John Mark John Mark: What leap have you made lately? Why is today’s video so mainstream-broadcast quality? It’s a fluid stream of thought. Is it the number of videos you’re making? Solidifying a your synthesis of P? Your finding your voice? I mean, the extemporaneous videos have just crossed some kind of threshold. I see what I think you knew you could do. It’s evangelical in inspiration and quality.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 20:33:00 UTC
If Natural Law, Physical Law and Gods Law are the same then yes, morals come from God. If morals are not the same as natural and physical law then men have erred in interpreting gods or nature’s law.
I prefer christians, especially devoted christians over all other people – and the evidentiary reality is christianity ‘works’ to produce better people than all other religions and better than every secular alternative. I just prefer to maintain the separation between law(Truth) and faith(Wisdom) and so theology must defend wisdom claims (the good) not truth claims (the true or false).
–“I thought doolittle was anti religion”– Nathan Danner
—“I’m not sure his religious views. These two are bringing religion into propertarianism whether Kurt intended it to be there or not.”—Nate
I have a job and I do my job. My job is to protect my people from the left’s lies, and another dark age – and part of that job is to discover a way to restore a religion to ‘the religion of the state’.
I know it is hard for the faithful to tolerate my work on religion. It’s certainly hard on me. And I request only that while I work on law others work on faith, and hopefully I will someday discover a means of uniting them.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 20:21:00 UTC
Who discovered rule of law by the natural right of reciprocity
Who discovered the republic democracy and rule of law
Who discovered reason, logic, natural philosophy and science
Who discovered natural rights philosophy
Who discovered the common law and napoleonic code?
Who discovered the Peace of Westphalia domesticating war?
Who discovered the Geneva conventions?
Who discovered the international charter of human rights?
Who discovered science technology medicine and dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death?
Yeah. I know. White people.
Yeah, colonialism wasn’t so good.
Yeah, it was just better than everyone else’s alternative..
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 20:18:00 UTC
—“I can only imagine the fallout from telling a significant other during a heated discussion that her emotions were simply a response to a perceived change in property.”—Michael Churchill
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 19:57:00 UTC
“We need leadership?”
“What have you done to be worthy of leaders?”
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 16:18:00 UTC
WAR CRIME
War crimes exist only under (a) Westphalian state responsibility for actions of all citizens and their agents – a monopoly on violence. (b) Soldiers under direction of the state.
War crimes were necessary under state run warfare in order to i) license states’ wars of aggression, ii) with conscripted soldiers, and iii) protecting the populace from harm, iiv) while preventing escalation that will prohibit the population from tolerating cessation and settlement.
In other words the purpose of war crimes is to facilitate the cooperation of the population with the state in the conduct of the state’s war.
Otherwise, war is war and there are no limits on behavior, and all else is pretense and deceit.
Islam broke the Westphalian peace with islamic terrorism
Russia broke the postwar consensus by seizing Ukraine.
We are in fourth generation warfare: the end of the european domestication of warfare.
The state no longer has or can have control over the monopoly of violence.
The non-state actors are more effective at fourth generation warfare in urban environments than are states and armor in the fields.
TOTAL WAR
Total war is warfare that includes any and all civilian-associated resources and infrastructure as legitimate military targets, mobilizes all of the resources of society to fight the war, and gives priority to warfare over non-combatant needs. The Oxford Living Dictionaries defines “total war” as “A war that is unrestricted in terms of the weapons used, the territory or combatants involved, or the objectives pursued, especially one in which the laws of war are disregarded.”
Fourth-generation Warfare (Premodern Warfare)
Fourth-generation warfare (4GW) is conflict characterized by a blurring of the lines between war and politics, combatants and civilians. The term was first used in 1980 by a team of United States analysts, including William S. Lind, to describe warfare’s return to a decentralized form. In terms of generational modern warfare, the fourth generation signifies the nation states’ loss of their near-monopoly on combat forces, returning to modes of conflict common in pre-modern times.
The treaties of Westphalia brought to an end a calamitous period of European history which caused the deaths of approximately eight million people. Scholars have identified Westphalia as the beginning of the modern international system, based on the concept of Westphalian sovereignty, though this interpretation has been challenged.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 16:08:00 UTC
By Martin Štěpán
Emotions are not moral or immoral, they just measure changes in property. At most, you can say they’re bad when they’re measuring incorrectly but that’s not about morality but about the brain working sub-optimally.
I think what might also be going on is conflation with Christian deadly sins. But these, as far as I know, are judged by actions.
So, greed can motivate a rational agent to accumulate wealth by engaging in reciprocal exchanges where parasitism and predation are sufficiently dis-incentivized.
Lust can motivate one deepen connection with his mate and to produce a next generation, especially, again, where the alternatives are sufficiently dis-incentivized.
Vengeance can lead one to punish what deserves to be punished and thus dis-incentivize the recipient of vengeance from repeating it (or else removing him from the society and the gene-pool) as well as dis-incentivize other from doing the same.
Self-deception might lead to behave in more moral ways, such as when one deceives himself that there is an afterlife and morality our actions in this life will determine whether it will be pleasurable or painful.
Empathy can often be extended to people who deserve none or who cannot or wouldn’t reciprocate, enabling parasitism.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 14:50:00 UTC
OUR LAW
Sovereigns cannot ‘give it up to god’ – that is an act of alienation of responsibility. A sovereign can neither surrender his rights or his responsibilities without breaking the contract for reciprocal insurance of sovereignty. This is why we must have stoicism in mind, and epicureanism in life. One is sovereign or not. Aristocracy requires sovereignty – the cult of non-submission. So we may need to face our permanent inequality of those who are sovereign for who responsibility is inalienable, and those who are serfs for whom responsibility is alienated by submission.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 12:42:00 UTC
WHY REQUEST EXCHANGE OF TRIBAL LOYALTY BETWEEN EUROPEAN RELIGIOUS FACTIONS?
—“Upon what foundation then did the progenitors of civilisation, Greece then Rome, build itself?”—
We evolve a means of production, and a means of military competition under that means of production, an organization to manage both, and a narrative to justify both, so that we can reduce the cost and opportunity for conflict in order to maintain those strategies. Every civilization’s strategy is fairly easy to express in those terms.
European civilization in mediterranean, continental, north sea, and Atlantic eras continue the aristocratic egalitarian tripartite trifunctional organization, and the old military strategy, old law (legal), old myths (social), philosophical, and theological (political) varying little other than the replacement of the ancient warrior-hunter-farmer heroic religion with the medieval farmer-peasant submissive religion of christianity. But given tripartism and trifunctionalism the law and the military remains constant and the church rise and fell. Today the new church is again semitic, with islam, judaism, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism, in competition with our traditional masculine hierarchical markets and law.
—“Are not their successes constituted of the virtues they upheld?”–
Virtues are excuses for the group competitive strategy we rarely if ever know. Values persist because they persist the competitive strategy. values can be undermined. Judiasm, christianity, marxism, postmodernism, and feminism sought to undermine european values and succeeded because women are vulnerable to the false promise and men are vulnerable to satisfying the demands of women unless in continuous competition with other males.
Our natural ancestral religion upon which our civilization is founded is one of chaotic gods we compete, cooperate, and trade with – not one we are submissive to. These gods of warriors, whether the greek, roman, germanic pantheons. The church sought to supplant them with submissive gods of slaves who were docile in their fear and ignorance – and who the church could extract revenue from by rent seeking.
Submission to gods so that one is devoid of responsibility is a christian innovation, achieving its zenith in islam. This is why it is seductive. Devotion to gods so that one is free of status pressure is not a christian innovation. It is even more seductive. Submission to scripture so that one is free of continuous calculation for which one may fail or be subject to blame is semitic innovation. It is seductive as well. These seductions are successful and they are the opposite of the aryan demand for non submission and non-alienation of rights and responsibilities, including pursuit of status, achievement, and innovative reason.
The church failed the aristocracy succeeded, and we have not yet found a means of accommodating christianity in its decline, while producing a non-false religion. We are in a time of transition. Either the second dark age of the jews will succeed, the second dark age of the muslims, or we will discover a means of combining our three religions chistian(feminine), heathen-nature(familial), pagan-hero(masculine), and aristotelian(judicial), or at least exchanging loyalty between the three, so that we are not subject to a second semitic dark age.
So we are still and will always be a triparite people: Scientific and Legal and heroic (agency), Philosophical and practical for the able, theological and submissive for the less able or more sensitive to conflict and social pressure (or the dysfunctional who confuse their spiritual accommodation of reality with reality itself.
—“What Christianity was there here?”–
What “here” are you referring to?
—“When you come to Christians asking not the renunciation of their faith but merely loyalty, remember that this is all the Romans first asked of the Christians too.”—
Our ancestors came to jews. Who we were too tolerant of, just as we are too tolerant of islamists, jews, marxists, postmodernists, feminists and science denialists. And because of our tolerance the jews used false promise, to bait our people into hazard, causing a dark age of ignorance and poverty and disease and suffering only aristotelian thought reversed, and ended the centuries of corruption by the church. Corruption not seen by americans until the prosecution of the deviancy of catholic churches, because protestants have forgotten the corruption of the church prior to the reformation, and the personalization of the relationship between the individual and god first, and the individual and jesus second – due largely to american evangelical protestants.
—“Remember, it wasn’t the strange and foreign beliefs of the Christians that first caught the attention of the Romans, but rather their abstention from community.”—
It was the use of christianity to undermine greco roman civlization just as islam, judaism, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and their science denialism is used to undermine european civilzation for the past century and a half.
Sol invictus was the migration of roman religion from zeus-jupiter. Mithras was the migration of the persian version of Mithra – the perfect man. Christianity was invented by using the victim-narrative and the promise of life after death, in stead of the Zeus-Sol-Mithra character we should aspire to be, and the jesus narrative invented so that it could replace the Epic Cycle (Homer) which had conquered and was about to erase the semitic world.
Judaism, christianity, ad islam were invented by the poor ignorant desert peasantry as a means of using the female group strategy of undermining by gossip, to overthrow the invention of markets, law, reason, merit, and transcendence of man into gods.
And I am, like my predecessors, trying once again to prevent another semitic dark age – by accommodating christians.
Christians who have not yet converted christianity into a hearth religion. But are very close to having done so.
If not for the invasion by jews, muslims, and the underclasses – because of christian tolerance – we would have had the time for christianity to evolve, and science to falsify the marxists, postmodernists feminists and difference-denialists.
So we are in a position where I must, or at least, someone of ability must, try to discover a vehicle for unity at faster pace than would naturally evolve.
If not for immigration I would not need to do this work. Because science has solved the lies.
But false promise to the vulnerable is seductive and spreads more quickly than we can stop it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 12:38:00 UTC
—“People (division of labor) and prices (distribution of knowledge) have different long term incentives. People have children, prices do not.”—Luke Weinhagen
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 11:39:00 UTC