Source: Facebook

  • WHY CHRISTIANITY (Religion) WORKS An obvious truth I don’t like: Europeans are n

    WHY CHRISTIANITY (Religion) WORKS

    An obvious truth I don’t like: Europeans are not only the youngest race (~10k ybp), and more neotenous than other races – except east asians who are more neotenous than we are – but our neoteny comes at the cost of greater emotional instability – which explains european women. We are in a middle range and east asians are off the neotenous cliff. And what does this mean? Neoteny has interesting consequences: not enough and you mature too early for agency except late in life and prevent lifelong learning. If you have enough you develop agency later and lifelong ability to learn, and too much you develop agency early at the cost of life long learning ability. (I might be one of the first people to discuss this, I’m not sure, but it’s obvious in the data.)

    We could test IQ, Conscientiousness, and Emotional Stability and then democracy might work. Or we could just restore property owning, married, european males and females employing any number of non-family members – which is demonstrated evidence of intelligence, conscientiousness and emotional stability rather than test evidence. And then a house of women and a house of men to negotiate differences between genders.

    The chinese used the former, for access to bureaucracy. I recommend the latter because we use markets for production. Evidence is evidence.

    So what’s my point? My point is that christianity is more necessary for europeans to stabilize the emotions than is obvious from our average intelligence. We tnd to link the two but that’s not really it. That’s why while there is a relationship between religiosity and intelligence, the chistian ethic remains constant across the population.

    I also understand that for those of us who are more pagan, we respect christians out of LOYALTY, like we respect the flag out of LOYALTY and our ancestors out of loyalty.

    As such I am loyal to my christian brothers, and observant out of loyalty. Even if my god is far closer to Thor-Tyr-Zeus, and my prophets are lawgivers: Odin and Aristotle.

    The solution is to request loyalty in exchange not that we seek to defeat the gods of dominance and submission to which the opposite cannot tolerate thanks (debt).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 15:29:00 UTC

  • By Ricardo Duchesne via MacDonald’s blog. —“today’s races are very young (outs

    By Ricardo Duchesne via MacDonald’s blog.

    —“today’s races are very young (outside Africa), and did not appear until about 12,000 to 10,000 years ago; and it may be that the European race is the youngest race, the last evolutionary stage of homo sapiens.”—

    —“According to Sandra Wilde et. al. “strong selection favoring lighter skin, hair, and eye has been operating in European populations over the last 5000 years”. In terms of these physical markers, Europeans are a very young race emerging in the course of centuries from a preceding people that were not European. This evolution, of course, was not merely about the evolution of “white” physical traits, though we should not underestimate the importance of these traits. It stands to reason that there were other key traits, including behavioral traits, which did not emerge at once but through time, which means that it is difficult to state with any definiteness when the inhabitants of Europe became “European”.”—

    —“We need to think of Europeans as a race that evolved through thousands of years inside Europe, not always gradually, but at an accelerated pace from about 10,000 years ago, in response both to the unique ecology of Europe and to their own unique cultural activities.”—

    —“Europeans were a race that evolved certain anatomical and behavioral traits by reason of breeding for thousands of years within a geographical area we call Europe. The I-Es were not a “mysterious” people who came from outside Europe but a people native to this continent. The official geographical definition of the “continent of Europe” is consistent with the cultural history of this continent in comprising “European Russia”, the Pontic Steppes located north of the Black and Caspian seas, present day Ukraine, the original homelands of the I-Es. … Other than the EFs who came from Anatolia, who already had genes for white skin, and then evolved into Europeans in Europe, there is strong genetic evidence showing that once a European race emerged out of the three populations MacDonald highlights, Europe did not experience any major genetic mixing from non-European immigrant races.”—

    —“Angles and Saxons who colonized Britain around AD 400-600 came from the Proto-Germanic Corded Ware and Bell-Beaker cultures that had melded during the Nordic Bronze Age (1730-760 BC) in Jutland, or what is present day Denmark. “—

    —“Europeans evolved in the course of time inside Europe and have remained European through almost their entire history until mass immigration came to be promoted in the last three decades.”—

    Its reversible.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 15:01:00 UTC

  • “Liberia’s constitution is almost identical to the american constitution. Consti

    —“Liberia’s constitution is almost identical to the american constitution. Constitutions merely enumerate the process for adhering to the norms, traditions ,and genetics of the majority ethnic population, and set the terms of integration for those outside the majority ethnic population.” – A friend (today)

    Neither the constitution nor the expansion of democratic republic to full franchise democracy nor coercion into social democracy are an more meaningful than the ethnicity of the groups who formed that constitution, and adapted to it.

    There will be no United States without Adapting to it.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 14:23:00 UTC

  • Operationalism: Testimony using a sequence of intuitionistically(incentives), lo

    Operationalism: Testimony using a sequence of intuitionistically(incentives), logically(speech), and physically testable actions.

    Operational constraints: Realism( Material, Persistent), Naturalism(physical rules of the material universe), Operationalism(description as human actions), Empiricism(observations of results reduced to analogy of experience by physical or logical means), rational choice, reciprocity.

    Science: the production of testimony by under operationalism

    Philosophy: “it’s sorta like that but I can’t explain how”: Analogies. Excuse making. Making stuff up.

    Sigh.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 13:52:00 UTC

  • “Curt: How do Amerindians vote?”– They are statistically insignificant. Only a

    —“Curt: How do Amerindians vote?”–

    They are statistically insignificant. Only a tiny percentage of them vote. A third are in under 18 and can’t vote. Those that do, vote largely democratic. However, the only successful amerindian politicians have been republican. Why? In general republicanism like religiosity and the flag are demonstrations of loyalty, and democratic voters a demonstration of rebellion. This trend continues.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 13:42:00 UTC

  • Feb 19, 2020, 1:04 PM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1l0raYNvGLc&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR1UcUzGNOOHDKGCyedNM-4PplWKGN-JNOF_auBxI8Qqlq4BeivWdAMT3zAUpdated Feb 19, 2020, 1:04 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 13:04:00 UTC

  • A Trump and Bernie election would be the most entertaining in history

    A Trump and Bernie election would be the most entertaining in history.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 12:33:00 UTC

  • THE FUTURE OF MACRO CITY STATES by Francesco Principi Love you Curt. Free cities

    THE FUTURE OF MACRO CITY STATES

    by Francesco Principi

    Love you Curt. Free cities have always represented the enemy of the tyrant state. Within a few years, world politics will be dominated by macro-cities – the influential megacities. And they are so connected to each other that they no longer have to bend to the concept of state and border. City-states are efficient on the model of the old ones: therefore not necessarily independent but with an autonomy such as to be able to engage in global relationships from which the surrounding area will benefit. I am sure this is the future.

    CD: Of course, although my understanding is that these macro states will crash with the bottom, and that the middle will escape them. So I just see a future of city-ghettos, and suburban and rural manor-states. In other words, the current wealth of cities is due to population migration made possible by financialization that was only sustainable until the end of the 20th century.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 12:12:00 UTC

  • THE LEFT AND THE RIGHT HAVE COMMON INTERESTS AND THE FINANCIAL AND STATE SECTOR

    THE LEFT AND THE RIGHT HAVE COMMON INTERESTS AND THE FINANCIAL AND STATE SECTOR IS OUR MUTUAL ENEMY

    I don’t think the Finance / Media / Academy / State “Cathedral” complex understands: The left and right agree that the finance and state complex is counter to our interests. That’s simply true. Otherwise we just want to sort into heterogeneous consumptive quantity (left), and homogenous conservative quality (right), The totalitarian state is preventing us from achieving our desired means of self determination. Without the federal government’s *unconstitutional* dominion over the social organization of the states, we could, as did the original colonies, and the many many states of the holy roman empire (german empire’s historical european organization) go our own way, and have diversity of states to suit the diversity of our interests.

    We aren’t proposing that anyone win the monopoly. We’re proposing the restoration of local control of self determination that is the origin of the constitution, the British empire, the Holy Roman Empire, and all of European history: small homogenous states with different cultures competing for population, production, and trade by the production of different commons.

    So you know, both left and right win by burning the financial and State sectors at the virtual stake so to speak, and then we return to what we seem to demand: a loosely federated states of european civilization with a material judicial ‘priesthood’ of the constitution, instead of a supernatural religious priesthood of the church.

    So you know, between the right and the left and the rewards of peaceful life and choice for the center, the only loser of this revolutionary reformation restoring the constitutional structure to it’s original intent as a federation of states combining arms into a single military for continental defense, and a supreme court to resolve conflicts over property and trade.

    Between the left in the cities and the right in the ‘red sea’ those who have abused us by financialization will easily pay the price.

    And propertarianism tells them how.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 11:26:00 UTC

  • CAUSALITY by Brandon Hayes —“The Conflict’s not so much race, but agency, resu

    CAUSALITY

    by Brandon Hayes

    —“The Conflict’s not so much race, but agency, resulting class, class size, and resulting subculture. Race is just a convenient low resolution proxy that obscures the problem.” – Curt Doolittle

    The claim isn’t that it’s a proxy for agency but it’s a proxy for this sequencing of phenomena: “agency, resulting class, class size, and resulting subculture”

    And replacing that higher resolution chain with “race” dilutes the information to be gleaned.

    LESS re-ordering is most expedient. Where tooling and training will do separation and conflict can be avoided.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 11:20:00 UTC