Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • REQUIREMENTS OF A RELIGION – TRANSFER NOT STASIS —“How do we sacralize (keep s

    REQUIREMENTS OF A RELIGION – TRANSFER NOT STASIS

    —“How do we sacralize (keep static) our value system, outside of religion? Christianity was the container, and will be again. We can modify which values are contained in it, but we need :

    1. A value system

    2. A way to transmit it to all classes (myth, feasts, spectacles)

    3. A way to keep the value system static (canonized)(burning heretics at the stake)

    Its obvious to me that this requires a monopoly institution. The only market for choosing between the monopolies is war. There can be no market for a sacralized value system. We allowed that and we got modernism.”—Bill Anderson

    SINCE WHEN IS STASIS A GOOD THING?

    it may be obvious to you but looking around the world (a) our value system isn’t from the church its from the having a commercial middle class, education, and the law, (b) man has discovered just about every imaginable way of training us into mindfulness. (c) we train with fairy tales, historical novels, bibliographies, histories, and the sciences.

    We have been through many waves of conquest by truth (reason) using deflationary grammars and conquest by lies (religion) using inflationary and conflationary grammars.

    Deflationary we innovate and prosper, conflationary we stagnate and suffer.

    So it doesn’t really matter what you intuit, because you are infected by the disease so to speak. Falsify those ideas by searching the world and you will find through the comparison of civilizations (japan being my favorite example in belonging, and switzerland being my favorite example in civic order).

    Your ideas cannot survive falsification. They can’t. Assuming one has intellectual honesty.

    Myth(commensurability on strategy), Ritual(mindfulness), Feast(calm belonging), Festival(excited belonging) and Markets (daily cooperation) work. They do. There is no evidence people need lies, they need commensurability so that they can cooperate with the least fear and doubt and insecurty, and the greatest optimism and trust.

    Conversely, primitive peoples were forced to compete with much more advanced peoples but they lacked commensurability due to tribalism, and lacked commerce due to primitivism. It’s not complicated. The problem is STATIC MEANS DEAD. And so it’s not that we must be static via positiva, but that we must be static VIA NEGATIVA (law).

    The very quest for the static as commensurability via positiva vs the dynamic as commensurability via negativa is the reason abrahamism was so stagnating under judaism, stagnating under christianity, and stagnating destructive and devolutinary under islam.

    Be careful what you value, for what you value may be simply ‘taking it easy’ such that you stagnate and devolve.

    THE RED QUEEN NEVER STOPS.

    Abrahamic religions, or any static religion, lets the red queen win.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 10:39:00 UTC

  • SELLING DEGREES VS INDULGENCES —“Academia is the modern priesthood.”— Bill A

    SELLING DEGREES VS INDULGENCES

    —“Academia is the modern priesthood.”— Bill Anderson

    It should be. The academy evolved out of the church instead out of the greek and roman upper middle class and aristocracy.

    And who filled the void of the church when the church failed to adapt to modernity? The church-in-waiting.

    However, the church and it’s selling of Indulgences had NOTHING on the academy selling degrees that are meaningless.

    I mean, the academy is the greatest scam since monotheistic religion.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 10:27:00 UTC

  • CONSTRUCTING PERFECT GOVERNMENT (Sort of Snarky Cartoon Version) INTJ+INTP Thats

    CONSTRUCTING PERFECT GOVERNMENT

    (Sort of Snarky Cartoon Version)

    INTJ+INTP Thats under 10% of the population. If you select for IQ that’s probably half of that (4%). If you select for commercial property that’s probably 1/4 of that. So that’s about 1% of the population should vote. And if we divide by commercial property size, that would give us three or four houses, following pareto laws, which would give us a king, judiciary, senate, house, and commons, selected from some small part of the upper 1% by demonstrated means.

    Sounds like constitutional monarchy under property requirements.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 10:23:00 UTC

  • BRINGING PSYCHOLOGY TO ITS FINAL CONCLUSION —“Curt Doolittle I noticed MBTI ha

    BRINGING PSYCHOLOGY TO ITS FINAL CONCLUSION

    —“Curt Doolittle I noticed MBTI has turned into a sort of religion for a-lot of people. Unfortunate how this always happens.”—Candice Mary

    As I’ve said elsewhere sixteen (4×4) with archetypal names, is about as complex as the average person can manage to ‘calculate’ with.

    I would much rather have people use MBTI and understand that we have different categories, relations and values, than to attempt to use the freudian model to dominate them into a uniform ideal, by casting everything as a ‘disease’ that doesn’t conform to that ideal. Freudianism is freaking evil.

    MBTI and Jung are crayons and fairy tales yes, but like fairy tales they contain a lot more than a grain of truth. Among my clan of people so to speak, big 5/6 factors and underlying dimensions we get greater precision but with the same empathy at the cost of losing the utility of archetypes.

    If you understand my work you lose empathy completely, and see people as clockworks, lacking nearly all agency.

    Then you are faced with having to just love people for the joy of it, and not blame them for their failings.

    Which is the optimum understanding that the very wisest of us (particularly catholics) eventually arrive at, and is one of the reasons the very top scholars in the world cease their irreligiosity while the public intellectuals preserve atheism.

    Hence my multi-year quest to understand how to produce a religion that free of abrahamic sophism, deceit, and immoralism, but achieves what we all desire from religion: the peace of mind and frequent elation that comes from surrender to running with the pack.

    It is wolves and dogs running in packs in the wild we should study – because it is precisely that emotion of safety in belonging and the sharing of perception and understanding by nothing but body language that we verbal and rational creatures long for.

    Domesticated wolves are our friends for this reason. Just as the wolfman is a subconscious archetype: we are the apes who hunt like wolves. We simply had the advantage of two feet and opposable thumbs, and extraordinary heat dissipation so we could pass those wolves and domesticate ourselves.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 10:16:00 UTC

  • PERSONALITY “TESTS” MBTI is the finger-paint version of the Big Five/Six(Minneso

    PERSONALITY “TESTS”

    MBTI is the finger-paint version of the Big Five/Six(Minnesota Multiphasic), which the crayon version of evolutionary biology, which is the painterly version of bio-chemistry, which in itself is the calculus of demonstrated behavior.

    Don’t get excited about precision. For some people finger painting and crayons suit their skill level and needs.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 09:55:00 UTC

  • WHAT MAKES CHRISTIANITY JEWISH, NOT EUROPEAN? (very important ideas) What makes

    WHAT MAKES CHRISTIANITY JEWISH, NOT EUROPEAN?

    (very important ideas)

    What makes Christianity Jewish is the method of presentation (fictional history), the adaptation rather than homeric repetition (justification), the method of argument: pilpul(sophism), the demand for exclusivity (monotheism), the demand for submission(slave morality), the demand for obedience (law vs wisdom) rather than respect and tolerance, the demand for expansion (domination), divisiveness and demonization (poly-ethicalism – although christian is less so than judaism or islam), the primacy of priests and conformity(positive) rather than law and conflict resolution (negative), the maladaptivity (devolution) rather than adaptivity (markets), the genetics (dysgenic rather than eugenic), and the spreading of ‘sources of ignorance’ rather than knowledge and innovation. The fact that it has been called an opiate of masses is simply a medical truism, since that’s precisely what it does (literally).

    The fact that people spoke and wrote in greek, in greek-conquered lands, does not make them greek. What makes on the member of a group evolutionary strategy is their method of cooperation toward a given end. In the case of western vs semitic, it’s Truth, Correspondence, Heroism, Agency, Innovation, and Rule of Empirical Law, vs Lying, Non-Correspondence, Slavery, the absence of Agency, Stagnation and the Rule by Fictional Law.

    The historical problem facing aristocratic and masculine western man in curing himself of the underclass and effeminate infection of abrahamic sophism, is that empirical law, commerce, and science is simply practiced while literature is debated. Once you understand this, the parallel between judaism and marxism, and christianity and postmodernism is obvious: jewish pseudoscience and law that is non-correspondent, and christian literature and rationalism that is allegorical and non correspondent. They attempt to achieve by overloading reason, with framing obscurantism and suggestion, an appeal to intuition of the interpersonal experience, rather than informing us as to the limits of personal perception and experience and the use of measurements both physical and logical to extend it.

    The Abrahamisms are Sophisms by analogy, not Measurements by description. Western man measures the empirical to understand and defeat reality. Semitic man fictionalizes to ignore, and circumvent reality.

    Abrahamic fictionalism is the very opposite of Western Description. They tell fictions. We report on events.

    (Thus endeth the lesson)

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 09:51:00 UTC

  • JUST LOVE THEM AND LIMIT THEIR INFLUENCE TO THEIR DOMAIN OF COMPETENCE Love wome

    JUST LOVE THEM AND LIMIT THEIR INFLUENCE TO THEIR DOMAIN OF COMPETENCE

    Love women, dont argue with them. Let them believe their feelings are sources of knowledge. they are overwhelmed by them and lack agency because of them. And cannot function if they cannot trust them. Those feelings are temporally and individually valuable. just deny their application to scale and intertemporal conditions where feelings are relevant to individuals but outcomes relevant to the group regardless of individual feelings. we made the mistake of universal enfranchisement. women are not bad they are wonderful. but their intuitions of scale (political) are as useless as are male intuitions about carrying, nursing, and caring for infants. The problem with universal enfranchisement, is that while women can deny us interpersonal influence we can no longer deny them political influence. we are compatible only through trade, and by trade we calculate the nash optimum despite our differences in ability and interest. and by including women in the political we eliminated the female market for marriage as well as the male market for politics.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 07:53:00 UTC

  • DIFFERENCES IN INTRINSIC VALUE OF WOMEN AND MEN The majority women are de facto

    DIFFERENCES IN INTRINSIC VALUE OF WOMEN AND MEN

    The majority women are de facto intrinsically valuable unless behaviorally costly as individuals. the majority of men are only intrinsically valuable as a team unless behaviorally exceptional as individuals. this asymmetry explains genetic asymmetry of reproduction of the genders, and the dangers of excess men explains the development of marriage, and the disappearance of groups with excess women.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 07:22:00 UTC

  • Hurry up 2022

    Hurry up 2022…

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 04:17:00 UTC

  • by Bill Joslin I’m reminded of something Stephen Davies said in a lecture. The e

    by Bill Joslin

    I’m reminded of something Stephen Davies said in a lecture.

    The enlightenment thinkers (Anglo) had a focus on “improvement”. Look at what worked and didn’t in the past and incrementally improve the product. Its focus was on the past as a resource.

    The counter-enlightenment (continental) had a focus on “progress”, that being an ideal state in which their efforts “progressed toward”. And this delineates the two. The later accompanies some vision of eutopia or equivalent. It rejects the past as something to run forward away from.

    To.me this shift to “progress” in the later parts of the 18th century through the 19th century was when the best social innovations (crystallization of a long organic development in England) where twisted in one themselves.with idealized arguments which we are now seeing the consequence.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 22:10:00 UTC