Source: Facebook

  • CHRISTIANITY IN EUROPE WAS A RELIGION OF, FOR, AND BY THE ELITE. (Christianity =

    CHRISTIANITY IN EUROPE WAS A RELIGION OF, FOR, AND BY THE ELITE.

    (Christianity = Marxism-Postmodernism)

    “All roads lead to Rome.

    Christianity in Europe was a religion of, for, and by the elite. For example Catholic Mass was given in Latin until 1963. Did peasants speak, read or understand Latin? Not 12th century french peasants that is for damn sure. The elite nature of the church goes back to the original legitimacy of kings. When the Roman Empire collapsed there was a huge power vacuum in the conquered territories. The very small and very young Catholic Church held onto its dominance in Europe by holding onto the power of the ancient Pontiff Maximus. Kindling the ancient legitimacy and glory of Rome the Pope was the origin of authority in Christendom.

    Here we have to interject a distinction between the Eastern and western Roman empires. In the Orthodox and Eastern Church the High Priest did not trump the authority of the Kings/Emperors. But, in the West the Pontiff (Pope) did trump the authority of kings. This traditional distinction between the two could go back to Caesar being Pontiff Maximus before being Emperor. And later Constantine being King who appointed priests.

    Remember when Napoleon crowned himself Emperor? This was to signify that he stands over the authority of the pope. First off what we know today as France was not completely unified during the Middle Ages. It was actually a diverse place with a Normans, Franks, Goths, Anglo-Germanic peoples, and who could forget the Swiss.

    If we start with the two hundred years between Charlemagne and the Norman invasion of Great Britain (East Anglia) in 1066 as a measure we can be assured that peasants in Europe were still very pagan. Charlemagne (crowned by the Pope) spread the authority of the Holy Roman Empire with a sword. Charlemagne is basically the ultimate Christian warrior king for Christ. If you do some digging you will find much of his kingship was spent on horseback spreading the word by spilling blood. He traveled collected taxes and asserted his and the Churches legitimate authority.

    In Early Christian France alone there is a very very diverse group of peoples living together. So basically the average peasant would only know what they are told by the Church i.e. the divine nature of the king, the dominance of the Christ, the meaning of the divine birth, and the meaning of Christ’s death. What is interesting is the degree of which the early church in Europe actually adapted the rituals and practices of the people in Europe.

    For exapmle we even today still celebrate, May first (Beltaine), Christmas (Saturnalia), Easter(Roman New Year), and Holloween (Samhaine). Have you ever played around a May Pole? Have you ever kissed under Holly? What about drinking at the modern New Year? All of these holidays (Holy Days) were originally pagan holy days. Is it not interesting how we still celebrate them? Did you know the puritan colony of Massachusetts had laws prohibiting all of the aforementioned Holy Days on the grounds that they were in fact Pagan!

    So basically the early church appealed to the native religions of Europe by adapting their practices. Because remember, Europeans were the first conquest of the cross they had to be slowly integrated because there were far to many pagans to kill.

    So in a TLDR answer to your question a peasant in early christian France would most likely still know about the ancient religion of their forefathers. They would be practicing Christians but the practices of villages across France would be markedly different. If you ever visit France you will notice village saints or church relics across the country. The peasants would know relatively know nothing outside of their small worlds. Being illiterate and with feudal system laws in place tying people to the land there was little opportunity for people to learn much about the world out side of what the local authority figures said. Those saints were once either pagan gods or heroes now forgotten and adapted by the Church. Those relics therein were once pagan relics. This was the only way the early church was able to survive in the Pagan stronghold of Europe. Through a conquest of integration built off of the once Omnipotent authority of the Roman Empire.

    Remember Beowulf was written down in the 11th century the line between pagan and christian was still fairly thin well into the renascence. There are some, like Colin, who have even theorized that the Druids, and Pagan Kings went underground joining the church in an attempt to keep their ancient traditions alive.”

    Edit: sources:

    Viola, Frank and Greg Barna: Pagan Chritianity (2008)

    González, Justo L. (1984). The Story of Christianity: Vol. 1: The Early Church to the Reformation. San Francisco: Harper.

    Grabar, André (1968). Christian iconography, a study of its origins. Princeton University Press.

    Morris, Colin (1989). The papal monarchy : the western church from 1050 to 1250. Oxford: Clarendon.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-20 18:37:00 UTC

  • A slave of irons is cheaper than the work of one’s hands. A slave of land(serf)

    A slave of irons is cheaper than the work of one’s hands.

    A slave of land(serf) is cheaper than a slave of irons.

    A slave of tax is cheaper than a slave of land.

    A slave of credit is cheaper than a slave of tax

    A slave of faith is the cheapest of all.

    He pays interest on his credit

    He pays taxes in his production

    He pays for his land

    He pays for himself.

    He costs nothing but false promises;

    But to bait him into slavery with false promises he must seek relief from an oppressor, and returns he can never quite grasp:

    Freedom from scarcity, freedom from inequality, freedom from a nature all but hostile to his existence.

    Europeans.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-20 18:29:00 UTC

  • Thomas sowell taught me that the reason the catholic church succeeds in producin

    Thomas sowell taught me that the reason the catholic church succeeds in producing intellectuals is that it forces you to think in terms greater than yourself, about human organization – it’s like a military discipline against the forces of nature rather than against man.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-20 17:45:00 UTC

  • TOLERATING THE TRUTH OF PHYSICAL, NATURAL, EVOLUTIONARY LAWS We need: The Aristo

    TOLERATING THE TRUTH OF PHYSICAL, NATURAL, EVOLUTIONARY LAWS

    We need:

    The Aristotle/Law (Truth) to know it;

    The Epic cycle/Paganism/Tragedy (Strong) to fight for it,

    The Arthurian/chivalry(Middle) to govern under it;

    and Christianity(Meek) to suffer it.

    The meek are left out of the European pagan pantheon – they are the slaves – those to be conquered, domesticated like animals, and used like animals, to advance the aristocracy that advances the laws of nature and nature’s god.

    Christianity provides the meek with honor and status and virtue.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-20 17:24:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/110277026_333915091339984_7465501862

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/110277026_333915091339984_7465501862

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/110277026_333915091339984_7465501862978626600_n_333915088006651.jpg MAJOR REFORMS PAGE

    (re: Martin’s suggestion that I simplify education.)

    1) Added anchor links from the topic list to the sections.

    2) Added

    — Economies

    — Commons

    3) Split

    — Education

    — Higher Education

    REGARDING EDUCATION

    Everything I write in the introduction is something I don’t have to write in the constitution. So I want to make those arguments here in the introduction that are most likely to meet opposition or confusion. Education is something people understand. If I say that we’re going to reform the economy that’s something they don’t expect to understand so deeply.

    I would prefer to get every section pretty filled out like education is, and then simply move the declaratives into the constitution where necessary.

    So I think we’ll finish the introduction and then decide how to present the information.MAJOR REFORMS PAGE

    (re: Martin’s suggestion that I simplify education.)

    1) Added anchor links from the topic list to the sections.

    2) Added

    — Economies

    — Commons

    3) Split

    — Education

    — Higher Education

    REGARDING EDUCATION

    Everything I write in the introduction is something I don’t have to write in the constitution. So I want to make those arguments here in the introduction that are most likely to meet opposition or confusion. Education is something people understand. If I say that we’re going to reform the economy that’s something they don’t expect to understand so deeply.

    I would prefer to get every section pretty filled out like education is, and then simply move the declaratives into the constitution where necessary.

    So I think we’ll finish the introduction and then decide how to present the information.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-20 17:15:00 UTC

  • WHY ARE ALL SOCIOLOGISTS LEFTIST (NOT RIGHT) Sociology is a leftists discipline

    WHY ARE ALL SOCIOLOGISTS LEFTIST (NOT RIGHT)

    Sociology is a leftists discipline because it is the Pseudoscience and the center of the replication crisis. Right wing ‘social science’ is aristocratic politics, law, and economics: science. The Right-wing uses science: Rule of law that produces markets that determine one’s value to others, economics to measure the success at rule of law in producing those markets, policy to supplement those markets – and we don’t deny the fact that natural selection must continue by continuing the western tradition of limiting reproduction to those that can survive and pay for their offspring by service of one another in those markets, with those policies, under that rule of law, measured by economics, and correspondence with, and coherence with, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. Period.

    The purpose of ‘social science’ is purely Marxist-Postmodernist (second Jewish counter-revolution against truth, reason, science): is to provide pseudo-scientific cover for the Great Lies: The nature of man (amoral), the variation in man (Race, class, age), the malleability of man (the slate isn’t blank or rewritable), the possibility of endless growth (end of scarcity), and therefore to claim Europeans are ‘evil’ and ‘oppressors’ for the discovery of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, domesticating themselves and others, so that Europeans nearly single-handedly dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, disease, suffering, and early death.

    The purpose of the first Jewish-Christian-Islamic counter-revolution against European civilization, and the purpose of the second Jewish Marxist, postmodernist, feminist, political correctness, counter-revolution against European civilization, is constructed by the myth of oppression, rather than domestication, and that the Great Lies are an alternative to the truth: that we must live within the limits of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws if we wish to prosper and pass thru the great filter; that only Europeans discovered and adapted to them; an that all other civilizations either failed to develop, or stagnated, or fell, because they failed to have the courage to face the truth: the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws are tragic for man.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-20 17:03:00 UTC

  • “The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on Earth, and

    —“The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on Earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but only to have the law of nature for his rule.” — Samuel Adams (via josh moye)

    —“Not every individual can practice Reciprocity in display word and deed. Every group can practice Rule of Law by Natural Law by getting rid of the members that can’t.”—Martin Štěpán

    —–“God is with us because only Europeans practice adherence to physical (entropy, conservation of energy), natural (reciprocity, testimony), and evolutionary laws (market eugenics, preventing regression). Only Europeans practice the Rule of Law by Natural Law. That is God’s Law.”— CDUpdated Jul 20, 2020, 2:25 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-20 14:25:00 UTC

  • REAL HISTORY OF SLAVERY Jul 20, 2020, 1:40 PM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWrfjUzYvPoTHE REAL HISTORY OF SLAVERY

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWrfjUzYvPoUpdated Jul 20, 2020, 1:40 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-20 13:40:00 UTC

  • Learned from “PantsGate” thanks to Western RenaissanceUpdated Jul 20, 2020, 1:33

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbHKU-FllNo&feature=shareLessons Learned from “PantsGate” thanks to Western RenaissanceUpdated Jul 20, 2020, 1:33 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-20 13:33:00 UTC

  • POSITIONING The Adults in the Room, The People with a Plan. The Honest and Ratio

    POSITIONING

    The Adults in the Room, The People with a Plan. The Honest and Rational voice of Truth in a world of False Promise, and Deceit. For all conservatives, across the spectrum. For normies, for the center, and left of center, and even for the misguided children on the extreme left and right. Because the only enemy of all people is a domestic empire with too many people, too little integration, too many competing preferences, and too great a power distance between people and the government to bring their wants into being. That is a mainstream not “social media” message we can get the press to show up for. That is a message that will sell today – across the spectrum.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-20 08:38:00 UTC