Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • GLOBALISM(COMMUNISM) VS NATIONALISM(FASCISM) 1) MARX, COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, GLOB

    GLOBALISM(COMMUNISM) VS NATIONALISM(FASCISM)

    1) MARX, COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, GLOBALISM – We don’t need to debunk marx, that’s been done for decades. Marx created a fairy story.

    (a) Man was not oppressed, but incrementally domesticated by his betters, like every other domesticated animal. Societies advanced best and fastest who most culled the underclasses (European Bipartite Manorialism, and East Asian Rice Farming) and culling the underclass is the cheapest, fastest, most secure means of improving the standard of life of the citizenry.

    (b) labor has little or no value since it is the organization of production that creates the value, and labor is a fungible low value cost easily and continuously replaced by machines, computers, and now artificial intelligences.

    (c) the underclass cannot organize production, or govern, or lead because they lack the ABILITIES to do so (dunning kruger, distribution of intelligence).

    (d) all non-market social orders maximize rent seeking at the expense of the laboring, working, middle, and professional classes, while all market orders suppress rent seeking through competition.

    (e) the problem we face is immigration of the underclasses, downward redistribution of reproduction to the lower and underclasses, subsidies that encourage this process, and the continuous destruction of the middle class majority produced by centuries of manorialism (hanging, disease, and wars), culling those underclasses,

    (f) the political problem we face is financialization of the economy in addition to bureaucratic rents, (both of which are fixable by market means.

    (g) Marx-Boas-Freud-Cantor-Adorno(et al) proposed an underclass monopoly, while Mises, Friedman, Rand, Rothbard, a Middle Class, while Foucault, Derrida, Rorty a Priestly-Feminine Upper Middle, while Friedan, Firestone, Dworkin a Feminist, and Strauss-Neocons a Political/Military upper class monopoly. The left proposes MONOPOLIES (a herd) and the right proposes MARKETS (packs).

    —VERSUS—

    2) FASCISM, NAZIISM, NATIONALISM – Naziism like all Fascism was providing an alternative to (Bolshevik) World Communism. It was the most successful implementation of the original French Proposition. Peterson knows this just as any scholar knows this.

    We are still fighting this warfare of Nationalism (A Market of Polities) and Globalism ( Monopoly Polity). and we have just complete a century of that test.

    (a) Each attempt by the globalists has failed, and (b) each attempt by the nationalists has eventually succeeded. We are currently in the last phase, under which we will restore nationalism worldwide and return to state-capitalism (fasicsm) most of which will be ethnocentric, and some which will not – and will devolve in to indian, muslim, african, and south american poverty.

    Rousseau (Feminine Subjective) + Schopenhauer, Hegel et al (Conflationists) + Kant (Masculine Analytic)

    -vs-

    Marx, Cantor, Freud, Adorno (Working and Underclasses) – FAILED

    -vs-

    Mises, Friedman, Rand, Rothbard, (Middle Classes) – FAILED

    -vs-

    Foucault, Derrida, Rorty (Priestly-Feminine Upper Middle) – FAILING RIGHT NOW

    -vs-

    Friedan, Firestone, Dworkin (Feminists) – FAILING RIGHT NOW

    -vs-

    Strauss-Neocons (Political/Military-Masculine – Upper) FAILED

    The gradual attack on Aristocratic Civilization from the bottom up.

    -The Counter-Revolution Against Anglo Legal-Empiricism, and German Rational-Science-

    Utopian Promise upon Achieving Monopoly Consensus + Straw Man + Pilpul and Critique

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 17:27:00 UTC

  • “Before all else, be armed.”–Machiavelli

    —“Before all else, be armed.”–Machiavelli

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 17:25:00 UTC

  • RE: PETERSON VS ZIZEK 1) PETERSON – JP is a clinical psychologist (cognitive the

    RE: PETERSON VS ZIZEK

    1) PETERSON – JP is a clinical psychologist (cognitive therapist), and he researches the impact of personality on behavior. His work is largely an attempt (knowingly or not) to restore Stoicism. He has (successfully) identified the relationship between jungian categories and literary archetypes and uses those narratives just as the priesthood has, to teach therapeutic concepts by suggestion rather than CBT’s direct exposure. (I disagree with this technique for therapy but not for teaching in the first place.) There is a worldwide demand for Stoicism because we have almost finally restored the level of civilization achieved by the late Empire before the Abrahamic Dark Age.

    So to flip it around, what is Aizek but a someone who has stolen and parroted others ideas and then practice Critique (Gossip)?

    2) MARX, COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, GLOBALISM – We don’t need to debunk marx, that’s been done for decades. Marx created a fairy story. (a) Man was not oppressed, but incrementally domesticated by his betters, like every other domesticated animal. Societies advanced best and fastest who most culled the underclasses (European Bipartite Manorialism, and East Asian Rice Farming) and culling the underclass is the cheapest, fastest, most secure means of improving the standard of life of the citizenry. (b) labor has little or no value since it is the organization of production that creates the value, and labor is a fungible low value cost easily and continuously replaced by machines, computers, and now artificial intelligences. (c) the underclass cannot organize production, or govern, or lead because they lack the ABILITIES to do so (dunning kruger, distribution of intelligence). (d) all non-market social orders maximize rent seeking at the expense of the laboring, working, middle, and professional classes, while all market orders suppress rent seeking through competition. (e) the problem we face is immigration of the underclasses, downward redistribution of reproduction to the lower and underclasses, subsidies that encourage this process, and the continuous destruction of the middle class majority produced by centuries of manorialism (hanging, disease, and wars), culling those underclasses, (f) the political problem we face is financialization of the economy in addition to bureaucratic rents, (both of which are fixable by market means. (g) Marx-Boas-Freud-Cantor-Adorno(et al) proposed an underclass monopoly, while Mises, Friedman, Rand, Rothbard, a Middle Class, while Foucault, Derrida, Rorty a Priestly-Feminine Upper Middle, while Friedan, Firestone, Dworkin a Feminist, and Strauss-Neocons a Political/Military upper class monopoly. The left proposes MONOPOLIES (a herd) and the right proposes MARKETS (packs).

    3) FASCISM, NAZIISM, NATIONALISM – Naziism like all Fascism was providing an alternative to (Bolshevik) World Communism. It was the most successful implementation of the original French Proposition. Peterson knows this just as any scholar knows this.

    We are still fighting this warfare of Nationalism (A Market of Polities) and Globalism ( Monopoly Polity). and we have just complete a century of that test.

    (a) Each attempt by the globalists has failed, and (b) each attempt by the nationalists has eventually succeeded. We are currently in the last phase, under which we will restore nationalism worldwide and return to state-capitalism (fasicsm) most of which will be ethnocentric, and some which will not – and will devolve in to indian, muslim, african, and south american poverty.

    Rousseau (Feminine Subjective) + Schopenhauer, Hegel et al (Conflationists) + Kant (Masculine Analytic)

    -vs-

    Marx, Cantor, Freud, Adorno (Working and Underclasses) – FAILED

    -vs-

    Mises, Friedman, Rand, Rothbard, (Middle Classes) – FAILED

    -vs-

    Foucault, Derrida, Rorty (Priestly-Feminine Upper Middle) – FAILING RIGHT NOW

    -vs-

    Friedan, Firestone, Dworkin (Feminists) – FAILING RIGHT NOW

    -vs-

    Strauss-Neocons (Political/Military-Masculine – Upper) FAILED

    The gradual attack on Aristocratic Civilization from the bottom up.

    -The Counter-Revolution Against Anglo Legal-Empiricism, and German Rational-Science-

    Utopian Promise upon Achieving Monopoly Consensus + Straw Man + Pilpul and Critique:

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 17:19:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46165548_10156776004742264_749091785

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46165548_10156776004742264_7490917851830681600_n_10156776004737264.jpg Necessary New StampAurick Faustwhat about counter signal memes for fashy goys?Nov 13, 2018, 4:47 PMNoah J RevoyNo counter signaling the truth, or we hang you.Nov 13, 2018, 4:57 PMKari Anne DorstadFollowing as i’m clueless to what this is about ?Nov 13, 2018, 5:21 PMChris CantrellI’m with Kari. Are you talking about signaling/counter signaling in regards to any strength or weakness? Is counter signaling, or just a lack of signaling, not preferable to signaling?Nov 13, 2018, 5:31 PMAlex MacleodGrug read old carvings, Grug grok new carvings, Grug not ask more, leader of bigbrain tribe happy as more time for teach bigbrains village-cleverness.Nov 13, 2018, 6:02 PMCurt DoolittleCOUNTER SIGNALING AS A COVER FOR COWARDICENov 14, 2018, 10:22 AMCurt DoolittleIt’s the opposite of VIRTUE SIGNALING as a cover for COST AVOIDANCENov 14, 2018, 10:22 AMCurt DoolittleLESSON: Virtue Signalling vs Counter-Signalling

    VIRTUE SIGNALING <- Description –> COUNTER-SIGNALING

    (about what I say)…………………………….(about what you say)Nov 14, 2018, 10:23 AMNecessary New Stamp

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 16:45:00 UTC

  • THEY CAN”T UNDERSTAND US – WE ARE ANTIFRAGILE by John Mark “They have no idea wh

    THEY CAN”T UNDERSTAND US – WE ARE ANTIFRAGILE

    by John Mark

    “They have no idea what is coming”

    —RE: “I thrive on attacks”– Curt

    This is an area where, from what I can tell, the Left truly does not understand the Right, especially the hard Right.

    We are antifragile. Because we have agency. A very large percentage (probably a majority) of our group are men of agency. If we did not have it, most of us would not be part of the hard right, because NPCs are incapable of paying the price one must pay – dedication to seeking the truth regardless of cost.

    Because leftists and NPCs lack agency, they have difficulty grasping what they are dealing with when they encounter a man of agency in the political realm. Most leftists alive today have never dealt with a political opponent like Trump in their lifetimes. (Reagan was a light version, but America was very different then.) The Left has no idea how to handle him except to double down on the same tactics, which merely energize him.

    My theory is, *they underestimate us* largely because *they cannot imagine being like us*. If *they* were subjected to the shaming they hurl at us, *they* would cower and conform. They cheer every time they censor one of us successfully, not realizing they are sowing the seeds of their own destruction. Because they are feeding the energy of the antifragile beast: men of agency of the West.

    Imagine being an NPC. You’ve never questioned the “popular accepted” narrative in your life. How could you have any idea what you’re dealing with when you’re dealing with Men of Agency of the West?

    They have no idea what’s coming. Just like they had no idea Trump would win, and could not fathom it, they cannot fathom the forces they have awakened by attacking us, our civilization, our honor, and our forefathers’ honor.

    WE LOVE THE FIGHT.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 15:53:00 UTC

  • “Are you a right wing libertarian?”— Hard to answer that question any longer.

    —“Are you a right wing libertarian?”—

    Hard to answer that question any longer. I write on Testimonial (Complete Scientific) Truth; the natural law of reciprocity; nomocracy (rule of law) under that natural law; the uniqueness of western civlization (individual sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, judge-jury-law, and the resulting markets in everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war). In effect the formal logic and science of cooperation that we call ‘social science’ written as ‘law’.

    “Libertarian” now refers unfortunately to Anarchism since it was usurped by the anarcho capitalists. And “Liberal” has been usurped by the american socialists. And I have lost nearly all my confidence in any form of democracy other than markets – and in doing so moved those markets into the houses of government, eliminating monopoly rule. So classical liberal is not available to me either.

    You would find my policy recommendations left of center, but my democratic recommendations right of center, and you probably wouldnt understand my economic work.

    But in the end result, all questions of politics devolve into Masculine Meritocratic, Capitalization, and Eugenics, versus Feminine Equalitarian, Consumption, and Dysgenics. In that sense I am an economic paleolibertarian and an normative paleoconservative in that it is impossible to both be intellectually honest, and sufficiently informed in economics and biology to hold any other proposition than we must pay the underclass to stop reproducing very soon if not immediately, and we must end all underclass immigration and reverse as much of it as possible.

    There is no other option other than ‘faith’.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 12:26:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 12:07:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46199447_10156775450972264_806925106

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46199447_10156775450972264_8069251063846273024_n_10156775450967264.jpg Guilty.Micah PezdirtzIs that supposed to be a bad thing?Nov 13, 2018, 12:10 PMDuje DanteCurt what do u think of this manNov 13, 2018, 12:12 PMNoah J RevoyThe most intolerant win.Nov 13, 2018, 12:23 PMZak DouglasendorsementNov 13, 2018, 12:28 PMVincent AnthonyIntellegence almost necessitates the agrivation of others. Small minds don’t like hearing uncormfortable truths.Nov 13, 2018, 12:51 PMAngus JamesonDescribes my aspirations. What a great compliment.Nov 13, 2018, 12:52 PMAngus JamesonMe: I never suffer fools and I don’t cast pearls before swine. Honest questions or debate, or you are dismissed with prejudice.Nov 13, 2018, 12:54 PMRussell WagnerIndeed, why not?Nov 13, 2018, 12:54 PMKevin CoxI find it amusing that this fellow apparently believes these two traits are not interrelated.Nov 13, 2018, 12:55 PMChristopher M MatthewsIntolerance is a necessary virtue.Nov 13, 2018, 12:59 PMC.G. DanielsI’m not seeing the negative here.Nov 13, 2018, 1:07 PMKelly JohnsonCharlie Delta me eitherNov 13, 2018, 1:08 PMAngus JamesonKevin Cox Indeed. High smarts along with continual learning and self-correction of errors leads to being an intolerant prick because of the utter mass of ignorance, stupidity, and #NPC regurgitation of catechisms all around you.

    Being an intolerant prick first, not smart and self correcting first, leads to Dunning-Kruger and solipsist ersatz “smarts.”Nov 13, 2018, 1:09 PMJoe Redtree”but”? why not “and”?Nov 13, 2018, 1:20 PMAndrea Royall<<< insufferable twat.. can confirm 🙂Nov 13, 2018, 1:34 PMAmy ComptonAndrea, I love your pixie cut. Cute!Nov 13, 2018, 1:41 PMJon JonathanNov 13, 2018, 1:44 PMJames Dmitro MakienkoThe actual scientific definition of tolerance is the decrease of resistance of a system or organism to outside hostile objects/virii/bacteria/chemicals/forces/((()))s

    So staying INtolerant means having increased resistance to harmful things which increases chances of survival. Which is evolutionary speaking a positive thing.Nov 13, 2018, 5:22 PMCurt DoolittleI don’t kow much about romanian interwar activists.Nov 13, 2018, 5:23 PMAyham NedalWhere exactly did he say that lolNov 13, 2018, 5:24 PMIgor RogovNot really. I attacked Curt in a ways that would get me banned and reported by any left-wing precocious nitwit within minutes, but Curt tolerated my lack of reverence with remarkably good humour.Nov 13, 2018, 8:24 PMBenny BurkeSincere question Curt, have you ever lost a fist fight?Nov 13, 2018, 8:36 PMJennifer DeanBetter than a limp prick.Nov 13, 2018, 8:59 PMJustin OdiognAyham, he didn’t say it.

    D James Kennedy did.Nov 14, 2018, 7:05 AMGuilty.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 12:05:00 UTC

  • ( I need a cabin, some of the guys, something to drink, some steaks, a few flann

    ( I need a cabin, some of the guys, something to drink, some steaks, a few flannel shirts, and three days of sh-t talking. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 12:05:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46199447_10156775450972264_806925106

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46199447_10156775450972264_8069251063846273024_n_10156775450967264.jpg Guilty.Micah PezdirtzIs that supposed to be a bad thing?Nov 13, 2018, 12:10 PMDuje DanteCurt what do u think of this manNov 13, 2018, 12:12 PMNoah J RevoyThe most intolerant win.Nov 13, 2018, 12:23 PMZak DouglasendorsementNov 13, 2018, 12:28 PMKevin WuAn intolerant but entirely tolerable prick*Nov 13, 2018, 12:38 PMVincent AnthonyIntellegence almost necessitates the agrivation of others. Small minds don’t like hearing uncormfortable truths.Nov 13, 2018, 12:51 PMAngus JamesonDescribes my aspirations. What a great compliment.Nov 13, 2018, 12:52 PMAngus JamesonMe: I never suffer fools and I don’t cast pearls before swine. Honest questions or debate, or you are dismissed with prejudice.Nov 13, 2018, 12:54 PMRussell WagnerIndeed, why not?Nov 13, 2018, 12:54 PMKevin CoxI find it amusing that this fellow apparently believes these two traits are not interrelated.Nov 13, 2018, 12:55 PMChristopher M MatthewsIntolerance is a necessary virtue.Nov 13, 2018, 12:59 PMCharlie DeltaI’m not seeing the negative here.Nov 13, 2018, 1:07 PMKelly JohnsonCharlie Delta me eitherNov 13, 2018, 1:08 PMAngus JamesonKevin Cox Indeed. High smarts along with continual learning and self-correction of errors leads to being an intolerant prick because of the utter mass of ignorance, stupidity, and #NPC regurgitation of catechisms all around you.

    Being an intolerant prick first, not smart and self correcting first, leads to Dunning-Kruger and solipsist ersatz “smarts.”Nov 13, 2018, 1:09 PMJoe Redtree”but”? why not “and”?Nov 13, 2018, 1:20 PMAndrea Royall<<< insufferable twat.. can confirm 🙂Nov 13, 2018, 1:34 PMAmy ComptonAndrea, I love your pixie cut. Cute!Nov 13, 2018, 1:41 PMJon JonathanNov 13, 2018, 1:44 PMJames Dmitro MakienkoThe actual scientific definition of tolerance is the decrease of resistance of a system or organism to outside hostile objects/virii/bacteria/chemicals/forces/((()))s

    So staying INtolerant means having increased resistance to harmful things which increases chances of survival. Which is evolutionary speaking a positive thing.Nov 13, 2018, 5:22 PMCurt DoolittleI don’t kow much about romanian interwar activists.Nov 13, 2018, 5:23 PMAyham NedalWhere exactly did he say that lolNov 13, 2018, 5:24 PMIgor RogovNot really. I attacked Curt in a ways that would get me banned and reported by any left-wing precocious nitwit within minutes, but Curt tolerated my lack of reverence with remarkably good humour.Nov 13, 2018, 8:24 PMBenny BurkeSincere question Curt, have you ever lost a fist fight?Nov 13, 2018, 8:36 PMJennifer DeanBetter than a limp prick.Nov 13, 2018, 8:59 PMJustin OdiognAyham, he didn’t say it.

    D James Kennedy did.Nov 14, 2018, 7:05 AMGuilty.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 12:05:00 UTC