I certainly think everything I say is compatible with the words of jesus of naza

I certainly think everything I say is compatible with the words of jesus of nazareth. I think the babylonian myths coopted in the bible are one set of origin stories (babylonian, greek, roman, french(carolingian), germanic, nordic, anglo-arthurian. I think churches and ‘priests’ are necessary. And I think christianity can be taught as myth, while removing the falsehoods by stating that it is myth and parable not history and truth.

I regard christianity as having failed, because the church was so desperate to preserve the lies, that it did not adapt to telling the truths: that the church in retrospect has worked hard to build civilization from the ashes of the empire – albeit with entirely selfish motives. And that the christianization of europa was among the great crimes in history.

But that does not mean we do not need a church. Without it we get the state or the academy or both. and as we have seen, they are far worse than the church.

We have but one aristocratic religion – that is the law and the sacredness of the law; sovereignty, and the sacredness of it; the beauty of women, family nature, craft, and art, and the sacredness of that beauty.

I am not sure why we need lies if we have thousands of years of great men and great families. If we have festivals to celebrate them. If we have stoicism for men and upper (and secular buddhism for women and bottom), and we create monthly or holiday ‘feasts and services’ wherein we practice how to behave in the presence of the sacred.

People went to church to learn. They stayed in church for institutional reasons. There is no reason we cannot ‘take’ the christian church and make it a place of learning, and institutional utility. But to do that we must separate the teachings of ‘love’ of jesus from the teachings of lies of the church.