@Sylivie Sure it does. You are so habituated to lying almost nothing you can say that makes you feel good is anything other than a lie. That’s why the devil needs dumb fucks like you. Because you’re the only ones stupid enough to bite the apple of ignorance.
@RadioFreeNorthwest I want to point out that this isn’t some POS piece of research but it’s Nyborg’s work using the national longitudinal study. you can tell someone’s IQ class and category of occupation from their religion. So there is an even higher correlatin between lack of success and religion than there is between IQ and religiosity.
@Bkozelka29 None of these will work – no. we know the ‘one true religion’ so to speak – and the catholic church could have completed the transition to it, and completed the unification of aryan and jew. The problem is providing the incentives to produce that one true religion when in competition with so many false religions. It may be necessary to start it as education, and let the one true religion evolve out of the celebrations of the ‘truth’ in that education. That seems about ‘right’.
@Sylivie You mean that Christianity, particularly fundamentalist Protestantism, provides the common person with insulation from status pressure and competition by differences in knowledge and understanding of the world – and consequently, from responsibility for knowledge and understanding of the world – and consequently, from the evolution of the self, the family, the economy, the community, the polity. God spoke one word that the entire universe despends upon: “Evolve”. Abraham gave the jews one command: destroy god’s word, god’s work, and God’s plan, by undermining the evolution of knowledge, undermining the evolution of man, and thereby undermining the ascent of man. In other words, Abraham was a devil, and the jews were his prophets.
@MapleCurtain@RadioFreeNorthwest FACT: There is a consistent IQ difference between christian sects, and JW is the dumbest (church of england the highest). I would like to see a larger data set but it’s almost certain that it’s correct.
@The Propertarian Institute “You would have to define the means of causality of parallel processing.”Considering the means of “force across empty space” has never been addressed by scientists, yu0r request for a causality laundry-list from a random internet commenter seems just a bit overambitious to say the least.
To: @xxxYYZxxx
I use the internet to run tests (king of the hill games), because my specialty, quite accidentally, is the logic of human ignorance, error, bias, fictionalism and deceit. Which is why I”m running the test against you folks. In your case (as I have said in the past) I’m testing your malinvestment. Because it’s similar to the Christian malinvestment: “If it turns out you’re half right, will you modify the half you’re wrong about?” The answer is almost always no in a gradient from those whose status depends upon it to those whose status is not. (Yours is and you’re reacting to my ‘sciencing’ of your cult as a threat to your status and self-image. This is the same effect as the addiction response. Or rather the addiction response is an artificially induced version of this informational induced threat to your status.)
As for force across empty space, (a) there is no such thing as empty space since space is produced by the continuous emergence and collapse of the quantum field. The energy of the quantum field is tens of orders of magnitude above any other energy density. (b) we have the math and evidence of how information is transmitted across that field (c) we have a full description of the hierarchy that can emerge from the quantum field and as others have said somewhat elegantly, ‘there is no room for any other information to exist or pass – so all ‘woo woo’ claims of magical information transmission have been permanently falsified.
You might want to interject that we don’t know the origin of the quantum field, but that is not true – the dipole effects are the only method of release (creating space time) of an organization of information under pressure. We just do not know if it’s possible to have existence be a meaningful term in the absence of that field. That said, a few lost generations of physicists due to mathematical pseudoscience aside (string theorists), we were ‘done’ with the overall story of the structure of the universe in 1991.
Like I said. If you can’t explain it operationally you don’t understand it. If contronted with operational explanations you evade it and do not reform, we are left only with that you have a motive to lie even if you lack the means.
And for unaccomplished young men cheap status by fictional claims of the pretense of knowledge has a long history back into shamanism. Or as we prefer: hucksterism. Or more simply ‘bulshitters’.
@The Propertarian Institute “You would have to define the means of causality of parallel processing.”Considering the means of “force across empty space” has never been addressed by scientists, yu0r request for a causality laundry-list from a random internet commenter seems just a bit overambitious to say the least.
To: @xxxYYZxxx
I use the internet to run tests (king of the hill games), because my specialty, quite accidentally, is the logic of human ignorance, error, bias, fictionalism and deceit. Which is why I”m running the test against you folks. In your case (as I have said in the past) I’m testing your malinvestment. Because it’s similar to the Christian malinvestment: “If it turns out you’re half right, will you modify the half you’re wrong about?” The answer is almost always no in a gradient from those whose status depends upon it to those whose status is not. (Yours is and you’re reacting to my ‘sciencing’ of your cult as a threat to your status and self-image. This is the same effect as the addiction response. Or rather the addiction response is an artificially induced version of this informational induced threat to your status.)
As for force across empty space, (a) there is no such thing as empty space since space is produced by the continuous emergence and collapse of the quantum field. The energy of the quantum field is tens of orders of magnitude above any other energy density. (b) we have the math and evidence of how information is transmitted across that field (c) we have a full description of the hierarchy that can emerge from the quantum field and as others have said somewhat elegantly, ‘there is no room for any other information to exist or pass – so all ‘woo woo’ claims of magical information transmission have been permanently falsified.
You might want to interject that we don’t know the origin of the quantum field, but that is not true – the dipole effects are the only method of release (creating space time) of an organization of information under pressure. We just do not know if it’s possible to have existence be a meaningful term in the absence of that field. That said, a few lost generations of physicists due to mathematical pseudoscience aside (string theorists), we were ‘done’ with the overall story of the structure of the universe in 1991.
Like I said. If you can’t explain it operationally you don’t understand it. If contronted with operational explanations you evade it and do not reform, we are left only with that you have a motive to lie even if you lack the means.
And for unaccomplished young men cheap status by fictional claims of the pretense of knowledge has a long history back into shamanism. Or as we prefer: hucksterism. Or more simply ‘bulshitters’.
Dr Wolff from Democracy Now on Capitalism vs Fascism (but not vs communism)
As always, Wolff is intentionally evading the reason for the development of Fascism – as a NATIONAL defense against INTERNATIONAL Communism, given that RULE OF LAW (capitalism) opened the door to international communism (like it has here in the west again in pomo-pc-woke form), and that it is international communism that was responsible for the terrors of the debate between the three poles of political preference.
Wolf is a subtle underminer (sedition) of rule of law because he and his tradition holds the false belief that a group of human professional executives could do better. The point of rule of law is that all humans are the same, and equally corruptible, and deterministically abusive of power. The frailty in western civilization is nothing to do with capitalism – which like communism or anarchism cannot exist – is that we didn’t complete the rule of law program by prohibiting the set of crimes possible using ‘words and money’: free riding, rent-seeking, privatization of common gains and socialization of losses, and false promises that bait into a hazard. What would happen if we did? It would be very clear who undermined western civ, who created the present crisis, and how easily it was to fix it, and how rapidly the working and middle classes would be rescued from their current re-imposition of serfdom by ‘experts’.
Dr. Wolff at democracy now shows how storytelling (overloading), pilpul (sophistry), and critique (undermining) and suggestion (deception), and false promise (baiting into a hazard) of alternatives to rule of law – constraining both commoners and professional ‘elites’ can be used to deceive the public with ease, and under the guise of ‘democracy’ advance the interests of globalists, who are nothing more than predators on western civilization’s accumulated capital and the means by which we accumulated that capital – and no other civilization did: the reciprocal insurance, by force of arms, of self-determination, by self-determined means, using sovereignty in demonstrated interests, and reciprocity in display, word, and deed, thereby limiting us to productive, voluntary cooperation adversarial markets in all walks of life whether associative, cooperative, productive, reproductive, commons, polities, or wars.
The dirty secret of western civilization is that this formula – the group strategy of western civilization – is the most consistent, correspondent and coherent with the laws of the universe (including the formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary), and as such is the most rapidly innovative and adaptive of all civilization. This explains the bronze age expansion of the Indo-Europeans, the iron age of the Mediterranean, and the steel age of the north sea peoples. And that across these ages, the Europeans have dragged primitive mankind, whether African, South Eurasian, Indian, and now East Asian, out of their failure by 800ad, to discover and adapt to those laws. Why? Because the cost of adapting to those laws is the continuation of natural selection by the suppression of the reproduction of those unfit for the constant stress of constant adaptation: the underclasses. The development of Every civilization was halted by the expansion of the underclass – and justified by the elites that parasitically depended upon them.
The entire sequence of the marxist, neo-Marxist, postmodernist, pc-woke, anti-west&anti-white movement is simply a revolt against darwin’s explanation for the disproportionate rate of evolution of Europeans compared to all other civilizations. And in particular a revolt against the abuse of this strategy by the germans during the second world war. Ergo this is the reason for the vast expansion of pseudoscience begun by Marx, Boas, Freud, Bohr, and Cantor, exacerbated by the Frankfurt School, Gould, Lewontin, only refuted in the past decade by economics, genetics, neuroscience, and what passes for artificial intelligence. In and of itself, Democracy is the slow path to communist tyranny, decline, and death.
The maximum value of democracy is the middle class (people who produce) voting to veto the members of the government for their policy failure under rule of law. There is no wisdom of crowds. There is wisdom only in a tradition held by those crowds. And even so, there is no durable wisdom in any tradition other than the scientific rule – rule of law by the European traditional natural law – and all other traditions failed by 800ad. No man is a hero to his debtors. No civilization is a hero to its debtors.
Dr Wolff from Democracy Now on Capitalism vs Fascism (but not vs communism)
As always, Wolff is intentionally evading the reason for the development of Fascism – as a NATIONAL defense against INTERNATIONAL Communism, given that RULE OF LAW (capitalism) opened the door to international communism (like it has here in the west again in pomo-pc-woke form), and that it is international communism that was responsible for the terrors of the debate between the three poles of political preference.
Wolf is a subtle underminer (sedition) of rule of law because he and his tradition holds the false belief that a group of human professional executives could do better. The point of rule of law is that all humans are the same, and equally corruptible, and deterministically abusive of power. The frailty in western civilization is nothing to do with capitalism – which like communism or anarchism cannot exist – is that we didn’t complete the rule of law program by prohibiting the set of crimes possible using ‘words and money’: free riding, rent-seeking, privatization of common gains and socialization of losses, and false promises that bait into a hazard. What would happen if we did? It would be very clear who undermined western civ, who created the present crisis, and how easily it was to fix it, and how rapidly the working and middle classes would be rescued from their current re-imposition of serfdom by ‘experts’.
Dr. Wolff at democracy now shows how storytelling (overloading), pilpul (sophistry), and critique (undermining) and suggestion (deception), and false promise (baiting into a hazard) of alternatives to rule of law – constraining both commoners and professional ‘elites’ can be used to deceive the public with ease, and under the guise of ‘democracy’ advance the interests of globalists, who are nothing more than predators on western civilization’s accumulated capital and the means by which we accumulated that capital – and no other civilization did: the reciprocal insurance, by force of arms, of self-determination, by self-determined means, using sovereignty in demonstrated interests, and reciprocity in display, word, and deed, thereby limiting us to productive, voluntary cooperation adversarial markets in all walks of life whether associative, cooperative, productive, reproductive, commons, polities, or wars.
The dirty secret of western civilization is that this formula – the group strategy of western civilization – is the most consistent, correspondent and coherent with the laws of the universe (including the formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary), and as such is the most rapidly innovative and adaptive of all civilization. This explains the bronze age expansion of the Indo-Europeans, the iron age of the Mediterranean, and the steel age of the north sea peoples. And that across these ages, the Europeans have dragged primitive mankind, whether African, South Eurasian, Indian, and now East Asian, out of their failure by 800ad, to discover and adapt to those laws. Why? Because the cost of adapting to those laws is the continuation of natural selection by the suppression of the reproduction of those unfit for the constant stress of constant adaptation: the underclasses. The development of Every civilization was halted by the expansion of the underclass – and justified by the elites that parasitically depended upon them.
The entire sequence of the marxist, neo-Marxist, postmodernist, pc-woke, anti-west&anti-white movement is simply a revolt against darwin’s explanation for the disproportionate rate of evolution of Europeans compared to all other civilizations. And in particular a revolt against the abuse of this strategy by the germans during the second world war. Ergo this is the reason for the vast expansion of pseudoscience begun by Marx, Boas, Freud, Bohr, and Cantor, exacerbated by the Frankfurt School, Gould, Lewontin, only refuted in the past decade by economics, genetics, neuroscience, and what passes for artificial intelligence. In and of itself, Democracy is the slow path to communist tyranny, decline, and death.
The maximum value of democracy is the middle class (people who produce) voting to veto the members of the government for their policy failure under rule of law. There is no wisdom of crowds. There is wisdom only in a tradition held by those crowds. And even so, there is no durable wisdom in any tradition other than the scientific rule – rule of law by the European traditional natural law – and all other traditions failed by 800ad. No man is a hero to his debtors. No civilization is a hero to its debtors.