Source: Facebook

(Collection of Twitter Posts)

Great excuse. So, you’re a posturing little punk from a second world country promoting a third world political religion, trying to get attention, by bravado and insult when you can’t even demonstrate you have an argument worth showing up for? You won’t, cause you can’t, make one.

I set my criteria. If you won’t show up …… Then apologize for your behavior, show me an argument (even define NB as other than vague “Dugginism”), and show me evidence that you can hold an adult debate. If you can’t then you’re just a poser afraid to make a case in public.

I told you to apologize for your childishness, show me evidence you can hold a debate, or there is no debate to accept. I’m claiming you can’t debate, don’t have an argument, and are an attention whore. You have to be ABLE to debate. You’ve demonstrated you can’t. Man up.

So what are we doing to debate then? Adaptive innovative, mixed economies, versus a repetition of the soviet and Russian failures of the past? is this a debate over prices and incentives again? What is there to debate other than another promise ‘this time will be different’?

Yes, you disagree, you haven’t learned from the failures of the past (china has: nationalsm+state capitalism+to catch up). And so have we (nationalism + state capitalism to stay ahead). Russia is poor so it can’t take either path and will have to return to forced labor. Simple.

Unfortunately, Russia is very poor, vast, infrastructure costs too high, low trust, massively corrupt, hated by everyone around it for hubris, lacking population and economy to become a great power, and can only succeed by restoring forced labor and low productivity. I agree.

You seem to be under the illusion that Propertarinism is other than a formal logic social science that explains the European miracle and how to repeat it – with European people. Russia failed in joining advanced civilizations by creating trust necessary for complex organizations.

My work restores European peoples to their trajectory free of lying – bolshevik and otherwise. Economies and Political systems are just organizations necessary for any given set of conditions with a given demographic. Russia remains backward but moral, west immoral but forward.

There is no reason to do debate in person unless there is evidence one is worthy of debate. So far I don’t hear any argument worth having that hasn’t been settled by the evidence. I you can’t make an argument in text you sure as heck can’t make one in words.

We are still trying to determine if you have any argument. So far you say you have beliefs. But this occult-religious or secular-religious (ideological) not scientific or rational and worthy of debate.

Maybe can explain to me why you think your ‘maxism will work this time’?

You can say disagree with my ‘science’ but you’re merely saying you disapprove or dislike it. You’re not saying it’s false (and you can’t – I know). You can only say that only anglos are fit for rule of law, and no other people are, and as such, other means of government needed.

And this is why I prefer to ‘test the mettle’ of posers in public, and in writing, because I know full well that you have an empty hat, claiming a rabbit in it.

China uses facism. National Capitalism. Fascism won. Clan Beurearatic fascism won in both china and russia. Boslhevism is jewish communism. The underclasses can’t do anything competent and never have.

Russia had about the same # people, more resources, but Russian people are low trust, lazy, production quality was trash, and (STILL) can’t form large organizations because of low trust. (same as Muslims). Russians used cheap(forced) labor, US/CN used credit. Incentives mattered.

The condition for victory was that everything RU touched went backward by a century. Every RU immigrant had the same effect on ukraine, latvia, lithuania etc as africans did on the usa. Even today RU are all ‘Glopnkis’. We make fun of them in UA. Lazy, violent, criminal, corrupt.

There is no evidence of that. And I am certain I now the economics of it better than you do. The quality declined rapidly generation by generation as people learned ‘to do the minimum’. Only the military could function and did. Hence your instincts of militarization of economics.

So no, it was Russian under-development, rapid industrialization using militarization of the economy, the failure to grasp that while states can concentrate capital to form industries they must immediately be managerially privatized or they turn parasitic. That is a law of econ.

And they were wrong, right? Those economists were wrong? I was there in the 70’s when the soviet failure was obvious, 80’s when we chose to bankrupt it, and 90’s when everything fell apart, and they said ‘well, we didn’t see that coming’ – but we did.

I played in those Red Blue war games in the 80’s. I understood that we could never win a ground war, but russia could never win an economic and technological one.

We were sifting thru data on russian production. It was obvious. Just as the Stalin vs Kruchev era build quality.

The Russian empire failed for the same reason the nazi’s failed: conversion of religious into ideological zeal, so that preserving the system of lies was more important than reacting to the empirical evidence on the ground. Hitler, Soviets, Chinese, Jews, Muslims, xians failed.

RU empire fell because the J’s convinced the peasants that they could be saved from poverty and war if they fell for the false promise they were oppressed and could rule. Had the whites succeeded, the czar survived,and the Hohenzollern taken DU throne Russia could have caught up.

In the end, you are still saying that a military organization of production by peasants unable to organize by trust and law, can do anything other than bring a backward country into parity, before converting from forced labor to incentives to maintain competitive advantage.

Yes russian can dugginize as soon as western europe falls and provide europe with an army and cause the rest of europe to fall down to russian standards of incompetence and poverty.

Yes I expect that something like this might happen because Germany is weak, and France not strong.

All power rotation in history in all civs follows the same path. As the economy increase in prosperity the number of the territorial (martial)aristocracy must shrink, and a new ‘house’ for the merchants created since they now produce all tax revenues. UK/DU yes. FR/RU failed.

I don’t see that you have a debate other than that you are following the Tradition RU habit of historical revisionism and data-cherrypicking in order to avoid the central thesis, of force labor discounts at cost of corruption, vs incentive labor costs in favor of productivity.

The consensus among political theorists at present is that nationalism is on the rise, state capitalism won over market capitalism, and that states must act as primary venture capitalists, and the private sector manage state assets by incentives. Problem? Slavs can’t Truth/ROL.

And that in the absence of European empires, the British empire, the American ‘preservation’ of the British empire, that the world will return to normal as a conflict of civilizations led by core states, with ‘torn countries’ creating conflict between those civilizations.(TK)

And that in the absence of European empires, the British empire, the American ‘preservation’ of the British empire, that the world will return to normal as a conflict of civilizations led by core states, with ‘torn countries’ creating conflict between those civilizations.(TK)

Worse, world economic and military instability is now in the USA’s favor, since we can no longer afford to police the world’s seas. China has taken manufacturing base. Mexico our labor force. Immigration our culture, state, and proceeds. Jews our rule of law. We’re done.

So you’re talking about stupid shit of the last century thinking you’re smart by fighting a war that was decided a century ago, and failing to see the evidence before you.

Russia will not survive this century intact. Nor with the USA. China might now. And Europe is .. lost.

We just outlined the debate. I’ve engaged your points. Nothing can compensate for the failure of forced labor economies to produce continuously declining production, and continuously increasing corruption that creates negates initial advantage.

You’re afraid of public written debate because you can’t play (((Abrahamic games ))). and don’t want a public record of your defeat. And you cant get away with kiddie games in public text that you can with mainbois in ‘discord’.

There is no perfect steady state government. The optimum is a monarchy as a judge of last resort, a professional bureaucracy, with state as primary venture capitalist, ensuring that profits made from the people are shared with the people at least in their commons.

The level of participatory government depends on the relative size of the middle (asset responsible) classes – not taxpaying classes. The only value of participatory government is negative – to vote out people or down taxes or down policy.

These are just truths. How do they apply to your people? Well, that’ depends on the level of sophistication of your people. Russians are smart educated but trust no one.

Well, I got you to say Chinese (Nationalist) Intolerant (fascist) state-capitalist (State as primary investor) instead of some silly ideological bullshit so now we are at least talking like adults. And yes that is the wave of the future as far as I can tell. So what?

I’m educating the audience. And I’m establishing the terms of the debate. So far, all I know is that you’re arguing for state capitalism and haven’t read my seconddeclaration and how the state is organized, or how the financial sector is absorbed by the state

Except that we know what “Chinese nationalist fascist expansionist, state capitalist, mixed economy” means because it exists and is possible. If you want to try to legitimize antique labels that’s just intellectual dishonesty. China is reverting to WORLD HISTORICAL NORMS.