–“I wonder if in one hundred years we just need a roomful of geniuses and the internet to run the whole world.”–Adam Voight
Yeah. That’s what I’m thinking. Except that word ‘run’ is an experiential analogy, and not an operational or descriptive statement.
So, what I worry about is whether it is analogy for “serve”, “farm”, or “enslave”.
…(!!!!)
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-23 05:05:00 UTC
(no sleep in two days. omg. I’m useless.)
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-23 03:23:00 UTC
I want every people to compete for dominance.
I just want our people to never be defeated.
What are you, cowards? Women?
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-23 03:23:00 UTC
E-PRIME LESSON OF THE DAY
THE RULE: DISALLOWED WORDS – NO “GOD MODE SPEECH”.
—E-Prime does not allow the conjugations of the verb “to be”, such as “be”, “am”, “is”, “are”, “was”, “were”, “been”, “being”; the archaic forms of to be (e.g. “art”, “wast”, “wert”), or the contractions of to be (e.g. “I’m”, “he’s”, ” she’s”, or “they’re”).—
REVERSAL: ALLOWED WORDS
—become; has; have; having; had (I’ve; you’ve), do; does; doing; did
can; could, will; would (they’d), shall; should, ought, may; might; must
remain, equal–
TRANSLATE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS INTO E-PRIME.
1) The cat is black.
2) Where have you been?
3) They were at the movies.
4) Where is john? He’s digging a ditch.
5) To be or not to be, That is the question.
EPrime (E’) is harder to use than you’d think. It takes about three weeks to get it down in writing. Another three weeks to start to speak it. But it’s the first step in speaking operationally: Using A Consistent Frame Of Reference (point of view) when narrating a sequence of human actions, and thereby demonstrating that you know of what you speak. 🙂
EXERCISES – SUGGESTION AND DECEPTION
Take a few SJW or other group criticisms and try to figure out what stated judgements, suggested substitutions, informational omissions, the individual is using to affect our interpretation of COSTS. (morality)
1) Stated Judgements (added by the speaker)
2) Suggested Substitutions (phrasing asking you to substitute information not stated) – my favorite is the NAP.
3) Intentional omissions (not stated by the speaker, and not suggested, but obscured)
4) Misinformation/Disinformation (intentional misdirections)
5) Saturation (Attempt to create evidence by your own resorting to intuition using all of the above.)
EXERCISES – PROPERTY IN TOTO
Make a list of property-in-toto categories.
Revisit your sjw criticisms above.
Attempt to discern what the speaker is attempting to steal from those categories using the methods of deception 1-5 above.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-23 03:18:00 UTC
http://www.counter-currents.com/2016/09/the-caste-system-of-the-alt-right/I’M NOT INCLUDED IN THE LIST OF ALT RIGHT-ERS? I THINK THAT”S A GOOD THING. 🙂
( http://www.counter-currents.com/2016/09/the-caste-system-of-the-alt-right/ )
1) I don’t know whether to be thrilled or hurt by not being included in this list. 🙂 I think… I think maybe … that I like it. 🙂
2) I wrote a similar list a few weeks ago. <a href=”https://propertarianism.wordpress.com/2016/09/23/the-new-right-class-structures/”>The New “Right” Class Structures</a> But I organized it by argumentative structure. Given our differences in abilities, we tend to argue differently at about every 10 points of IQ (with significant overlap). This division corresponds to both social and occupational classes as well as IQ. And I placed people in the alt-right given their method of argument. Which of course some people found insulting. But just as the English language contains three sets of terms: german for the lower class, french for the ruling class, and latin for the intellectual class, all political movements use a different language and argumentative method for every caste or class. (expressive, ridicule, moral justification, rational/historical justification, ratio-empirical-correspondence, and institutional. (And I consider myself in the NEW RIGHT rather than ALT RIGHT – for this reason: class argument method.) So view the world as the outgoing ‘hopeful’ old right(political). The resigned alt right(cultural). The traditional right in transition(religio-familial). The New Right (scientific-institutional).
3) And, I do understand why I am not included in this post’s list:
(a) I view the world as abandoning the 20th century battle between feminine universalism(socialism) and its paternal opponent masculine particularism(fascism), and that worldwide all groups are returning to Nationalism and Tribalism – in recognition of the failure of the anglo-contractual-commercial-universalism, and Jewish socialism-libertarian-neo-conservatism (ie: puritans and jews). And that we are just like everyone else – trying to reassert our traditional history now that the ‘market’ has been maximized by the universal adoption of consumer credit capitalism worldwide.
(b) I blame us (whites) for not manning the fortress Europa , not those who have succeeded in breaching our walls – it is after all, the purpose of competition, and we are losing because we are lazy and unwilling to fight.
(c) I spend my time worrying about institutional solutions, not trying to appease my bruised ego by ridiculing the wildlife for merely being wildlife. The scorpion DOES kill the frog before they get to the other side of the stream. Only a fool trusts the scorpion to act against its nature.
So:
i) Nationalism is for everyone, not just us. And anyone that it’s not for, is someone to be exterminated as a threat to the rest, not just us – to mankind.
ii) We must fight, and stop talking as if we will win a democratic election. Hillary is just the Left’s Dole: the next anointed apparatchik available in a weak field of options.
iii) We need a solution to fight for that restores our walls, and a process of transition, and a process of disrupting the economy and government such that surrender is obtained rather than ongoing hardship.
CLOSING
The alt-right is still a working-class and lower middle-class movement. because that’s where all the disenfranchised males are. And disenfranchised males are the only people who matter in creating a revolution. Unfortunately, the alt right has no answers to offer and is just a resistance movement.
But Resistance is insufficient for revolution. Rebellion is insufficient for Rule. Criticism is insufficient for proposing a solution. And a solution is necessary to coordinate action. Instead we must have a solution to demand, a plan of transition, and a plan by which to demand our solution.
The alt right is succeeding by adopting the methods of the Marxist/Socialist/Feminist/cultural-Marxists: poison the virtue signals of the opponents and make their status signals a worthless commodity. It’s working. And all we had to do was give up our ‘honor’ to do it. But once that’s done – “What’ch ya’ got there sonny?” Nothin’.
Necessary does not mean sufficient. The Alt right is necessary but insufficient. That’s where others come in. And that combination of ALT-RIGHT(Culture/aesthetics), TRAD-RIGHT(Ethics and Family), and NEW-RIGHT(institutions), will be what provides the full compliment of classes necessary to change the power structures.
But, in the end. “We gotta’ fight.”
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
L’viv Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-23 03:06:00 UTC
https://propertarianism.wordpress.com/2016/09/23/the-new-right-class-structures/THE NEW “RIGHTS” BY CLASS STRUCTURE
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-23 03:03:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-23 02:01:00 UTC
http://www.counter-currents.com/2016/09/on-whites-and-fighting/ON WHITES IN SPORTS
(responding to:
http://www.counter-currents.com/2016/09/on-whites-and-fighting/
)
DISAGREE : We just frame the observation incorrectly.
1) White men excel (dominate in war) because of how we act in GROUPS of individuals. Even the legendary quote that one Spartan is the equal of any other warrior, but together they are unequalled. The reason we do excel is something that we are just beginning to understand, but it appears to be a)lower impulsivity/higher calm, b) cultural indoctrination into indo european heroism c) our ability to spatially model groups – or better yet, to operate as a pack – this last one I am trying to find more research on, d) militia training or experience from youth with the expectation of war, and lastly e) what appears to be an iq advantage in our professional warrior class.
2) The races can easily be stacked by degrees of sexual maturity – and degree of sexual maturity is second only to scale of class distributions in determining demonstrated racial differences. Asians lowest, whites second, black haired peoples third, and Africans highest. It is illogical to assume that we will not pay a price for our ‘domestication’. But we hold the ‘upper middle’ in both degree of sexual maturity, and balance of spatial vs verbal intellectual ability. The east Asians lack our verbal ability and they are by far the least sexually mature people (I have theories on that – since I’m pretty sure it’s selection of females that determines that trend, and greater immaturity was preferable(necessary) in the mongoloids than in the whites to create a similar behavior in male selection of females. All that interesting info said, Asians obtain longer life spans. Blacks obtain greater physical tolerance for damage, and require less nurture for shorter periods of time – both suitable for a low IQ population in a hostile environment. These small differences contribute significantly to the in-progress speciation of the races after we exterminated the previous human species. So blacks pay for their superior speed and strength far more so than we pay for our less superior speed and strength by gaining lower impulsivity, better organization, better use of weapons. (You don’t see that many black swordsmen either). So we have simple sports (basketball, weightlifting, and boxing) and we have complex sports (fencing, quarterbacking, and strategy games), and we are just not paying attention to how important the complex sports are in which we excel.
3) Competitive sport in the west was generally for fitness (among militia and soldiers) and gambling (among militia and soldiers), and most often between men of similar abilities. (even judicial duels had to be reasonably ‘fair’ matches. But this sport does not demonstrate how we do in war. Empirical evidence does. (Black logistics, white special-forces, and officers.) So our physical fitness was (like Swiss men today) a property of our ‘everyone fights for the franchise’ system of enfranchisement. So the purpose of such fighting was in-group improvement of the group, not testing against outgroups. So we are ‘testing’ for the wrong thing. We’re running an indifferent test of the lower castes and judging ourselves against a false measure. Put 100 white men with weapons aginst 100 of anyone else and that’s the difference in our abilities. I would counter that the problem is that cheap sports are physically advantageous and expensive sports with lots of equipment are expensive. In real terms football is analogous a bunch of underclass peasants protecting the king (quarterback). (Conversely we do the same thing when competing with Jews. If we ‘stuck together’ like they do we would end their ability to employ the female reproductive strategy against us: shame, rally, divide, conquer, and siphon resources.)
CLOSING
So I suggest we remember WHO AND WHAT WE ARE: Spartans, Romans, Germans, Vikings. And we need to f_uck the Athenians/Venetians/Spanish/French/English and their effeminate pretenses.
Rule or be ruled. We invented aristocratic egalitarianism: equality in sovereignty for those who fight.
Let’s get back into legions and fight.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-23 01:46:00 UTC
There is only one demonstrably existential heaven: your genetic legacy.
Make sure you leave one. Otherwise your line resides in hell.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-23 01:22:00 UTC
Not that I had much free time today, but I worked a bit on teaching e-prime and it turns out that everyone who succesfully uses it, learns by the same simple sequence. So I am pretty confident that I can do that.
eprime forces you to identify the actor and his actions. Next we deal with property-in-toto – which I think is pretty simple.
Next we improve on property in toto by translating actions into financial language (discount/premium etc).
Then we get into writing law.
I don’t think it’s all that hard. It’s just that aspies sort of think in this level of detail anyway. So like when I listen to Vivek Upadhyay I hear my own voice. That’s what it sounds like in my head.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-22 18:24:00 UTC