Source: Facebook

  • TRY TO UNDERSTAND MY STRATEGY…. I really don’t want to be more popular. I want

    TRY TO UNDERSTAND MY STRATEGY….

    I really don’t want to be more popular. I want P to be popular. I want US to be popular as a movement. John is doing a great job. the first generation of guys is now frighteningly competent. We have new a new guys that are doing a good job. The more it’s about ‘me’ the less it’s about ‘us’ and I want P to be about US not me. They can Alinsky-me. They can’t alinsky all of us.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 15:13:00 UTC

  • WHAT DOES WHITE MEAN? (possibly controversial post warning)(This post covers gen

    WHAT DOES WHITE MEAN?

    (possibly controversial post warning)(This post covers genetic differences in neoteny, cognition and personality between geographic groups, and between the sexes. Stop reading if you are concerned you would be offended.)

    —“White means….”— Elizabeth Anonymous

    Hmmm…. I do science. I leave intellectual dishonesty for others.

    We don’t have a term for Genetic, Ethic, Europeans other than ‘White’. But “White”, meaning Ancestral Ethnic European, is easily genetically determinable. In general, at least six generations are necessary to launder ethnic outbreeding. Even, by six generations someone will still express certain dominant traits despite constraining breeding within the group. And it is still easy to determine the difference between a full Scandinavian and the same generation with an Iberian ancestor.

    Whites are the remains of the post-glacial maximum peoples, plus the early neolithic farmers, who were conquered, largely genocided and replaced by the ie’s. We are the most genetically homogenous people outside of Han-Korean-Japanese. The only open question is whether we include the remaining pre-ie Anatolian, early neolithic farmer populations of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, and Sardinia in the classification ‘white’ out of cultural affinity under Christianity, or we limit ourselves to genetics using the european branch of the IE expansion: Itals (south), Germanics, Scandinavians, Baltics, Slavs, and Finnics. The rest of the Caucasians descend from the Iranic branch of the IE’s, and anatolians (Hittites), Caucasians (if they existed), and those that integrated into the Semitic peoples – are all lost to us. There were only a few post-glacial maximum west eurasian peoples, and the turks of the northern far east, are the only peoples of the post-glacial that are not indo europeans.

    Science is science. Women fear conflict. Women disapprove rather than accept an undesirable but true statement. Women will deny a truth to avoid conflict. Women will advance a falsehood to eschew conflict. While the male vs female distribution of personality Traits and Facets overlaps, the difference between the sexual (gender) relative homogeneity of traits, and the relative heterogeneity of Facets under those traits, is (a) agreeableness, (c) dominance expression, and this results in the (to females) annoying male habit of stating the truth despite the undesirability of it. It also accounts for the approximately 20% improvement in male detection of general trait expression and symmetric improvement in female detection of individual trait expression. In other words, males are more often correct in the ascertainment of empirically correct stereotypes than females, both at the perceptual-cognitive level and at the agreeability level. While women are equally superior at individual emotional empathy and incentive-sympathy.

    Net net of the science as it sits: Neoteny slows maturity and buys agency (neural formation) at the cost of emotional instability (creativity, neuroticism). This explains the high emotional instability of european women, and the nearly 1/3 of european women that experience psychological issues when not working in close association with other women to limit them. East asians are the most neotenous by far, europeans less so, africans and afro-asiatics lees so. This is why east asians, then europeans, then afrio-asiatics (semitic peoples), the africans have increasing rates of maturity at decreasing agency and verbal ability. Europeans (a) have not over-neotenized like the east asians nor under neotenized like the africans, and at the same time we have practiced cold weather eugenics for thousands of years. So between our neotenic development, our least-clannish(racist) temperament, our balance of verbal and spatial abilities, and our development of sovereignty (what we mistakenly call individualism) and the culture that resulted from it, including tripartism (markets between miltiary-judicial, producers-philosophers, and priests-theologians, we developed reason, empiricism, science, technology and medicine faster than all other peoples in the world combined.

    Ergo, unfortunately, it’s true that at last working class and upward whites are genetically and culturally superior in those ways necessary for the production of advanced and rapidly advancing civilization. And demand by women and immigrants to revert our civilization to primitive, reality-denying, maladaptive, authoritarian, non-market civilization, just proves that (a) these other peoples are unable to integrate in our civilization because they cannot compete in it, (b) our women have defected against our civilization out of fear of conflict and are assisting the destruction of our civilization – just as women and slaves undermined and brought down the roman empire using Christianity from within.

    So christianity in the ancient world with the false promise of life after death, and promise of freedom from nature’s competition by marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, human-bio-diversity-denialism, and ‘silencing the truth’ in the modern world to destroy western civlization yet again.

    It’s women that need to look in the mirror. Not men.

    We have the courage to face the man in the mirror.

    Do you have the courage to face the woman in the mirror?

    That is the only test of equality of agency that matters.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 15:03:00 UTC

  • Seriously. Take any given libertarian position and try to figure out how it’s vi

    Seriously. Take any given libertarian position and try to figure out how it’s violating reciprocity by baiting into hazard.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 14:19:00 UTC

  • In simple terms, men find greater persistence, consumptive, productive, and repr

    In simple terms, men find greater persistence, consumptive, productive, and reproductive advantage in loyalty in pursuit of advantage despite conflict whereas women find greater persistence, consumptive, and reproductive advantage in disloyalty and avoidance of conflict. This is why women defect and why all cultures that survive prevent women from defection by limiting political participation.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 13:24:00 UTC

  • “The sentiments about the education system you have shared lately, Curt, of said

    —“The sentiments about the education system you have shared lately, Curt, of said system being closer to a Church than a system of education, are similar to an analysis done by YouTuber Sargon of Akkad a few years ago. His analysis came during a major incursion of Progressivist ideology in the realm of Video Games (GamerGate), where he worked to identify the source of the incursion. While Sargon (Carl Benjamin) was not as concise as you, and hasn’t visited the subject for some time, your latest posts on the subject have rekindled a personal desire for him to grant you an interview.

    I’m not sure if you’re on his radar (or vise verse prior to my reply here), but his platform and politics would work in your favor and would give him some more content for his channel.

    Thoughts?”—Steven Kolpek

    Thinking….

    My analysis is that of Hilbert(1920s) Hayek (1970’s) and Thomas Sowell (1980’a) combined with Kevin Macdonald(1990’s) and Stephen Hicks (2010’s).

    Hicks explains the evolution of leftist (jewish) thought.

    Macdonald documents it in detail.

    I articulate the methodology of (abrahamic) leftist thought and how to expand our law to outlaw and suppress it.

    In doing so I was able to document western group strategy in precise economic and scientific terms.

    I think were people differ is whether (a) it is possible to make abrahamism illegal, (b) whether it is possible to reform the academy using that law (c) or whether people must be ostracized from the polity because they are irredeemable.

    I think that fixing the universities is rather easy. It’s a money problem and ending the money problem will fix the problem.

    I don’t feel the need to have help with publicity but I would of course talk to the man and enjoy it.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 13:13:00 UTC

  • Marxism, Postmodernism, Political correctness, HBD Science Denialism, and Free S

    Marxism, Postmodernism, Political correctness, HBD Science Denialism, and Free Speech Suppression are just Judaism-chrsitanit-Islam version two.

    Same process. Same Technique. Same false promise.

    In the old world they sought to destroy greco-roman market-religion, market-philosophy, reason, empiricism, law, human beauty, life as joyous, meritocracy – and replace it with totalitarian religion, totalitarian thought, totalitarian lying, empiricism-denial, supernatural law, human ugliness, and life as suffering, and authoritarian hierarchy of supernatural liars.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 13:05:00 UTC

  • IT’S SIMPLE: Truth: Europeanism Wisdom: Sinism Myth: Hinduism Lies: Abrahamism

    IT’S SIMPLE:

    Truth: Europeanism

    Wisdom: Sinism

    Myth: Hinduism

    Lies: Abrahamism


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 12:57:00 UTC

  • Bill Joslin : Feedback on Videos. This post is private for the two of us. Three

    Bill Joslin : Feedback on Videos. This post is private for the two of us.

    Three things

    1. I think you’ve probably noticed that you have to script the videos and use slides. It’s not like having a conversation.It’s the same thing I figured out doing the first lesson on geometry. Conversing and teaching are vastly different. My sister teaches ‘teaching’ at university and it’s really project plans for getting a series of concepts across. John is finally getting to where he can do them from notes without fully scripting. But at the level of resolution he’s communicating that’s not as important as the level of resolution we’re communicating.

    2. I think you’re trying to jump right to your interpretation of the work as you apply it, rather than teaching the work as a formal method and then interpreting and applying it. That won’t work. You’ll need to teach the method as a method like we teach a formula, and then apply it, and then interpret it. This will make it much easier for you achieve two different goals: teaching the methodology (boring) skipping the political philosophy, and then interpreting the political philosophy as personal philosophy – which is how you have been grabbing people’s deep attention: you’re making it relevant to their personal lives.

    3. I think if you want to produce content we should collaborate on it where you pick the topic, I make sure you’ve got the method down, and then you teach it and apply it.

    Hugs


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 11:08:00 UTC

  • FULL-ACCOUNTING FIXES THE “ISMS” by Luke Weinhagen . Full-Accounting Fixes “isms

    FULL-ACCOUNTING FIXES THE “ISMS”

    by Luke Weinhagen .

    Full-Accounting Fixes “isms”

    Communism, as it has been practiced, has functioned to keep full-accounting out of community interactions.

    Capitalism, as it has been practiced, has functioned to keep full-accounting our of capital interactions.

    Parasites use both to extract value from our common interests at the discount available due to suppressing full-accounting.

    The solution… full-accounting.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 10:57:00 UTC

  • “SHRILLING” (VS SHRILL, SHREW, SCOLD) |Shrilling| Counter-Signaling -> Outraging

    “SHRILLING” (VS SHRILL, SHREW, SCOLD)

    |Shrilling| Counter-Signaling -> Outraging -> Shrilling -> Shrieking

    Shrilling : hbd science-denialism, feminism, postmodernism, marxism, inappropriate theism.

    shrill

    1a: having or emitting a sharp high-pitched tone or sound

    1b: accompanied by sharp high-pitched sounds or cries

    2: having a sharp or vivid effect on the senses

    3: PIERCING, STRIDENT, INTEMPERATE

    shrew, shrewish (adj.)

    “peevish, malignant, clamorous, spiteful, vexatious, turbulent woman” [Johnson] is late 14c., from earlier sense of “spiteful person” (male or female), mid-13c.,late 14c., “wicked, malignant,” from shrew + -ish. Of women, “malignant and scolding,” from 1560s. Related: Shrewishly; shrewishness.

    scold (n.)

    mid-12c., “person of ribald speech,” later “person fond of abusive language” (c. 1300), especially a shrewish woman [Johnson defines it as “A clamourous, rude, mean, low, foul-mouthed woman”], from Old Norse skald “poet” (see skald). The sense evolution might reflect the fact that Germanic poets (like their Celtic counterparts) were famously feared for their ability to lampoon and mock (as in skaldskapr “poetry,” also, in Icelandic law books, “libel in verse”).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 10:15:00 UTC