Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • (I don’t think of it as marxist terms by the way. The west has always practiced

    (I don’t think of it as marxist terms by the way. The west has always practiced the model of aristocracy, nobility, burgher, freeman, serf, slave, and ‘other’. All that changes is the distribution of power between aristocracy(military), nobility (managerial), and clergy (administrative). What’s ‘Novel’ is the expansion of the ‘burgher’ s (merchants) and the transfer of the clerical class and revenues from the clergy to what we consider the middle class. )

    —“Results from these three research methods suggests that in the United States today approximately 15 to 20 percent are in the poor, lower class; 30 to 40 percent are in the working class; 40 to 50 percent are in the middle class; and 1 to 3 percent are in the rich, upper class.”—-

    I use Paul Fussel’s book “Class” as the best overall analysis to date.

    Prior to the enlightenment, 50% of europe’s lands were in the hands of the church and rented out for profit. The monasteries produced goods and functioned as the ‘big corporations do today’, The clergy, because it maintained a near monopoly on literacy, fulfilled much of the clerical labor force – at least as far as government went.

    With the enlightenment and the printing press (a) the clergy no longer had a monopoly (similar to today’s academy/state/media complex is losing it’s monopoly on the control of information, and (b) the revolutions deprived the church of its means of income, and (c) private industry could concentrate capital and invest and the church could not.

    When Darwin dealt a death blow to the only income stream related to the church (a channel to the divine), the academy ‘left the parent’s home’ so to speak and took over teaching the ‘new religion of sciences’ so to speak.

    Unfortunately, the truth was only appealing to the upper classes. So once the academy found the lies of the cosmopolitans to serve as a product for the ascendent middle, working, and lower classes, they stepped in and replaced the church as the propagandists and ‘priests’ of the new state.

    What has happened, primarily since (a) the failure of the great society program, and (b) the fall of world communism, the expansive corruptoin of all socialist polities, and (c) the incremental erasure of the (((cosmopolitan pseudosciences))) strangely enough, in no small part by (((a group of intellectuals))) who are nearly forced to admit that given the record of democratic voting, the economic and political record, the results of cognitive, genetic, and archeological science, that the conservatives (aristocracy) was right all along.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 17:34:00 UTC

  • DEFINITION OF A CORPORATION A corporation: an organization of individuals and th

    DEFINITION OF A CORPORATION

    A corporation: an organization of individuals and their capital which the government has granted limited liability to the members by restricting personal financial liability to the capital invested in the organization in the event of failure. The reason states provide this limited liability is to encourage the risk taking necessary for entrepreneurial activity, and to reduce the power of the financial system from engaging in moral hazard in order to profit immorally. The state, as in all things, functions largely as an insurer of last resort.

    —“The modern corporate form of business organization evolved over many centuries. and despite a large body of historical research. its origins are still obscure. why. then, was the corporation invented‘? The early joint-stock companies in England embodied an important change in contractual form. Scholars have rationalized that these corporations evolved in response to an exogeneous increase in the demand for capital by the early foreign trading companies. Our complementary. supply-side hypothesis stresses the advantages that more readily transferable property rights held for the owner-managers of these early companies. These two hypotheses and the historical evidence on their relative importance will help explain the emergence of the corporate form of economic

    organization.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 16:11:00 UTC

  • PREFACE: In my view all people can be domesticated by the common natural law if

    PREFACE: In my view all people can be domesticated by the common natural law if that law provides sufficient suppression of innovative means of parasitism. And that our philosohpers and scientists failed to develop that method of legal suppression for a variety of reasons – most of which had to do with incentives at the time.

    JEWISH PERSECUTION WORLDWIDE

    Sol – the problem for jews is that they want to preserve their separatism and avoid contributing to the host commons, and instead, to live parasitically off it. This is the same strategy as the gypsies but at a much more indirect method. To do this the jews have made a habit of working with the central government against the interests of the people. The fact that this service could not be provided until the templars, and that the templars were crushed by it, left open an opportunity for the jews to seize that function in society as it emerged. Both the church and the Nobility thought it ‘dirty’ work.

    The problem is, that eventually, a shock occurs, and the people who have contact with what they see as licensed predators (sort of how we see the IRS and Collection Agencies today), take out their anger and steal the property of those who have allied with the state against them. (Just as the jews have done in this country).

    i can’t remember the name of the book. I should but I always forget it. But it’s written by a jew, and he recommends that jews end this cycle of parasitism and alliance with the states against the people, and realize that they are not so much victims but deserving of what has happened to them – it’s a problem of their own making.

    This is my position as well. The jewish group evolutionary strategy is successful, but it has lead to a specialization in literacy, and a weakness in numbers, and physicality. Sot hat the jewish people require host civilizations to provide the protection of property while they engage in profitable but continuously antagonizing extractions from the people and their commons. Israel is an interesting experiment because it will demonstrate whether jews can convert from parasitic consumption of commons, to the expensive production of commons. If so, judaism will start looking a lot like presbyterianism.

    Separate but among cannot work unless one pays heavily into the commons. But jews choose primarily those occupations that are not productive and parasitically consume the commons – those that make use of asymmetric information.

    (in other words, having a lot of jewish doctors, physical scientists, and accountants is one thing, but having a lot of jewish bankers, financiers, advertisers, marketers, public intellectuals, artists, propagandists, lawyers, politicians, is a very bad thing because it creates too great a hazard (as we can see from Mr Krugman) such that the cognitive bias favor of creating additional hazards but escaping accountability for them, can be sated in the course of one’s duties. Without the law to take away the benefit-of the doubt, we cannot ‘train’ their cult to behave as high trust individuals in a high trust society – in great numbers.

    I dunno. I am pretty fond of reformed jews and I don’t see much of a difference between them and our classical liberal bourgeoisie except for our western predilection for (masculine) contribution to the ACCUMULATIVE commons and the jewish (female) predilection for contribution to the CONSUMPTIVE commons.

    All people can be domesticated by sufficient law constructed to take advantage of incentives to prosecute parasitic behavior.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 15:29:00 UTC

  • Vitalii Maslianok Jeez Vitalii. The farther I get in to rewriting it, the more I

    Vitalii Maslianok

    Jeez Vitalii. The farther I get in to rewriting it, the more I find of this code that is elegant. I mean, architecturally it’s excellent. The whole CSS bundle looks like it got our of your control, and clearly the maintenance pages that you didn’t build are a big hole, but the entire workspace/sliding-pages thing is quite nice. React is actually a hell of a lot faster, and quite a bit more readable, but damn…. you do nice work. Gutting the backend into an API makes everything so much easier too.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 15:07:00 UTC

  • People are such weaklings today. I mean, what about breaking Freddy’s ribs by ki

    People are such weaklings today. I mean, what about breaking Freddy’s ribs by kicking him while he was down, breaking David’s nose that bled like hell. Fights at the bus stop with unbeatable, future stalker-murderers. Other fights where the best you can hope for is getting a hold until the other guy gives up. Running away from fights you can’t possibly win. Getting lost in corn fields. Rolling smoke bombs in class. Throwing snowballs at the older guys and running away from them laughing and then spending the next two weeks avoiding them. Pranking teachers a hundred ways with chalk dust. Setting field-fires that spread so fast you can’t outrun them, and melting your sneakers and losing your eyelashes and eyebrows. Snowballs at cars. Pouring gas on the road and lighting it on fire. Moving orange traffic cones into dead ends or nonsensical directions. Prank phone calls. Snow Forts. Blowing stuff up with gunpowder from discarded shells and leftover fireworks. Model rockets with explosive payloads. Threatening and infrequently shooting the bigger guys with a bow and arrow. Motorcycle and mini-bike races where we broke bones. Driving around rural towns pranking people by switching all the political signs in a neighborhood between the parties. Playing trashcan bowling and making a hell of a mess. Running from the police at 3:00am because you’ve been climbing telephone poles. Running from the police because you’ve been shooting out street lights with your wrist-rockets. Pinching girl’s backsides to see which one’s would laugh – and getting dates that way (really). Selling by the pound to pay for your party habit. Racing with other guys down back roads late at night trying to start a fight – or more realistically – preserving the thrill of the possibility without bringing it into fruition. “Parking” in the woods and enjoying every minute of it. Stealing the other team’s mascott. Hanging a mannequin on the flagpole of Mcdonald’s. Doing purple microdot and then going sledding and realizing the ten second lag between action and perception. Unsuccessful Panty raids in the dorms. Borrowing money you don’t have, and acquiring small companies and flipping them. Turning in your boss for criminal activity. Doing a hostile takeover of a company, and later being the subject of a hostile takeover. Writing propaganda against a political order that can’t tell the difference between mischief that prepares us for war and harm.

    The only people worthy of respect are the adrenaline junkies in extreme sports. And no wonder we need them. We leave oppressively tedious lives.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 09:59:00 UTC

  • Q:”WHAT’S PLATONIC PHILOSOPHY?” (first attempt) (pretty close) A: (a) referring

    Q:”WHAT’S PLATONIC PHILOSOPHY?”

    (first attempt) (pretty close)

    A: (a) referring to (supplying information by) the extra-natural (a subset of the supernatural) in a justificationary argument – and specifically, references to extra normal ideals – instead of limiting references to the existential. More generally, (b) Plato and Socrates were literary (analogistic) philosophers producing dialogs. Aristotle was a descriptive (correspondent) philosopher. Plato invoked order (decidability) provided by the extra-natural, as a compromise means of avoiding the supernatural. (This appears to have been the greek innovation over the flood river authoritarian civilizations.) In other words plato conflated the mythical, literary, and rational, to produce authoritative arguments as a means of avoiding the mythical and supernatural authoritarianism of the theologists.

    In the ancient world we saw another instance of the deflationary division so common in western civilization: the separation of decidability into a) law, b) science (aristotelian descriptive philosophy), c) literary envisionary philosophy and it’s companion history, d) platonic philosophy conflating a limited supernaturalism and literary philosophy, e) the continuation of theology: the conflation of law and supernatural mythology, and f) the Augustinian conflation of reason and theology. And all these ‘languages’ or ‘techniques’ persisted through the centuries.

    The Anglos preserve aristotelianism, the french literary(rousseau), the germans have preserved platonism (kant et al). and the jews have conflated law, and pseudoscience, as a replacement for law and supernaturalism.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 09:57:00 UTC

  • PHILOSOPHY IN THE SPECTRUM OF DECIDABILITY (Notice the order) (Notice how produc

    PHILOSOPHY IN THE SPECTRUM OF DECIDABILITY

    (Notice the order) (Notice how producing an ordered series makes attacks by empty verbalisms almost impossible)

    — Correspondence —

    *Reason: comparisons of differences in order to produce decidability by preference or necessity.

    *Logic: the use of reason to identify general rules of internal consistency, for use in testing the internal consistency of propositions.

    *Law: the declaration of general rules of decidability in matters of conflict, in populations large enough for extra-familial commons to develop. Laws evolve internal consistency out of the necessity of decidability in matters with multiple causes.

    *Philosophy: the use of reason and information to produce a set of internally consistent general rules of decidability within domains of varying scale – including ‘complete’ scale: science.

    *History: a reduction of the complexity of past reality to an internally consistent narrative, as externally correspondent as feasible, for the purpose of providing information, for use in ideation or decidability.

    *Literature: the use of narrative to produce an internally consistent, existentially possible, but not externally correspondent alternative to history. (conflation of mythology and history)

    —- Limits of Correspondence—

    ( Invocation of dream states for the purpose of suggestion)

    Mythology: the use of pseudo-historical, super-normal, or super-natural narrative used to produce a set of internally related if not internally consistent explanations in the absence of history. Note that super-normal, (impossible heroes), anthropomorphism( attributing human characteristics to non human objects), and supernatural (impossible non-human characters) and extra natural ( other-worlds) are demonstrated in various myths.

    Theology: The conflation of Mythology and Law for the purpose of producing an internally consistent method of decidability and justification for the use of exclusion or the application of force in cross-tribal groups.

    Occult/NewAge: the conflation of supernaturalism and dream state to produce a purely intutionistic, experiential, and pre-rational, not necessarily consistent but at least framed, method of decidability.

    Dream State: free association driven by intuition, independent of reason, or by the intentional avoidance of reason.

    Drug State: chemically induced dream state, disabling ability to reason while preserving free association.

    ====

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 09:35:00 UTC

  • I certainly think everything I say is compatible with the words of jesus of naza

    I certainly think everything I say is compatible with the words of jesus of nazareth. I think the babylonian myths coopted in the bible are one set of origin stories (babylonian, greek, roman, french(carolingian), germanic, nordic, anglo-arthurian. I think churches and ‘priests’ are necessary. And I think christianity can be taught as myth, while removing the falsehoods by stating that it is myth and parable not history and truth.

    I regard christianity as having failed, because the church was so desperate to preserve the lies, that it did not adapt to telling the truths: that the church in retrospect has worked hard to build civilization from the ashes of the empire – albeit with entirely selfish motives. And that the christianization of europa was among the great crimes in history.

    But that does not mean we do not need a church. Without it we get the state or the academy or both. and as we have seen, they are far worse than the church.

    We have but one aristocratic religion – that is the law and the sacredness of the law; sovereignty, and the sacredness of it; the beauty of women, family nature, craft, and art, and the sacredness of that beauty.

    I am not sure why we need lies if we have thousands of years of great men and great families. If we have festivals to celebrate them. If we have stoicism for men and upper (and secular buddhism for women and bottom), and we create monthly or holiday ‘feasts and services’ wherein we practice how to behave in the presence of the sacred.

    People went to church to learn. They stayed in church for institutional reasons. There is no reason we cannot ‘take’ the christian church and make it a place of learning, and institutional utility. But to do that we must separate the teachings of ‘love’ of jesus from the teachings of lies of the church.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 08:46:00 UTC

  • (When I use the term “88’er” I’m referring exclusively to the people who try to

    (When I use the term “88’er” I’m referring exclusively to the people who try to justify the hitler cult who lack intelligence to do so, and rapidly resort to insults and spamming when their sophism runs into the brick wall of reason, logic, science, and the institutions necessary to produce and maintain a polity its economy, and its commons.)

    Basically I’m ok with anything as long as it’s not false or impossible. And for a polity, it’s economy, and its commons, the chickens come home to roost eventually. The less more correspondent your rules of decidability, the more survivable and durable your polity, economy, and commons. The less correspondent your rules of decidability the less survivable and durable your polity, economy, and commons.

    NSDAP was a non-correspondent momentum play – an attempt to create a religion (cult) to use remaining property-in-toto, to create an empire that would provide survivability where the status quo would not. That I agree that this aesthetic was beautiful, and the strategy was a brilliant use of new media, propaganda, and irreproducible time-and-place, is very different from saying it was either survivable or repeatable. The Nazis innovated using new technology to take advantage of time and place. If you want to create a new aesthetic in this time and place, you need to innovate in aesthetic, use new technology, that will produce similar ends in this time and place.

    IMHO this is not possible because NS was a working class movement that competed against the communist working class movement. And frankly we no longer possess such a working class, nor one that can be motivated by such means, in this time and place. The era where we could rally the peasantry, rally the working class has been gone, and we are left with the opposite vulnerability – others are rallying the under-and-immigrant-classes (the opposition) using the strategy the NS made use of.

    Right now we have a full spectrum of the New Right emerging with a language for every class. And as is usual in the west, instead of speaking with one class voice (the working class under NS, the peasantry under christianity), we are speaking with all voices of all our classes.

    Yet, each class makes the mistake that their language is sufficient for the motivation of other classes. They live in their own cognitively biased world. And so we may in fact need various languages of inspiration and motivation for each of the classes – I certainly don’t intend to inspire the working class, only to fight for his interests in my own classes.

    So rallying around a singe ideology is very difficult. And it will be difficult until we have a solution and a plan of achieving it. But when we have a solution and a plan of achieving it, each class can modify it’s message to support the plan or some variation of it.

    This is what is preventing the right from coalescing into a single movement. It’s why the current administration bought us time, but may not have been as helpful as being backed against the wall as the left now feels.

    I am certain my solution of modifying the constitution will produce the ends we desire over a fairly short if not rapid period of time. And it will work – not because it will produce a shared belief – but because it will prevent the formation of competing solutions, and it will use the same selfish market incentives in the prosecution of anti-westerners as we westerners have used to create our other ‘markets in everything’.

    Just as simpletons talk about people, average people talk about events, above average people talk about ideas – in revolutionary context, simpletons talk about beliefs (if we all believe or value x), average people talk about education or policy (if we can only get x done), above average people talk about institutions and incentives (if we only do x the rest will follow).

    There may exist some other possible means. But as far as I can tell, we have lost our numbers due to the intentional invasion of the west by the underclasses for the purpose of creating demand for authority, for the purpose of ending western aristocratic civilization, and the great experiment of the anglo saxon peoples in contractualism, sovereignty, and rule of internally consistent externally correspondent reciprocally moral, Natural Law. The only system of self governance that makes possible Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, and Subsidy.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 08:33:00 UTC

  • Every time the whacko 88’ers attack me all they do is legitimize me with the mai

    Every time the whacko 88’ers attack me all they do is legitimize me with the mainstream – proving my point. Nationalism for everyone sells. shit talking other people while claiming your superior does nothing.

    (yes I’ve been drinking. lol)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 20:34:00 UTC