Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • MORE ON MARKET FASCISM What’s the difference between MARKET FASCISM and the Stat

    MORE ON MARKET FASCISM

    What’s the difference between MARKET FASCISM and the Status Quo?

    There are two differences:

    1) Since markets regulated by natural law are the only POSSIBLE means of preserving sovereignty, and voluntary cooperation free of parasitism, then any attempt to perpetuate an alternative is an act of attempted fraud.

    So the difference is that under Market Fascism, there is no tolerance for criticism of the sovereign market order just as no tolerance for cannibalism, murder, theft, fraud, and conspiracy. Becuase tolerance for such crimes itself a crime. You may only propose exchanges.

    You can use the court to pursue an involuntary imposition of costs that violates natural law. But you may not propose an imposition of costs that violates natural law.

    In other words, you must constrain yourself to function within the markets in word and deed.

    2) Since you must fully account for the consequences of any action, the externalities produced by your action must not privatize the commons or socialize your losses. This means that you must be more careful in profiting from the ignorance of your fellow citizen shareholders.

    In other words your opportunity to profit from arbitrage is limited.

    These are simple, but far reaching demands.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 14:51:00 UTC

  • If Regional Monarchy creates positive incentives for the accumulation of interge

    If Regional Monarchy creates positive incentives for the accumulation of intergenerational capital. (Judge of last resort)

    If Territorial Nobility creates the positive incentives for the accumulation of capital. (Territorial Judge of Last Resort)

    If Aristocratic Family creates the positive incentives for the accumulation of intergenerational capital (Genetic Judge)

    If Sovereign Individual creates the positive incentive for the accumulation of capital. (Productive Judge)

    If Kinship creates the positive incentive for the accumulation of capital and the redistribution of capital to kin….

    Then kinship rule is simply the means by which we accumulate quality capital.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 14:25:00 UTC

  • Apparently (Thankfully) I don’t make the Alt Right Hit List. I’ll stick with ari

    Apparently (Thankfully) I don’t make the Alt Right Hit List.

    I’ll stick with aristocracy, and universal nationalism thanks. Let’s save every family, tribe, nation and race from The Jewish-Puritan Pseudoscientific Religion. Saving our own does not exclude saving all the others too.

    #NewRight.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 13:23:00 UTC

  • ( I am in a Barnes and Noble. The starbucks has no electrical plugs. They have r

    ( I am in a Barnes and Noble. The starbucks has no electrical plugs. They have removed all the B&N comfortable chairs. And I can’t find another coffee shop here in town. There are no other nerds. There are a lot of the ‘peasantry’ from the Hartford area here. And I am longing for the university town feeling. Because I can feel the IQ vacuum like a drop in atmospheric pressure. )

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 13:21:00 UTC

  • MORE ON OVERSING UPDATE: Well, I think I posted that I had the database and the

    MORE ON OVERSING UPDATE:

    Well, I think I posted that I had the database and the models (code that controls them finished), and that I’d ‘fixed’ the various architectural issues that were bothering me(permissions, appointments, accounting). And now I’m working on fixing the front end which uses React/Flux instead of jquery Ractive. Why? I cannot debug this enormous thing and unit test it without separating the UI from the API – and they are far too intermingled. And really, once you understand that the app is a few facebook pages, and the workspace, and that most of the controls are reused over and over again, it’s really not that hard to change the code base. thankfully, while the presentation layer is killing me, an awful lot of the middleware just needs code cleanup, and ‘curt levels’ of comments and documentation (and I write a lot of comments and documentation).

    I don’t see the investment market opening up until February so I figure I have at least until then to make the changes I want to.

    Iain has had family problems and has been offline for almost six months, but he’s back at work and getting our end of year reporting done finally. Although I suspect he’s workign at the same pace I am.

    I should have done this over a year ago, but I’m still happy that we’re making progress. the app is a joy. And it’s going to be even better.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 13:18:00 UTC

  • (PROGRESS: I’m working on the book when I have the mind for it and the software

    (PROGRESS: I’m working on the book when I have the mind for it and the software when I don’t. Programming is relaxing and much easier. Right now I’m extremely inspired and writing most of the time. Prior to the election I was working mostly on software. And it seems like this is the right balance for me. I do not feel ‘better’ but it’s pretty obvious that the courses of antibiotics have made a profound difference in curing me of whatever this horrible antagonist to my asthma has been for the past (near) year. I have been struggling to get out the first chapter – setting the stage- but its finally coming together with both the argument and voice I am looking for. And honestly it’s the hardest part of the book for me – other than maybe the challenge it will be writing down the formal methodology in Part 6. That’s possibly going to make me a bit crazier than usual. But it’s more like writing an instruction manual than telling a story so hopefully I can work through it a bit at a time. But Part 1 – that’s the overall narrative. And I finally feel like I know how to tell the story. And Im in the process of telling it. Will it matter to those of you who have followed me? I don’t know. In my view the problem of the information age and incrementally suppressing falsehood, is pretty simple now. The explanation of history as the battle between eugenic truth and dysgenic lies is pretty easy. And the suggestion that we can complete the indo-european project if we return to rule-for-fun-and-profit is even more interesting. But I suppose what most people want is a collection of all those little arguments that we must construct along the way. And I think the book will do that – very thoroughly. Assuming I have the juice to finish it now.)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 13:09:00 UTC

  • THE DESTRUCTION OF MOTHERHOOD —“Curt you said something a long time ago….”–

    THE DESTRUCTION OF MOTHERHOOD

    —“Curt you said something a long time ago….”—

    Yes… that western women are losing the art of motherhood and parenting which was transferred intergenerationally through direct experience, just like the military responsibility of men. Women may no longer have either the knowledge or the confidence to mother children. So not only have we destroyed the family, not only have we infantilized our children for multiple generations, but we have destroyed motherhood, fatherhood, responsibility for the commons and the nation. So are we nothing more than decreasingly civilized, decreasingly domesticated, irrelevant individual animals herded by the government for tax revenue? And for what purpose? So that women could enter the workplace and increase the scope and scale of government? so that we could delay entry into the workplace and lengthen retirement out of it? So that we must immigrate hordes of the undomesticated underclasses and commit genocide against our people? To undo all western civilization for no other purpose than to justify a school system and tax system that serves as little more than socially and developmentally destructive day care?

    The alternative is simply to restore ourselves to rulership, specialize in rulership, and breed in the luxury of rulership.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 12:45:00 UTC

  • We have to be honest with ourselves, just as were the Spartans, and accept that

    We have to be honest with ourselves, just as were the Spartans, and accept that if we let the Helots or the women participate in the franchise they will revert to barbarism.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 12:37:00 UTC

  • IN PRAISE OF TAXES 😉 (rulership is a profession, and one we must return to) Ass

    IN PRAISE OF TAXES 😉

    (rulership is a profession, and one we must return to)

    Assuming that taxes are used for the purpose of the creation and defense of the full spectrum of markets. And assuming we have juridical defense against taxes not used in creation and defense of those markets. And assuming that tax competition exists by freedom of exit and absence of collusion. And assuming one of the markets constructed is a market for commons. Then taxes are merely a commission on the use of violence to construct markets that enforce production and deny parasitism.

    In other words, the Aristocracy may profit via commissions on the construction, maintenance, and defense of markets just like the provider of any other form of good, service, or information.

    In fact, the wealth created by profits from the construction, maintenance and defense of markets, is possibly the most morally defensible form of profit a man, family, and clan, tribe, and race can demonstrate.

    So again, the libertarians, classical liberals, and progressive liberals, and Marxist socialist have been wrong. While the liberation from the mysticism of the church by the scientific enlightenment has been a boon for man, the attempts by the various other classes to create monopolies favoring their classes rather than markets for the cooperation between the classes, has been predicated on moral falsehoods, pseudoscience, and outright lies.

    Like the Spartans, Athenians, Romans, Germans, French, we must rule for our betterment and the betterment of man, or be ruled against our interests, and against the interests of man.

    Not only should we tax. We should revel in our taxes. We should maximize the returns on our shares. And continue to profit from the incremental domestication and eventual transcendence of man.

    We were mistaken. We need NO OTHER CAREER than rule. Rule and fee for rule, by commission on successful rule, is perhaps the greatest of our achievements, and a means by which we have, can, and shall profit.

    What must we do to return to rule?

    Restore Rule of Natural Law (Science)

    Restore the Judiciary. (Rule of Law)

    Restore the Monarchy. (Judge of last resort)

    Restore the Nobility (Governors)

    Restore the Knights (Regiments)

    Restore the Sheriffs. (Police)

    Restore the Militia (disaster, emergency, war)

    Restore the Artisans (artists and craftsmen)

    Restore the Laborers (of the commons)

    Restore the market for marriage

    Restore the market for commons

    Restore the market for rule.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 12:29:00 UTC

  • “I can remember you saying you’d position yourself right of Hoppe though, lol”–

    —“I can remember you saying you’d position yourself right of Hoppe though, lol”— Roy Van de Weteringh

    Yeah, well, Hoppe, as a german, and an academic, has german intuitions. As an american, and an englishman, and an entrepreneur and a social scientist, I have different intuitions: man is rational and predation is rational.

    So it’s more accurate to say that I am more INTOLERANT of violations than Hoppe, and Hoppe is more INTOLERANT of violations than Rothbard.

    The reason being that I see the accumulation of consequences cheaply produced as insurmountable by competition, whereas he sees competition as producing sufficient value that negative consequences can be defeated. And Rothbard either ignores the accumulation of consequences, or sees the destructive consequences as a ‘good’ war against the white man.

    Hoppe’s just wrong. The accumulation of falsehoods by the Cathedral Religion is all the evidence we need.

    There is no difference between the manufacture, distribution, and sale of products, services, and information. And rothbard limits us to products, hoppe to an optimistic view of services, and me(doolittle) extends to information. I am more pessimistic than the other two.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 11:53:00 UTC