Source: Facebook

  • Prefer carbines. Always preferred the even smaller the MP5 actually. Love the fe

    Prefer carbines. Always preferred the even smaller the MP5 actually. Love the feel of the bullpups. I have an fn2000, but the aug/tavor/f90 are superior by far. the 416 piston design fixes the main reliability problem of the M4/AR15. The AK’s 8 dumb parts make it hard to argue with, but it feels like you’re luggin a box of rocks. Sure, we all have our preferences. I can point the bullpups most naturally, and the MP5 feels like it’s part of my body. And Im a little partial to maintaining sight picture, so that’s why I love the MP5/M4/AR15, except I HATE the charging handle. I love the bullpups for quickly pointing with a dot sight. But in the end, the MP5 has distance and accuracy but not the drill power. The M4 with the upgraded piston, still lets you drill someone through a wall, carry a shitload of rounds, and reach out and touch someone with little weight. and for all the value of the bullpups in comfort and pointability they problem is that they have a lot of parts to maintain.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 20:46:00 UTC

  • ***My feeling is that the cuckolding of our men has so pussified them that inste

    ***My feeling is that the cuckolding of our men has so pussified them that instead of convincing or negotiating as our first choice, the idea that fighting should be the FIRST choice, and that convincing and exchanging only when they are more preferable is something very difficult to restore to our moral framework.***


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 20:03:00 UTC

  • CONGRATULATIONS TO UKRAINE ON VISA-FREE TRAVEL TO SCHENGEN!!!!! SLAVA UKRAINI!!!

    CONGRATULATIONS TO UKRAINE ON VISA-FREE TRAVEL TO SCHENGEN!!!!! SLAVA UKRAINI!!! WHOO HOOO!!!!


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 19:57:00 UTC

  • IS THE WORST CAPITAL CITY IN AMERICA Everyone knows it. What a sh-t hole

    https://wallethub.com/edu/best-state-capitals/19030/#main-findingsHARTFORD IS THE WORST CAPITAL CITY IN AMERICA

    https://wallethub.com/edu/best-state-capitals/19030/#main-findings

    Everyone knows it. What a sh-t hole.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 19:24:00 UTC

  • Q&A: CURT: DIFFERENT ECONOMIES FOR DIFFERENT CLASSES? —“Could you elaborate on

    Q&A: CURT: DIFFERENT ECONOMIES FOR DIFFERENT CLASSES?

    —“Could you elaborate on the concept of different economies for different classes? Does this mean laws can be enforced differently on different classes?”—John Zebley

    No it just means that the working and middle class and upper middle class market of voluntarily organized production does not account for the various commons produced by the people who make possible the voluntary organization of production (the market) by NOT engaging in criminal, unethical, immoral, and conspiratorial actions – and paying a high cost of doing so. Nor does the middle class market account for the vast extractions performed by the upper and elite class market which appears almost entirely extractive, and of trivial if any value. The working and laboring classes and the underclass contribute mostly by consuming (creating demand), policing each other, policing the commons, and serving in various hazardous capacities. But this is costly for them. And if they have access to consumption but not access to production then the market is ‘failing’ to pay them for what the market needs of them: behaving in the interest of the market. The same is true for the upper and elite classes most of whom benefit from tax revenues of questionable if not negative value, and the financial classes who benefit from our archaic liquidity distribution system in which they actually provide zero if not negative value.(really).

    SO that may be a lot to grasp. But the classical liberal economic system – as well as the keynesian and new keyensian, fails to account for externalities paid for by the underclasses, and rents privatized by the upper classes.

    The point is not so much that we need markets, but that by cherry picking what we measure, we legitimize the positive externalities of the middle class market, but fail to compensate the lower class market, and unjustly compensate the upper class market.

    So it’s not a matter of different law. It’s a matter of insufficiently accounting for the very different inputs and outputs of the different classes.

    I mean the whole world knows the middle classes generate prosperity. That’s settled science. But that doesn’t mean the middle class market and profit and loss account for the full inputs and outputs that make the middle class economy possible.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 18:53:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 18:40:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 18:39:00 UTC

  • SHIFTS (FINALLY). 🙂

    https://fee.org/articles/10-reasons-to-rethink-the-narrative-about-trump-s-success/TUCKER SHIFTS (FINALLY). 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 18:37:00 UTC

  • MORITZ BIERLING NAILS IT: —“It’s rather simple really. Once you see costs beyo

    MORITZ BIERLING NAILS IT:

    —“It’s rather simple really. Once you see costs beyond prices, and returns beyond profit, what we previously thought to be simply parasitic extraction is revealed as payment for participation in the market created by the aristocracy and maintained by the militia.

    It’s all about the accounting.”— Moritz Bierling


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 18:21:00 UTC

  • Q&A: “CURT: IS LIBERTARIAN FASICSM POSSIBLE?” (no, but…) —“Curt! Could Liber

    Q&A: “CURT: IS LIBERTARIAN FASICSM POSSIBLE?” (no, but…)

    —“Curt! Could Libertarian-Fascism or even Anarcho-Fascism be a thing?”— Felicity J. Sharpe

    Both libertarianism and anarcho-capitalism are impossibilities.

    Market fascism in the sense that rule of law under proper in toto imposes markets in all areas of life, is certainly possible and that’s what I articulate. But the fantasy that you escape paying for commons that you benefit from is just not gonna happen.

    What can happen is that we can prevent being forced to pay for commons that harm us. And that’s the best we can do.

    So yes we can have market fascism, meaning markets in everything, and non imposition of costs. Can we have libertarian or anarchy capitalism’s parasitic free riding? No they’re impossible


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 17:24:00 UTC