—This aligns nicely with the post war world order: an end of history, promise of unlimited growth… “when globalism is complete, our debts will be paid”—Bill JoslinUpdated Apr 21, 2020, 11:50 AM
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 11:50:00 UTC
Source: Facebook
-
SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION REDUCTION OF COGNITIVE LOAD —“Given that it takes a substa
SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION REDUCTION OF COGNITIVE LOAD
—“Given that it takes a substantial degree of general knowledge to comprehend how “social constructions ” exist largely as a reflection (expression) of biology (and the subsequent distributions that occur when variation of biology interact), social construction theory alleviates the cognitive load required. it is sociological fast food – the cheap and easy fix for ignorance…. you get what you pay for…”—Bill Joslin
—“(it’s cultural beer goggles)”— Brandon Hayes
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 11:48:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/94496573_263104145087746_22261217675
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/94496573_263104145087746_2226121767590559744_o_263104138421080.jpg
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 11:47:00 UTC
-
“HOPIUM” by Will Benge I just realized why the Roman system experienced its firs
“HOPIUM”
by Will Benge
I just realized why the Roman system experienced its first minor slippage – which led to the major, and then collapse: the great minds had, perhaps desperately, assumed ( by wishful thinking) their globetrotting would furnish requisite precious metals or equivalent.
And thusly their money “issues” would absolve. And they’d escape the creditor vice, the pike and the jailor.
Which explains why they sent their army to so many formidable places, as warranty for the same.
Hopium: The drug of the desperate.
===
The celts were not poor.
They were metalworkers, and lived well.
And therefore the celtic holocaust.
The Carthaginians were not poor.
They were merchants, with a navy, and lived well.
And therefore the carthaginian holocaust.
The Greeks were not poor.
They were Merchants and Warriors, and lived well.
And therefore the Greek conquest.
The Middle Eastern aristocracy was not poor.
They were despots that taxed production and trade, and lived well.
And therefore the conquest of the Persian empire.
etc.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 09:08:00 UTC
-
THE INCENTIVE FOR SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION —Social construction requires a false pr
THE INCENTIVE FOR SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
—Social construction requires a false promise. The only viable false promises that scale for social construction are those that violate physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. Violating those laws baits the victims into hazard by violating those laws.—
(worth repeating) (important)
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 09:02:00 UTC
-
IS THE BIG LIE ULTIMATELY JUST SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM? Pretty much. Social constr
IS THE BIG LIE ULTIMATELY JUST SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM?
Pretty much. Social construction is how the big lies are created. But let’s go a little deeper and understand why.
—-“Among the most intriguing ideas for improving fairness in our economy–and creating capitalism that earns popular support–is “universal basic capital.” Spread the equity, give all a stake. “—Jonathan Haidt @JonHaidt
https://berggruen.org/the-worldpost/articles/sharing-the-wealth-as-we-recover-health/
Consensus, getting heads together, leadership, these are all village-thinking. The female intuition doesn’t scale. We have institutions and rule of law of tort for a reason – it scales, at the cost of suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, keeping natural selection.
It wasn’t europeans that developed global religion, global marxism, global socialism, global cosmopolitanism, global postmodernism, global hbd-denialism, or europeans that undermined rule of law.
It was feminine intuition, and people of it, that cannot scale.
—” is the big lie ultimately just social constructivism?
So they try to do social engineering that achieves nothing except psychologically abusing people.”—
Social construction yes. Social construction requires a false promise. The only viable false promises that scale are those that violate physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. Violating those laws baits the victims into hazard.
Female social construction > ((())) > The Left.
Female Social Construction to Manage behavioral growth of children, using her seduction > The ((())) group strategy (undermining host peoples, while riding on their commons) > The Anti Evolutionary (domestication) Canon: Freud, Boas, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida, Trotsky-Kristol.
So if ((())) war on western-sensemaking, our realism, naturalism, operationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity, testimony, commons, and eugenics, is a continuation of their ancient world rebellion against the masculine empires, and an involuntary rebellion against evolution-eugenics.
This means if it’s genetic, as it is in our women,it’s irreparable, and separation is the only possibility. If it’s purely cultural (doesn’t appear to be) then it’s a matter of separating from their culture. Either way we have to outlaw it by requiring truthful reciprocal speech.
Which is the purpose of my work on the law: to end the repeatedly successful use of abrahamic technique at destroying civilizations from within by false promise, baiting into hazard, selling to vulnerable women and the underclasses, and reversing east and west eugenics.
We don’t need to increase ‘fairness’ or ‘social justice’ neither of which are either definable or measureable, but we need to return to suppression of the reproduction of those that cannot compete in the suite of market tests at whatever level of development that we’re in.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 08:08:00 UTC
-
(little old lady) me: (laughing) her: “What? Tell me.” me: “Another female fan.
(little old lady)
me: (laughing)
her: “What? Tell me.”
me: “Another female fan. Unsolicited photos.”
her: “I don’t think you’d survive that.”
me: “I’m not sure I care. It’s the only way to go.”
her: “she’s probably psycho. she’d have to be.”
me: “Those women have their uses.”
her: (sigh) (eye roll)
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 07:48:00 UTC
-
The problem is getting the rest of the world into middle class manners, ethics,
The problem is getting the rest of the world into middle class manners, ethics, morals, and values. We can only do that if the self, the family, and the commons are equally valued and defended regardless of class. The minute you give up on your other classes you give up on the commons. The same is true for heterogeneity. Create conflict between groups and we give up on the commons, and devolve to self and family.
—“There are more books published in Spanish in any one year than there have been in the entire history of Arab publishing.”—
Feminine, present, experiential civilization.
There are very few arab intellectuals. Those few, say some version of the same thing “we live in our emotions not in our reason, we can read but we are still illiterate, we have freedom but no discipline.”
This is the problem with ritual-cultures. it’s extremely successful at solving the problem of social insecurity (mindfulness). It only solves part of the problem and amplifies the rest by making agency impossible.
Same for fundamentalism in christianity: it makes wonderful citizens and families – perhaps the best in the world – and prepares people for commercial society – but at the cost of needing a parental martial empirical aristocracy to defend, rule, and govern them.
One of the reasons the french lost to the english was the combination of their effeminacy and excessive faith – the same excessive effeminacy and faith that they demonstrate today. (although you have to read letters from the period prior to agincourt to see how faith-insane they were.)
The hindus remain caste-and-family, on the effeminate side, and socially lazy and irresponsible – so they are wonderful people lacking the hostility of the muslims, but can’t end familial corruption endemic in the society, nor do they have the military like the west and china to enforce policy so that a non-corrupt bureaucracy can evolve.
I don’t complain about the chinese and koreans other than their women are as spoiled and hyper-consumptive and civilization destroying as western women and their males are further gone than western men because they were further gone in the first place.
The upper middle and lower upper classes around the world are all the same. This is because we are not lacking in competitive ability, or dependent upon equally ignorant or uncompetitive peers for information and opinion.
Without the militia men WILL NOT OWN THE COMMONS.
From there, everything falls apart.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 07:40:00 UTC
-
KOTKIN. (ie: more support for my theory that cities will be plantations or ghett
https://quillette.com/2020/03/25/the-coming-age-of-dispersion/IMPORTANT – KOTKIN.
(ie: more support for my theory that cities will be plantations or ghettos)
https://quillette.com/2020/03/25/the-coming-age-of-dispersion/Updated Apr 20, 2020, 9:26 PM
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-20 21:26:00 UTC
-
The five female erotic archetypes: “vampire, werewolf, pirate, surgeon, billiona
The five female erotic archetypes: “vampire, werewolf, pirate, surgeon, billionaire”
Sigh.
Cheerleader. Arsty chick. or Nerdy girl. Waaaay easier.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-20 18:59:00 UTC