Source: Facebook

TESTIMONIALISM ALL OF MY WORK IS REDUCIBLE TO THIS

(very important)

Everything else is education

THE REASON FOR WESTERN EXCEPTIONALISM: SOVEREIGNTY, TRUTH, AND MARKETS PRODUCE VELOCITY.

1) Individual Sovereignty. (Not liberty from immoral rule, not freedom from immoral command, not positive freedom from nature’s constraints – but sovereignty. )

2) Testimonial (performative) Truth: The Development of (unforgiving) Martial Epistemology (of the brotherhood of warriors) into a universal commons, and from that the discovery of objective Truth, and Debate, Reason, Greek ‘science’, Empirical Science, and now Testimonial Truth (‘complete science’).

3) Cooperation at scale under sovereignty can only be achieved by the use of voluntary markets, and reciprocal insurance: a market for consumption(labor, craft, organization, decision making), a market for production(goods, services, information), a market for reproduction(marriage and family), a market for commons (territory, resources, built capital, information, norms, traditions, ‘laws’, and institutions.), a market for dispute resolution (natural, empirical, common, judge-discovered, law, decided by jury), a market for polities (different group competitive strategies accessible through voluntary association and disassociation).

4) Just as only truth survives when we eliminate ignorance, error, bias, and deceit, prosperity survives when we first, collect in groups so that we reduce the opportunity cost of cooperation, and second when we eliminate the frictions of unpredictability in our attempts at cooperation increasing the velocity of cooperation and extending our plans and production cycles further into the future, where less change is required in the present to cause greater change in the increasingly distant future.

5) A small, relatively poor group of people can use force of arms to create Sovereign Rule (Aristocratic Egalitarianism), as an industry and as a profession – and it is the most profitable profession yet invented by man.

6) By incrementally suppressing all nonsovereign acts using natural, judge discovered, common law, as those nonsovereign acts are discovered (the imposition of costs), then humans are increasingly forced out of parasitism and into production, with transfer within kin groups the limit of that legal reach. Kin insure kin.

7) The unproductive are prohibited from reproduction. The problematic are hung. The excesses are eliminated by starvation, disease, and war. Thus incrementally reducing the costly lower classes that lack both ability and will to engage in productive labors.

8) The enlightenment seizure of power by the middle class from the aristocracy using the equalizing power of guns, in the hands of the numerous and common man, destroyed (a) the multi-house government that served as a market for commons between the classes. (b) The ‘truth’ of the four or more classes as cooperating not competing. (c) the cost of the entry into the franchise of property owners as demonstrated by service in the military(the market for property franchise) – joining the company of insurers of last resort. (d) the cost of entry into the political franchise by the ownership of real property. (the market for the political franchise by demonstrated success at productivity) (e) the cost of reproduction as demonstrated by productivity sufficient to obtain a marriage (the market for reproduction), (f) the incentive to limit rule to the minimum interference, and the universal demand for increases in the power of rule to force submission rather than resolve differences by calculation: cooperative exchange. (g) the suppression of natural law by the rubric of monopoly majoritarian rule. And the conflation of law with legislation and regulation(commands). (h+) and many more.

The consequence of which has been our loss of sovereignty, liberty, and freedom (and soon consumption), in exchange for vastly increasing the scale of our underclasses, and increasing the transaction costs of cooperation, and spending down millennia of genetic, institutional, legal, normative, cultural, civilizational, artistic, territorial and every other form of capital that we inherited from those who had accumulated it.

-The Six Warranties of Due Diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit.

-The inclusion of Moral Due Diligence: Productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to externalities that are productive, fully informed, warrantied and voluntary.

-The inclusion of Full Accounting of Changes in Property In Toto(demonstrated property) in the consideration of Moral Due Diligence.

– The writing of laws using strict construction from the first principle of natural law: non-imposition of costs against property in toto.

-The Defense of the Informational Commons against the imposition of costs by use of universal standing in matters of the informational commons.

TRUTH

The problem of the second Great Deceit.

Solving it through demand truth in public speech, prosecuting as fraud just as we prosecute all other frauds.

The problem is creating legal due diligence criteria.

Solving it through tests of due diligence in all possible dimensions

Testimonialism provides a list of those due diligences.

We already know most of those due diligences.

But we add Morality and Full Accounting to the list.

Morality requires productive, informed, warrantied voluntary transfers limited to externalities of the same criteria.

Full Accounting requires that we enumerate the changes in state to all forms of capital (property in toto).

LAW

When we discover new law we write it using strict construction from the first principle of morality (above).

We start with the intention of the newly discovered law (scope), and we continue with definitions(declarations), and processes(functions.)

Law must be then constructed, operationally, and it must be fully calculable – essentially a programming language of law that is just as complete as are computable formulae.

This creates a non-interpretable, but expandable, fully testable, legal system, open to continuous improvement and correction.

To ensure the enforcement of this system, and to ensure constant correction of it, as it applies to the informational commons, this commons must be open to defense under universal standing.

The same criteria applies to all contracts, including those involuntary contracts we call legislation and regulation.

Meaning that any and all citizens can compete with legislators and regulators, and the judiciary to force truthful and moral operation of that industry that we call government, that produces that product and services we call ‘commons’. Or stated in the legal vernacular: the people must always possess juridical defense against law, legislation, regulation, and contract -without exception.

MARKET FOR COMMONS

The other significant advice that I’ve given consists in the methods of restoring the use of government as a market for commons between the classes by various means, all of which eliminate the monopoly production of commons under that worst of all possible tyrannies: democracy.

ALL THE REST IS EXPLANATION

Everything else I have written is to EDUCATE by explanation the causes of the principle of universal sovereignty and the market society that is the only solution to persistence of sovereignty, and why the west in both the modern and ancient worlds, was able to innovate so much faster than the rest, despite being a small, poor population on the edge of the bronze age.

THERE IS NOTHING MORE TO UNDERSTAND

But one does not need (as I do) to understand the entirety of why this solution is sufficient to restore the west to its strategy of sovereignty and by consequence markets for consumption, production, reproduction(family), commons(govt), population(countries), and leadership (monarchies). Nor does one need (as I do) to understand the entire history of why this is all so. One needs only understand that the solution is to evolve our law to match the increases in the industrialization of information distribution, so that any informational product of any kind enters the market for information regulated just as we regulate any other product or service: that it must be truthful.

AND IT ISNT COMPLICATED

Now, I do not have the faintest idea why any of that is hard to grasp.

Nor do I understand why testimonialism is hard to grasp:

1 – Identity: Categorical Consistency. I don’t see why we aren’t great at this already. (sensibility)

2 – Logic: Internal Consistency – although when I say this I mean that logical consistency does not refer to ‘meaning’ but to existentially possible statements. There is nothing new here that isn’t largely in eprime and performative truth. (reason)

3 – Empirical: External Consistency (Correspondence). I don’t have to teach the world about empiricism for goodness sakes. (reality)

4 – Operational: Existential Consistency. This takes a bit of practice but again, it is easily solved by writing in eprime in first person voice, as a sequence of operations and observations. This is already done in the physical sciences. (human action)

5 – Moral: Voluntary Consistency. All transfers consist exclusively of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to externalities of the same criteria. The only novelty here is in full-accounting of property in toto. (cooperation)

6 – Scope: Scope consistency. Consisting of (a) limits, (b) parsimony, and (c) full accounting. Where the only novelty here is a full accounting of property in toto. (scope)

SURVIVAL VS UNDERSTANDING SEEMS COUNTER INTUITIVE

What is counter-intuitive, that most people seem to have trouble grasping, is the difference between the false comforting certainty of justificationism, and the true but uncomfortable uncertainty of survival from criticism. We are taught to prove things. to get the right answer. But the universe does not work like that. Anything that is not false might be true. Law works by the same means: if there are criteria by which a thing is illegal (false) than that which survives those criteria is legal (true).

TESTIMONIALISM MERELY INCREMENTALLY EXTENDS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD OF PROVIDING A WARRANTY OF DUE DILIGENCE AGAINST IGNORANCE, ERROR, BIAS, AND DECEIT

So testimonialism extends the scientific method into social science, law, and politics. As long as you have done your due diligence as a producer of a good, a service, or information, then you have broken no natural law. If you produce a good, a service, or information, and have not done due diligence, and done no harm, then you have broken no natural law. But if you produce a good, a service, or information and someone claims harm, then you are liable for damages. And the problem you face, is that damages done by disinformation are extraordinarily hard to repair, compared to those done by goods and much harder to repair than those done by services.

Testimonialism is reducible to the requirement that we test all dimensions that humans can possibly sense, perceive, and act against.

WE ARE, OURSELVES, AN INSTRUMENT OF MEASUREMENT

Why does that matter? Because with any testimony we are trying to create a description that through a process of reconstruction, the audience envisions that which you claim to have envisioned. So our bodies, senses, minds function as units of measure. Therefore reducing the world to descriptions that are subjectively testable by a jury is a test of your descriptions. We humans are the unit of measure because we are marginally indifferent – at least in groups – in what we can sense, perceive, understand, and sympathize with.

Imagine you are looking at a scene, and describing it. And you are talking to someone who sees 100 scenes (or an infinite number for that matter), and he is trying to identify which one you’re describing, but you can’t hear him. He can only hear you.

If he can correctly choose the one you’re describing your testimony is ‘truthful’.

THE NECESSARY PART OF MY WORK IS ‘DONE’

So I don’t believe that I have more work to do in explaining the central insights provided by my work. I may have much more EDUCATION to do. And I can create more educational content. But the central thesis of sovereignty > markets > truth > informational commons > strict construction > universal standing > market government with houses for each of the classes does not seem to be very hard to understand.

YOU NEED TO USE YOUR VIOLENCE

If you want to know the answer – I just gave it to you. You just need to withdraw from the state the deposit of your violence, and use that violence in every way possible to disrupt economy and infrastructure and rule until your demand for truth is met.

Or that’s the amount of energy I have to put into this tonight. You don’t need to understand more than that in order to understand how to restore western civilization from the second great utopian deceit: cosmopolitanism: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Adorno and the many others of their ilk.

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine