Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • PATERNAL REBUKE OF THE INFANTILIZED (worth repeating) (rebuke) We are not equal.

    PATERNAL REBUKE OF THE INFANTILIZED

    (worth repeating) (rebuke)

    We are not equal. We can engage in reciprocity. In doing so we can engage in reciprocal loyalty and insurance. But the weak are not equal to the strong, the woman to the man, the child to the adult. That is why we must have reciprocity to cooperate despite our differences.

    The purpose of what you [theology, philosophy, ideology] and those like you desire is to use saturation in falsehood to socially construct emotional cognitive political and military arrested development. And to drag mankind down to your level of infantile primitivism.

    Where the aristocracy took the opposite position: can we drag mankind kicking and screaming from easily manipulable female infantilism to maintain her ability to cheaply manipulate, into young adulthood to question her with philosophy, to agency with which we can rule with evidence and action, over the infants, infantile, young, limited, and those of arrested development.

    And yes I realize that indoctrination, choice, and truth constitute of spectrum of child, young adult, mature adult. And I recognize that there is value in theology for children, reason for young adults, and truth for adults – because mirrors the possible intellectual development of the mind. I also know that I am working in the language of adults, not young adults and women, or child.

    If you can calculate it’s science, if you can’t it’s philosophy. I do operational law. It’s calculable. Just as mathematics is the formal logic of the physical, operational law is the formal logic of sentient life.

    The only reason I use the framework of philosophy is, by design, to destroy philosophy with operationalism, as our ancestors destroyed theology empiricism. The only thing for philosophy now is choice within the limits of truth. The only thing left for theology is indoctrination into mindfulness within the group strategy independent of choice or truth. As far as I know philosophy is done. What remains as philosophy is but the history of the development of secular theology. If you understand that paragraph you will understand what I have done.

    Are these statements arrogant as if between equals, or truth from parent to youth, or teacher to student? One is only arrogant if he both errs and is equal. One is merely disciplining if one is parent and unequal.

    -Quod Erat Demonstrandum

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-17 11:01:00 UTC

  • Just as french write informal universalist secular theology of the feminine, and

    Just as french write informal universalist secular theology of the feminine, and germans write formal universalist philosophy that is secular theology of harmony, the russians write masculine very informal nationalist propaganda as a secular theology of the masculine. These are the result of geographic location and cultural history.

    While yes my implementation of rule of law is pretty intolerant, and I jokingly refer to my work as either rule of law fascism or market fascism, and while I advocate for nationalism, and restoration of the anglosphere – remains of the british empire – to create the scale necessary for preservation of the defense of the sea trade between our continents – my work is also in large part dispassionate.

    So where duggin has his ambitions, writes, speaks, and argues passionately and romantically in what I consider nonsense-propaganda, I write in pretty rigorous analytic argument dispassionately and unromantically. And this lack of romance and passion – my anglo empiricism – is not what the passionate market wants me wo write. What the young passionate male mind wants is an heroic and often esoteric secular-religious vision. Yet I’m just updating the founding fathers, with their formality and martial reserve.

    So in that sense whether french feminine passive aggressive essay, german rational inspirational harmony, russian low trust machismo, and anglo high trust empirical, and chinese face-before-truth authoritarian, or jewish feminine undermining using magical thinking to bait into hazard, we are all arguing for our futures in a world returning to normal after a century of jewish intellectual pseudoscience and sophistry in marxism, syndicalism, postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism, neoconservatism – a sequence of attempts by the jewish counter-revolution against the empirical revolution and it’s darwinian consequences. They sought to capture europa for their ends just as the french, germans, and russians sought to capture it for their ends. They have failed. Or it will be evident shortly that they failed.

    So I see the world differently, that we are all turning to the masculine defense of our peoples and cultures after the undermining and destruction of the leftist feminine attempts to use european wealth, and christian tolerance, to turn the world into another middle eastern equalitarian desert under totalitarian feminine presumption that knitting-circle consensus and harmony is possible, or that continued knitting circle gossip and undermining among usurers of our civilization is possible. It isn’t. It’s Magical thinking.Updated Apr 17, 2020, 7:54 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-17 07:54:00 UTC

  • ROVING LIBERAL PARASITES —“Voters drain the liberal states they live in then m

    ROVING LIBERAL PARASITES

    —“Voters drain the liberal states they live in then move the more conservative States and drain those dates and move again roaming parasites.”—Corey Ihler

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-17 07:18:00 UTC

  • “CURT WHAT ABOUT SOCIALISM” Define how you use the term socialism. I’m assuming

    “CURT WHAT ABOUT SOCIALISM”

    Define how you use the term socialism. I’m assuming you mean european socialism (french-german) not jewish socialism (jewish russian).

    Socialism means state control of the means of production.

    Mixed economy means using the borrowing power of the state to strategically finance what the private sector cannot or will not.

    My opinion is the same as most major economists – that the state does not capture the proceeds of those investments and return them to the common people.

    My opinion is that we should finance repatriation of all non-trivial industry AND automate the heck out of it, and that the state should take non-voting interest in these companies and demand dividends as income for the people.

    My opinion is that the financial sector is predatory and that consumer credit should be purely statistical and direct from the treasury eliminating all rent seeking from the financial sector.

    My opinion is that liquidity necessary to generate demand should not be distributed to the financial sector for credit multipliers, but as cash distribution directly to citizens that business and finance compete for.

    My opinion is that education is largely wasted income other than the high end stem fields, and that all other schooling takes one year to two years non-resident at most.

    My opinion is that teaching and research staffs should be separate corporations with separate controls, and that phd and research programs should be well funded and largely state funded.

    My opinion is that the military used to fund basic research, and that presently, basic research must be faked under medical or non-military, when in general the state should treat investment in research as a venture capitalists, seeking returns for the polity in longer time horizons than other peoples.

    My opinion is that the best education in the world should be offered to all citizens from the best educators in the world, and that this should be a continuous process, and it should cost almost nothing (200 per course or something)

    My opinion is that if universities admit students that if the student doesn’t compete two years or transfer the university eats the money. And that the university carries the loan entirely, even if the loan is borrow by the university from the government.

    My opinion is that if we did this we’d be back to one income households just fine.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-16 22:32:00 UTC

  • LOYALTY (from elsewhere) Very smart fellow and intellectually honest. Pleasure d

    LOYALTY

    (from elsewhere)

    Very smart fellow and intellectually honest. Pleasure discussing this with you.

    —“When I brought up the religiosity of the US founders I was referring only to a very basic common principle: that morality, and its subgenre of political law, must be grounded in God by a logical necessity (hence the ‘God-given’ ‘inalienable rights’). This is a philosophical truth that Catholicism specifically built into European civ. and consequently handed down to our Protestant and Deist founders”–

    Well, it’s in our law which predates christianity by over two thousand years.

    Christian: God has given us his son jesus as his prophet, and first among his laws is to live in imitation of jesus and according to his teachings – teachings we call christian morality: to love thy neighbor as thyself,

    Deist: God has given us the evidence of his hand: the physical laws of nature(the physical sciences), the natural law of reciprocity (morality), the law of christian love (christianity), and the law of evolutionary necessity (transcendence).

    Scientist: Whether a god exists or not these are the laws evident in the universe: the physical laws of nature(the physical sciences), the natural law of reciprocity (morality), the law of seduction into reciprocity (christianity), and the law of evolutionary necessity (transcendence).

    The human brain evolved to distribute between feminine and empathic to raise children in small numbers and masculine and systematizing to govern polities in large numbers. Each of us regardless of sex, has a mix of feminine and masculine intuitions. For those of you with more feminine cognition, the empathic is necessary – you must feel the spirituality. For those of us who are in the middle – practical – we must only undrestand that the norm works and imitate it. For those of us who are entirely masculine, we feel nothing, find faith childish, find norms arbitrary, and seek the science in faith and norm – because we cannot feel, we cannot just imitate, we can only calculate.

    Throughout our history we have practiced Trifunctionalism: The martial aristocracy, the Religion of the Faithful, and the Judicial law to resolve our differences. We have always had three leadership groups: violence, law, and faith. Women and the faithful cannot think as men. Men and the empirical cannot think as women and the faithful. But by obeying the judicial law we can still cooperate despite our thinking.

    There is no place for truth in faith or it would not be faith. There is no place for faith in truth or it would not be truth. There is no place for violence in either. As such we are left with the law to judge our differences.

    Men and women can be loyal to one another. Men and women of feminine mind can marry. Men and women of practical mind can marry. Men and women of systematizing mind can marry. And under our law any combination in between – because loyalty is enough.

    Likewise the faithful, judicial, and martial can be loyal to one another.

    As we always have been. And both succeed.

    Or we cannot and both fail.

    And my name is Caesar so to speak. And my job is the law. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-16 21:15:00 UTC

  • I remember when I was first struck by what was going wrong. It was in the early

    I remember when I was first struck by what was going wrong. It was in the early 80’s. Long enough for the false promises of the sixties and seventies to become presumptions, long enough for people to intuit something wasn’t right, but not long enough for them to be falsified. … It’s early summer. A woman was pushing a stroller across the street on Farmington avenue. I don’t know why but I understood from her body language something wasn’t right. And then I started seeing it everywhere. That nagging feeling that we should be happy but we aren’t.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-16 19:42:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/93841616_259096468821847_34811546378

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/93841616_259096468821847_3481154637896089600_o_259096462155181.jpg Some things are worth wearing a tux for.Some things are worth wearing a tux for.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-16 19:15:00 UTC

  • ( When I listen to other couples talk I wonder why anyone in america gets marrie

    ( When I listen to other couples talk I wonder why anyone in america gets married. What a bunch of ignorant, spoiled, self-indulgent, twits leading meaningless hamster-wheel lives, of obesity, virtue signaling, and social dysfunction from a failure to compete enough to learn to compromise. We don’t need man caves. We gotta build barracks for men so we can get away from the nests of harpies, and the harpies don’t have to deal with mansplaining they can’t understand anyway. It’s complete madness. I need to go back to eastern europe – western civ has gone mad. I can sit with a ukrainian woman in a cafe all day long with drinks and food, holding hands, chatting with friends, frittering time away on our phones, and sharing hugs and giggles and enjoying life like real human beings. America is full of addicts terrified of missing out on the next consumption signal, living in the world’s largest most elaborately decorated prison cells of their own making. These people are fking nuts. Really. )

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-16 19:14:00 UTC

  • Well, now, let’s see if adding a #twitter hashtag will trigger it. That’s fine.

    Well, now, let’s see if adding a #twitter hashtag will trigger it. That’s fine. I would rather not post everything.

    Dummy Text: It’s the completion of the scientific method – which almost certainly means nothing to most of you – and even if you think it does, I promise you that you don’t understand – because your understanding of the scientific method is almost certainly incomplete. I didn’t understand the scope of consequences that would result from completing it either. And that’s why Propertarianism is complicated: because the consequences of completing that method affect every discipline.

    And one of the other consequences is that it explains includes our present social and political conflict, and how to solve it. So the minimum reason you want to understand my work is to understand and perhaps solve the present conflict. And, hopefully, that’s enough to tempt you into following along with me. If it doesn’t then our current conflict is in even more desperate condition.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-16 18:56:00 UTC

  • Apr 16, 2020, 4:43 PM

    https://www.npr.org/2020/04/16/835343965/-a-perfect-storm-extremists-look-for-ways-to-exploit-coronavirus-pandemichttps://www.npr.org/2020/04/16/835343965/-a-perfect-storm-extremists-look-for-ways-to-exploit-coronavirus-pandemicUpdated Apr 16, 2020, 4:43 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-16 16:43:00 UTC