Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • BOOK UPDATE —“When’s the book coming out?”— name of the day. SHORT ANSWER Ev

    BOOK UPDATE

    —“When’s the book coming out?”— name of the day.

    SHORT ANSWER

    Everything is available free online. The book is a TOME. Do yourself a favor and read what’s online. The book is for ultra nerds and makes wittgenstein look like a conversationalist. If you can’t handle what’s online you certainly can’t handle the book.

    LONGER ANSWER

    Like we say in software… when it’s done. (after the courses. demand for the courses created pressure). Besides it’s all online in the overview. The book is just refinement. And I am extremely paranoid about making errors in it. Because I understand it will be under a great deal of scrutiny. Ergo I don’t think the book is much more helpful than what’s online. The overview and over 6000 articles. So I don’t feel as much pressure to publish it as I do provide the courses. And the courses help me further simplify the book.

    Ergo: we are working on the courses.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 20:23:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52051045_10156982689467264_495368900

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52051045_10156982689467264_495368900

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52051045_10156982689467264_49536890071678976_o_10156982689462264.jpg Steven KnappMy only regret is that I’ve but two hands to stack them with.Feb 12, 2019, 8:16 PMAnne SummersSkull piles are boring. We need a reintroduction to 9-pins. Let the sounds of thunder peel.Feb 13, 2019, 1:15 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 20:14:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52522670_10156982684237264_118005561

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52522670_10156982684237264_118005561

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52522670_10156982684237264_1180055617629323264_o_10156982684177264.jpg Rodrigo YoshimaYour quote?Feb 12, 2019, 8:15 PMCurt Doolittle(yes. unless i list others as “—-author name” )Feb 12, 2019, 8:16 PMRodrigo YoshimaCurt Doolittle awesomeFeb 12, 2019, 8:17 PMJohn MarkGreat fontFeb 13, 2019, 1:59 AMNoah J RevoyPrepare 100 men for leadership.

    Educate 1000 men as teachers.

    Instruct 10,000 men as captains.

    Train 100,000 men as fighters.Feb 13, 2019, 6:46 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 20:11:00 UTC

  • “Arguments are only for convincing your friends to help you make a bigger skull

    —“Arguments are only for convincing your friends to help you make a bigger skull pile.”—Dan Warren

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 20:09:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51733948_10156982680277264_111992919

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51733948_10156982680277264_111992919

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51733948_10156982680277264_1119929197926547456_o_10156982680272264.jpg Chaim Isaac ShekelgruberDogmatists be like “My received truth isn’t like the other received truths”Feb 12, 2019, 8:21 PMMikey D Moore…..OOOA! I see what you did there.Feb 12, 2019, 8:34 PMChristopher HallWhite sharia 2.0 i cFeb 12, 2019, 8:50 PMDuje DanteCringeFeb 12, 2019, 10:00 PMEliebe MatiasIn the land of Eurásia, where the nukes flies…Feb 12, 2019, 10:02 PMDaniel Roland AndersonMikey D Moore

    https://youtu.be/YuYUzjNiZqkFeb 13, 2019, 12:59 AMDaniel Roland AndersonClose enough, I reckon.Feb 13, 2019, 12:59 AMDarren HowellDoes that mean we become … White Walkers… 🤔🤔🤣🤣🤣Feb 13, 2019, 3:57 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 20:09:00 UTC

  • TERMINAL MORONITUDE —“FWIW: “There is no ‘wrong’. There is only what people wi

    TERMINAL MORONITUDE

    —“FWIW: “There is no ‘wrong’. There is only what people will retaliate against you for doing.” They retaliate against you for some reason. That reason is the imposition of costs upon that which they have born costs to obtain an interest. it’s that simple. Propertarianism isn’t excuses making for priors. It’s just empirical evidence of the accumulated history of mankind across all civilizations.”— CURTD

    —“Moral relativism is always a red flag.”—Moron

    Um, it’s MORAL ABSOLUTISM. You silly git. it’s EMPIRICAL moral absolutism.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 19:51:00 UTC

  • “Less argument. More skull piles.”—Solomon Volodymyr

    —“Less argument. More skull piles.”—Solomon Volodymyr

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 19:20:00 UTC

  • Provide a solution, and leadership will emerge. If leadership emerges so will co

    Provide a solution, and leadership will emerge.

    If leadership emerges so will consensus.

    If Consensus emerges, so will action.

    If action emerges, then we will win.

    .

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 18:52:00 UTC

  • CHANTING THE CORE 😉 Given: Any statement passes the tests of: – categorically c

    CHANTING THE CORE 😉

    Given:

    Any statement passes the tests of:

    – categorically consistent (identity)

    – internally consistent (Logically consistent)

    – externally correspondent (empirically consistent)

    – existentially consistent (operationally stated)

    – scope consistent (limits and full accounting)

    – rational (subjectively consistent – incentives )

    – reciprocal (reciprocally subjectively consistent – exchanges)

    – with these warranties of due diligence,

    – within the limits of possible restitution,

    Therefore:

    – Any such display word or deed;

    – is free of imposition of costs,

    And Therefore;

    – free of retaliation.

    And Therefore;

    – it is truthful and moral.

    We can never know if a statement is true (“critical naturalism”).

    We can only know that we have exhausted due diligence sufficient for the demand for due diligence given the promise, claim, testimony we are making.

    This is Propertarian Natural Law’s epistemology:

    … “Testimonialism’:

    … … “The completion of the scientific method”,

    … … … or what some call

    … … … … ‘Critical Naturalism’.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 18:50:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51882926_10156982475267264_390036777

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51882926_10156982475267264_390036777

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51882926_10156982475267264_390036777697542144_n_10156982475262264.jpg SHAMELESS PLUG: https://rangerup.com/Jack SanduskyCurt drops the Mic.Feb 12, 2019, 6:35 PMLuke LemmonBeing fully willing and capable of violent action while being opposed to it’s pursuit (Not to confuse it with it’s occasional need) is the definition of being meek. Being completely opposed to violent action in the face of its need is cowardice. It’s moral grandstanding hiding weakness. When the need to unsheathe our swords comes, the facade is uplifted.

    This is my favorite thing you discuss. The necessity of being capable of violence in order to restore natural law. “The meek will inherit the Earth” as the Bible verse goes.Feb 12, 2019, 6:45 PMAlain DwightOnly the naive think words and feelings rather than ethical violence can counter unethical violence.

    Antiviolence is like antigun. You can’t be. Only weapons enable disarming others. The question is: who should be armed and what should be constrained via violence?

    So what violence does antiviolence oxymoron rhetoric support? Arguably the worst and most tyrannical kind (the state against its own citizens).Feb 13, 2019, 10:07 AMSHAMELESS PLUG: https://rangerup.com/

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 18:26:00 UTC