Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51467513_10156982045137264_756010889

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51467513_10156982045137264_756010889

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51467513_10156982045137264_7560108894500945920_n_10156982045127264.jpg ;)Tom BielerAre these available in a a PVC patch with hook and loop on the back of it?Feb 12, 2019, 2:40 PMCurt Doolittlejust market testing . final yes. robes, hoodies, caps, shirts…Feb 12, 2019, 2:41 PMChip SillsLike itFeb 12, 2019, 2:46 PMRadu M OleniucA better one: 🙂

    “Oderint dum metuant” – Let them hate me, so that they will but fear me.

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152206622321565&set=a.110896166564&type=3&theaterFeb 12, 2019, 2:50 PMJustin RockwellWhat’s the meaning or story behind the black Swan and such?Feb 12, 2019, 2:50 PMWilliam ViergeverCurt Doolittle ??? no branding irons??Feb 12, 2019, 2:51 PMMatt Evansguess: black swans “never” happenFeb 12, 2019, 2:51 PMCurt Doolittleand … therefore the institute logo. ;)Feb 12, 2019, 2:52 PMJustin RockwellCurt Doolittle just getting caught up on the blog and found it, it’s alot of information to process and sift through I’ve only been reading all this for a couple of days nowFeb 12, 2019, 2:53 PMMatt EvansYou aren’t serious until you get someone like PalmettoState Armory to sell AR-15 lowers with this engraving on the mag well

    [I laughed so hard when I saw them selling “No Step on Snek” lowers 🙂 ]Feb 12, 2019, 2:53 PMDaniel JacksonI’ll take 6 robesFeb 12, 2019, 2:54 PMCurt Doolittle^ trying to determine whether manufacturer can meet demand. ;)Feb 12, 2019, 2:55 PMRichard HallCan I get this on an arm band?Feb 12, 2019, 2:55 PMDaniel JacksonLet me know when the product is readyFeb 12, 2019, 2:55 PMCurt DoolittleWilliam Viergever brillliant. will do.Feb 12, 2019, 2:56 PMBene HarrisonI would love a propertarian hook and loop patchFeb 12, 2019, 2:56 PMDaniel JacksonFerrum est ad felicitatem via tuaFeb 12, 2019, 2:56 PMMatt Evansso, I am not good at latin, but online transation tools seem to want that word to be “Sigilium”, not “Sigilum” for the translation to make sense. they don’t know what “Sigilum” is, whereas “Sigilium” seems to make sense in context…Feb 12, 2019, 2:56 PMBill Joslin(the tree of life – better IMO)Feb 12, 2019, 2:57 PMRussell WagnerI’m diggin’ the Black Swan. Following…Feb 12, 2019, 2:58 PMMatthew VölkischPARA

    BELLUM

    D E U S

    V U L TFeb 12, 2019, 4:12 PMThomas NorgateLooks lovely but can you/another explain the words and swan to me?Feb 12, 2019, 4:20 PMCurt Doolittle(based upon the templar sigil)

    “The Sigil of Militia of Natural Law”

    “Truth and Violence”Feb 12, 2019, 4:28 PMThomas NorgateThorsten NorgateFeb 12, 2019, 4:41 PMVinny VidivicciMy job when I was in the military was intelligence. I remember constantly watching the feeds for activities of the black swans. I thought they were the “bad guys”.Feb 12, 2019, 4:50 PMJeff UrizenWatch this 4 part documentary if you have the time https://youtu.be/DotBVZ26asIFeb 12, 2019, 4:56 PMBill Joslin;-)Feb 12, 2019, 4:58 PMTyler Karl LiaGo with Anglo-Saxon. We don’t need to cuck with Latin.Feb 12, 2019, 5:49 PMTyler Karl LiaThere is nothing innately more cultured or poetic about Latin. The use of Latin in the place of our Germanic tongue has never made sense to me.

    We are not Roman or Latin – most (white) Americans are of Northwestern European ancestry and our founders were of Anglo-Saxon and Dutch blood.

    Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin were both highly interested in Anglo-Saxon, the former wanted it taught in schools and the latter wanted it for our legal tongue.

    Such thoughts would only strengthen our Folk as a whole and provide us with depth and roots.

    Play around with this: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/fulk%C4%85

    You will have to look up the grammar, but this is a great source for etymology.Feb 12, 2019, 6:26 PMMark FisherAfter reading this post and comments, literally scrolling a couple posts down, my extremely liberal sister-in-law (bless her heart [as we say in the south]) had post this pic in a totally unrelated and non-political context.

    I was struck by the symbolism. Pardon the randomness good sirs. It has been a “day”.

    Love the idea presented above…Feb 12, 2019, 7:07 PMZach QuarryIf you make a patch offer it in Coyote. Some guy’s will want that.Feb 12, 2019, 7:53 PMCurt Doolittlewhat is Coyote?Feb 12, 2019, 7:54 PMZach QuarryA color.Feb 12, 2019, 7:55 PMCurt DoolittleTan you mean? Yes?Feb 12, 2019, 7:55 PMZach QuarryLike for desert or multicam patterns. Black will stick out.Feb 12, 2019, 7:55 PMZach QuarryIt’s a little darker. I’m not gonna be gay about it. Tan will work.Feb 12, 2019, 7:56 PMBill JoslinBlack, coyote, and ODFeb 12, 2019, 8:11 PMZach QuarryBill Joslin Maybe a limited run HawaiianFeb 12, 2019, 8:14 PMDarren HowellJustin Rockwell mate, get back to us after a couple of months… just don’t forget to ask questions whenever and wherever you need clarification! Curt is only too happy to help!!👌Feb 13, 2019, 3:51 AMJosĂ© Francisco MayoraViolence is truth.Feb 13, 2019, 4:26 AMGuillermo CammareriGreat documentary, and today makes more sense. Freud, Bernays and today the CEO/creator of Netflix.

    All from the same family. Amazing.Feb 13, 2019, 3:45 PMStephen ThomasThe Militia of Natural Law hmmm

    Or

    The Natural Law Militia

    I like bothFeb 13, 2019, 4:53 PMMike FeeneyI’d choose a different font. Looks like Copperplate. How about Optima (ExtraBlack):Feb 14, 2019, 1:33 AMRoss LampersOMG just looked up the symbolism of the black swan on Wikipedia…

    Just a giant mug shot of Curt chilling at home.Feb 14, 2019, 4:54 PMRoss LampersFeb 14, 2019, 4:54 PMRoss LampersSummary: “READ SIEGE FACKOT”

    Ref. Citations:

    FBI .gov/trickshot-honeypotFeb 14, 2019, 5:02 PMGeorg BĂŒhlerThe Latin is incorrect…. It should say “veritas et violentia”.Feb 14, 2019, 8:45 PMCurt Doolittlewhat is the correct latin for “truth and violence”Feb 14, 2019, 8:52 PMSeth BarcelloSigillum militum iuris naturalis

    veritas et violentiaFeb 15, 2019, 6:09 AMGeorg BĂŒhlerThere is no “m” neededFeb 15, 2019, 8:34 AM;)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 14:39:00 UTC

  • CONTRIBUTION TO PROPERTARIANISM by @Michelle Catlin, on Medium A fuller, better,

    https://medium.com/@CatlinNyaa/a-propertarian-moral-foundations-theory-a70e440b9b13?fbclid=IwAR0rRaHYAf6JKt16ClFZK1POGrIkTAaz4-uqrJ4-j6adT9Scpjd08sLU_owNEW CONTRIBUTION TO PROPERTARIANISM

    by @Michelle Catlin, on Medium

    A fuller, better, treatment of the subject. Well written.

    This is Canon. Can’t compliment enough.

    https://medium.com/@CatlinNyaa/a-propertarian-moral-foundations-theory-a70e440b9b13?fbclid=IwAR0rRaHYAf6JKt16ClFZK1POGrIkTAaz4-uqrJ4-j6adT9Scpjd08sLU_ow

    —-

    References

    (

    Original P version: https://propertarianism.com/2014/09/28/moral-foundations-as-property-rights/

    )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 14:14:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 13:12:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 13:10:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 12:44:00 UTC

  • You tagged Matt Lawlor photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51852501_1015

    You tagged Matt Lawlor photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51852501_1015

    You tagged Matt Lawlor photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51852501_10156981793197264_1582782795325898752_o_10156981793187264.jpg YOU WILL END UP AT PROPERTARIANISM. YOU WILL. SORRY. (But take your time. We can’t handle too many of you at once.)Emily WalshHow do I read Siege without being put on a listFeb 12, 2019, 12:50 PMCurt Doolittledownload it from our library. ;)Feb 12, 2019, 12:51 PMCurt Doolittlehttps://mega.nz/#!uqwlgQaR!m-aIxx3rkzpQvRb1RwOPjCuoFBkfJPIoUg2RbAjMKnIFeb 12, 2019, 12:56 PMAustyn PemberCurt Doolittle what do you think of Siege and Mason?Feb 12, 2019, 1:06 PMCurt DoolittleUm, I think there are ways of reaching each demographic and narrative is one of the best means. I think visualizing howsuch things would roll out is good for removing doubt. I think everyone who works on internal security at all undrstands this strategy. And I think everyone knows it will work.Feb 12, 2019, 1:08 PMCurt DoolittleWhy: those who act first hoard the resources, and block transport, commnunication, and power. Between panic, hoarding, and interruption of commerce, the ‘nine meals before chaos’ is rather obvious.Feb 12, 2019, 1:09 PMRoss LampersMatt Lawlor ^

    From now on when people ask for a beginners intro to propertarianism the answer is READ SIEGEFeb 12, 2019, 1:42 PMRoss Lampershttps://youtu.be/OG4XAPEFGcoFeb 12, 2019, 1:44 PMDavid StephenEmily Walsh please dont take this wrong. Looking at your profile I would have never expected someone who “looked” like you to be interested in reading Siege. The fact you are brings me hope to our struggle.Feb 12, 2019, 2:20 PMHunter DuncanThe thought of a typical suburban mom reading siege is cracking me up. Holy shit that’s a white pillFeb 12, 2019, 2:30 PMCurt Doolittleyou know i fking love that clip…. lolFeb 12, 2019, 2:45 PMRoss LampersYou should it’s a good clipFeb 12, 2019, 5:18 PMDan PooleI echo the above sentiments. I’ve got my issues with “Seige,” but if suburban normies are reading it and actually like what that book is ultimitely trying to accomplish, then maybe there’s hope after all. I have YET to meet a normie White suburban family in real life that thinks like that, and believe me, it’s not for lack of tryingFeb 12, 2019, 6:50 PMCurt DoolittleProvide a solution, and leadership will emerge.

    If leadership emerges so will consensus.

    If Consensus emerges, so will action.

    If action emerges, then we will win.Feb 12, 2019, 6:51 PMCaduceus MercuriusI think SIEGE can be summed up as follows:

    Don’t do protest marches.

    Don’t think you can achieve anything with a political party.

    Don’t think voting will change anything that is of true importance.

    If you’re going to fight, don’t just throw rocks at cops and similar minor targets (including Antifa etc.), but plan your attacks carefully for maximum disruption of the system.Feb 13, 2019, 5:07 AMYOU WILL END UP AT PROPERTARIANISM. YOU WILL. SORRY. (But take your time. We can’t handle too many of you at once.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 12:41:00 UTC

  • VISIONS OF THE FUTURE I don’t have anything against other groups because I under

    VISIONS OF THE FUTURE

    I don’t have anything against other groups because I understand men speak by and act by different grammars and that those grammars reflect their genes, class, and region – so they have little choice. But reciprocity rules.

    There is no value in trying to get despotic absolutists, the religious absolutists, the legal absolutists, the classical liberals, the libertarians, and the anarcho capitalists to unite behind a single message or goal other than survival as a group.

    The reality is that we need authority, religion, law, government, entrepreneurs, investors, and artists. And these demands are supplied by each of the right’s groups. With shared sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, and markets for voluntary organization in all walks of life – and prohibition on all actions against our people.

    My simple point is that law is and forever will be the means of organizing a population into whatever polity possible, and the left will always be better able to use the semitic techniques of false promise, baiting into moral hazard, fictionalisms, to lie, cheat, and steal from our people, and subject them once again to defeat.

    As far as I know this argument is unassailable other than to make the claim that the right and libertarians are better liars, whose message sells better than the false promises of the left, when what separates us largely from the left is that we speak the truth whether in scientific, legal, rationalist, or allegorical form, and that our message does not sell, but must be enforced, for the good of those who would hyper-consume the institutions that make our quality of life possible.

    There is only one way of imposing order at any scale – and that is law: the market for punishment. What order you build upon that law, must today consist of force, finance, commons production, insurance, administration, and education. You cannot avoid producing all of those functions and survive competition in the world. It cannot be done.

    And these are the roles of the various wings of the right and near right.

    And if you understand my policy recommendations you will understand also that I’ve solved most of the means of preying upon our people

    You must only decide:

    (a) How you want to obtain power,

    (b) What degree of separation to choose (conquest, secession, big sort.

    (c) How you want to operate whatever government or governments result.

    (d) What policies to enact if obtaining power and operating government, while still defending against enemies foreign and domestic.

    (e) Whether you want to even attempt to impose dictatorship, or a state version of christianity. Because both will fail.

    My preference is to defederalize, to redistribute centralized federal weath to many regions, eliminate discretionary rule in the federal government – leaving only watchman duties: military, treasury, insurer of last resort, judiciary limited to conflicts between the states.

    My preference is to impose voluntary disassociation and let the ‘market’ do its job. (this will drive (((enemy))) and occupier into urban centers.(ghettos).

    My preference is to issue warnings to all other states that if their people come here for our rule, then we will come there to rule their people out of self defense.

    My preference is forcible repatriation and revocation of passports of the enemies in exchange for not engaging in war upon them mostly south america.

    My preference is to make european religions of all forms the law of the land, and to prohibit all others, and to restore the churches to control of education, under threat of decomposition if they violate any of the laws.

    My preference is to immediately export the revolution and restoration to the rest of our peoples – in cooperation with those outside of western europe -all of whom will help us.

    But the truth is – we will ALWAYS AND EVERYWHERE gravitate to a government of rule of law if we want to survive competition on the world stage with our own people. Because we can outcompete others only by this means.

    Everything else is not ‘my problem’ so to speak: it is yours. Because I don’t need to involve myself in anything other than bringing about change, and providing the means of transition, and a means of operating such a government if we win.

    If you want to fight over control of it that’s your game. But you will, I promise, end up with what I propose simply because of the numbers, power, and knowledge of the different factions.

    You can have wishes and fantasies. But the only reality that can exist is revolt is necessary and very soon. That it will be somewhere between uncomfortable and horrific. That we will choose PRAGMATICALLY whatever means of ‘divorce’ is most easily available (mine is easiest), and what rules to impose on people in order to complete the victory, while not being conquered by external forces.

    Anything else you believe is nonsense. If you are too frightened to fight for these conditions then just shut up, cower, and stay out of the way of those who are not. There are men among us. And we are many. And we are enough.

    Anyone i find deluding our people to any other set of options is an ally of our enemy, and I will, and we will, do everything possible to punish you and silence you for your actions.

    Curt Doolittle.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 11:51:00 UTC

  • ON THE REPLICATION CRISIS IN PSYCHOLOGY (PSEUDOSCIENCE) What if the reason we ha

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0522-1MORE ON THE REPLICATION CRISIS IN PSYCHOLOGY (PSEUDOSCIENCE)

    What if the reason we have not developed a framework, and why psychology cannot convert to a science, is because we may like what we find? I’ve been working on the problem as a byproduct of my work (method) and I think it’s relatively simple and solid. We just won’t like it.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0522-1

    ====

    by Valerio Caprario (via james santagata)

    Incredibly deep paper:

    – the replicability crisis in psychology is not only driven by methodological and statistical shortcomings

    – it’s mainly driven by a lack of theoretical frameworks

    – Psychology needs to be turned into a formal science

    Abstract (Gated)

    The replication crisis facing the psychological sciences is widely regarded as rooted in methodological or statistical shortcomings. We argue that a large part of the problem is the lack of a cumulative theoretical framework or frameworks. Without an overarching theoretical framework that generates hypotheses across diverse domains, empirical programs spawn and grow from personal intuitions and culturally biased folk theories. By providing ways to develop clear predictions, including through the use of formal modelling, theoretical frameworks set expectations that determine whether a new finding is confirmatory, nicely integrating with existing lines of research, or surprising, and therefore requiring further replication and scrutiny. Such frameworks also prioritize certain research foci, motivate the use diverse empirical approaches and, often, provide a natural means to integrate across the sciences. Thus, overarching theoretical frameworks pave the way toward a more general theory of human behaviour. We illustrate one such a theoretical framework: dual inheritance theory.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 06:41:00 UTC

  • THOUGHTS ON OTHERS AND THE MOMENT (important read, esp near the end) PETERSON I

    THOUGHTS ON OTHERS AND THE MOMENT

    (important read, esp near the end)

    PETERSON

    I prefer not to punch on Peterson. I am very critical of his (lame) “Darwinian Truth” (ack). I do like his use of archetypes but not the semitic ‘submission’ despite its utility in therapy of the suffering. I prefer he spend more time on restoring Self Authoring as stoicism (development) rather than self help (correction after the fact). I don’t think he should end his straddling. He makes a sales funnel for us.

    MOLLY

    I won’t punch on Molly (although he is not gonna cut it as a philosopher and I wish he’d stop saying that) he is a great teacher, and he opens the sales funnel for us much further. … I disagree that he should move faster with our direction. He has a large audience to move and they trail. … I disagree that I should try to advocate my work on his show, I just feel that I should help his arguments when they are … insufficient (like the taleb issue).

    WOODS

    I have never that I know of said anything bad about Woods, although if I recall I’ve pushed back on issues where he is simply wrong. Tom is a good person. And I would love it if he could convince me that the church was not terrible for our people. I don’t follow tom so much as try to understand his rather ‘normie’ position in general.

    MISES INSTITUTE

    I have a personal mission to end the mises institute and their income stream unless they abandon the rothbardian fraud, and transfer to hayekian thought and western ethics.

    ROTHBARD, MISES, HOPPE

    I attacked rothbard, mises and hoppe to reform libertarianism and re-demarcate western libertarianism from semitic libertinism – and do clearly demarcate semitic pilpul, german rationalism, from anglo ratio-empiricism. I use Block (who I personally have affection for) as an example of rothbardian folly because he is the only serious rothbardian advocate of it.

    STRATEGY

    My strategy was to undermine jewish libertinism, and restore western soverentarianism(upper), liberty (middle), freedom (lower) so that we libertarians can once again form the intellectual vanguard of the ‘conservative’ (male) western strategy.

    TALEB

    I used to support Taleb but now that he’s come out as anti-white I”m going to have to put him on the ‘prosecute’ list.

    AUGUSTUS

    I don’t ever disagree with Augustus and like him very much and I like his via positiva as the opposite of my via-negativa. I also prefer his frame of thought because he understands the law so well.

    TRS

    I have a friendship with the TRS guys because they were the first people to pay attention to me … and I just like them. I mean, it’s really hard NOT to like them. They’re Hysterical.

    OTHERWISE I DON’T PAY ATTENTION

    I don’t pay attention to anyone else. Unless someone swings at me. Really. Unless someone asks me to look at something I don’t.

    The primary value of others is finding excuses to riff off their thoughts, so that I can illustrate a point, and continue the stream of education I provide to people. It’s this repetition from dozens of different angles, that makes it possible for me to slowly carve away and accumulated error bias and deceit.

    THE POPULAR CULTURE ISN”T MY TARGET

    I’m trying to recreate a frankfurt school that is in favor of our people rather than the enemy of our people. And I am pretty close to doing it.

    WIth these people we can easily saturate the informational commons with our arguments. It is very difficult if not impossible to defeat them. Because they expose the methods and consequences of abrahamism and it’s predation upon our people.

    WHAT I PAY ATTENTION TO

    Mostly I read the books, papers and blogs in Economics, Social Science, Cognitive Science, Genetics (anthropology), General physical science although I ignore biology and chemistry. Right now is a relatively dead period for economics. Social science continues to reform. CogSci (doesn’t really exist any longer but it is a term of convention now) continues to move rapidly, as does genetics. Physical science is really just improving measurements but we see very little indication of the next revolutionary step. AI is what it is and I think nothing is to be said other than we CAN make moral AI’s with propertarianism, but we cannot stop people from making immoral AI’s unless we hold people, organizations, governments, and nations accountable for doing so.

    INDIA PROJECT

    I am currently trying to understand the indian tradition and this turns out to be both interesting and difficult. The problem is finding material in sufficiently scientific form rather than the hindu equivalent of rational philosophy. India might provide an optimum solution of how to evolve a heart tradition. This is because india’s problem is simply demographic. but what passes for religion is not really good for europeans but the structure of it is … amazing. So really we have the european the indian, and confucian traditions to rely on with only the semitic as a threat to the world and mankind.

    THE CHRISTIANITY PROBLEM

    Most of the frustration I’m generating at the moment is due to the fact that I am still trying to find a way to accommodate the existing christians, and it appears that I have discovered the only possible solution because there is no direct solution under natural law (truth).

    It’s harder for christians in the first place, and harder for christians who stumble upon this phase of my work. Because they don’t understand how I work through criticism.

    And while I have solved the problem of religion (what generates demand). I just am struggling for a way to accommodate christians without providing an eternal weak point in the law.

    MY OWN PROBLEM – IN GENERAL

    It is a well understood phenomenon that overly smart folk cannot imagine the minds of not overly smart folks, and I am guilty always of overestimating the cognitive ability of others. We are all victims of cognitive biases that evolution gave us so that we would live in the illusion of greater similarity than we actually possess. The hard problems were not as hard for me to solve as learning how to communicate them parsimoniously. The hardest problem is not one which we communicate, but one which we intuit. We call this religion although it is more analogous to the “operating system” we install (train into) in our intuitions so that other software “paradigms” are open to understanding, negotiation, cooperation, and performance. But I struggle to understand and to adapt accordingly. It’s just a never ending battle.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 06:29:00 UTC

  • NO, UPB IS A MINOR RETREAD ON NAP. —“UPB isn’t synonymous with the NAP… Conf

    NO, UPB IS A MINOR RETREAD ON NAP.

    —“UPB isn’t synonymous with the NAP… Conflating UPB with the NAP suggests you’re not familiar with it? UPB is more like the extension of the scientific method to ethics more than anything else. I can’t see anything on the website about UPB – unless its refuted under a different name.”— Hamish

    Hamish:

    Comparing Jewish Libertarian Ethics vs European Libertarian Ethics.

    The test of any jewish-libertarian law is voluntarism.

    JEWISH LIBERTARIANISM (Libertinism)

    1. The first test of it’s failure is blackmail. It fails the test of blackmail.

    2. The second test of voluntarism is fully informed vs lying, the test is selling a lemon. if fails the selling of a lemon.

    3. The third test of voluntarism is baiting in to moral hazard, the test is usury. It fails the test of usury.

    4. The fourth test is of voluntarism is externality. The tests are prostitution, gambling, drug use, pornography….

    5. The fifth test of voluntarism is rent seeking….

    6. The sixth test is of voluntarism is undermining (propaganda, tradition, law, activism, reciprocity )….

    Jewish libertarianism (libertinism): voluntarism, plausible deniability, and denial of responsibility for externality. (“Can I get away with this?”) The ethics of the gypsy trader, ghetto, and pale.

    Jewish law and custom and habit is ‘it only takes two to make a deal” and “us vs them” and “undermining others is heroic”.

    EUROPEAN LIBERTARIANISM (Sovereignty)

    The test of european libertarianism is productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer free of imposition of cost by externality that would reduce the trust and risk of the people to engage in the production of goods, services, information whether private or common. it is applicable to all. that’s what rule of law means: applicable to all.

    European libertarianism (Sovereignty): reciprocity, full accounting of responsibility, for internality and externality. (“What can I be prosecuted for trying to get away with?”) The ethics of landholders who are militia and kin.

    European law and custom is we must limit our actions to internalization of costs, and as such ‘productive, fully informed, warrantied, transfer, free of imposition of costs by externality upon the interests of others.

    The purpose of law is to prevent low trust, low risk, retaliation cycles, and the feuds, and feuds accumulating in wars that result.

    The reason we developed the commons, mercantilism, the corporation, and large private corporations and capital markets and high trust and high economic velocity in the west, is because we practiced high trust ethics. The reason jews must live off a host, and muslims cannot build organizations larger than the family exept for their dogmatic religion, and as a consequence lived in poverty, is this difference in ethics.

    Europeans: Truth before face. Muslims: Face before truth. Judaism: neither truth nor face but simple utility.

    THE WEAPONIZATION OF THE FEMALE GROUP STRATEGY

    What you and every other libertarian (sucker) falls prey to is the semitic group strategy of baiting in to moral hazard using a half truth that baits your moral intuition into bypassing your critical reason (skepticism, distrust), with horrendous external consequences.

    This is the strategy of women. Women evolved to bait with promise of verbal attention, support, affection, care, or sex, without delivering on the sex, affection, or care. Women bait men into moral hazard. We call it manipulating but it is just their natural reproductive strategy at work. Women bait each other into moral hazard out of fear of ‘sticking out’ or ‘going against the grain’ thus generating pressure of ostracization.

    The semitic peoples evolved clannism, low trust, ghetto ethics, and baiting in to moral hazard using religion and intolerance as their group strategy. This is not successful against each other, but it is successful against more advanced (higher trust higher neoteny) people.

    The abrahamic religions and sophism of the old world and the abrahamic pseudosciences and sophisms of the modern world, all function by the same method of deceit: baiting a sucker into moral hazard, by offer of a discount. Western people are higher trust both genetically (low clannishness) and culturally (christian universalism), and institutionally (involuntary warranty of due diligence in products and services).

    All I have done is put into law the inability to use thse weapons against our people. Ive ended the ability to use half truths baiting into moral hazard, as a means of lying, in the commons.

    I finished the law for the age of information.

    ===

    HAZARD

    “A tiger trap presents a hazard not only to the tiger, but to man.”

    1. In old English law. An unlawful game at dice, those who play at being called “hazardors.” Jacob.

    2. In modern law. Any game of chance or wagering. Cheek v. Com., 100 Ky. 1,87 S. W. 152; Graves v. Ford, 3 B. Mon. (Ky.) 113; Somers v. State, 6 Sneed (Tenn.) 488.

    3. In insurance law. The risk, danger, or probability that the event Insured against may happen, varying with the circumstances of the particular case. See State Ins. Co. v. Taylor, 14 Colo. 499, 24 Pac. 883, 20 Am. St. Rep. 281.

    4. Moral hazard. In fire insurance. The risk or danger of the destruction of the insured property by fire, as measured by the character and interest of the insured owner, his habits as a prudent and careful man or the reverse, his known integrity or his bad reputation, and the amount of loss he would suffer by the destruction of the property or the gain he would make by suffering it to burn and collecting the insurance. See Syndicate Ins. Co. v. Bohn. 65 Fed. 170. 12 0. O. A. 531, 27 L. R. A. 614.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 05:26:00 UTC