Next podcast: “Our Civilization’s Next Great Enterprise.”
Long, deep, and, … renders judgement.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-19 17:16:00 UTC
Next podcast: “Our Civilization’s Next Great Enterprise.”
Long, deep, and, … renders judgement.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-19 17:16:00 UTC
FROM PM
POSSIBILITY ONE:
Confusing two hierarchies.
Right and Wrong are higher categories.
Right: righteous, moral, ethical, amoral.
Wrong: evil, Immoral, unethical, amoral
POSSIBILITY TWO
One hierarchy creating ambiguity
Right: righteous, moral, ethical, reciprocal, right, amoral.
Wrong: evil, Immoral, unethical, criminal, wrong, amoral
BOTH
Both converge on the amoral
Both treat right and wrong as minor infractions.
SUGGESTION
I would suggest keeping categories of right and wrong and the subcategories within them.
-hugs
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-19 17:04:00 UTC
Five very eloquent people you don’t want to miss:
Predmetsky Rosenborg
Scott De Warren
Andrew M Gilmour
Daniel Gurpide
James Krieger
These people are well educated and their thoughts worth capture.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-19 09:43:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/93435467_261279501936877_3057175034305970176_o_261279495270211.jpg Ok. That’s funny. It’s true. It’s funny.Ok. That’s funny. It’s true. It’s funny.

Source date (UTC): 2020-04-19 09:08:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/94038625_261278908603603_1884160792220139520_o_261278905270270.jpg SEE, IT’S NOT JUST ME.
Data is data is data.SEE, IT’S NOT JUST ME.
Data is data is data.

Source date (UTC): 2020-04-19 09:07:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/93795925_261247458606748_3241060253743185920_n_261247455273415.jpg I’M A PRACTITIONER OF CYCLES
—“Curt, What do you think of Peter Turchin’s Work”—
Well I’m a practitioner, right? So I don’t know how to make a higher endorsement than that.
Turchin, Kondratiev, Strauss and Howe, Caroll, Toynbee, Spenger, Durant … I mean, my model is a little lower level, meaning military, economic, and demographic, rather than statistical, so I tend to think in supply demand curves rather than statistical correlations, but I’m not just a follower but a practitioner.I’M A PRACTITIONER OF CYCLES
—“Curt, What do you think of Peter Turchin’s Work”—
Well I’m a practitioner, right? So I don’t know how to make a higher endorsement than that.
Turchin, Kondratiev, Strauss and Howe, Caroll, Toynbee, Spenger, Durant … I mean, my model is a little lower level, meaning military, economic, and demographic, rather than statistical, so I tend to think in supply demand curves rather than statistical correlations, but I’m not just a follower but a practitioner.

Source date (UTC): 2020-04-19 08:17:00 UTC
There are a small number of optimum houses: the longhouse (cold rural family), the manor-house(porches, large farm, multi-generation), the courtyard house(suburban multi-generation), the townhouse with shared courtyard (mult-generation), the paris-house (apartments) with shared courtyard and boulevards.
I find the whole open-concept return to longhouses interesting and obvious. It’s the optimum.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-19 08:06:00 UTC
—“I actually think Johannesburg represents the future. My version of what I think the world is going to become looks like Johannesburg.”— Neil Blomkamp
Exactly.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 18:25:00 UTC
Most political conflict would rapidly dissipate if maintaining a checking account, accounting, basic economics, business economics, and macro economics was taught early in life. And if basic contracts were taught early in life. And if economic history were taught early in life.
There is a reason they don’t teach it.
So the state can lie.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 15:45:00 UTC
—“That’s what it always comes down to, freedom from consequences. The false promise of freedom from consequences is baiting into hazard as ignoring consequences must necessarily result in destruction.”—Andrew M Gilmour
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 15:43:00 UTC