—“Damn I’ve been waiting for the perfect time for this question. Curt, whiskey recommendations?”—Roy Blackheart
First of all, ( 😉 ) it’s like selecting between slavic, german, scandinavian, and celtic women. It doesn’t matter. they’re all good.
However, some of them are better for drinking and some for tasting, and some with meals. In this order: Jack Daniels (is my ‘regular drink’ because it’s lincoln county process so no allergic reaction, and I have to take benadryl to drink the others), then Lagavulin (food), Laphroaig (snacks), Ardbeg (cigars). Always with one cube of ice and a splash of water. Sometimes with a pinch of sugar, depending on what I’m having it with.
I can drink Jack all night if I have water and coffee to drink with it as well.
Otherwise, my constitution does not appreciate these things as much as my soul, so I usually puke my guts out after five or six glasses and two cigars. But I don’t care. Its part of the ritual. Some people need a fast. I need to tie one on and pray to the porcelain gods.
—“there’s nothing more startling for an observant postmodern ‘humanist’ than the moment he discovers that he’s dealing with someone who thinks in terms of what *is* (and what todo about it) rather than what *should* be (and how to assure others believe it should too)”—Paweł Płachecki
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46133182_10156774325697264_8670522051217326080_n_10156774325692264.jpg (humor)Jon JonathanThe cucks can move south to England. They will fit in.Nov 12, 2018, 9:57 PMBill JoslinReverse and reinstate Hadrian’s wallNov 12, 2018, 10:15 PMIgor Surkanov”Sea or the middle east” is a great chant for the reconquistaNov 12, 2018, 10:56 PMJohn EdwardSea or sandNov 12, 2018, 11:27 PMIgor SurkanovJohn Edward much betterNov 12, 2018, 11:29 PMWilliam Black(humor)Nov 13, 2018, 1:09 AMVince Yoderall joking aside, there does need to be a separation of r-selected and K-selected peopleNov 13, 2018, 3:05 AMAlex MacleodI think they are water-adapted; they often have fishy names.Nov 13, 2018, 5:40 AMAlex MacleodI haven’t met all 70 million people, but I estimate that there are far more patriots in provincial England and far more cucks in rump Britannia, where most of the populace huddle in the firezone of Edinburgh and Glasgow, and are insensible to the Marxist hijack of party politics. If we see 1997 as Peak Cuck for the UK, and Scotland characteristically time-lagging, it’s tide may turn in a decade. Plus -Come on, -the whole UK is more neutered than even France.Nov 13, 2018, 6:11 AMAlex MacleodMillicent WillowsNov 13, 2018, 7:00 AM(humor)
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46133182_10156774325697264_8670522051217326080_n_10156774325692264.jpg (humor)Jon JonathanThe cucks can move south to England. They will fit in.Nov 12, 2018, 9:57 PMBill JoslinReverse and reinstate Hadrian’s wallNov 12, 2018, 10:15 PMIgor Surkanov”Sea or the middle east” is a great chant for the reconquistaNov 12, 2018, 10:56 PMJohn EdwardSea or sandNov 12, 2018, 11:27 PMIgor SurkanovJohn Edward much betterNov 12, 2018, 11:29 PMWilliam Black(humor)Nov 13, 2018, 1:09 AMVince Yoderall joking aside, there does need to be a separation of r-selected and K-selected peopleNov 13, 2018, 3:05 AMGreg StrangAs a Scot I have to disagree however we have what I would call a unique and challenging opportunity here.
Much of our underclasses are already heavily entrenched in “council estate” or similar ghetto areas, mostly across the central belt between & including Fife and Glasgow. Essentially the culture in these places is ready for a commune style r-selective society.
The hardest part of the speciation question IMO is not what a potential “we” do with a potential “them” after achieving whatever theoretical objectives prior, I actually think the herd should more or less be left to self organize as it will be ever changing in organization.
The question for me and the opportunity I see is in HOW we must organize and execute plans alongside others to create an independent frame or set of institutions / power structures / commons within the state of Scotland(UK) to allow a new class-like speciation based on the let us say lifestyle differences desired. The Highlands have many close knit communities and odd rural infrastructure with large amounts of undeveloped land particularly in mountainous zones. I also think there is a polarization within rural Scottish areas that one might find surprisingly open to a preceding ideological conversion campaign.
A combination of feudal rural politics and production combined with a propertarianism based central market economy run from a large mega-city could form the basis of the new infrastructure and the architectural form would be as important as the functional, this new Home serving as a beacon for the perrenniallists seeking a new order. Of course, building such a wonder seems insane, but is it not a fitting Home for the k-selected superhuman of the future?
Call me a dreamer but I felt like posting this stream of thought here this morning in case I hit on anything pertinent ;)Nov 13, 2018, 4:02 AMAlex MacleodI think they are water-adapted; they often have fishy names.Nov 13, 2018, 5:40 AMAlex MacleodI haven’t met all 70 million people, but I estimate that there are far more patriots in provincial England and far more cucks in rump Britannia, where most of the populace huddle in the firezone of Edinburgh and Glasgow, and are insensible to the Marxist hijack of party politics. If we see 1997 as Peak Cuck for the UK, and Scotland characteristically time-lagging, it’s tide may turn in a decade. Plus -Come on, -the whole UK is more neutered than even France.Nov 13, 2018, 6:11 AMAlex MacleodMillicent WillowsNov 13, 2018, 7:00 AM(humor)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93e8BOk2oOEPOSTMODERN ASS CLOWNS: MORE ON THE NONSENSE OF GENERATIVE ANTHROPOLOGY
Of course it’s nonsense. Postmodernism’s “Social Construction” + Chomsky’s Generative Grammar (From Turing) = “Generative anthropology”. A bit of wishful thinking masquerading as an “hypothesis” – a contrivance as means by which to advocate for Relativism, Undecidability, Arbitrary Truth, and Internal consistency without external correspondence.
In other words yet another iteration of the attempt by the literary, continental, theological, essayists and moral fictionalists (desperately in search of a science ) to continue their revolt against anglo empiricism, science, economics finance, law, and darwinian evolution given the series of failures of europeans to produce a fictional or mythological, or spiritual, pseudo rational, or pseudoscientific method via Derrida, foucault, Adorno et al, marx, boas, freud, rousseau, kant et al.
There is some (mentally unhealthy ) group of people that demand a continuous narrative dream world providing analogistic (literary) rather than descriptive (scientific, organic, mechanical), as a means of preserving the means of deception and coercion available when the narrative diverges from descriptive to analogical.
This divergence creates opportunity for the cunning to manipulate or deceive or provoke submission under pretense of knowledge that parents employ over children and professors over students and priests and politicians over adults.
All of postmodern thought seeks nothing more than to continue the priestly method of getting status, power, advantage and income from persuasion by these frauds. Alinsky is the most honest postmodernist. The rest are simply less honest.
In the case of Thomas and Spencer and crew this is just secular empty verbalism as a replacement for theology for the reasons I stated – because they lack insight into knowledge, policy, or process and invent fictions for themselves and others by which to sedate themselves and obtain attention from the … unsophisticated … as a cover for powerlessness alienation, and failure to compete seually, socially, economically, and politically.
Which means they are little different from the rest of the postmodern academy: publishing fairy stories as means of getting grants and selling nonsense courses to young women easily falling victim to non existent tragedies that can be rallied against verbally without surviving in the marke for a productive good. Pathetic really.
My argument is always the same. Separate the feminine/r-selected/herd/dysgenic pool from the masculine/k-selected/pack/eugenic pool. We are wealthy enough to afford the production of preferred but DIFFERENT commons, and if the dysgenic herd wants to produce their preferred commons and the eugenic pack wants to produce their preferred commons the only thing preventing both achieving their goals is the current monopoly commons. The solution is to separate (secede) and devolve normative regulation and commons production to the groups and let them speciate. The question MIGHT be race, but it’s not. It’s genetic strategy. The dysgenic and the eugenic. I’m perfectly happy if you folks want to construct india and brazil as long as those of us who want otherwise continue the western tradition of eugenic social order and continuous production of prosperity.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46201546_10156773963177264_7804203851711512576_n_10156773963172264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46003571_10156773963232264_278249366077046784_n_10156773963227264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46147274_10156773963307264_1440236687652290560_n_10156773963302264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45986512_10156773963402264_187061742889598976_n_10156773963397264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46059111_10156773963472264_7868449265310236672_n_10156773963467264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46124379_10156773963647264_187492863116836864_n_10156773963637264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46093252_10156773971407264_1038939411942735872_o_10156773971402264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46101417_10156773984882264_1392653294735720448_o_10156773984852264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46002442_10156774005477264_4966488550875856896_n_10156774005462264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46174807_10156774005757264_4053197492349566976_n_10156774005752264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46049040_10156774006387264_1881615019074912256_n_10156774006382264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46139976_10156774006572264_2252364588999770112_n_10156774006567264.jpg Greg HamiltonInteresting I’ve been doing genealogy and unbeknownst to me most my ancestors end up from Normandy and that upper green part of France
I was brought up thinking I was Irish and Scottish (and I am) I’m just a whole lot of Viking/Norman alsoNov 13, 2018, 2:21 PMCurt Doolittle(Same here)Nov 13, 2018, 3:38 PMGreg HamiltonLike most conquering peoples the Normans married into local ruling families.
You can see marriages across the “border”a decent amount to obviously end hostilities
Hence most the Irish, Scottish, and even the little Welsh blood I have.Nov 13, 2018, 3:50 PM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45981522_10156774006882264_555580631354966016_n_10156774006872264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46039330_10156774007112264_578697605630918656_n_10156774007092264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46030537_10156774008097264_1549148936495693824_n_10156774008092264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46030538_10156774008417264_4321074387852722176_o_10156774008407264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46253609_10156774008582264_2616270991826878464_n_10156774008577264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46003568_10156774010212264_6147140267016192000_n_10156774010207264.jpg Dan AltschuldHbdchick is 👍Nov 12, 2018, 8:29 PM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46113180_10156774010252264_5399877263875375104_o_10156774010247264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46118480_10156774010232264_7779446354547310592_n_10156774010227264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46043952_10156774010302264_983068145189126144_n_10156774010292264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46075107_10156774010332264_4012216013922762752_n_10156774010327264.jpg HBDCHICK’S SUMMARY OF BIPARTITE MANORIALISM AND ITS REACH
@hbdchick
the main feature of bipartite manorialism in medieval europe was the dual, conjoined arrangement of the central manor farm (the demesne) along with the attached individual farms of the tenants, with the tenants owing labor on the demesne (later rent)…
…tenants were independently responsible for the success of their own farms, i.e. w/the production of foodstuffs for themselves (to be self-sufficient iow) as well as for producing a certain amount of foods and products for the manor (agricultural, but also things like cloth)…
…another extremely important aspect of bipartite manorialism, tho, was the curious feature of *common* arable fields in which tenants were allotted certain furrows to farm alongside and inbetween the furrows of the demesne…
…these furrows *were* the tenants’ farms (alongside whatever garden they might have). in the early days of manorialism, the furrows/farms were not passed down within families, but “reassigned” each generation. over time tenancies became inheritable and eventually…
…the common field system disappeared and farms were restructured to be more like free-standing units (although still within the manor system), but for a good 500-1000 years, depending on the region, the common field system was in place…
…however, in order to avoid any tragedies of commons, tenants came together on village councils to agree upon plans for planting and the grazing of animals in fallow fields, etc. here from Tradition and Transformation in Anglo-Saxon England (https://books.google.com/books?id=_SlMAQAAQBAJ …):
…the same practices were found in other regions of nw europe which saw bipartite manorialism + open field systems. here on vaine pâture in nw france:hbd chick added,
(oh, sorry. forgot. “CPrRs” are “common property regimes.” these collective village institutions that governed open fields and common pastures.)
…and, again, here are the regions in nw “core” europe where bipartite manorialism/open field systems were found:hbd chick added,
here you go. core europe. the dark regions of communal open fields (i.e. regions that had bipartite manorialism during the middle ages). from Regions, Institutions, and Agrarian Change in European History…
by the time manorialism got to east germany (east of the elbe) it was a purely rent-based system. individual tenant farmers working their own farms and paying cash rents. (further east in russia it was often extended families.)
…and the outcome of all this, i think (*theorize*)?
and selecting for behavioral traits related to reciprocal altruism while selecting out traits related to parochial altruism, since these folks were neither living/working in extended family groups or marrying close family members, but, instead, cooperating w/unrelated fellows.
btw, some medieval ridge and furrow field systems are still visible in england. here are three from: gloucestershire
(https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Medieval_Ridge_and_Furrow_above_Wood_Stanway_-_geograph.org.uk_-_640050.jpg …); buckinghamshire (http://www.heritage-explorer.co.uk/web/he/searchdetail.aspx?id=1488&large=1 …); and worcestershire (https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=654&ei=lNfoW4ynE6LlkgWSqoCIBA&q=common+fields+furrows&oq=common+fields+furrows&gs_l=img.3…1482.5260.0.5427.21.13.0.8.2.0.156.1397.3j9.12.0….0…1ac.1.64.img..1.13.1330…0j0i8i30k1j0i24k1j0i10i24k1.0.8oaGF6jdXv0#imgdii=KJ7ZkoGp3VKs9M:&imgrc=B81gElEVEKUnbM …):
and there are even a handful of open field systems still in operation in england today. there’s one in laxton, nottinghamshire. you can read about how the farmers all work together on their manor here!: http://www.laxtonnotts.org.uk/Laxton%20manorial_system.htm …
oh, yes. forgot to mention: given that WHEAT was pretty much the main crop of medieval manors w/their *common property regimes* (i.e. *collective* village institutions), i can’t see how @ThomasTalhelm et al. argue that rice farming leads to holistic thinking patterns because…
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46201546_10156773963177264_7804203851711512576_n_10156773963172264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46003571_10156773963232264_278249366077046784_n_10156773963227264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46147274_10156773963307264_1440236687652290560_n_10156773963302264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45986512_10156773963402264_187061742889598976_n_10156773963397264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46059111_10156773963472264_7868449265310236672_n_10156773963467264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46124379_10156773963647264_187492863116836864_n_10156773963637264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46093252_10156773971407264_1038939411942735872_o_10156773971402264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46101417_10156773984882264_1392653294735720448_o_10156773984852264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46002442_10156774005477264_4966488550875856896_n_10156774005462264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46174807_10156774005757264_4053197492349566976_n_10156774005752264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46049040_10156774006387264_1881615019074912256_n_10156774006382264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46139976_10156774006572264_2252364588999770112_n_10156774006567264.jpg Greg HamiltonInteresting I’ve been doing genealogy and unbeknownst to me most my ancestors end up from Normandy and that upper green part of France
I was brought up thinking I was Irish and Scottish (and I am) I’m just a whole lot of Viking/Norman alsoNov 13, 2018, 2:21 PMCurt Doolittle(Same here)Nov 13, 2018, 3:38 PMGreg HamiltonLike most conquering peoples the Normans married into local ruling families.
You can see marriages across the “border”a decent amount to obviously end hostilities
Hence most the Irish, Scottish, and even the little Welsh blood I have.Nov 13, 2018, 3:50 PMKevin WuOnce you go Huguenot
In France you are welcome notNov 13, 2018, 5:29 PM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45981522_10156774006882264_555580631354966016_n_10156774006872264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46039330_10156774007112264_578697605630918656_n_10156774007092264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46030537_10156774008097264_1549148936495693824_n_10156774008092264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46030538_10156774008417264_4321074387852722176_o_10156774008407264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46253609_10156774008582264_2616270991826878464_n_10156774008577264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46003568_10156774010212264_6147140267016192000_n_10156774010207264.jpg Dan AltschuldHbdchick is 👍Nov 12, 2018, 8:29 PM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46113180_10156774010252264_5399877263875375104_o_10156774010247264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46118480_10156774010232264_7779446354547310592_n_10156774010227264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46043952_10156774010302264_983068145189126144_n_10156774010292264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46075107_10156774010332264_4012216013922762752_n_10156774010327264.jpg HBDCHICK’S SUMMARY OF BIPARTITE MANORIALISM AND ITS REACH
@hbdchick
the main feature of bipartite manorialism in medieval europe was the dual, conjoined arrangement of the central manor farm (the demesne) along with the attached individual farms of the tenants, with the tenants owing labor on the demesne (later rent)…
…tenants were independently responsible for the success of their own farms, i.e. w/the production of foodstuffs for themselves (to be self-sufficient iow) as well as for producing a certain amount of foods and products for the manor (agricultural, but also things like cloth)…
…another extremely important aspect of bipartite manorialism, tho, was the curious feature of *common* arable fields in which tenants were allotted certain furrows to farm alongside and inbetween the furrows of the demesne…
…these furrows *were* the tenants’ farms (alongside whatever garden they might have). in the early days of manorialism, the furrows/farms were not passed down within families, but “reassigned” each generation. over time tenancies became inheritable and eventually…
…the common field system disappeared and farms were restructured to be more like free-standing units (although still within the manor system), but for a good 500-1000 years, depending on the region, the common field system was in place…
…however, in order to avoid any tragedies of commons, tenants came together on village councils to agree upon plans for planting and the grazing of animals in fallow fields, etc. here from Tradition and Transformation in Anglo-Saxon England (https://books.google.com/books?id=_SlMAQAAQBAJ …):
…the same practices were found in other regions of nw europe which saw bipartite manorialism + open field systems. here on vaine pâture in nw france:hbd chick added,
(oh, sorry. forgot. “CPrRs” are “common property regimes.” these collective village institutions that governed open fields and common pastures.)
…and, again, here are the regions in nw “core” europe where bipartite manorialism/open field systems were found:hbd chick added,
here you go. core europe. the dark regions of communal open fields (i.e. regions that had bipartite manorialism during the middle ages). from Regions, Institutions, and Agrarian Change in European History…
by the time manorialism got to east germany (east of the elbe) it was a purely rent-based system. individual tenant farmers working their own farms and paying cash rents. (further east in russia it was often extended families.)
…and the outcome of all this, i think (*theorize*)?
and selecting for behavioral traits related to reciprocal altruism while selecting out traits related to parochial altruism, since these folks were neither living/working in extended family groups or marrying close family members, but, instead, cooperating w/unrelated fellows.
btw, some medieval ridge and furrow field systems are still visible in england. here are three from: gloucestershire
(https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Medieval_Ridge_and_Furrow_above_Wood_Stanway_-_geograph.org.uk_-_640050.jpg …); buckinghamshire (http://www.heritage-explorer.co.uk/web/he/searchdetail.aspx?id=1488&large=1 …); and worcestershire (https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=654&ei=lNfoW4ynE6LlkgWSqoCIBA&q=common+fields+furrows&oq=common+fields+furrows&gs_l=img.3…1482.5260.0.5427.21.13.0.8.2.0.156.1397.3j9.12.0….0…1ac.1.64.img..1.13.1330…0j0i8i30k1j0i24k1j0i10i24k1.0.8oaGF6jdXv0#imgdii=KJ7ZkoGp3VKs9M:&imgrc=B81gElEVEKUnbM …):
and there are even a handful of open field systems still in operation in england today. there’s one in laxton, nottinghamshire. you can read about how the farmers all work together on their manor here!: http://www.laxtonnotts.org.uk/Laxton%20manorial_system.htm …
oh, yes. forgot to mention: given that WHEAT was pretty much the main crop of medieval manors w/their *common property regimes* (i.e. *collective* village institutions), i can’t see how @ThomasTalhelm et al. argue that rice farming leads to holistic thinking patterns because…
