Boost of @alternative_right If you believe in any of these:
* Equality
* Feminism
* Diversity
* Welfare
You are not conservative, but a Leftist, and you are also in denial of the research of Charles Darwin.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-07 23:12:55 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106893016160295229
@toodarkmark Climate, Isolation, Cooperation, Domestication > Speciation
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-06 18:26:59 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106886123987597657
THE SOLUTION
We flatten the inequality curve by ending the possibility of its emergence, by continuously reducing the reproduction of the bottom, who are unfit for continuous evolutionary innovation and adaptation: the niche exploited by western man.
It’s the only permanent solution to the stress of inequality – being left behind – as defects that limit continuous innovation, adaptation, and evolution accumulate in those unfit for continuous innovation, adaptation, and evolution that is the foundation of western civilization.
Where continuous innovation, adaptation, and evolution is produced by reciprocally insuring via arms the self-determination by self-determined means by enforcement of sovereignty in demonstrated interests and reciprocity in display word and deed leaving only markets for survival.
If you understand these paragraphs, you will understand the secret of western civilization – we discovered the most parsimonious and rapidly innovative, adaptive,and evolutionary group strategy possible for man – and the entire world is justifiably threatened and terrified by it.
Western Man and Western Civilization are genetically superior enough, and as civilizational superior in the extreme, that European civilization is an existential threat to prior civilizations as industrialization was to agrarianism.
So, by simply trying to end lying in politics economics and commerce I’ve come to the end of my journey, with the operational mathematics (logic) of the universe as a very simple algorithm.
The choice of whether the natural aristocracy shall profit from the domestication of man’s behavior and his labor – rent seeking – with dysgenic results. Or to profit from innovation, adaptation, and evolution of man himself, with eugenic results.
The difference is only treatment of the bottom as an asset to be increased (like cattle, slaves, or serfs), or a liability to be decreased (like barbarians). So the difference in rate of evolution of civilizations is the choice of treatment of the unfit for peerage.
Each civilization developed a concept of time nature, man, and of archetypes (gods) as either stagnant (balance-china), cyclical, or progressive (European). Only europeans didn’t abuse time – we invented the OODA-LOOP group strategy. (look it up)
We’ve emerged in a calm period in geological history, we ate everything we could get our hands on until we resorted to farming.
But the entire universe is hostile to life, and our little blue marble, in a galaxy in a rural part of space, in a rural part of our galaxy, living largely in a temperate zone between unbearable heat and unbearable cold, and wet oceans and dry deserts, in the few ‘green’ spots.
So, the reason no one is succeeding in a political solution is that every solution is designed under agrarian (past) ethics and morality where power and wealth are earned by parasitism on a vast peasantry, the scale of which now exhausts the planet’s capacity for it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-06 18:26:18 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106886121261864268
So I should point out that while white science, technology, industrialization and medicine served the more primitive civilizations as did our own, our eugenics didn’t. And our civilization produced those gains largely because of our eugenic institutions.
The Chinese however, have at least chosen to ensure that they are the last man standing – by preventing the most aggressive dysgenic civilization (jews and Muslims) from introgression. And preventing the intermediate civilization that tolerates introgression (europeans) too.
— ” CCP has the most radical offensive realists on earth. They understand the clash of civilizations & avoid Parasitic outgroups & punish social decay. ” –@RationalXi
Agreed. Like I’ve said over and over again: they aren’t communist, they’re fascist. And they proved fascism won the debate of the industrial age – not capitalism or communism. Fascism is a defense against communism and the liberalism that makes communism possible.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-06 18:20:38 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106886099032331465
PATH TO RIGHT VICTORY
PItching an endpoint is fantasy storytelling without an operational means of bringing it into being with the resources at your disposal. Generals don’t fight wars with the men, weapons, supply lines, resources, strategy&tactics they prefer. They fight wars with what they have. As such the winners of all wars are those not that choose endpoints, but that choose the accumulation of resources to CHOOSE the endpoint.
All of you as factions, stuck in the fantasy role-playing game of unconsciously trying to sell an endpoint rather than selling a sequence of victories that accumulate resources (men) who have a common real interest in victories but uncommon fantasies of endpoints.
In other words, you’re trying to win a political game with cheap political attention with cheap stories that have worked only under a European time window that no longer exists. The unifying message is defeating the enemy, not the divisive endpoint.
The group that doesn’t tell stories, but accumulates victories by defeating the enemy, will accumulate resources victories and legitimacy necessary to influence the endpoint.
So factions need to stop playing the loser’s game of selling an endpoint, and instead, selling and accumulating small but increasing victories that talk about how evil the concrete existential enemy and threat is, and not causing division over unknowable unachievable ends.
There is no endpoint message that will sell other than victories. And there are no victories that allow the accumulation of power without a brand under which associate with those victories, and an organization that manages that brand.
And that brand must be nothing more concrete than righting an injustice by defeating the existential threat of an enemy. That will unify people. So you want an abstract symbol brand to claim victory on without an endpoint that creates division. Converge power.
This is why I generally don’t interact with the right because nazis, white nationalists, fundamentalists, and even civnats, are successfully factionalized and made weak by the fact that they provide the enemy the target that they need, making the reactionary the enemy: suckers.
The enemy works by undermining anything concrete: leaders, messages, endpoints. So the only way to defeat the enemy is to make THEM the story. And imitate trump by making the enemy defend the fact that you’ve made them the story. Trying to get cheap attention serves the enemy.
So the enemy counts on you trying cheaply build coalitions with leaders, symbolism, and endpoints, when the only way to defeat them is with slow, constant, material victories, where you demonize the enemy, saturate the narrative with stories of the enemy, controlling the story.
Why isn’t it obvious to the right? Because the right is just as emotional as the left and as anti-intellectual as the left is anti-rational. So the right is operating from the worst possible position: their own instincts.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-06 18:16:54 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106886084355858213
THE ADVANTAGE OF EUROPEAN DIMORPHISM VS EAST ASIAN NEOTENY
I tended to make the mistake that the Chinese being the most neotenous with the same basic IQ advantage would have the most potential, but we’re less neotenic but more dimorphic and I didn’t account for the adaptive utility of dimorphism vs the east asians – hard lesson.
This is a recent revelation that I’ve only come to understand as I write about how the universe computes evolutionary potential. The sex differences increase computational potential, just as neotenic evolution increases it. I just didn’t see the relation.
This is why whites and asians are socially and politically compatible and whites and asians are both ‘incompatible’ with less neotenically evolved peoples.
Neoteny: Wolf->Dog. Meaning ‘delay and minimize sexual maturity giving more time for neurological development under childhood behavioral flexitility.
Dimorphic: Female vs Male Body Plan.
Europeans are teh most dimorphic. (Hence the value of our women)
E. Asians are the most ‘evolved’ by neoteny. Phjysical, mental, social.
Then Europeans
Then South Eurasians
Then Africans
Then Old africans (Austronesians, Khoi-San)
Europeans conquer and become assimilated. Indians conquer and stagnate. Chinese conquered and domesticate. Muslims conquer, undermine, destroy. Jews undermine and let Muslims in to destroy. Gypsies just steal and consume. Africans can’t organize to do anything.
We are wrong. Chinese are right. Fascists were right. Sorry. Just is.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-06 18:07:57 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106886049110182051
IMPORTANT:
feminine intuition is the invasive mother – seeking self-reward, self-image, and self status, from the perpetuation of control over her offspring – therefore producing infantilization (at scale that means millennials, xians, jews, and muslims.).
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-06 18:01:41 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106886024466645767
CIVILIZATIONAL LAW – SIMPLE RULE OF EVERYTHING
Europeans conquer and become assimilated. Indians conquer and stagnate. Chinese conquered and domesticate. Muslims conquer, undermine, destroy. Jews undermine and let Muslims in to destroy. Gypsies just steal and consume. Africans can’t organize to do anything.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-06 17:56:45 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106886005117701514
Neoteny: Wolf->Dog. Meaning ‘delay and minimize sexual maturity giving more time for neurological development under childhood behavioral flexitility.
Dimorphic: Female vs Male Body Plan.
E. Asians most ‘evolved’ by neoteny. Phjysical, mental, social.
The only ‘problem’ I see in east asian civilization is face-before-truth. The primary advantage in the west is ‘truth-before-face, regardless of cost to the hierarchy’.
Or as we say, ‘our duty to speak truth to power’.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-06 17:56:24 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106886003741576664
JUST WHO IS DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION?
I think you have it backwards:
— “As I carry the oath of enlistment with me until I die, especially the part where it says I will defend the Constitution from all enemies; foreign and domestic. I request for the #ProudBoys to be a terror organization.” — DavidWeissman
I thought they were defending the constitution and you were the introgressor undermining the constitution with marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, pc, woke, anti-colonialism, whiteness, whites, white replacement, and positive law by undermining and false-promise post-whiteness.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-06 17:50:23 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106885980066286023