Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • “No man has (or ever had) any inherent right to the use of the earth; nor to per

    —“No man has (or ever had) any inherent right to the use of the earth; nor to personal independence; nor to property, nor to wives, nor to liberty of speech; nor to freedom of thought; nor to anything except he can (by himself or in conjunction with his allies) assert his ‘rights’ by Power.

    What are (in popular parlance) called ‘rights,’ are really ‘spoil’ — the prerogatives of formerly exerted Might; but a ‘right’ lapses immediately, when those who are enjoying it, become incapable of further maintaining it.

    Consequently all ‘rights’ are as transient as morning rainbows, international treaties, or clauses in a temporary armistice. They may be abrogated at any moment, by any one of the contracting parties, holding the necessary Power.

    Broadly speaking therefore, Might is incarnated Right, and rights are metamorphosed mights. Power and Justice are synonyms; for Might is mighty and does prevail. They who possess the undisputable Might (be they one, ten, or ten million) may and do proclaim the Right.

    Government is founded on property, property is founded on conquest, and conquest is founded on Power— and Power is founded on brain and brawn — on Organic Animality.

    Just as parents dictate right to their children, so masterful animals dictate right to millions and millions of sodden-livered, baby-minded men.

    Monarchic rulers are the gaudy jumping-jacks, and representative institutions the tax gathering mechanism of the Mighty-Ones. Banks and safe-deposits are their treasure-stores, and armies and navies their sentinels, executioners, watchmen.” – Sam Hyde

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-12 13:17:00 UTC

  • Can we cloak our Aspertarianism under the trans umbrella?

    Can we cloak our Aspertarianism under the trans umbrella?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-12 11:31:00 UTC

  • WHERE DO RIGHTS COME FROM? Rights CAN only exist as contract rights. Rights are

    WHERE DO RIGHTS COME FROM?

    Rights CAN only exist as contract rights.

    Rights are brought into existence when a third party insures the terms of a normative, commercial, or political contract (usually brothers, extended family, a chieftain, set of elders, king, or government).

    We can NEED those rights.

    We can WANT those rights.

    We can DEMAND those rights.

    But those rights can only be brought into existence by a group of insurers. And those insurers insure them by force.

    Anyone who says otherwise is lying, engaging in wishful thinking, fantasizing, stupid, or ignorant.

    PERIOD.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-12 11:28:00 UTC

  • NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN I define Natural Law as: NEGATIVA: non-provocation:

    NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN

    I define Natural Law as: NEGATIVA: non-provocation: non imposition of costs against property in toto: that which others have born costs to obtain an interest in without imposing costs upon that which others have born costs to obtain an interest in. POSITIVA: reward: the requirement that we limit our actions that affect the property-in-toto of others to those that cause productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to productive externalities.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-12 10:39:00 UTC

  • “Veritatis simplex oratio est”–Seneca (The language of truth is simple.) Unfort

    —“Veritatis simplex oratio est”–Seneca

    (The language of truth is simple.)

    Unfortunately, the language by which we discover it is not.

    Else it would not have taken us millennia to create it.

    Gods work with simple rules. But they transcribe them in the most complex of languages: the fabric of the universe.

    The translation effort has been our costliest monument.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-12 10:23:00 UTC

  • The LEFT justifies and glamorizes anti-social violence (outcasts, dysfunctional,

    The LEFT justifies and glamorizes anti-social violence (outcasts, dysfunctional, criminals, rebels, political deception). Meanwhile, the RIGHT justifies and glamorizes pro-social violence (war, police, sheriffs, heroism).

    The Anti-social Left, the Pro-Social Right.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-12 10:05:00 UTC

  • ANTI-PHILOSOPHY Science is a method by which we attempt to remove error, bias, w

    ANTI-PHILOSOPHY

    Science is a method by which we attempt to remove error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, theology, pseudo-rationalism, pseudoscience) from our thoughts and speech. It’s purely reductive.

    1 – Categories are the methods by which we test names for consistency of state, properties and relations.

    2 – The logics are methods by which we test dimensions for internal consistency.

    3 – The empirical is the method by which we test for external consistency (correspondence).

    4 – The operational is the method by which we test for existential possibility.

    5 – Reciprocity is the method by which we test for morality.

    6 – Limits (and full accounting) are the method by which we test for parsimony and completeness.

    Literature is the method by which we construct and communicate fantasies (generate possibilities which we can then test by Scientific Means.

    Philosophical literature is a conflation of fantasy moral literature combined with insufficient testing. In other words, it’s deception. 😉 Hence why philosophers have been accused of doing far more harm than good.

    We read philosophy in order to obtain ideas.

    We read and practice science in order to sift what little truth is contained in them.

    Via Positiva (ideas through free association), Via Negativa (survival from criticism), Via Deceptio ( advocacy without supplying the full suite of criticisms )

    I have seen precious little in philosophy that is other than an attempt to create a literary moral alternative to theology.

    ANOTHER VIEW

    Physical Science (external correspondence)

    Law (reciprocity)

    Logic (internal consistency)

    Accounting (scope)

    Testimony (language)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-12 10:03:00 UTC

  • MY THOUGHTS ON : John-Paul Wright / Stefan Molyneux THE LEFT – People on the lef

    MY THOUGHTS ON : John-Paul Wright / Stefan Molyneux

    THE LEFT

    – People on the left score lower than people on the right in self control.

    – Self control (impulsivity) along with IQ, is an ubiquitous predictor of life outcomes.

    – People on the left score higher on aggression than people on the right.

    – Leftists assume through self experience that agency is limited.

    – Criminals overwhelmingly tend to be leftists.

    – Justify and glamorize anti-social violence (rebels, criminals, political deceit)

    – Moral Specialization (motherhood)

    – Left academia is engaged in ADVOCACY not in CRITICISM. (lying)

    THE RIGHT

    – The right is more conscientious, less impulsive, less aggressive, has greater assumption of agency, and far lower criminality.

    – Justify and glamorize pro-social violence (war, police, sheriff, heroism).

    – Moral Generalization(‘tribal-hood’)

    – Right academia is engaged in criticism, not advocacy.

    TIME PREFERENCES

    – The right is empirical(skeptical) ‘show me, so that we know the consequences first.’

    – The right self corrects and prosecutes its own members.

    – The left is rational(optimistic) ‘just do it and figure out the consequences later’

    – The left ‘forgets’ rather than self-corrects, and ‘reframes’ its own members.

    INARGUABLE CORRELATIONS

    There are two of the strongest correlations in social science:

    1) impulsivity and aggression

    2) stereotypes.

    The left lies about these two factors consistently.

    ORIGINS

    – Women need to be impulsive since the cost of child rearing is irrationally high.

    – Women must invest heavily in children so they advance them regardless of their merit (denial).

    – Women who are married with children develop conservative political positions.

    – Women who are married with more than two children develop most conservative political positions because they are unable to fantasize given the evidence before them.

    CONSEQUENCES

    1. the left produces a kleptocratic order (female strategy)

    2. it’s necessary for women to employ a kleptocratic (parasitic) strategy given the asymmetry of costs of reproduction.

    3. gender biases can cross genders, and do, so men demonstrate the same parasitic strategy when they cannot compete without doing so.

    4. some individuals adopt these biases for signaling purposes.

    5. the only method of improving a society is to reduce the number of the impulsive (leftists). A leftist society will always degenerate.

    6. the method of decreasing the possibility of leftist action is rule of natural law.

    7. the method of decreasing the number of leftist actors is by limiting the reproduction of leftist actors.

    8. the method of increasing the number of rightist actors is by retention of the results of their productivity when allocated to reproduction, and subsidy of their reproduction if possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-12 09:24:00 UTC

  • James Augustus Berens: —“Heroic Man, by necessity, is uncultured—more precisel

    James Augustus Berens:

    —“Heroic Man, by necessity, is uncultured—more precisely de-cultured. He seeks the destruction in himself of that which is untrue, dishonest, lowly. For industrialized mass culture is driven by values produced and consumed by the herd, those domesticated masses so enthralled with their own mediocrity that their sheepishness eludes them.

    Indeed an honest observer would risk little to note that common man, that tame, soft fellow seems almost incapable of grasping even the most basic of truths about his fundamental condition.

    But mans collective mastery over nature subsumes with it the elimination, nay the distancing, of the contest; and as such, the ultimate test of that which he values. It has come to pass that we are so free of our original burden—the shrill and unforgiving mistress we call nature—that we actively hold anti-values as the highest of all values, and the consequences for our mis-valuations are so far removed from the immediately perceptible that it takes a mad man or a genius to see the necessary course of subsequent events (most likely one must suffer through both).

    But Heroic Man gives easily to his own restlessness and distaste of common values. And as such seeks values of the highest degree, only those tested by time, his enemies and nature. And where the random course of events fails to deliver a satisfactory test, the Hero—to the bewilderment of the domesticated herd—most paradoxically tests all that is himself by confronting that primordial principle that governs all of existence, including his own. That is, the law of entropic decline, disorder, decay.

    Only at the edge of near-death, does our Hero re-affirm his values, does he say yes to himself and yes to the world. It is, in this particular manner—the test, crucible & contest—that the Hero transcends mere man, that he aligns himself with The True, The Beautiful & The Good.

    For nothing is more True than Survival.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-11 22:36:00 UTC

  • Joel Davis: —“By violence we may test our will against reality. By triumph we

    Joel Davis: —“By violence we may test our will against reality. By triumph we may manifest our will in reality. And we can argue about what is and what isn’t until we are blue in the face… Ultimately the test of whether your ideas can transform into reality will be whether you succeed or fail in overcoming that which resists it’s manifestation.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-11 22:35:00 UTC