@Deplorme@alternative_right Who defines ‘rights’?
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-09 18:01:00 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106903008729382570
Source: Original Site Post
-
@Deplorme @alternative_right Define human rights. 😉
@Deplorme@alternative_right Define human rights. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-09 17:48:18 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106902958770146560
-
@Deplorme @alternative_right A rather sophistic and possibly stupid response. We
@Deplorme@alternative_right A rather sophistic and possibly stupid response. We do not disagree on the one natural right to self-determination by self-determined means, by sovereignty in demonstrated interests, and reciprocity in display word and deed. We disagree on ‘human rights’ – go ahead and try to enumerate them. We disagree on what violates them. We disagree on wht constitutes a right vs an obligation, and what is inalienable. We disagree on the nature and malleability of man. We disagree on the good, the useful, and the bad. We only agree on the obvious and trivial – yet cooperation at scale and the tendency of man to justify his parsasitisms and to live at the margin of moral norms lead to non-trivial conflicts. So you have your personal illusion of what ‘rights’ consist of but do you have an equally personal illusion of what obligations and inalienations result from them? I doubt you have anything more than animal intuition, accumulated by accident and indoctrination. And that if you can even make such a statement as you have, that you must be profoundly ignorant of this world, and possibly indoctrinated into magical thinking.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-09 17:21:55 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106902855032363607
-
@Deplorme @alternative_right If, in the end, we require a means of decidability,
@Deplorme@alternative_right If, in the end, we require a means of decidability, in matters of conflict, whether positive or negative, how then shall such decisions be made, and conflict whether due to ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, or deceit be avoided?
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-09 16:37:21 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106902679794946952
-
I AVOID THE VAXX TOPIC I avoid it the Vaxx Topic. It’s radioactive, because it’s
I AVOID THE VAXX TOPIC
I avoid it the Vaxx Topic. It’s radioactive, because it’s politicized – and politicized for the same reason that AGW was politicized. Why? It’s now a moral issue. And everyone – without exception – doubles down on their moral biases. Once a matter is moral it’s not scientific. So trying to use science or morality, only demonizes both science and the opposition’s morality.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-08 22:57:05 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106898510651475607
-
@kaosktrl Therapy is a white people thing. Why do you so many white people need
@kaosktrl Therapy is a white people thing. Why do you so many white people need therapy? 😉 Why do so many people like you deny you’re seeking therapy?
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-08 22:31:06 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106898408519529739
-
@kaosktrl I’m whiter than you. 😉
@kaosktrl I’m whiter than you. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-08 22:29:50 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106898403491750961
-
THE FINAL PILL: THE SEMITIC REVOLT AGAINST THE INDO EUROPEAN CIVILIZATIONS Islam
THE FINAL PILL: THE SEMITIC REVOLT AGAINST THE INDO EUROPEAN CIVILIZATIONS
Islam then is the feminization of the male strategy, and the infantilization of the female strategy. Judaism was invented to rebel, Christianity to undermine, Islam to destroy. All three are a war against the indo european discovery of paternalism, and the continuous evolution of man.
“This might be the final pill to swallow before a full awakening.”
The Semitic Invention Of The Big Lie: Seduction: baiting into the hazard of submission and ignorance by the false promise of freedom from evolutionary laws.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-08 22:29:06 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106898400623744118
-
THE ENEMY DOESNT USE TRUTH Note how European demand for truth before face, truth
THE ENEMY DOESNT USE TRUTH
Note how European demand for truth before face, truth in public, truth in trade, truth in court, truth in confession, constrain impulsive display word and deed, and constrain virtue signaling to works rather than words.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-08 22:13:05 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106898337653089335
-
THE ENEMY DESIRES ATTENTION Note how much the enemy desires attention – to be li
THE ENEMY DESIRES ATTENTION
Note how much the enemy desires attention – to be listened to – so that they can use storytelling, baiting-into-hazard, suspension of disbelief, pilpul, critique, and suggestion, to achieve their deception without making a constructivist argument open to rational testing:testimony.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-08 22:12:46 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106898336441051369