Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • FRENCH, BRITISH, AND AMERICAN SEPARATIONS OF CHURCH AND STATE by David Rosser Ow

    FRENCH, BRITISH, AND AMERICAN SEPARATIONS OF CHURCH AND STATE

    by David Rosser Owen

    “The West” that separates Church and State is basically France and French-style secularism.

    The USA doesn’t really separate church and state as such, but instead, decided against having an established church so as not to weaken the resolve of the 13 Colonies, in their wish to leave being British, and gain independence.

    Why? So that the Established Anglican states (e.g. New York, Maryland, Virginia) would not end up fighting Puritan fundamentalists (e.g. Massachusetts, Connecticut) when they should be watching their collective backs.

    in other words, Americans did not establish a religion because (a) it would have divided the states, and (b) they perceived the state religion of britain as ‘diluted’, which we would today translate as “insufficiently cleansed of catholicism and Popery.”

    The UK’s secularism (separating Church and State) means here that there are no Churchmen holding senior offices of the secular state as churchmen – the last bishop as Lord Chancellor was in the 1600s.

    But it doesn’t mean that the Common Law doesn’t derive from Natural Law (i.e. Divinely inspired Law, as the books by people like Hooker, Feilding, or Hearnshaw state).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 12:08:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 11:33:00 UTC

  • EVERYONE STOPS BEING CHRISTIAN … as soon as they pass through the door from th

    EVERYONE STOPS BEING CHRISTIAN … as soon as they pass through the door from the church to the parking lot.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 11:25:00 UTC

  • “Women are devoted, and men are loyal. There’s a difference.”

    —“Women are devoted, and men are loyal. There’s a difference.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 11:13:00 UTC

  • “An Unchristian Strategy” by Ely Harman 1) Eradication of the hatable or hateful

    “An Unchristian Strategy”

    by Ely Harman

    1) Eradication of the hatable or hateful from human societies.

    2) The extension of kinship love only as far as distant kin with concentric circles of decreasing trust outside of that.

    3) Tit for tat (reciprocity) with forgiveness (to break cycles of recrimination) unless we’ve had enough of forgiving someone in particular.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 11:12:00 UTC

  • blocked: Paden Wright blocked: Devin Sible REMINDER: I teach argument. I don’t d

    blocked: Paden Wright

    blocked: Devin Sible

    REMINDER:

    I teach argument.

    I don’t do stupid.

    I don’t do stupid memes in particular.

    You probably aren’t witty – you’re probably an idiot.

    You probably aren’t funny – you’re probably infantile.

    When you criticize precision as autism you’re an infantile idiot.

    I enjoy Troll killing: it’s like eskimos and whales – a heritage thing, and FB is a bridge over infested waters.

    Tolerance is an excuse of the weak.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 11:10:00 UTC

  • UM WITHOUT PROPERTY MOTHER IS KNOWABLE, WITH PROPERTY FATHER IS KNOWABLE. Father

    UM WITHOUT PROPERTY MOTHER IS KNOWABLE, WITH PROPERTY FATHER IS KNOWABLE.

    Father=Property=Civilization

    —“So was Gimbutas, the woman behind the Kurgan hypothesis, which postulated that the Proto-Indo-Europeans originated on the East European steppe. She said that the Old Europeans were peaceful, matriarchal goddess-worshippers while the Proto-Indo-Europeans were warlike, patriarchal nomads in an attempt to construe their invasion as a negative event, and yet the opposite ensued and people were glad that they got rid of the degeneracy of the previous population. She wanted things to be a certain way and it backfired.”—Alexander Zavialov

    Well, (a) yes it’s gimbutas that ‘discovered’ the urheimat. But (b) her feminist (matriarchy) theory I’m pretty sure went out the window. (c) it is true that in very primitive (early) societies households consisted of women and their men ‘rotated’ to fuck what they could. In this sense it was matrilineal. But that’s because YOUR MOTHER IS ALL YOU KNOW IS TRUE in a consanguineous band.

    It’s once you have property and divide up property and women that you get paternalism. Why? Because PROPERTY AND EXcluSIVITY IS KNOWABLE. (mostly).

    There aren’t any consanguineous bands left. Why? They can’t survive and compete without property.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 10:44:00 UTC

  • “Tolerance is not a moral absolute; it is a peace treaty. Tolerance is a social

    —“Tolerance is not a moral absolute; it is a peace treaty. Tolerance is a social norm because it allows different people to live side-by-side without being at each other’s throats. It means that we accept that people may be different from us, in their customs, in their behavior, in their dress, in their sex lives, and that if this doesn’t directly affect our lives, it is none of our business. But the model of a peace treaty differs from the model of a moral precept in one simple way: the protection of a peace treaty only extends to those willing to abide by its terms. It is an agreement to live in peace, not an agreement to be peaceful no matter the conduct of others. A peace treaty is not a suicide pact.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 10:40:00 UTC

  • “The emperor did nothing wrong”

    —“The emperor did nothing wrong”–

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 10:38:00 UTC

  • “There’s no convincing me that Voldemort is a bad guy.”— Alexander Zavialov

    —“There’s no convincing me that Voldemort is a bad guy.”— Alexander Zavialov

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 10:38:00 UTC