Source: Facebook

  • “What is the central dogma of the postmodern left?”—- THE POSTMODERN CANON (Re

    —“What is the central dogma of the postmodern left?”—-

    THE POSTMODERN CANON (Really, this is the answer).

    (The Vision of the Anointed)

    1) While never having power, never governing, never building business and industry or army, the anointed are confident that they could rule better than the law, markets, and meritocratic outcomes.

    2) All that matters in enforcing the vision of the anointed is political power, and as such all that matters is getting political power, and therefore groups must do whatever possible to obtain political power by any means.

    3) Truth, reason, science, reciprocity, value, are therefore just one means of obtaining power and therefore irrelevant in the pursuit of power, and as such neither truth, nor reason, nor value nor results of the sciences, nor the requirement for reciprocity either serve the interests of obtaining power or not, and therefore intellectual honestly and consistency is both unnecessary and an impediment to obtaining power.

    4) The communist, scientific socialist, democratic socialist, and cultural marxist movements having failed in the competition for power given the successes of science, private property, markets, and consumer capitalism, the only means of obtaining power by which to impose a managed economy and equality of outcome, is to change the political value system from economic outcome to social status outcome (‘oppression’).

    5) Changing from material improvement and relative material equality to social status equality is to pursue the intuitively desirable but the physically impossible. (just as communism and socialism and life after death were impossible)

    6) The optimum means of obtaining power is to fragment the polity into identities, and therefore increase the demand for authoritarian solutions that replace existing market models.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 20:25:00 UTC

  • POSTMODERN CANON (Really, this is the answer).** 1. All that matters in governan

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-central-dogma-of-the-postmodern-left/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=7de0e90e&srid=u4Qv**THE POSTMODERN CANON (Really, this is the answer).**

    1. All that matters in governance is power, and as such all that matters is getting power, and therefore groups must do whatever possible to obtain power by any means.

    2. Truth, reason, science, reciprocity, value, are therefore just one means of obtaining power and therefore irrelevant in the pursuit of power, and as such neither truth, nor reason, nor value nor results of the sciences, nor the requirement for reciprocity either serve the interests of obtaining power or not, and therefore intellectual honestly and consistency is both unnecessary and an impediment to obtaining power.

    3. The communist, scientific socialist, democratic socialist, and cultural marxist movements having failed in the competition for power given the successes of science, private property, markets, and consumer capitalism, the only means of obtaining power by which to impose a managed economy and equality of outcome, is to change the political value system from economic outcome to social status outcome (‘oppression’).

    4. Changing from material improvement and relative material equality to social status equality is to pursue the intuitively desirable but the physically impossible. (just as communism and socialism and life after death were impossible)

    5. The optimum means of obtaining power is to fragment the polity into identities, and therefore increase the demand for authoritarian solutions that replace existing market models.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 20:10:00 UTC

  • ARE WRONG. WAR IS THE BEST INDUSTRY AFTER RULE. WAR, RULE, FINANCE … Everythin

    https://news.stanford.edu/2018/05/03/war-drove-18th-century-industrial-revolution-great-britain/LIBERTARIANS ARE WRONG. WAR IS THE BEST INDUSTRY AFTER RULE.

    WAR, RULE, FINANCE … Everything else is just noise.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 19:55:00 UTC

  • WIRED FOR GADGETS Men have a thing for ‘devices’ like women have a thing for acc

    WIRED FOR GADGETS

    Men have a thing for ‘devices’ like women have a thing for accessories. I can’t remember the study but basically the more gears and stupid stuff a thing has the more interested a male will be in it. Some test where they brought men into rooms and let them get bored for a minute and watched what they demonstrated an interest in, and the mechanical stuff just won every time. The whole transformers thing took advantage of this basic idea, and its why gaming and programming is so hypnotizing and consuming for men.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 18:11:00 UTC

  • (All: Is there an updated map of the alt-right? I haven’t seen one.)

    (All: Is there an updated map of the alt-right? I haven’t seen one.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 17:21:00 UTC

  • RELIGIOSITY AS A MASK You know, you don’t know this, but I do: that the principl

    RELIGIOSITY AS A MASK

    You know, you don’t know this, but I do: that the principle reason people hide behind authoritarian religions is so that they don’t have to negotiate with other people on existential terms. In other words, it’s a form of isolation despite public appearances.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 17:07:00 UTC

  • LOVE IS ENOUGH. TRUTH IS FOR MEN. POSSIBILITY FOR WOMEN. Like I said. Love women

    LOVE IS ENOUGH. TRUTH IS FOR MEN. POSSIBILITY FOR WOMEN.

    Like I said. Love women. Listen to them (it’s hard to do that for any length of time I know – but all men develop the ability to filter, respond, and not try to solve all their problems). Try to make them happy as you can without going into debt. Don’t argue truth and falsehood, or good or bad, just take a stand on what is possible and advisable or not. Women are the most awesome part of life I’ve found, and other than destroying the competition in business the greatest high. 😉 But they aren’t men, and we aren’t women, and we’re both much happier when we understand that. 😉 It’s usually easier to get men to understand that women aren’t men than get (american) women to understand men aren’t women. The problem is very simple economics of demographics: since women are more marginally indifferent and more narrowly distributed, the number of men desirable for women is much smaller than the number of women desirable for men – and this is a constant problem. Women settle much more often than men. And while women almost always underestimate their sexual market value (it’s just weight and preening and you’re there), men vastly overestimate their sexual market value. So for men, it’s not complicated: read heavy things, lift heavy things, save and invest everything you can. When a woman attracts a man her standard of living increases by twenty percent or more. When a man attracts a woman his standard of living decreases by twenty percent or more. For women men are emotionally burdensome, and for men women are experientially (financially) burdensome. So make sure you understand the investment you’re making in one another. Marriage is the most damaging financial mistake you can make and is the most significant factor in determining whether you will be comfortable and happy or poor and depressed in old age.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 17:04:00 UTC

  • “Historians are apologists for the human race.”— Charles Martel ( I thought th

    —“Historians are apologists for the human race.”— Charles Martel

    ( I thought that was particularly good. 😉 )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 16:39:00 UTC

  • “Germanicized Christianity, without Abrahamism, Pilpul, and Semitic Myths.” Now

    “Germanicized Christianity, without Abrahamism, Pilpul, and Semitic Myths.”

    Now to balance this anti-abrahamism out the truth is that you will be happier serving the interests of others than any other pursuit in life. It’s just true. Sorry. There are very few of us who are wired oddly enough to live happily alone without succumbing to it.

    Random acts of kindness. Deliberate acts of charity (service). Resistance of the political. Deliberate contribution to kin.

    These are the things that will make you happy.

    But do not ask for acknowledgement in return.

    That is the the dark side of charity.

    It isn’t charity if you want appreciation.

    It comes with time.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 16:36:00 UTC

  • NEW RELIGION Leaving behind abrahamic deception requires replacing it with anyth

    NEW RELIGION

    Leaving behind abrahamic deception requires replacing it with anything other than oath, ritual, feast, and festival. None of which require any falsehoods, and all of which are easily produced.

    TED, Football Games, and Concerts are just Church. Why do you think stadium rock relied upon anthems? Why is TED popular with the left (Scientific Miracles). Why are team sports so popular with the working and underclasses (pack experience and the hunt). Why are concert experiences so popular with the middle and working classes (they’re spiritual). All that is necessary to produce the effect we get from religion is proximity, shared experience, oath, and some corresponding physical repetition. Why is Government so attractive a sports team, and democracy so attractive a savior, and economics so attractive a heaven?

    There is no reason why the experience must be conflated with law, pseudohistory, or the supernatural. THAT’S THE EVIDENCE.

    We know why religions work. I can disassemble any of them into component parts (although hinduism is still confusing to me).

    The fact that so many substitutes for religion exist, but none have been canonized is merely a failure to do what the nazis, fascists, and communists did: create a secular religion.

    I mean, too bad the nazi thing went sideways because the aesthetics were genius. Soviet aesthetics were genius as well. Rock aesthetics were genius.

    The problem is that markets are the optimum, and homogeneity is the optimum, and everyone just got only one part right or the other.

    Doesn’t mean it can’t be done right.

    No one is going to revert to abrahamic primitivism except those who are already primitive.

    And those who are primitive by that choice and their deferral of agency are self selecting themselves into the RULED and out of those who RULE.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 16:33:00 UTC