from the north across the south. The romans could not defeat them. And Christianity like woke today, was an appealing cult for the women and underclasses, who could be governed by cults but not by reason law and duty to one another. In other words, homogenous european rome could not maintain the culture of heterogenous roman empire, nor could it recreate it after the invasion and plauges. However, the group strategy of the Celtics, germanics-scandinavians, and balto-slavics was the same as the group strategy of the itals of rome, and the dorians(?) of Greece. So greece and rome provided new technology that’s affordable with waterborne traide that wasn’t available on the continent, but didn’t alter the group strategy of the west indo europeans that was relatively homogenous across the european plain. We can give our technology to India and china and Africa and the middle east but they still retain their group strategies and largely retain their religions. All our status networks (values) are embedded in that group strategy normst traditions and values. The European group strategy, the strategy of pirates, steppe raiders, vikings, and world conquering europeans is the same: an aristocracy that through force of arms, reciprocally insures the self determination by self determined means by demand for sovereignty in demonstrated interest, reciprocity in display word and deed, and thereby limiting us adversarial markets in all aspects of life, at the cost of the suppression of the reproduction of the unfit to share that burden. It’s the last phrase that terrifies the world who are unfit for that burden. And that burden is the price of rule of law, and the sovereignty, reciprocity, and self determination that result from it. That is the 5000 years of strategy that unites the european people. And it explains the rate of development of the european people versus all other peoples combined in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, interrupted only by semitic Christianity and the dark ages of superstition and ignorance they created by the destruction of the arts, letters, and culture – the technology – of greco roman civilization, and impose mandatory illiteracy and ignorance on our people by force of arms. This is the social order that innovates, adapts, and evolves fatser than all other civilizations combined. Worse, it’s the only social order that didn’t fail stagnate or decline by 800ad. The Great Filter is the underclass.

  • Review of the Northwest Front Constitution of 2006

    I try to avoid the Fundamentalist, WN, NS movements as much as possible – despite agreeing that I’d prefer to live in a homogenous polity of my own relations, if for no other reason than the reduction of competition for status and because of status for opportunity, and because of opportunity for political power. Like most libertarians and conservatives I view government as a means of limiting us to voluntary market cooperation, and like most conservatives, I view the role of religion, education, and Law as training naturally barbaric, naturally amoral, male and female superpredators to limit themselves to such voluntary market cooperation. This means we can only survive and reproduce by limiting ourselves to voluntary markets cooperation.. And this means that people unfit for the resulting hierarchy that results from voluntary markets for cooperation are selected out of the gene pool by suppression of their reproduction in exchange for their caretaking.  This is a kind way of saying that the natural order always and everywhere either results in indentured and serf classes whose needs are provided for by exiting them from the market for cooperation in exchange for exiting them from reproduction – thereby constantly reducing the burden of unfit people on fit people. So despite the context of avoiding WN, NS, and Fundamentalists, that doesn’t mean I eschew discourse with their thought leaders – any more than eschewing discourse with libertarian and leftist thought leaders.  Why? Because they’re all unsatisfied with the status quo, they’ve all just chosen the extreme means of solving the problem of altering the status quo and therefore limiting themselves to political fringes.  The status quo is just as problematic for leftists, libertarians, and rightists. The only people it’s good for are the predatory elites who pit everyone against one another, the top organizing the bottom against the middle. And the left as always serves as the useful idiot soldiery for the top that organizes them against the middle. Yesterday I had a two-hour conversation with someone from the Northwest Front. This is a well-organized, well-thought-out movement with written canon, strategy, tactics, and constitution. As in all cases, conservatives are superior educators, and leftists are superior agitators. And the conservatives are happy to state their desired end state, while the left evades any statement of their desired end state. So after our conversation, I agreed to look at their constitution. And after reading it, I can’t find fault with it. It’s free of the usual optimism, sophistry, and pretense. A study of world constitutions is a study of fantasy political literature -which is why constitutions other than the American are so subject to irrelevance. And the constitution they sent me to review is a document consisting of clearly stated empirical realism. However, that constitution is one of escape from the enemy, without correcting for the means of total war by the enemy.  The enemy of western civilization uses the female method of undermining from within by sowing discord, demonizing the leadership, demonizing the norms traditions values and institutions of cultural production, and then promising a big lie that if they were in charge ‘things would be better’.  This is the fantasy of every mother and most women.  Because they desire the world be suited for the reduction of their effort of the neuroticism (worrying, anxiety, fear, impulse) of the female mind, as suits their children – or worse, that suits their status pursuit, whether by virtue-signaling non-aggression under the pretense of care, or hypergamy under the pretense of equality, or hyperconsumption under the pretense of both, if they don’t have children. All of these ‘benevolent facades’ are just selfish demands from males to satisfy their impulses over which – without religion or ritual of some kind, or kinship-female group suppression, or the empiricism that results from having four or more children – they cannot control.  Likewise, male motivation for heroism and desire for status, and access to kindness, affection, sex, reproduction, is obtained by satisfying the selfishness of women that they project as benevolence but are just demands for discounts on consumption because of her necessity of raising fragile offspring while maintaining her maximum market value to women and to men – but primarily to women. So my work takes a very different approach. And that is to increase the suppression of female anti-social behavior, that scales to female warfare, that was converted to a group evolutionary strategy by the Jews, Christians and Muslims, to the same degree that we have suppressed the male anti-social behavior that scale to male warfare, that was converted to a group evolutionary strategy by the Indo Europeans from whom Europeans descend. So where the Northwest Front constitution states isolation and political organization, my work on the law creates a market (court) for the suppression of the female means of anti-social behavior, just as thoroughly as it creates a market (court) for the suppression of male anti-social behavior.  The difference is that I don’t leave out the problem of the ‘unfit’ – and solve that problem too. The pre-war soft-eugenicists were right. The war hard-eugenicists were … wrong. Sorry. So where most if not all constitutions evade law in favor of the law-making process, my constitution turns law into a formal logic that is as rock-solid as mathematics and writing like software programming, to ensure that the female method of civilizational destruction cannot only be suppressed internally but that war is justified in suppression of it externally. So when I say that my work on constitutions is inflexible in law, but that the means of construction of policy (legislation, regulation) is a Chinese menu of choices within that law, though I do recommend a recipe for ‘perfect government’ for people capable of it, you can set up any government you want that suppresses both male and female means of internal anti-social behavior, and anti-societal warfare. Ergo my work os compatible with the NW constitution. It would be compatible for all conservative and libertarian people and for certain most centrist people.  But if you want a free-rider upper cast that parasitically lives off , and obtains power by the redistribution underclass, at the expense of the productive middle classes then you’re going to have to find some other constitution and body of law.    

  • Review of the Northwest Front Constitution of 2006

    I try to avoid the Fundamentalist, WN, NS movements as much as possible – despite agreeing that I’d prefer to live in a homogenous polity of my own relations, if for no other reason than the reduction of competition for status and because of status for opportunity, and because of opportunity for political power. Like most libertarians and conservatives I view government as a means of limiting us to voluntary market cooperation, and like most conservatives, I view the role of religion, education, and Law as training naturally barbaric, naturally amoral, male and female superpredators to limit themselves to such voluntary market cooperation. This means we can only survive and reproduce by limiting ourselves to voluntary markets cooperation.. And this means that people unfit for the resulting hierarchy that results from voluntary markets for cooperation are selected out of the gene pool by suppression of their reproduction in exchange for their caretaking.  This is a kind way of saying that the natural order always and everywhere either results in indentured and serf classes whose needs are provided for by exiting them from the market for cooperation in exchange for exiting them from reproduction – thereby constantly reducing the burden of unfit people on fit people. So despite the context of avoiding WN, NS, and Fundamentalists, that doesn’t mean I eschew discourse with their thought leaders – any more than eschewing discourse with libertarian and leftist thought leaders.  Why? Because they’re all unsatisfied with the status quo, they’ve all just chosen the extreme means of solving the problem of altering the status quo and therefore limiting themselves to political fringes.  The status quo is just as problematic for leftists, libertarians, and rightists. The only people it’s good for are the predatory elites who pit everyone against one another, the top organizing the bottom against the middle. And the left as always serves as the useful idiot soldiery for the top that organizes them against the middle. Yesterday I had a two-hour conversation with someone from the Northwest Front. This is a well-organized, well-thought-out movement with written canon, strategy, tactics, and constitution. As in all cases, conservatives are superior educators, and leftists are superior agitators. And the conservatives are happy to state their desired end state, while the left evades any statement of their desired end state. So after our conversation, I agreed to look at their constitution. And after reading it, I can’t find fault with it. It’s free of the usual optimism, sophistry, and pretense. A study of world constitutions is a study of fantasy political literature -which is why constitutions other than the American are so subject to irrelevance. And the constitution they sent me to review is a document consisting of clearly stated empirical realism. However, that constitution is one of escape from the enemy, without correcting for the means of total war by the enemy.  The enemy of western civilization uses the female method of undermining from within by sowing discord, demonizing the leadership, demonizing the norms traditions values and institutions of cultural production, and then promising a big lie that if they were in charge ‘things would be better’.  This is the fantasy of every mother and most women.  Because they desire the world be suited for the reduction of their effort of the neuroticism (worrying, anxiety, fear, impulse) of the female mind, as suits their children – or worse, that suits their status pursuit, whether by virtue-signaling non-aggression under the pretense of care, or hypergamy under the pretense of equality, or hyperconsumption under the pretense of both, if they don’t have children. All of these ‘benevolent facades’ are just selfish demands from males to satisfy their impulses over which – without religion or ritual of some kind, or kinship-female group suppression, or the empiricism that results from having four or more children – they cannot control.  Likewise, male motivation for heroism and desire for status, and access to kindness, affection, sex, reproduction, is obtained by satisfying the selfishness of women that they project as benevolence but are just demands for discounts on consumption because of her necessity of raising fragile offspring while maintaining her maximum market value to women and to men – but primarily to women. So my work takes a very different approach. And that is to increase the suppression of female anti-social behavior, that scales to female warfare, that was converted to a group evolutionary strategy by the Jews, Christians and Muslims, to the same degree that we have suppressed the male anti-social behavior that scale to male warfare, that was converted to a group evolutionary strategy by the Indo Europeans from whom Europeans descend. So where the Northwest Front constitution states isolation and political organization, my work on the law creates a market (court) for the suppression of the female means of anti-social behavior, just as thoroughly as it creates a market (court) for the suppression of male anti-social behavior.  The difference is that I don’t leave out the problem of the ‘unfit’ – and solve that problem too. The pre-war soft-eugenicists were right. The war hard-eugenicists were … wrong. Sorry. So where most if not all constitutions evade law in favor of the law-making process, my constitution turns law into a formal logic that is as rock-solid as mathematics and writing like software programming, to ensure that the female method of civilizational destruction cannot only be suppressed internally but that war is justified in suppression of it externally. So when I say that my work on constitutions is inflexible in law, but that the means of construction of policy (legislation, regulation) is a Chinese menu of choices within that law, though I do recommend a recipe for ‘perfect government’ for people capable of it, you can set up any government you want that suppresses both male and female means of internal anti-social behavior, and anti-societal warfare. Ergo my work os compatible with the NW constitution. It would be compatible for all conservative and libertarian people and for certain most centrist people.  But if you want a free-rider upper cast that parasitically lives off , and obtains power by the redistribution underclass, at the expense of the productive middle classes then you’re going to have to find some other constitution and body of law.    

  • A Screed Against Europeans

    RE   0 – This video is a half-truth by the means half-truths are conveyed. It’s Exasperating. And it attempts to circumvent the problem. And the prsentation getting worse and more false as we move through it. This is a screed against western civilization not against the use of the term.

    1 – We use the word Aryan for Indo-European cultural and technological innovation and language just like we use the European industrial revolution. It’s incorrect to use it as a race or ethnicity because Europeans and South Eurasians (including iranics) are different races. It is not incorrect to use it as referring to the Indo-European cultural, technological, political, and military innovation.
    2 – The original Yamnaya appear to be in genetically european – eastward rotation. Interacting with the trade over the caucuses. Most innovations occur in response to conflicts on borderlands.
    3 – The aryan invasion theory is correct as a gradual process. The Dravidians were earlier versions of iranics. The earlier peoples of India were
    4 – Five generations of man in five leaps of neotenic evolution due to isolation and speciation events. African @55IQ > East African @70IQ > South Eurasians@84IQ) > { East Branch : East Asians (105IQ > Siberians 90IQ > Siberian Americans @85IQ }, {West Branch: Europeans > Ice Ages: ice shelf spectrum west to east > Ancestral North Eurasians > Europeans (100IQ). All hybrids are exactly as predicted by these numbers. Sorry but yes, races are substantially different and that was settled in 2018. But like sex, personality, class and IQ differences the popular nonsense persists the error. As such the primary difference between the races is the relative scales of the classes.
    5 – This is why all peoples in all countries live in conditions consistently and without exception corresponding to IQ. Why? All that matters is the relative size of your smart fraction (>125) to the underclass (<95). The ‘race problem’ is real because it is a ‘class problem’ and people in polities live, associate, cooperate, work, and most importantly vote, as racial blocks – without exception. Period.
    6 – Persisting the lies of equality of groups despite the inequality of class sizes only prevents us from producing policy that is suitable to the vastly different rates of gestation maturity and agency of the major racial groups. 7 – Persisting the lies of the equality of culture only means that the world will devolve into favelas and imitations of the middle east. Only Europeans live in this fantasy. The rest of the world doesn’t.
    8 – The demographic superiority of northwestern and northeastern Asians is a fact. The cultural superiority is a fact. The fact is that every other civilization failed by 800ad despite agrarianism. Europeans merely escaped the same fate because of the reintroduction of greek thought restoration of north sea trade, and the Muslim closure of the ports of Constantinople, forcing the Europeans to invent the age of sail.
    9 – that we can spread our Europan empiricism, rule of law, science, technology, and medicine to the world is simply a problem of technological distribution. We cannot however spread high trust, nor higher rates of self-domestication, lower rates of gestation and maturity, lower impulsivity and higher agency.
    10 – we’ve exhausted the industrial revolution. Malthus wasn’t wrong. His timing was off.

  • A Screed Against Europeans

    RE   0 – This video is a half-truth by the means half-truths are conveyed. It’s Exasperating. And it attempts to circumvent the problem. And the prsentation getting worse and more false as we move through it. This is a screed against western civilization not against the use of the term.

    1 – We use the word Aryan for Indo-European cultural and technological innovation and language just like we use the European industrial revolution. It’s incorrect to use it as a race or ethnicity because Europeans and South Eurasians (including iranics) are different races. It is not incorrect to use it as referring to the Indo-European cultural, technological, political, and military innovation.
    2 – The original Yamnaya appear to be in genetically european – eastward rotation. Interacting with the trade over the caucuses. Most innovations occur in response to conflicts on borderlands.
    3 – The aryan invasion theory is correct as a gradual process. The Dravidians were earlier versions of iranics. The earlier peoples of India were
    4 – Five generations of man in five leaps of neotenic evolution due to isolation and speciation events. African @55IQ > East African @70IQ > South Eurasians@84IQ) > { East Branch : East Asians (105IQ > Siberians 90IQ > Siberian Americans @85IQ }, {West Branch: Europeans > Ice Ages: ice shelf spectrum west to east > Ancestral North Eurasians > Europeans (100IQ). All hybrids are exactly as predicted by these numbers. Sorry but yes, races are substantially different and that was settled in 2018. But like sex, personality, class and IQ differences the popular nonsense persists the error. As such the primary difference between the races is the relative scales of the classes.
    5 – This is why all peoples in all countries live in conditions consistently and without exception corresponding to IQ. Why? All that matters is the relative size of your smart fraction (>125) to the underclass (<95). The ‘race problem’ is real because it is a ‘class problem’ and people in polities live, associate, cooperate, work, and most importantly vote, as racial blocks – without exception. Period.
    6 – Persisting the lies of equality of groups despite the inequality of class sizes only prevents us from producing policy that is suitable to the vastly different rates of gestation maturity and agency of the major racial groups. 7 – Persisting the lies of the equality of culture only means that the world will devolve into favelas and imitations of the middle east. Only Europeans live in this fantasy. The rest of the world doesn’t.
    8 – The demographic superiority of northwestern and northeastern Asians is a fact. The cultural superiority is a fact. The fact is that every other civilization failed by 800ad despite agrarianism. Europeans merely escaped the same fate because of the reintroduction of greek thought restoration of north sea trade, and the Muslim closure of the ports of Constantinople, forcing the Europeans to invent the age of sail.
    9 – that we can spread our Europan empiricism, rule of law, science, technology, and medicine to the world is simply a problem of technological distribution. We cannot however spread high trust, nor higher rates of self-domestication, lower rates of gestation and maturity, lower impulsivity and higher agency.
    10 – we’ve exhausted the industrial revolution. Malthus wasn’t wrong. His timing was off.

  • @Sylivie Why? The jews, (christians,) and muslims have been using the same mater

    @Sylivie Why? The jews, (christians,) and muslims have been using the same material for thousands of years. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2021-09-02 20:17:50 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106863910627942658

  • @CYPHERZ @RadioFreeNorthwest Freedom. Tolerance by those who are competent, for

    @CYPHERZ@RadioFreeNorthwest Freedom. Tolerance by those who are competent, for your presence among them as other than a wild animal (barbarian), domesticated animal (slave), or child (serf), because you possess the ability and will to ALSO defend their self determiniation by self determined means, by reciprocal insurance of sovereignty in demonstrated interests, and limiting yourself to reciprocity in display word and deed. Otherwise you are a threat to them, their families, their society, their polity, their capital, and their own sovereignty, liberty, and freedom.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-09-02 18:55:53 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106863588347295465