Our job then is to produce law that instills sufficient fear of accountability for the seizure of attention by those who are sufficiently disagreeable that they do not fear accountability.
There exists a population of people that desire attention. Of these people there are those that are agreeable and those that are disagreeable. And among them are those that fear accountability, and those that don’t fear accountability. When desire defeats fear we get the enemy.
RE:
PROPOSITION: Psychology, Sociology, Philosophy, The Academy, Democratically Elected Political Parties, and the Media are all limited by the same set of ‘lies’: because they are seeking to ‘cheat the universe’ not adapt to it. And we have run out of ways to cheat nature at our present level of scientific, technological, and economic scale:
1) The false promise that man will coalesce on the equalitarianism and egalitarianism of the extended family, clan, and tribe when evidence is that in the presence of sufficient wealth that CAN possess the luxury of pursuing their genetic, intuitionistic, and contextual bias – that they will.
2) The enlightenment false promise of an aristocracy of everyone instead of the demonstrated evidence of equality producing a peasantry of everyone.
3) The Cognitively Feminine Counter-Revolution against the Darwinian (cognitively masculine) explanation of man and the eugenic revolution it inspired: Freud, Boaz, Marx et al.
4) Where that cognitively feminine counter-revolution made four false promises:
i) the end of scarcity with the false promise of endless growth,
ii) the nature of man as moral rather than an amoral and practical superpredator, both male political and female social, for whom we’ve developed a spectrum of institutions to constrain our behavior to moral (reciprocal and proportional),
iii) the malleability of man given the wide difference in adaptive velocity (intelligence) and self-regulation (conscientiousness).
iv) and the necessity of continuing natural selection given that the difference in the distribution of people and peoples is due to the group limitation on neotenic evolution, and the accumulation of genetic load, where both mutation and sortition cause the formation of classes that are organized by their rate and value of their rate of adaptation – because mankind evolved to specialize in adaptation itself, and we sort by adaptation itself, and we compete by adaptation itself.
BTW: What you’re both talking about is the “Wilsonian Synthesis” or the unification of the sciences. (E. O. Wilson – Consilience )
DIVORCE: Yes the problem is we need a divorce so we can pursue our genetic, biological, interests because there are no incentives NOT to, and every incentive to do so. Because we can organize over larger geographic territories of social, economic, and political cooperation. We desire to sort to common interests, with the political, economic, social, and cognitive organization that most suits our genetics, intuition, and self-selected knowledge. I would thank Gregg for the framing of a divorce fighting over children since this is the most accurate and intuitionistic narrative that explains our condition. (Of course, I agree that divorce is necessary since no incentives to can be constructed. Or said differently, agrarianism caused a homogenization of relationships that under industrialization are no longer of value, so we are seeing the return to demand for separation, isolation, and return to speciation that was ended by the unification of the world by the Europeans under the age of sail. The only moral solution is divorce. There is no possibility of reconstructing agrarian incentives, without reconstructing the demands of the agrarian economy.
NOTES:
RE:
PROPOSITION: Psychology, Sociology, Philosophy, The Academy, Democratically Elected Political Parties, and the Media are all limited by the same set of ‘lies’: because they are seeking to ‘cheat the universe’ not adapt to it. And we have run out of ways to cheat nature at our present level of scientific, technological, and economic scale:
1) The false promise that man will coalesce on the equalitarianism and egalitarianism of the extended family, clan, and tribe when evidence is that in the presence of sufficient wealth that CAN possess the luxury of pursuing their genetic, intuitionistic, and contextual bias – that they will.
2) The enlightenment false promise of an aristocracy of everyone instead of the demonstrated evidence of equality producing a peasantry of everyone.
3) The Cognitively Feminine Counter-Revolution against the Darwinian (cognitively masculine) explanation of man and the eugenic revolution it inspired: Freud, Boaz, Marx et al.
4) Where that cognitively feminine counter-revolution made four false promises:
i) the end of scarcity with the false promise of endless growth,
ii) the nature of man as moral rather than an amoral and practical superpredator, both male political and female social, for whom we’ve developed a spectrum of institutions to constrain our behavior to moral (reciprocal and proportional),
iii) the malleability of man given the wide difference in adaptive velocity (intelligence) and self-regulation (conscientiousness).
iv) and the necessity of continuing natural selection given that the difference in the distribution of people and peoples is due to the group limitation on neotenic evolution, and the accumulation of genetic load, where both mutation and sortition cause the formation of classes that are organized by their rate and value of their rate of adaptation – because mankind evolved to specialize in adaptation itself, and we sort by adaptation itself, and we compete by adaptation itself.
BTW: What you’re both talking about is the “Wilsonian Synthesis” or the unification of the sciences. (E. O. Wilson – Consilience )
DIVORCE: Yes the problem is we need a divorce so we can pursue our genetic, biological, interests because there are no incentives NOT to, and every incentive to do so. Because we can organize over larger geographic territories of social, economic, and political cooperation. We desire to sort to common interests, with the political, economic, social, and cognitive organization that most suits our genetics, intuition, and self-selected knowledge. I would thank Gregg for the framing of a divorce fighting over children since this is the most accurate and intuitionistic narrative that explains our condition. (Of course, I agree that divorce is necessary since no incentives to can be constructed. Or said differently, agrarianism caused a homogenization of relationships that under industrialization are no longer of value, so we are seeing the return to demand for separation, isolation, and return to speciation that was ended by the unification of the world by the Europeans under the age of sail. The only moral solution is divorce. There is no possibility of reconstructing agrarian incentives, without reconstructing the demands of the agrarian economy.
NOTES:
@CathFashBattleFront lol only a fking moron would believe that stupid sh-t. So yeah. I gave up trying to save you sh-ts and I’m glad you’re out of the gene pool. lol
@CathFashBattleFront Lol. I am love trashing you losers every day as you are slowly and constantly eradicated by a superior enemy and your own inferior character, intelligence, knowledge, and ability. You’re the anal leakage of the white genetic digestion tract, and the rest of us are privileged to see you decay as the rotting refuse that you are – cleaning up the white gene pool by your disappearance.
— ” @curtdoolittle Curt, how would you define mindfulness? ” — @guillem123123
Mindfulness consists in the opposite of neuroticism. Where neuroticism means worried, impulsive or intrusive thoughts competing for your attention – sometimes so much that you are all but disabled from organized action and behavior.
So Mindfulness, means calm, unworried, focused on what is actionable. The discipline (training, skill) of control of your auto-association, attention, and reaction to stimuli such that you are least if not fully in self-control of your reaction to the environment.
Mindfunless is Largely achieved through practice at repetition of breathing, thought, speech (prayer), or ritual actions (tea service), such that such state eventually can be produced at will. (Controlling the automaton that is the neural market for attention.)
The brain consists of an economy of neurons fighting for attention so that they get ‘fed’. Unfed neurons decline in connectivity. Fed increase in connectivity and influence. So we (attention) can be the victim of that conflict, or we can gain control of that conflict.
Historically we lived in bands or tribes with continuous saturation of information by tribe members, in display word and deed. So we functioned as a group, and our brains(neural economies) evolved to perceive and use that competitive tribal info. Without it:Negative consequences.
This is why I say humans evolved to a cognitive load, and a cognitive load of saturation in a family, band, tribal flow of information. So neurologically, idle hands make ill will. Or, more accurately: idle neurons fight for food and attention like bored children.
Mindfulness is more important for women because they evolved to be more attuned to empathy (specific cases of stress) where men evolved to be more attuned to systems (accumulated stresses in the group). Female in
— ” @curtdoolittle Curt, how would you define mindfulness? ” — @guillem123123
Mindfulness consists in the opposite of neuroticism. Where neuroticism means worried, impulsive or intrusive thoughts competing for your attention – sometimes so much that you are all but disabled from organized action and behavior.
So Mindfulness, means calm, unworried, focused on what is actionable. The discipline (training, skill) of control of your auto-association, attention, and reaction to stimuli such that you are least if not fully in self-control of your reaction to the environment.
Mindfunless is Largely achieved through practice at repetition of breathing, thought, speech (prayer), or ritual actions (tea service), such that such state eventually can be produced at will. (Controlling the automaton that is the neural market for attention.)
The brain consists of an economy of neurons fighting for attention so that they get ‘fed’. Unfed neurons decline in connectivity. Fed increase in connectivity and influence. So we (attention) can be the victim of that conflict, or we can gain control of that conflict.
Historically we lived in bands or tribes with continuous saturation of information by tribe members, in display word and deed. So we functioned as a group, and our brains(neural economies) evolved to perceive and use that competitive tribal info. Without it:Negative consequences.
This is why I say humans evolved to a cognitive load, and a cognitive load of saturation in a family, band, tribal flow of information. So neurologically, idle hands make ill will. Or, more accurately: idle neurons fight for food and attention like bored children.
Mindfulness is more important for women because they evolved to be more attuned to empathy (specific cases of stress) where men evolved to be more attuned to systems (accumulated stresses in the group). Female in