Source: Facebook

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52498681_10156980434342264_5122284834521088000_o_10156980434332264.jpg THE TWO OBJECTIONSConnor CreeganI guess I would say that the problem lies in the assumption that there is a valid motivational arm correspondent with the arm of your philosophy. You’ve stated before that your system has a “demand” for an aesthetic component, but any reasonable aesthetic component will naturally run contrary to it because literary experiences are, in essence, at odds with excessive use of operational language. So which is it, do we “read Siege” to motivate revolution only to prosecute against the publication of Siege once regime change has occurred, or do we remain purists and hope that present measured material incentives are enough?Feb 12, 2019, 3:31 PMCurt DoolittleNot logical. There is plenty of motivational content that is not false. I just don’t say what political organization, and what mythology, and what mission one must choose – because theya re utilitarian.

I lay out what I think the optimum (most competitive) form of government is that will provide the highest returns for european peoples. I suggest what I think might be the optimum religious content.

But propertarianism like law is ‘via negativa’. Anything that is not false or parasitic is ‘good’. I don’t need to choose ‘the good’ I just need to remove all ‘bad’.

If you need to lie to do it and it includes parasitism on your own then it is not a good. It’s just admission of failure.

Your argument is that all goods consist of lies, and that’s false.Feb 12, 2019, 5:03 PMConnor CreeganDeception, in your philosophy, is contingent on the intended rejection of operational language, is it not?Feb 12, 2019, 5:08 PMCurt Doolittle????Feb 12, 2019, 6:17 PMZach QuarryThe legal system is a different way to apply violence. Before applying physical violence.Feb 12, 2019, 6:17 PMConnor CreeganAm I misunderstanding how you define and identify purposeful deception?Feb 12, 2019, 6:24 PMCurt DoolittleI have no idea because I don’t know what you’re implying.

Given:

Any statement passes the tests of:

categorically consistent (identity)

Internally consistent (Logically consistent)

externally correspondent (empirically consistent)

existentially consistent (operationally stated)

scope consistent (limits and full accounting)

rational (subjectively consistent – incentives )

reciprocal (reciprocally subjectively consistent – exchanges)

with these warranties of due diligence,

within the limits of possible restitution,

any display word or deed is free of imposition of costs,

and therefore free of retaliation.

Therefore it is truthful and moral.

We can never know if a statement is true (critical naturalism). We can only know that we have exhausted due diligence sufficient for the demand for due diligence given the promise, claim, testimony we are making.

This is Propertarian Natural Law’s epistemology: “Testimonialism’, or what some call ‘Critical Naturalism’.Feb 12, 2019, 6:47 PMTHE TWO OBJECTIONS

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52156672_10156980116932264_6547672682064773120_o_10156980116922264.jpg UM YOU ARE WELCOME TO THE MEMBERS OF “THE STUPID PARTY”Charles M TriplettI though John Mark’s YouTube videos were really good. How does she feel he’s a liability? He articulates his position excellently.Feb 11, 2019, 6:29 PMCurt DoolittleI think it’s just GSRRM ploy and claiming knowledge she does not have. In other words, appeal to false authority, or false evidence, under cover of GSRRM.Feb 11, 2019, 6:42 PMGreg HamiltonLol. Random thot says therefore cut him loose he’s a liability !Feb 11, 2019, 6:45 PMZach QuarryYeah, nah! I’m sold on what would pretty much stop us from fighting the left wing for eternity. One fight to rule them all, and in the darkness separate and punish them. Oof! Added alittle more to it.Feb 11, 2019, 7:06 PMDylan KnowlesYour vibe attracts your tribeFeb 11, 2019, 7:35 PMEdmund BlackadderHow does she arrive at the idea John Mark is a liability?Feb 11, 2019, 7:52 PMAlex RobinsonI’m entirely ignorant of the context of your conversation Curt, but could you further elaborate what you mean by the universalist for women and tribe for men comment?Feb 11, 2019, 7:58 PMCurt Doolittlereproductive strategies of female and male are different and are in competition. Which is something that’s been in the lit forever. Not a surprise. The fact that our cog biases reflect this is something the postmoderns rallied against, but cog sci has demonstrated otherwise. People are like any other domesticated animal. But because we can speak, and negotiate, we have consciousness. But our consiousness is even more influenced by our genes (biology) than the other way ’round.Feb 11, 2019, 8:33 PMCurt Doolittlein other words we do not so much know what we are doing as know what we are doing in the context of our reproductive strategy.Feb 11, 2019, 8:38 PMJarrod MarmaHis spread is attracting criticism and accusations that he (or Curt himself) is a fed. I personally will blame his anonymity as a large source of the problem because John Mark I know you might have a separate life that you don’t want entangled but a lot of hypocrisy can be seen in demanding truth while wearing a disguise. I have respect for what you’re doing and I understand possible lines of reasoning, but it didn’t seem like Curt addressed that unheard question that is possibly causing a good deal of hesitance among followers. If we’re going to demand honesty shouldn’t we lead with it?

(I have real pictures of me on my account if you want to point at my profile picture too)Feb 11, 2019, 9:12 PMCurt Doolittleit is of an asset value for john to be an achetype rather than an individual. As an archetype you can criticize his ideas or not. As an individual you can engage in ad homs. And as far as I know all I attribute this line of argument to, is GSSRM against not being able to use ad homs for the purpose of GSSRM rather than argument – which is what stupid people do. It’s all they can do.Feb 11, 2019, 9:26 PMAlex RobinsonYou’re saying that because of the way our reproductive organs work, men prefer small communities where women prefer large ones? I hope you understand if that isn’t accurate, you were vague lol.Feb 11, 2019, 9:31 PMCurt DoolittleJohn simply finds the utility of riffing off the “Anonymous” branding valuable. He will tell you otherwise but that’s the reason.Feb 11, 2019, 9:50 PMCurt DoolittleThe Anonymous and V for Vendetta brands are exeptional to riff off of.Feb 11, 2019, 9:51 PMJarrod MarmaAs long as the profits aren’t going to Warner Bros. 🤣Feb 11, 2019, 9:54 PMCurt DoolittleI actually have no idea who he is but I”m betting on a very small graphic arts firm, or web development company in the midwest or south. At least that’s my read.Feb 11, 2019, 9:54 PMEdmund BlackadderOr DisneyFeb 11, 2019, 9:55 PMCurt Doolittleoh don’t tell me stuff like that. it makes me cringe.Feb 11, 2019, 9:55 PMCurt Doolittle( just trying to be economical to keep up with the load tonight…. men think and work in hierarchical packs and women tend to work in a herd with herd morality (no one left behind) simple pseudoscientific version is r/k selection. )Feb 11, 2019, 10:13 PMAlex RobinsonCurt Doolittle gotcha, I see your point now. I’m very interested in going deeper but I can wait the topic to come up.Feb 11, 2019, 10:36 PMChristian KalafutThe Roman Empire was the most universalist entity in the ancient world and yet you praise it?Feb 12, 2019, 11:33 AMCurt DoolittleIt wasn’t universalist. It was a market for religions as long as they recognized the atuority of rome. They integrated sects the way english integrates words.Feb 12, 2019, 12:40 PMCurt DoolittleRome was a commercial empire, not a despotic or religious.Feb 12, 2019, 12:48 PMUM YOU ARE WELCOME TO THE MEMBERS OF “THE STUPID PARTY”