Source: Facebook

  • KIN, CLASS, CASTE: MODELS AND FUNCTIONS Kinship System (oligarchy)(small nation

    KIN, CLASS, CASTE: MODELS AND FUNCTIONS

    Kinship System (oligarchy)(small nation states),

    Class System (informal institution – markets) or

    Caste System (formal institution – religion and laws),

    exist universally in all nations, states, and empires. Without exception. It’s arguable the entire world operates as a caste system with whites arguably the minority aristocracy, followed by east Asians, then Hindus, then steppes, then Arabs, then the darker races. The data in every walk of life agrees with it. Just how it is.

    We see it in the patterns of relations in every walk of life. Why? because of (a) kin selection, (b) reproductive desirability, (c) commercial desirability (d) political desirability.

    kinship systems show the least diversity, class the next most diverse.

    Now, is a caste system superior or inferior to a class system? Well it depends upon the problems of managing the size of the underclass. The smaller the underclass the more useful kin and market orders. the larger the underclass the more useful the authoritarian and caste orders.

    All the warm climate states have the problem of the inability to reduce the relative size of the underclass and therefore create a voluntary organization of production using the proceeds of whatever they can produce. This means that any warm climate people unable to cull the lower classes will have permanent favelas and slums, and northern climes that eliminate lower classes will continue to prosper.

    There is a strange economics to the use of air conditioning.

    The hindus are … unnecessarily limited by the cast system and will do much better with the class system in the market order. However, it will mean (likely) degeneration into more Muslim frameworks more tolerable by leadership from the underclasses.

    Islam is suitable for rule of the ‘evil 80’s.’ Hinduism preserves the ability for a class to prevent expansion of rule by the evil 80’s.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 11:50:00 UTC

  • “I do not have it in me anymore to put in efforts to counter Marx-shit ideas. I

    —“I do not have it in me anymore to put in efforts to counter Marx-shit ideas. I just want to burn them and be done with it.”— Manu Agrawal


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 10:23:00 UTC

  • “We can follow Pinker in the characterization of Intelligence itself as a heuris

    —“We can follow Pinker in the characterization of Intelligence itself as a heuristic of sorts devised by evolutionary processes. The cost of specialization in terms of individuation is simply too costly, so a general set of cognitive dispositions that can adapt is of greater benefit to the species in question.”—Skye Stewart


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 19:34:00 UTC

  • “Most conclusions are really excuses to stop thinking; and most arguments (espec

    —“Most conclusions are really excuses to stop thinking; and most arguments (especially without ontological integrity) are a defenses for excuses rather than warranties of conclusions.”—Bill Joslin

    BINGO. All speech is negotiation. Truth is not natural to man .This is why science has been such an expensive and time consuming project that has taken us 2500 years: we fight it at every turn.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 15:34:00 UTC

  • (bottom outliers – sunk costs) ..90 – 105 WORKING THIRD 106 – 125 ORGANIZING THI

    (bottom outliers – sunk costs)

    ..90 – 105 WORKING THIRD

    106 – 125 ORGANIZING THIRD

    126 + 140.. DECIDING THIRD

    (top outliers – ideas)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 15:31:00 UTC

  • European Paganism Consists of Different Forms Of Reasoning PRECISE CASES (Decidi

    European Paganism Consists of Different Forms Of Reasoning

    PRECISE CASES (Deciding Class)

    Science

    Law`

    Biography

    GENERAL RULES (Organizing Classes)

    History

    Literature

    Philosophy

    BROAD ANALOGIES (Working Classes)

    Religion

    Myth

    Superstition


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 15:28:00 UTC

  • ( A certain lady dressed me down very hard in L’viv before I came to the states.

    ( A certain lady dressed me down very hard in L’viv before I came to the states. And it kicked my a–. The problem is that I can’t really translate it into anything useful. What I heard was “I hate you” but what I might have heard was ‘please fix this’, or it could have been ‘you are just too fucking stupid for words sometimes and right now you’re upsetting me’. And it’s still screwing with my head. Becuase those three things aren’ mutually exclusive. lol )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 15:12:00 UTC

  • TO BE A EUROPEAN IS TO PRACTICE PAGANISM: 1 – Aristotelian Reason, Science, and

    TO BE A EUROPEAN IS TO PRACTICE PAGANISM:

    1 – Aristotelian Reason, Science, and Truth (science)

    2 – English, Roman, and Stoic Natural Law (law)

    3 – The Lives of the Great Men (history)

    4 – The Literature of the Great Books (literature)

    5 – The Ideas of the Great Philosophers (philosophy)

    6 – The Parables of the Saints and Prophets (religion)

    7 – The Myths and Legends of Pagan Warriors (myth)

    We have always been, and always will be, a PAGAN people.

    We permit no conflation. Because any conflation breeds a monopoly.

    And we permit no monopoly. Becuase we are the people who practice sovereignty.

    And sovereignty can exist only under markets, not monopoly.

    And the secular socialist state seeks to deprive us of sovereignty by delivering us to monopoly.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 15:07:00 UTC

  • TO RULE ARISTOCRATICALLY IS TO LIMIT NOT TO DIRECT. WE MUST RULE, OR BE RULED. W

    TO RULE ARISTOCRATICALLY IS TO LIMIT NOT TO DIRECT. WE MUST RULE, OR BE RULED. WE FORGOT. WE ARE MEN. WE MUST RULE.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 14:57:00 UTC

  • Q&A: ARISTOCRACY VS OLIGARCHY —“What are the features that distinguish aristoc

    Q&A: ARISTOCRACY VS OLIGARCHY

    —“What are the features that distinguish aristocracy and oligarchy?”— William Butchman

    An aristocracy preserves a judge of last resort (monarch).

    You can kill a monarch and change the judge of last resort.

    It is much harder to kill an oligarchy (group).

    It is much harder to kill a government (larger group)

    it is much harder to kill a bureaucracy ( larger group )

    An oligarchy subverts the market (rule of law) by use of:

    – Force

    – Gossip

    – Capital

    The defense against an oligarchy is a judiciary that rules by productive fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer limited to productive externalities.

    Most oligarchies persist only because they violate one or more of the provisions of natural law. Most commonly: productivity.

    In other words competition in the market and prosecution in court are EQUALLY necessary methods of preserving sovereignty by the suppression of parasitism, and the demand for sovereign transfer, in a market for opportunities, rather than in a market for rents, where the market for opportunities is made possible by nothing more than an increase in population density and an increase in the suppression of parasitism.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 14:34:00 UTC