Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • “Strong men tend to attract yes-men around them. More so than others, they must

    —“Strong men tend to attract yes-men around them. More so than others, they must be careful not to become trapped in a bubble of lies.”— Josh Jeppson

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 13:23:00 UTC

  • “If we can’t explain it, that’s because do not posses the “Operational to criter

    —“If we can’t explain it, that’s because do not posses the “Operational to criteria” claim it’s true. If we can’t claim it’s true then we can’t claim to apprehend it. If we can’t claim to apprehend it we can’t claim comprehend it. If we can’t claim comprehend it we can’t remember the truth.” — Bill Joslin

    (did ‘ja see what I did there?)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 13:21:00 UTC

  • “You cannot allow any of your people to avoid the brutal facts. If they start li

    “You cannot allow any of your people to avoid the brutal facts. If they start living in a dream world, it’s going to be bad.” — General Mattis

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 13:16:00 UTC

  • The purpose of Stoicism and Buddhism is to end our rule by emotion: meaning “ani

    The purpose of Stoicism and Buddhism is to end our rule by emotion: meaning “animal instinct” so that we might, with effort, become humans. Albeit Stoicism provides an objective and masculine, action oriented solution within reality, and Buddhism provides a subjective and feminine means of disconnecting from reality, both achieve mindfulness by similar means.

    So no. We are only ruled by emotion because we fail to CHOOSE NOT to be.

    There is a very great difference between a domesticated animal, and a human being. A domesticated animal has been trained to cause little damage despite its impulses. A human no longer is governed by impulses.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 13:07:00 UTC

  • Q: “How did you get so smart?” A: “Years of screwing up.”—Bart Barresi

    —Q: “How did you get so smart?”

    A: “Years of screwing up.”—Bart Barresi

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 12:04:00 UTC

  • DOES PROPERTARIANISM’S NATURAL LAW REQUIRE THAT MUCH IQ? It doesn’t take all tha

    DOES PROPERTARIANISM’S NATURAL LAW REQUIRE THAT MUCH IQ?

    It doesn’t take all that high an iQ to learn Propertarianism: Natural Law. The difference is that we live the existing anglo law and we don’t live Propertarianism’s Natural Law. So while there is more content to the study of the existing law, there is more novelty in the study of Propertarianism. So it’s not that you need to LEARN so much in Propertarianism, it’s that you have to RELEARN quite a bit.

    We humans rely heavily on intuition and overestimate our reason. So learning a lot of confirmations like the existing law, is much easier than learning a lot of reformations like Natural Law.

    The reason we invest the time in learning something reforming like Propertarianism’s Natural Law, is the additional explanatory power, coercive power, and justification for violence that it gives us.

    So yes, it is somewhat hard to learn if you want to prosecute, less so if you want to persuade, and less so if you want to know what to fight for, and less so if you just want justification to fight.

    Learn only what you need to.

    A few us of us need to be prosecutors, a few more lawyers, a few more sheriffs, but a whole lot of warriors. Warriors just need to know the objective, and to fight. The rest of us just administrate the result.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 11:55:00 UTC

  • WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF? We have conquered most of the known world: – in the Arya

    WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF?

    We have conquered most of the known world:

    – in the Aryan expansion phase.

    – under alexander

    – under the romans

    – in the colonial era

    – in the postwar era

    despite always being a miniscule minority.

    Why do you think we can’t do it OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN?

    It’s an easy question to answer:

    LOOK AT THE MAN IN THE MIRROR.

    WHO ARE YOU?

    We don’t need armies. We are in an era of 4th Generation Warfare.

    We are in the most fragile period of civilization since the fall of the roman empire.

    WE HAVE OPPORTUNITY.

    But you must choose to LEAD.

    And to lead you must ACT.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 11:14:00 UTC

  • NO, IT’S NOT EASY. PROPERTARIANISM =~= LAW DEGREE —“You’ll never create a move

    NO, IT’S NOT EASY. PROPERTARIANISM =~= LAW DEGREE

    —“You’ll never create a movement with such a complex ideology, it’s not appealing.”—- “liberty owl”.

    Well, you have to study the law for years and pass the bar. Since Propertarianism is an internally consistent (logical) and externally correspondent (empirical) and existentially possible (operational), and morally consistent (reciprocal), that defines its own scope (full accounting, limits, and parsimony), restatement of Law, then it shouldn’t be surprising that (a) it takes a lawyer’s IQ and effort to master it, and (b) a not insignificant amount of time, and (c) must be ‘simplified’ for consumption by the lower classes with new, simple, general rules, and (d) that simple general rules for average people must be defensible by scientific arguments for more advanced people.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 11:10:00 UTC

  • The Anglosphere and the Germania are on suicide watch. It’s Poland, Lithuania, L

    The Anglosphere and the Germania are on suicide watch. It’s Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Ukraine, and their cousins the Hungarians, Czechs, and Romanians, that will either produce the next cultural empire; or it will be the reunification of the anglosphere and germania in combination with the eastern and the russian that will transform mankind.

    IT IS JUST A CHOICE. WILL WE FIGHT. OR WILL WE GO QUIETLY INTO THE NIGHT?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 11:05:00 UTC

  • I THINK THIS POST MIGHT BE IMPORTANT – TRY SHARING IT WITH WOMEN. I’ve been gett

    I THINK THIS POST MIGHT BE IMPORTANT – TRY SHARING IT WITH WOMEN.

    I’ve been getting a lot of private messages from women over this post – all with the central theme of ‘yeah… that’s about right’. I’d like to see how it does on the men’s movement sites (I always seek criticism).

    It positions the problem women face, I think correctly. It positions the problem men face, I think correctly. And I think that the combination of birth control, employing too many women in the work force, un-mothering our children, industrializing child care and education, making marriage dissolution easier and more preferable, and undermining the institution of marriage itself has led to catastrophic late age misery, and harmful early age stresses.

    Men must be men if we wish women to be women. Women must be women if we wish men to be men. the only people that benefit from gender neutrality are those who are outside the norms. The only appeal of serving those outside the norms is created by the feeling of fragility we have created by destroying the compromise between the sexes that we call relationships and marriage for the purpose of intergenerational persistence of our lines. By overcompensating for the bottom we have further empowered the top and destroyed the middle.

    But women have a much harder problem: What Men Can They Trust? (Almost none)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 11:02:00 UTC