—-“National Socialism (working class) and Libertarianism (middle, producing class) are class-specific evolutionary strategies stated in rational-universalist terms.”—- James Augustus Berens
(james being genius again)
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 20:24:00 UTC
—“National Socialism and Libertarianism are two versions of astrology for white guys.”— Aleister Pound
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 20:01:00 UTC
—“It took tens of thousands of years of particular environmental selection pressures, as well as mixing with different non homo sapiens to produce the separate groups of Africans and Europeans. How can this ever be replicated? It won’t and it can’t be.”—- Critic
The thing about rationality is that as we approach truth we approach indifference.
to say that people are not the same is not the same as saying that all sentient creatures regardless of genetic difference, can cooperate productively if they observe natural law. And that all human beings can approach indifference if they reduce their underclasses.
But I”m glad you’re willing to make a genetic claim. Because indifference does not require identical-ness. unless we’re not rational creatures.
And that after all is the underlying argument,
Apparently what is obvious to some is impenetrable to others.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 16:55:00 UTC
THE NEW CHURCH AND THE OLD
If the catholic church will no longer crown worthy monarchs, then we must replace the church. For all its services, that is the one that most transformed our civilization for the better. There is no better government than christian monarchy under natural law, and houses of parliament that allow for the creation of commons in a market between the classes.
if there is to be a future church, one restoring natural law, one restoring the monarchy, and one restoring the west – then this is our sole purpose: to certify those who govern by natural law and the law of nature, and to prosecute and kill those who do not.
All the other service that a new church most provide are those that can be categorized as education and training.
The training of the sovereign mind of stoics.
The training of behavior in the (sovereign) sacred commons
The training of the tradition and ritual of the family
The training of arts, crafts, and sciences in the markets for production, commons, polities and transcendence.
No more lies.
Truth is enough.
We have heroes a plenty without inventing false ones.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 15:21:00 UTC
AGENCY AND MATURITY MANIFEST VIA COMPETITION
We might make the correlation between all left leaning lack of agency disorders. But I think that’s about as far as it can go. Leftsm is a kind of failure to develop. Women don’t develop until they have enough children that they must. Men develop as soon as they must compete in one way or another. Those that don’t compete don’t develop. Those women that don’t have children or have too few or have other shelter may not develop. I don’t think it’s any more complex than that. Since it is simply true that men are more disposable the line of demarcation is pretty simple. But then we are not talking science now we are talking hypothesis.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 14:29:00 UTC
3000 YEARS: V1:Europeans vs Indo-Iranians, V2:Athens/Sparta vs Jerusalem/Babylon, V3:Anglos/Germans vs Jewish/Russians. TRUTH VS LIES.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 14:16:00 UTC
RE EVOLA ON WOMEN DISCOVERING THE DISUTILITY OF WORK
Women have a very hard time coming to that level of agency unless they are predisposed to it.
If other women see nonsense as a status signal among women, they will hen peck each other and consume all that exists to obtain it no matter how ridiculous.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 12:58:00 UTC
SEE: THE NAZIS HATE ME. lolz
—“Curt is pretty much the most worthless person with a voice on the internet. Pure sophistry.”– Reginald Davis
NOT AN ARGUMENT
Correlation without causation is sophistry.
Argument to preference rather than cost is sophistry.
Argument ad hominem is sophistry.
ARGUMENT
The differences between the different groups of homo sapiens is visually obvious but behaviorally determined not by physical features but (a) by endocrine differences from pedomorphic selection delaying maturity and its depth – thereby extending our learning years, and (b) by altering the distribution of the population through underclass reduction. The world upper classes are behaviorally indifferent save for what appear to be verbal abilities superior in the north and west, and spatial and memory abilities superior in the far east. The upper classes are not a problem for one another. The lower classes function as armies however, whether they fight by physical violence, immigration, reproduction, information and conversion.
All homo sapiens, regardless of group, can transcend assuming they eliminate the impediments posed by their underclasses.
I see no evidence anywhere in the world that this is false.
That this result is achievable by preventing the migration of all but the upper classes is rather obvious.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 12:53:00 UTC
DENY POTENTIAL ALLIES THE FIELD
Part of winning the war against the left’s jewish pseudoscientific, puritan and german psuedo rational, and french moral, and islamic reactionary movments is denying your allies in the libertarian and the right, their fantasies. It is easy for them to concentrate their forces upon us, prior to concentrating their forces upon each other.
Ending traditional conservatism wasn’t necessary -it failed despite access to power. Ending optimistic conservatism wasn’t necessary – it failed despite access to power. Ending neoconservatism wasn’t necessary – it failed despite access to power. Ending libertinism (Libertarianism) was a bit harder because it was such a failure it never obtained access to power with which to demonstrate their failure. Ending the Christian 88’ers is even harder because they have no chance whatsoever of obtaining power, and demonstrating failure while in power. Any more than their peers, the Jewish communists and socialists have of obtaining power. It is harder to defeat libertarians because of the pseudoscientific and anti-historical bulwark that they have created – sufficient for an attempt at constructing a new religion. And it’s even harder to defeat the 88’ers because they have neither the intellectual bulwark to defeat, nor the evidence of failure, nor the power during which they can demonstrate their failure.
On the other hand the demonstration of the failure of the 88’ers is their fantasy that they can lead the very revolution that they seek to obtain, by intellectual argument, moral imperative, or obtaining and holding power.
The 88’ers are just soldiers. The libertines just escapists. the merchants just followers. It is up for the warriors and the aristocracy to lead, so that the soldiers have something possible to follow.
But like their marxist peers, they have the fantasy that they can rule. This fantasy must be ended in order for them to obtain their desired status by possible, and durable means.
There is only one future available to us that restores the relative position of our classes in relation to other classes: the restoration of our competitive advantage: sovereignty, truth, beauty, and the production of commons against which no other people can compete.
Everyone thinks they can lead. But we lead because people want us to, and they want us to because we have actionable plans, and we achieve results because we have actionable plans and people who want a leader to inform them how to act in favor of what end.
If you don’t have ideas, dont have plans, don’t have leaders, and don’t have sufficient number of people who can act on those plans as suggested by their leaders, then you are just IN THE WAY.
You are a useful idiot working in favor of the left against your own people.
That’s my criticism of the 88’ers.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 12:39:00 UTC
There is a very big difference between Jewish positive law (wisdom) and european negative law (logical and empirical). Natural Law=Science.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 12:02:00 UTC