Source: Facebook

  • DEFINITION OF MORALITY Morality = Reciprocity Reciprocity = limiting our display

    DEFINITION OF MORALITY

    Morality = Reciprocity

    Reciprocity = limiting our display word and deed to productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality to the action, and warrantied within the limits of the actors’ capacity for restitution, between those who demonstrate, promise, imply, or expect exchange of reciprocity.

    As far as I know, that is the logical, empirical, biologically necessary, genetically necessary and complete definition of morality, for conscious beings, and there are no cases under which the definition fails.

    Some people will try to conflate the moral and the good, where good consists of an additional investment in addition to not violating reciprocity – but this demands involuntary transfer from others, and violates reciprocity.

    Some people will try to demand involuntary exchange of a promise of reciprocity from those who do not offer it – but an enemy is nothing more than an enemy who will not engage in reciprocity.

    Some people will argue this is a binary condition rather than an agreement, under which we match their level of reciprocity and irreciprocity. But while we seek perfect reciprocity, we rarely obtain it. In international trade and in politics we all but never obtain reciprocity, instead we exchange selective reciprocities and irreciprocities within our tolerance for continued cooperation, boycott, or war.

    Some people will try to demand reciprocity in war between groups, between whom the exchange of reciprocity has been withdrawn, but this demand violates reciprocity.

    Humans demonstrate the minimum morality that they can get away with without provoking altruistic punishment from others.

    Humans possess extraordinary abilities of accounting for debts and credits with others, our relative status, status differences, and the tendency of people to engage in moral or immoral behavior.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 07:02:00 UTC

  • I curate the feed. It’s time consuming. Comments I delete: 1. Stuff that will at

    I curate the feed. It’s time consuming.

    Comments I delete:

    1. Stuff that will attract FB auditors.

    2. Counter-signaling opinion without supporting argument.

    3. Humor or sarcasm where it’s uncalled for.

    4. Too-stupid-for-words

    5. Most Memes, music, clips.

    6. Off topic or stomping on the topic.

    I ban for:

    1. Wasting my time.

    2. Wasting other people’s time.

    3. Trolling – wasting everyone’s time

    4. Shrilling (feminism, postmodernism, marxism, inappropriate theism).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 16:41:00 UTC

  • (humor: restaurant. chatting up the staff. pizza guy. hispanic. very amerindian.

    (humor: restaurant. chatting up the staff. pizza guy. hispanic. very amerindian. I say “Hey, so my family says the pizza is better since you came here.” He opens spreads his hands a bit, palms up, shrugs an ‘of course’, and goes back to work. I laugh. “A man should be confident”. The women (most are italian) agree.)

    Search for opportunities for complimenting others.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 16:29:00 UTC

  • (Do you have any idea how not-fun it was running all those king of the hill game

    (Do you have any idea how not-fun it was running all those king of the hill games on sensitive and taboo subjects just so that I could understand them? I am so glad to be working on sh-t people care about instead of basic research. )


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 14:47:00 UTC

  • DEBATE OVER ODIN By AunMarie Grooms There are two debates in the Greater Heathen

    DEBATE OVER ODIN

    By AunMarie Grooms

    There are two debates in the Greater Heathen community over two different concepts.

    1. Odin is a deity who comes after and through the higher gods Orlog (natural law) and the Nine Wood Ogresses,

    2. Odin was a mortal man who through right good will and action became deified as a god (this concept comes to the tradition via Snori in his Prose Edda (Reinterpretation of the Poetic Eddas) and his Heimskringla.

    These works were his equivalent of a Doctoral Theses written as proof of his ability to interview and collect data as he was becoming a regional law man.

    In order to write on this topic he had to toss in his Christian influenced apologies, namely the old gods were just mortal men deified over time.

    The answer to 1. Is the concepts of gods vs giants. Gods have your people’s invested interest, while giants can be ambivalent, hostile or apathetic to your people.

    Other people’s gods are your people’s giants. Therefore Orlog, and The Nine would not be considered gods as they are indifferent to any people’s well being.

    Odin is therefore not a demi-god, but the primary god of his people. Not sure why Curt chose to list them this way. I’m sure he has his own reasons.

    ===

    (CD: I used demigod because that is the technical term for men who become gods, rather than gods whose origins are eternal. The old gods fit the pre-ie gods. thor fits the ie gods. Odin appears in the pantheon and ascends. So I’m of the opinion that odin existed. That does not mean I am right. It just means thats my current undestanding. Additioally, in my understanding of religion, that is the best kind of religion to have: man transcendent. )


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 14:05:00 UTC

  • Would you be better off if you paid microsoft, apple, google, the price of a col

    Would you be better off if you paid microsoft, apple, google, the price of a college education to train you, or paying a college to educate you?

    This is where I am going with the line of thought.

    To kill the academy entirely.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 12:57:00 UTC

  • There is a vast difference between being educated and being knowledgeable. In th

    There is a vast difference between being educated and being knowledgeable. In theory education leads to knowledge in practice that doesn’t appear the case unless on learns formulae for categorization calculation and transformation of states – instead it leads to indoctrination.

    The academy is thee enemy of our people.

    It is a worse enemy than the church.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 12:55:00 UTC

  • (from twitter) Sotomayor and Ginsberg will be gone before Trump is. Hart Cellar

    (from twitter)

    Sotomayor and Ginsberg will be gone before Trump is.

    Hart Cellar was a violation of the natural law of the constitution and was the means by which the postwar jewish left succeeded in immigrating dependents where the false promises of marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism and denialism had failed to persuade the european people.

    The Parade of undermining western civ. with pseudoscience, sophism, and lies: Cantor, Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida, Friedan, and hundreds of followers and thousands of propagandists: unwarrantable, false promise, baiting into hazard, with Pilpul, Critique and “GSRRM”.

    The Jewish century is over. The second fall of european civilization by the destruction of german and russian civilization will not be followed by anglo civilization.

    We will restore rule of law.

    And it will “happen again”

    Just as it always does.

    Because it is earned.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 12:32:00 UTC

  • EUROPEAN EXPANSION DUE TO THE FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE TO ISLAM —“European colon

    EUROPEAN EXPANSION DUE TO THE FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE TO ISLAM

    —“European colonial expansion was spurred on by the loss of Constantinople and trade with the East. Columbus would have had no major need to sail the ocean blue in 1492 if Constantinople hadn’t fallen in 1453.”—

    Correct. Hence why Italy fell from commercial centrality, and the atlantic took over it, and the Hansa was unable to mature into the continental power we expected from the holy roman (german) empire.

    —“Colonization I no different from conquest, and conquest is itself for the purpose of creating a back-up habitat or niche.

    I do not see how you can outlaw conquest; it’s not like you can just make it illegal.”—Don Miguel

    Not sure how you got there. I wouldn’t and didn’t say that There is nothing to outlaw. Conquest and colonization is just war, and we cannot outlaw war. Peace is just war by other means.

    instead what i say is that some civilizations are parasitic and destructive (islam, gypsies, jews). Some are slow conquerors (china’s gradual borg-like-assimmilation), some are consolidators (india). And some have not yet consolidated (africa).

    P-law is negativa: we need a reason NOT to conquer, colonize, or replace others who are irreciprocal. reciprocity is the only reason.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 12:05:00 UTC

  • MARKET DEMAND FOR MORALS by Zack Neuberger Bell curves in everything Look at pri

    MARKET DEMAND FOR MORALS

    by Zack Neuberger

    Bell curves in everything Look at prisons: when forced into shared space, a hierarchy, and without firearms, even IQ 85s understand reciprocity, imposition of cost, and free-riding.

    The low cost off irreciprocal interactions in free society allows them to disregard it in free society as they have little reason not to.

    -The demand for morals


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 11:52:00 UTC