Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • A GOD IS A SYSTEM OF MEASUREMENT Man is the measure of all things to man, becaus

    A GOD IS A SYSTEM OF MEASUREMENT

    Man is the measure of all things to man, because man is the only system of measurement available to man. God is a system of measurement in the group’s ideal of man to imitate (as in Jesus, or Achilles) a demigod to aspire to (Odin, Hercules), a god to negotiate with (zeus, thor, tyr), one to obey (jehova, allah), or one to simply understand (deism, the physical and natural laws). Any creature inventing a god would invent one in his image just as we have – and just as the hundreds of gods have been invented abandoned or lost before the present gods.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 13:24:00 UTC

  • MORE ACCURATELY DESCRIBED AS SPECTRA by Luke Weinhagen I view freedom, liberty a

    MORE ACCURATELY DESCRIBED AS SPECTRA

    by Luke Weinhagen

    I view freedom, liberty and sovereignty in general as concepts more accurately described as spectra than as binaries – (https://www.facebook.com/luke.weinhagen/posts/10218951102141226) – as every individual has varying access to each of these within any of the limitless interactions we can exercise them, but I agree with the conclusion.

    We all have limits. these limits make cooperation valuable. We exceed our individual limits for freedom and liberty through cooperation with others. In doing so we insure each other’s sovereignty. Where we fail to do so we are at the mercy of, are slaves to, the forces imposing those limits.Updated Feb 21, 2020, 1:03 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 13:03:00 UTC

  • RECENT: INALIENABILITY Recent Work: Most of my offline work tries to solve inali

    RECENT: INALIENABILITY

    Recent Work: Most of my offline work tries to solve inalienability under sovereignty.

    the more I learned P the angrier I became at the postwar jewish invasion of western thought. But the more I understand our original group strategy and our law, the more complete it is and the more ELEGANT it is as an extension of the laws of nature rather than one that seeks to deceive men.

    inalienation: you cannot surrender your rights without surrendering your sovereignty and thereby defecting from and committing treason against your peers

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 12:02:00 UTC

  • TESTIMONY (P AND CONTINGENCY) by Robert Danis What I like most about your writin

    TESTIMONY (P AND CONTINGENCY)

    by Robert Danis

    What I like most about your writings for P is that your breaking it down into the smallest possible component. Most people try to take a something as a whole and you can’t – you have to break it down into components.

    ===IMPORTANT==

    Continuous recursive disambiguation

    Convert all speech to transactions stated in a series of subjectively (humanly) testable operations.

    Meaning: first causes. 😉

    And as first causes, there are no contingent premises.

    And as non-contingent P is closed to deception by suggestion that is dependent upon ambiguity and contingency.

    This is why P defeats set logic – which is forever contingent.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 11:59:00 UTC

  • TESTIMONY by Robby Thorne I had given up on saving Western Civilization until I

    TESTIMONY

    by Robby Thorne

    I had given up on saving Western Civilization until I found you. Because of you, I’ve gotten off the couch, away from the TV, and spend my days coordinating 2A events. Last night while I was at work, people from our small militia, basically strong armed a small town to go 2A. Still, I had a hand in it. This morning I’m in my car in the cold, waiting to see if I have motivated people in my community to get some exercise. So rather than cuss you for putting me to work, I think you for giving me something worthwhile to do, and giving me hope for the future. You might not see the fruits of your labor, but I’m starting to pick apples here in VA. You really are my hero Curt. Have a great day my friend.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 11:51:00 UTC

  • SCIENCE PRESERVING FAITH They means of preserving the faith under the science of

    SCIENCE PRESERVING FAITH

    They means of preserving the faith under the science of gods as information, is that while protocol is behavior, and the transmission between people (nodes, modules) is slow (in itself a survival technique), it is possible that the host (body of the faithful) functions as a collectively subconscious organism, and that given synchronicity, we all operate as if there were a physical connection, when in fact, the only connection is the information we are subject to by our sense, perception, auto-association. This provides a rational and scientific explanation for why religion does work despite the pantheon of grammars we express it in. It explains the value of Jesus and nature for the submissive (uncompetitive) and the traditional(dominant, competitive) european gods as dominance expression. This ends the problem of the multiplicity of conflicting gods, and the evident and undeniable failure of gods in all material things, and that god created the universe, but leaves the rest of theology intact. So this leaves us with a scientific view of every religion that does not seek to dominate any other religion, and falsifies every religion that does seek to dominate other religions. Furthermore, it explains the western pantheon of scientific, normative-legal, ideal philosophical and theological grammars as satisfying the language of each group of ‘gods’ in our pantheon. If you pray to your god, talk to your god, or think in the language of your deity, or your deism, you will participate in the construction of that ‘will’.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 11:45:00 UTC

  • THE QUALIA OF GEOMETRY IS UNIFORM by Andrew M Gilmour If Dennett built more on c

    THE QUALIA OF GEOMETRY IS UNIFORM

    by Andrew M Gilmour

    If Dennett built more on cog/sci and less on phenomenology. Dennett also made the mistake of using colour for uniformity of qualia as opposed to geometry (ancient Greeks). The qualia of geometry is uniform; the qualia of colour is not. *Uniform across human personal consciousness.

    —-

    CD: Well done. Will add that to our geometry presentation.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 11:30:00 UTC

  • You are sovereign in fact or you are not. You have liberty or freedom by permiss

    You are sovereign in fact or you are not. You have liberty or freedom by permission. If you must ask permission you are a slave.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 11:29:00 UTC

  • DOOLITTLE VS DENNETT ON CONSIOUSNESS —“You know, P language reminds me of a di

    DOOLITTLE VS DENNETT ON CONSIOUSNESS

    —“You know, P language reminds me of a direction I think Danial Dennett was going with how to study consciousness (Phenomenology), but P is more complete. It was in his book “consciousness explained”.”— Adam Jacob Robert Walker

    Yes, well we are all subject to the same information and converging on the same solution. And I’m just the one who put it all together first.

    Probably because I started with ai, programming and economics instead of philosophy and psychology.

    So as the neurological revolution unfolded over the past twenty years I had less of a paradigm shift than the other thinkers.

    And I don’t have pressure to publish. So I just kept working without anchoring myself.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 10:36:00 UTC

  • THINKING THINGS THRU IS SCARY —“Faith without works is dead.”—John Brennan –

    THINKING THINGS THRU IS SCARY

    —“Faith without works is dead.”—John Brennan

    —“Faith without works is free riding. It’s a crime. ;)”—Curt Doolittle

    —“Faith without works is:

    1 – Baiting into hazard for oneself in both religious and logical terms,

    2 – Making an unfalsifiable promise to the commons (i.e believe in Jesus and be saved in afterlife),

    3 – Parasitism on others within the higher-trust group of other faithful

    All of which are violations of reciprocity.

    Even though faith attempts to define reciprocity as “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” it lacks the grammar to break it down to what it really means and how to apply it.

    P. solves that problem.”—James Dmitro Makienko

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 09:24:00 UTC