Much of Propertarianism and Testimonialism evolved from my criticism of the pseu

Much of Propertarianism and Testimonialism evolved from my criticism of the pseudoscience of Mises, the immoralism of Rothbard, and the Kantian/Marxist rationalism of Hoppe.

I was trying to restate what I saw in Hoppe (a formal, operational, logic of human cooperation that could be stated as law), in scientific terms (an extension or completion of the scientific method)

If you want to deeply understand the internals of propertarianism it is best achieved by reading through my work reforming JEWISH Austrian economics (mises/rothbard/hoppe) from pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational, to fully scientific and rational. (Reforming CHRISTIAN Austrian economics Menger is unnecessary since that corpus has already been added to the mainstream. Mises’ insight – praxeology as a test of reciprocity – has not.)

I created a separate group to store those ideas as a set of posts (articles).

https://www.facebook.com/groups/scientific.praxeology/permalink/750994611656577/

If you work through this list (and it is work) you should have an historical context in which to understand Propertarianism.

What you will not probably grasp is that NATURAL LAW (propertarianism) is the completion of the program started by the Aristotle and the Stoics, which is (contrary to christianity) the origin and cause of western civilization. Not that I had any idea. I just discovered that as I went along.

But that’s another longer story.