http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/09/26/a-short-course-in-propertarian-reasoning/A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN REASONING
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-11 13:12:00 UTC
http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/09/26/a-short-course-in-propertarian-reasoning/A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN REASONING
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-11 13:12:00 UTC
http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-11 13:12:00 UTC
http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/04/due-diligence-necessary-for-the-warranty-of-truthfulness/DUE DILIGENCE NECESSARY FOR A WARRANTY OF TRUTHFULNESS
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-11 13:11:00 UTC
http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/28/a-short-course-on-propertarianisms-testimonial-truth/A SHORT COURSE IN TESTIMONIAL TRUTH
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-11 13:10:00 UTC
INTERESTING IDEA: EAST VS WEST CLASS INTERESTS?
Siraaj Khandkar
—“Your distinction of two highest tiers is interesting. I always wondered what are the main differences that influenced developments of Western and Eastern Europe (besides geography-necessitated strategies) and one of the things seems to be that Russian highest classes peak at ideas (your lower upper) and rarely prioritize entrepreneurship (this is how I understand your “Power, Associations, Opportunities”).”—
Curt Doolittle
^^^ correct. Although I had not considered that, you’re right. Western judiciary and laws provide protections such that the entrepreneurial class can operate fairly freely without fear of predation by the state. (but omg if you do anything bad the state will eat you in public one bite at a time, to make an example of you.) Russian thinkers are deep and creative. But the entrepreneurial class (a dozen of whom I’ve met) live in relative fear OR evolve into oligarchs that the government fears.
I also think that the history of Boyars as predators and soviets, then gangsters, and oligarchs have left Russians exhausted and suspecious. Germanic europeans did not have this problem. The princedom’s competed for talent. American europeans didn’t have it at all since we never have had a ‘noble’ class other than the entrepreneurial class we call the ‘Puritans’/Calvinists.
Americans have a serious problem with our big financial institutions, but any INDIVIDUAL in them is easy to take down. We are so dependent upon those financial institutions, just as Russians are dependent upon their resource institutions.
I’ve been sort of back and forth on the whole putin vs oligarchs thing, but we need to do a similar thing here in the west. Because the Soros’ and Rothchilds and various large financial institutions do what the oligarchs have done, but just use more sophisticated means of doing it. But our people are just as pissed off. They just are in the condition of Russia in the 1990’s so they aren’t ready to kill people yet. (But we’re getting there.)
I think what differs between east and west europe is that the highest power in the west are the judges, and the highest power in the east are the rulers. And that’s probably been an historical truth since the dawn of our civilizations. In america even more so than in europe. Our supreme court at least until recently, and our constitution, at least until recently, were considered ‘sacred’. And in western history kings have had a very difficult time usurping the common law. In english history it’s a good way for a king to get killed.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-11 13:07:00 UTC
Much of Propertarianism and Testimonialism evolved from my criticism of the pseudoscience of Mises, the immoralism of Rothbard, and the Kantian/Marxist rationalism of Hoppe.
I was trying to restate what I saw in Hoppe (a formal, operational, logic of human cooperation that could be stated as law), in scientific terms (an extension or completion of the scientific method)
If you want to deeply understand the internals of propertarianism it is best achieved by reading through my work reforming JEWISH Austrian economics (mises/rothbard/hoppe) from pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational, to fully scientific and rational. (Reforming CHRISTIAN Austrian economics Menger is unnecessary since that corpus has already been added to the mainstream. Mises’ insight – praxeology as a test of reciprocity – has not.)
I created a separate group to store those ideas as a set of posts (articles).
https://www.facebook.com/groups/scientific.praxeology/permalink/750994611656577/
If you work through this list (and it is work) you should have an historical context in which to understand Propertarianism.
What you will not probably grasp is that NATURAL LAW (propertarianism) is the completion of the program started by the Aristotle and the Stoics, which is (contrary to christianity) the origin and cause of western civilization. Not that I had any idea. I just discovered that as I went along.
But that’s another longer story.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-11 12:00:00 UTC
THE CHORD OF ELITES – PROPERTARIAN CLASS THEORY
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-11 11:46:00 UTC
I use class as a {set} of values:
CLASS:
}
….genetic class (physical symmetry, health, intelligence etc)
….reproductive class (reproductive desirability)
….associative class (associative cooperative desirability)
….social class (regional ethnicity, family structure, values, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, myths)
….occupational class (occupational achievement)
….economic class (economic achievement)
….political class (fame: entertainment / political achievement)
}
The effects of each class are cumulative.
It’s pretty scary how accurate this measure is.
I don’t weight economic or political at all – they’re outliers.
If you want to create a simulation you start with this model and build out.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-11 11:45:00 UTC
Upper social class: Discuss Power, Associations, Opportunities.
My social class(upper middle/lower upper): Discuss ideas. Excellences. Possibilities.
The next social class(middle): discuss events, biz, possessions. travel.
The next social class (working): discuss sports, family, experiences
The next social class (proletarian): discuss people.
all the old italian guys in my range of hearing are showing off family, the way other people show of new cars or houses, the way I show off ideas, the way others show off power and opportunities.
The proles make me crazy, and sports are an opiate that tires me, but I’m big on the middle and working class.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-11 11:05:00 UTC
THEORY VS FACT VS A PRIORI
This is one of those things that i have to explain over and over again.
1) THEORY: we are capable of only one epistemological method (EM) of describing cause and effect relations:
observation > free association > idea > wayfinding > hypothesis > criticism > theory > public criticism > law > survival in widespread application > incorporation into normative metaphysical value judgements.
2) A FACT: A fact is a special case of the EM, in which we create an hypothesis, theory, and law to describe an OBSERVATION.
3) THE A PRIORI: an apriori is a special case of the EM in which once we discover an hypothesis, we cannot imagine a false condition (I use the incidence of prime numbers as an example of special cases). Almost all non-reductio apriori statements fail unless they also include limits and full accounting. this does not prevent the use of apriori concepts. it limits that which can be deduced from apriori statements to ‘very little’.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-11 10:54:00 UTC