( jeez don’t get pissed at me if I’m short with you in email or text or whatever. I’m sort ’cause I can’t be anything else. FB provides a lot of context. i can see previous conversations, see the context of the comment, and grab a quick look at your profile. In email and other media i am flying blind. And I’m awfully prolific and I can’t spend five minutes figuring out ‘who are you and what the heck are you talking about’. I just want to know what you want and what you need me to do.)
(I have 350 pending friend requests and 21 open slots. It is probably time to create a public person page, because my attempts to move people to the Propertarian Institute page seem unsuccessful)
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46098173_10156773810132264_8606988936469807104_n_10156773810127264.jpg (From the out of left field department)Curt DoolittleI have no idea who this person is, or why I rec’d this message request but I answered it honestly… lolzNov 12, 2018, 3:55 PMJonathan WilburHim: “How do you like your water?”
Curt: “VIOLENT”Nov 12, 2018, 3:58 PMDavin EastleyLaphroaig is fantastic. Same with Ardbeg.Nov 12, 2018, 4:02 PMMikey D MooreCrying laughing.Nov 12, 2018, 4:21 PMDan Donley7 year old sliding in to your DMsNov 12, 2018, 4:25 PMCraig CulpepperYes but JD is trash. Very disappointed in CD hahaNov 12, 2018, 4:32 PMDavin EastleyHence why I didn’t mention it ;)Nov 12, 2018, 4:39 PMRoy BlackheartDamn I’ve been waiting for the perfect time for this question. Curt, whiskey recommendations?Nov 12, 2018, 4:40 PMAndrew ClaytonLaphroaig 😍Nov 12, 2018, 4:58 PMKari Anne DorstadCurt Doolittle what is a Laphroig ? Some kind of foreign beer ?Nov 12, 2018, 5:27 PMCurt DoolittleFirst of all, it’s like selecting between slavic, german, scandinavian, and celtic women. It doesn’t matter. they’re all good. However, some of them are better for drinking and some for tasting, and some with meals. In this order: Jack Daniels (is my ‘regular drink’ because it’s lincoln county process so no allergic reaction, and I have to take benadryl to drink the others), then Lagavulin (food), Laphroaig (snacks), Ardbeg (cigars). Always with one cube of ice and a splash of water. Sometimes with a pinch of sugar, depending on what I’m having it with.
I can drink Jack all night if I have water and coffee to drink with it as well.
Otherwise, my constitution does not appreciate these things as much as my soul, so I usually puke my guts out after five or six glasses and two cigars. But I don’t care. Its part of the ritual. Some people need a fast. I need to tie one on and pray to the porcelain gods.
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/media_set?set=a.10151392636077264Nov 12, 2018, 5:42 PMCraig CulpepperJack Daniels already fueled the first civil war and we all know how that turned out. Maybe switch to Bulleit?Nov 12, 2018, 5:49 PMCraig CulpepperOkay that’s a lie but I went with it anyway.Nov 12, 2018, 5:52 PMCurt DoolittleScotch WhiskeyNov 12, 2018, 5:56 PMChris CantrellJack Daniels barrel proof select is very good and one of the few whiskeys that is not over hyped and over priced right now.Nov 12, 2018, 5:56 PMKari Anne DorstadCurt Doolittle oh ok 👌Nov 12, 2018, 5:56 PMArthur RoddamCurt I figured you to be a single malt scotch kinda guy.Nov 12, 2018, 6:27 PMCurt Doolittleit’s a signal thing I assume.Nov 12, 2018, 6:28 PMJared NeavesLaphroig is the best!Nov 12, 2018, 6:55 PMAlex MacleodWhile we’re here -should I take Antidepressants?Nov 12, 2018, 7:10 PMArthur RoddamNot with alcohol.Nov 12, 2018, 7:11 PMRoy BlackheartI asked and you certainly didn’t disappoint, thanks.Nov 12, 2018, 8:54 PMRoy BlackheartGlad to know I’m not the only one who considers Jack Daniels one of the best night caps.Nov 12, 2018, 8:57 PMJon JonathanJack has a nice warminf effect when it hits the stomach in January but certainly isnt as pleasant in the mouth as a peaty single malt.Nov 12, 2018, 11:05 PMJonathan TilasKristian SheetsNov 13, 2018, 7:01 PMKristian SheetsJonathan Tilas I’m a tequila guyNov 13, 2018, 7:01 PMJonathan TilasI can fuck with tequila especially in a hot tubNov 13, 2018, 7:02 PMKristian SheetsJonathan Tilas I fuck with tequila ALL the timeNov 13, 2018, 7:03 PMJonathan TilasKristian Sheets lmao that is unfortunately how I started out with my ex though 😂Nov 13, 2018, 7:09 PM(From the out of left field department)
It is, and will be war over SPECIATION. Whether we will regress into the equalitarian herd, or evolve into hierarchical packs. We are wealthy enough to speciate. Each side wants to produce commons that suit its method of speciation: herd(r), or pack(k). Since this question is not possible to resolve by compromise, our only choice is separation. This means that some significant portion of the ingroup will exit. And this is politically, economically, strategically, and evolutionarily desirable. Unfortunately the herd always fears the pack, and will resist it.
Over my professional and intellectual life, I have had many people tell me I have changed their lives in a conversation. However, this is somewhat misleading. I have, almost always, done little else other than remove an error, or confirm a self discovery, and put your intuitions and gut feelings into tangible scientific prose, that you are too ‘christianized’ and insufficiently ‘aryanized’ to permit yourself to make on your own. And you just needed someone to give your subconscious permission to love and aspire to that which your christanization and insufficient aryanization had prevented you from following righteously on your own. Ergo, It will do no good to remove that obstacle until it blocks you. Any mentor can help you move forward. Help you take another step. But most importantly, what we hope to do with Propertarianism, Stoicism, Ethnocentrism, and Heroism, is to end the construction of those obstacles before they are constructed to limit you in the first place. To restore your aryanism: that we are gods of our own making, and whether you are slave, serf, man, demigod, or god, is merely a matter of your choice.
THE COSTLY SCHOOLING OF THE COCKROACHES OF CRITIQUE
—“Curt covering for his ignorance of actual knowledge”– Robert Townsend (ie: This ass-clown: https://www.facebook.com/robert.townsend.1088893)
So wait, I made the argument that the knowledge was disbursed and that it was degree of available investment that made possible the experimentation that made the nuclear program eventually yield, and you are saying that one person’s ‘genius’ was more influential that time, place, state of available knowledge, number of people in the field, and funding available for experimentation?. This is the same fallacy of the imbeciles who fear artificial intelligence, when it is not a shortage of calculative power (bayesian account) that is the problem but the time and resources to conduct the experiments necessary to incrementally falsify errors in our theories. I mean, the calculus was developed simultaneously. So were just about every one of the technological and scientific advancements – even Einstein was merely first and heaped with undue praise just like every other. All he brought to the problemw as the frame. And yes it was an innovation but it is also a deterministic one. The same is true for great musicians and artists – a market develops over three generations that produces an outlier (mozart, durer, davinci).
I mean, I understand you’re not well read but start with The Gifts of Athena and then for a broader view move back to charles murray, then narrow in on the evolution of copper, bronze, iron, and steel, and then move to writing and language. Genius is the archetype but it is economies and the competition between many people that percolates by market means individual excellences. And it is the ECONOMY THAT MAKES IT POSSIBLE.
Why? textual interpretation is cheap, but experiments are costly. the reason we can’t make more progress in physics at the moment appears to be nothing more than we can’t get anyone to put up the 10B it would take to run the next scale of tests….
So I mean, you can use CRITIQUE (sophism) to attempt to position that I have not put forth an argument, but as I have just illustrated, I have both done so and illustrated how childish your ‘hero worship’ is, and how you are YET AGAIN demonstrating the problem of the J-Question’s method of argument by employing Critique against me while ‘heaping undue praise’ on an individual when it is merely the individual who crosses the line first that gets the prize, but it is the CONSTRUCTION OF THE COMPETITIVE RACE IN THE FIRST PLACE that made his achievement possible.
So again, please do not waste my time. It is not difficult for me to eviscerate ignorant, pre-rational, sophists like yourself, but it is still a waste of my time.
There are many fools like you in the world and the cost of intellectually tarring and feathering you morons is not difficult so much as time consuming. Unfortunately you propagate like cockroaches and you sell your idiotic narratives to other cockroaches, at a rate that defeats our ability to correct you with intellectual insecticide.
—“the Hermetic principle. Gender exists within everything. Male, female, hard, soft, light, dark. The similarities between his comparisons are characteristics of gender.”–Bradley Morgan
Um.. how would you state that scientifically: I can, in that the computational efficiency (calculation of successful specialization) of genders (two of them) defeated all other permutations and the additional calculative variation of additional genders seems to NOT provide enough additional value to compete with two genders. There is an argument that male and female cognitive structures in humans produce a spectrum from extremes of either end to a balance, and that this allows us to calculate the exploitation of a wider variety of opportunities than rigid specialization would. This is possibly the optimum method of evolutionary progress because we do not require the cost of a third or more gender, but we can still produce adaptive responses and express them anywhere between the extremes.
THE FACT THAT I (WE) HAVE BOTH ADVOCATES AND CRITICS IS EVIDENCE OF THE VERACITY OF THE IDEAS
—“Hello, I hear you’re a Bad Man with some extreme views. Someone posted screen caps of you. Your position seemed reasonable to me so thought I’d friend request you. We have mutual friends who are in both camps about you: pro and against.”— A New Friend
Hi. Well, ‘bad man’ is probably due to my online persona which is a little over the top for marketing (and education) purposes.
The fact that I have pro and against camps is merely evidence of the success of the system of thought generating debate. (one way or another at least men have something worthy of debate).
The truth is I CANNOT FIND A CRITIC with any argument any longer. All I can find is people who have yet to understand what I argue, or who argue the sufficiency of the solution, or who argue the practicality of the solution. In general – and I am serious – it is extremely unlikely that for the next few generations at least (if ever), anyone will propose a counter argument any more than they will propose one counter to darwin…. 😉
(Seriously, I have had no critic emerge other than the sufficiency of the argument, to provide a via-positiva solution to satisfy the market demand for a personal philosophy. And it will become very clear over the coming months that what I said would happen, has – that people who want to produce the via positiva around the aesthetic (elite), martial (physical) and the emotional (stoicism), have emerged to satisfy that market demand – meaning we will in fact produce physical, emotional, and intellectual programs with coherent and consistent themes. The fact that we have reached critical mass recently is probably becoming obvious – even if that critical mass has come more so from the personal philosophical side of the movement than the analytical that I produce.)
