Source: Facebook

  • ( I don’t get involved in ‘***gates’. Rallying and shaming is for common folk. S

    ( I don’t get involved in ‘***gates’. Rallying and shaming is for common folk. Sorry. The substantive problem is the lack of rule of law under natural law with which we can prosecute by violence acts of harm, theft, fraud, and deceit. Everything else is just monkeys hooting at one another across territories. So either pull out your weapons and beat, break, kill, and burn, or look in the mirror at the monkey. It’s about that effective. )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-07 11:43:00 UTC

  • ON LIBERAL CALLS FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION: WE HAVE OTHER IDEAS – HANGING

    ON LIBERAL CALLS FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION: WE HAVE OTHER IDEAS – HANGING TREES FOR THE LIARS.

    No we are not having a constitutional convention.

    1) Liberals have destroyed the constitution’s rule of law by arguing that we can pass whatever laws we want. The 14th amendment alone invalidated the constitution. What damage wasn’t done then was done by the income tax. What wasn’t done then was done by Roosevelt’s threat to stack the supreme court if we didn’t enact social security. If we can pass abortion, gay marriage, and obamacare, and if we have circumvented the amendment and convention process, then rule of law no longer exists. the government exists only out of habit, and simply hasn’t created enough discord to cause a revolution – until now.

    2) So lets just skip yet another leftist lie. There is no united states any longer, because there is no constitution any longer, because there is no rule of law any longer, because the liberals destroyed rule of law in order to destroy the united states by achieving through immigration of the third world against the will of the people in order to destroy the united states by an act of fraud..

    3) So here is what we suggest: the moment you call for a convention you’re declaring war. And we WANT a war. We love war. It is our greatest achievement after truth.

    We can agree that the undesirable states with the immigrant cities leave the union, freeing us from generations of accumulated debt and expense, and cultural and genetic conquest. Preserving the government.

    Or we can remove all federal legislation and return it to the states, and dissolve the supreme court, the congress and the presidency, leaving only the Military, the Treasury, and The Insurer of Last Resort, to be managed by a board of the governors.

    Or we will end the united states and devolve into separate regional polities that reflect regional cultures, and abandon the federal government entirely, returning all powers and functions to the regions or states.

    Or we can start a civil war, kill as many of each other and the members of the government that we can – and let the chips fall where they may.

    But what we will NOT do is allow the liberals to use the pretense of rule of law to engineer a conquest of our people, culture, and territories We’ll kill all of you first – and revel in it.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-06 18:45:00 UTC

  • (The crazy lady is here in the coffee shop again. OMG. Has this whole country go

    (The crazy lady is here in the coffee shop again. OMG. Has this whole country gone insane?)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-06 13:20:00 UTC

  • WHAT SHALL BE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY’S PUNISHMENT FOR THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL? For cri

    WHAT SHALL BE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY’S PUNISHMENT FOR THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL?

    For crimes against humanity, against western civilization, against the united states of america, what shall be the punishment for Columbia University?

    1) Sponsorship of a Natural Law School and Degree?

    2) “Cornell Style” Forcible Restructuring of Curriculum and Staff?

    3) Total Purge of Staff and Replacement?

    4) Closure, Destruction, And Prosecution?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-06 08:18:00 UTC

  • THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CLASSES (propertarian class theory) ——UPPER——- TOOL

    THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CLASSES

    (propertarian class theory)

    ——UPPER——-

    TOOL OF COERCION: FORCE – MILITARY, LAW, SHERIFF

    1) UPPER – PRODUCTION OF ORDER (SOVEREIGNTY)

    Rule Economyt (Aristocracy Profit from the Organization of Labor+K)

    ——MIDDLE——-

    TOOL OF COERCION – REMUNERATION – ORGANIZATION, DISTRIBUTION AND TRADE

    2) UPPER MIDDLE – ORGANIZATION OF PRODUCTION (LIBERTY)

    Capitalism ( Organization of Labor+Knowledge )

    3) MIDDLE – ORGANIZATION OF TRANSFORMATION (FREEDOM)

    Market Economy ( Voluntarily Organized Labor+K)

    4) LOWER MIDDLE (working) TRANSFORMATION (PARTICIPATION)

    Mixed Economy ( Voluntary + Involuntarily Organized Labor+K)

    ——LOWER——-

    TOOL OF COERCION: GOSSIP (RESISTANCE) – PRODUCTION, DIST. AND TRADE

    5) LOWER (working) LABOR (PARTICIPATION)

    Command Economy ( Lower – Involuntarily Organized Labor+K)

    6) DEPENDENT – PRODUCTION OF GENERATIONS (POS. FREEDOM)

    Dependent Economy (Dependents – Redistributions from Labor+K)

    #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-06 08:05:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 22:10:00 UTC

  • JA BERENS ON STOICISM AND SCALE —“Stoicism functions as a tool for limiting th

    JA BERENS ON STOICISM AND SCALE

    —“Stoicism functions as a tool for limiting the scope of human cognitive processes (cognition & responses to perceived changes in state) to the consequential (actionable at individual scale).

    The scope of man’s cognitive processes evolved under tribal/local scale with limited complexity.

    Under more complex systems, like those of post-industrial societies, information surpasses the scale of individual actionability, yet because of our innate cognitive biases we respond to, perceive and approach information as if it were consequential.

    Complexity and the [perceived] randomness of events eliminate the feedback/information man receives from his actions. That is, as complexity increases, the difficulty of calculating the consequences of a given action or set of actions increases. Thus the need for stoicism as a mental instrument for goal-directed action in an increasingly complex world.

    It is no surprise, then, that much in the way that Doolittle and Taleb attack pseudoscience via operationalism and probability theory, respectively, we see a resurgence of stoicism guided by operational and probabilistic thinking. In respect to the former, we decrease uncertainty and launder our thoughts of error, bias, [self] deceit and wishful thinking; and, in respect to the latter, under uncertainty, through the investment and coordination of action to produce a convexity of returns/results (anti-fragility): investment in portfolios with limited down side and unlimited upside.”— James Augustus Berens

    SAME PROBLEM FACING THE GREEKS.

    Scale.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 18:32:00 UTC

  • Now, I recognize that biological differences exist between groups, and that grou

    Now, I recognize that biological differences exist between groups, and that groups are better or worse hosts for particular ideas. And that groups choose ideas that suit their genes. And that use of ideas modifies genes, more so than genes modify ideas.

    But in general when I talk about peoples, I refer to their ideas.

    For this reason I have tried to change to the terms Aryan for Whites, Judaic for Jews, Sinic for Chinese etc.

    There are plenty of others working on genetics. I am interested in ideas.

    Because ideas modify genes.

    Good ideas require good hosts.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 18:20:00 UTC

  • People don’t have ideas. Ideas occupy people

    People don’t have ideas. Ideas occupy people.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 18:16:00 UTC

  • TEACHING OTHERS: LEAPS VS STEPS My general philosophy is to produce and generate

    TEACHING OTHERS: LEAPS VS STEPS

    My general philosophy is to produce and generate interest. I don’t like to ‘direct’. I love answering questions. But I prefer each of us makes his own journey out of recognizing and acting on his own opportunities. I have found over my life that if I try to structure learning for others that I fail because the way I learn myself is too different from the way the majority learn. There are some of us who intuit great leaps between seemingly unrelated concepts then try to learn how to fill in the steps between them. But most of us learn by taking one step at a time. The kind of people who make great leaps also, only need content, and for me to answer a few questions. The kind of people who learn step by step are harder for me to reach. In part because I reach the ‘steps’ at the end of my journey – not the beginning. So I can’t really ‘think backward’ until I’ve thoroughly solved the problem.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 15:41:00 UTC