Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • I don’t try to be smarter than people in history unless they do things for decep

    I don’t try to be smarter than people in history unless they do things for deceptive, emotional, or ideological reasons. We all make calculations given sparse information in real time and under stress, and we all get some of them wrong.

    Study Napoleon for a perfect autistic (infovore seizing opportunities), and study hannibal for the opposite (slow construction of a strategy), and study Rommel and Alexander for mastering tactical maneuver with professional forces, and study islam for ‘raid them to death and destroy their whole civilization by daily small sieges’.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 16:00:00 UTC

  • “The Emperor is the happiest character in the Star Wars universe. He’s always la

    —“The Emperor is the happiest character in the Star Wars universe. He’s always laughing.”— Cary Morris

    See? What he said. lol

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 15:48:00 UTC

  • “Curt: Thanks for writing about autism. I knew nothing about it and I was workin

    —“Curt: Thanks for writing about autism. I knew nothing about it and I was working with someone on the spectrum – who knows he is – and instead of finding his behaviors frustrating I could frame and understand them them.”— A Friend.

    Helping each other on the journey man. 😉 -hugs.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 15:44:00 UTC

  • “Males are required to make group judgements regardless of outliers. “— Greg H

    —“Males are required to make group judgements regardless of outliers. “— Greg Hamilton

    Women evolved to think of individual children’s (and women’s) needs, while men evolved to think of the tribe (family) survival.

    Division of production cycles, division of temporal perception, cognition, calculation, and advocacy.

    We are amazing together, but we are cognitive specialists. We need to understand what part of the production cycle we specialize in. The now, the soon, the later, and the future.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 15:41:00 UTC

  • SORRY ABRAHAMISTS. FACE REALITY – NEVER AGAIN. We complete the scientific method

    SORRY ABRAHAMISTS. FACE REALITY – NEVER AGAIN.

    We complete the scientific method and the european, greco, roman, germanic program, and in doing so write it into law and end your fraud in supernatural, pseudo-rational (counter-enligthenment), and pseudoscientific (contemporary) eras. Never again.

    LOOK:

    Operational grammar, semantics, and testability (calculation and falsificationism)

    -vs-

    fictionalist grammar and semantics and untestability (sophism and justificationism).

    It’s not an OPINION. It’s just a FACT. Sorry. It’s the difference between numerology, astrology, semitic mysticism, monopoly, and semitic law, vs mathematics, science, historical mythology, competing disciplines, and tort (natural) law.

    I mean, it’s not an opinion any more than that there is a substantial difference between arithmetic and geometry or measurement vs analogy.

    I mean, I know this is hard for mortal minds to grasp, but it sure as hell shouldn’t be.

    Abrahamic religion is the language of lying. Egyptian and Hindu religions are merely mythologies (wisdom literatures) not laws. Buddhism was originally a very poorly stated means of self discipline producing what we call mindfulness (self control). Confucianism is much closer to reason within the limits of chinese language, concepts, grammar and technology. But the abrahamic religions claim to be both a monopoly, and true, and singular. And they are presented and argued using conflationar grammar and semantics, justificationism, and sophism we call ‘Pilpul’ (the verbal equivalent of numerology).

    There is nothing good in abrahamic religions that cannot be stated without lying. There is everything bad in those religions because they evolved to teach us to lie, are taught by lying, and defended by lies and sophisms, and produced externalities the horrors of which are the darkest mark in human history.

    The abrahamic innovation reversing greek reason resulted in Judaism under which the most educated people in europe accomplishing absolutely nothing except conspiring with the state against the people then being cyclically exterminated for it. Christianity accomplished nothing other than destroying germanic culture, eliminating the ability of europeans to defend themselves until the VIking restoration, privatizing literacy as a means of control and submission, turning 50% of european capital dead and for no other purpose than rents, and creating the largest and most corrupt and parasitic bureaucracy in human history. Islam accomplished nothing except the consumption and extermination of all the great civilizations of the ancient world, and reducing all peoples under its influence to dysgenic, ignorant, superstitious, aggressive emoters, and leaving 3/4 of a billion people dead in their wake. The abrahamic dark age was the darkest event in human history, and while the great plagues were devastating, it is patently obvious that abrahamic pilpul and its fictionalism was worse than anything other than malaria.

    No no. Your lies are done.

    NEVER AGAIN.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 15:32:00 UTC

  • SPRING IS SPRUNG, THE GRASS IS RISEN. DO HEAR THE REVOLUTION COMIN’? (The govern

    SPRING IS SPRUNG, THE GRASS IS RISEN. DO HEAR THE REVOLUTION COMIN’? (The government behaves best when the guillotine is most certain.) #Trump

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 13:54:00 UTC

  • PUT A WARRIOR IN CHARGE OF MILLIONS OF ARMED MEN —“Oliver North to become next

    PUT A WARRIOR IN CHARGE OF MILLIONS OF ARMED MEN

    —“Oliver North to become next president of National Rifle Association”—

    I wish I’d thought of that. Absolutely Perfect Timing. Genius.

    Wow.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 13:50:00 UTC

  • UM, LET ME HELP YOU….. —“Just an opinion”— It is a fact that we can, using

    UM, LET ME HELP YOU…..

    —“Just an opinion”—

    It is a fact that we can, using the big 5/6 inventory, and breaking those dimensions into traits, measure the differences between the expressions of those genders, and this measurement has been done at vast scale over many years.

    These traits map to reward (endocrine) systems. Those endocrine systems map to stages of the prey and reproductive drives, since in evolutionary history that is the minimum necessary framework evolution was able to work with and extend into the full suite of properties of homo-sapiens-sapiens.

    As such, while I use Ordinary Language Terms, those terms are necessary to translate those differences in endocrine responses and therefore incentives, to a narrative set of comparisons that people can understand.

    In this case, men in fact do demonstrate loyalty and women far less, while men do not experience what women call devotion (the feeling they have toward children) on anywhere near the scale.

    I then translate these terms into economic language such that we see the equilibrial relation between male and female behavior.

    I do this so that I can explain to people in scientific terms what their intuitions mean, sot hat they know they are both genetically determined (80%) in utero/developmentally determined (20%) and not choice.

    Because they are not choice, that means we must not expect to CONVINCE each other. Instead the solution is not to achieve one solution or the other but to create exchanges where both get SOME or MOST of what they want (both personally and politically) even if none of us get ALL of what we want.

    Now because I just assume you are a decent person (it is my default presumption even if I must tolerate the occasional solipsism from the intuitions of women, and the occasional dominance expression from overconfident young men), I’m taking the time to explain this to you – even though you did not take the time to investigate me, or ask me how I came to such conclusions, or even construct a rational or scientific opposition, just an emotive one.

    But I cannot cover the subjects I do, which literally encompass the entirety of the human spectrum of knowledge and explain every statement in argumentative form.

    Instead, people tend to follow me for rather long periods, and I post a lot of aphorisms, contrasts (as do confucians, but closed), series, spectra, and grids as well as “SKETCHES” because if I wrote proofs for every idea I put forth (a) no one could comprehend them, and (b) I would cover 1/100000’th of the subjects that I do.

    OK?

    Thank you. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 12:54:00 UTC

  • WE ARE ALL COMPATIBLE, PRECISELY BECAUSE TRUTH IS TRUTH REGARDLESS OF OUR DIFFER

    WE ARE ALL COMPATIBLE, PRECISELY BECAUSE TRUTH IS TRUTH REGARDLESS OF OUR DIFFERENCES

    My specialty is in not erring. I don’t err often. For the simple reason that I work harder at not being wrong than almost anyone else. It’s my job.

    My emotional condition has no bearing on whether I speak the truth. Your technique of trying to say it does is just lying. Right? You’re engaging in deception? By trying to say the truth is other than the truth? By saying a normal distribution (bell curve) doesn’t exist whenever we describe the properties of any set of people?

    Again. It’s a cognitive bias (the lack of reason) that you’re demonstrating not reason. This is why men like me don’t debate with all but a minority of women like you. Because all but a minority of women like you are cognitively biases such that you cannot tell the difference between the TRUE, the GOOD, and the PREFERABLE. Because you are not in fact reasoning, but intuiting (feeling). Evolution made you the way you are so that you will defend your children no matter how bad they are for the family and tribe. It’s not an act of reason, but an instinct.

    What’s true is true whether you like it or not or whether it’s in your interests or not. I criticize arationality regardless of gender. That’s equality. No deceit allowed is equality.

    We are all compatible even if we are all different and unequal. it’s by advocating, cooperating and criticizing an conflicting that we calculate an evolutionary path through a universe largely hostile to life.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 12:32:00 UTC

  • Do you know what the cognitive bias called NAXALT is, and how you can identify t

    Do you know what the cognitive bias called NAXALT is, and how you can identify that a woman, or a male lacking a father is speaking by the use of this cognitive bias?

    Men cognitively perceive distributions and speak in distributions. Women fear distributions and speak in equality or indifferences.

    So you merely demonstrate the fact that we are different in cognitive function (which the science says anyway – men and women have different brain structures), just as we are in anti-social behavior, with men biasing toward physical crime and women biasing toward emotional and psychological crime (psychosis).

    So, no the statement is simply true. Which is one of the primary causes for the relative absence of women in powerful positions in high risk and competitive organizations, versus the relative dominance of women in parasitic monopolistic bureaucracies like the government and education.

    We are paid in no small part by our loyalty.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 12:13:00 UTC