Form: Outline

  • LET FREEDOM REIGN Prohibit parasitism. Property rights for property en toto. Com

    LET FREEDOM REIGN

    Prohibit parasitism.

    Property rights for property en toto.

    Common organic law.

    Universal standing.

    Universal adherence.

    Contracts for commons

    Hereditary Monarch with Veto.

    Citizenship as shareholder.

    Dividends.

    Progressive fees.

    Voluntary allocation to commons.

    Truthful speech and deed.

    Warranty of truthful speech and deed.

    Mandatory insurance

    Involuntary saving.

    Involuntary service.

    No politicians.

    Lots of public intellectuals.

    Every man a sheriff.

    And catching liars is a profitable avocation.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-21 12:39:00 UTC

  • Changing My Mind on Education Reading/Writing: Greek, Latin, English, Programmin

    Changing My Mind on Education

    Reading/Writing: Greek, Latin, English, Programming – the language of machines.

    Testimony/Speaking: Observation, Testimony, Grammar, Rhetoric, Logic

    The Record of Man: Science, Technologies, Politics, Wars, Arts, Myths. (Taught as history)

    Recording: Arithmetic, Accounting, Economics (Taught as History)

    Solving: Algebra, Geometry/Trigonometry, Statistics (calculus). (Taught as History)

    Write every day.(1 hour) Plan your day. Review your day.

    Read every day (1 hour).

    Exercise every day (2 hours)

    Start working as early in life as its possible to find work.

    Un-invent childhood.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-13 09:27:00 UTC

  • OF RELIGION Rodney Stark’s: A Theory Of Religion Laurence Ianncone’s Economics o

    http://www.colorado.edu/economics/morey/4999Ethics/Religion/Iannaccone1998_Edward.pdfECONOMICS OF RELIGION

    Rodney Stark’s: A Theory Of Religion

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0813523303/

    Laurence Ianncone’s Economics of Religion

    http://www.colorado.edu/economics/morey/4999Ethics/Religion/Iannaccone1998_Edward.pdf

    Iannaccone, Laurence. “Economics of Religion.” (with William S. Bainbridge). The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, Second Edition, edited by John Hinnells. Routledge: 2010, pp. 461-475.

    Iannaccone, Laurence. “Funding the Faiths: Toward a Theory of Religious Finance” (with Feler Bose). The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Religion, edited by Rachel McCleary. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. 2011, pp. 323-342.

    Iannaccone, Laurence R., Colleen E. Haight, and Jared Rubin. 2011. “Lessons from Delphi: Religious Markets and Spiritual Capitals,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 77, no. 3: 326-338.

    BECKER

    I was heavily influenced by Gary Becker’s work. And because of my work on propertarianism, testimonial truth, operationalism, and critical rationalism, I have come to see that there is merit both in deductive(rational), operational (descriptive) and empirical (correlative) work. But I think the point is that Becker succeeds in all three dimensions when he works, and caps it off with elegant charts.

    The value of this deductive work (Stark’s) is that these statements can be implemented as software models.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-12 06:14:00 UTC

  • The Evolution of Suppression of Free Riding

    [E]volution:

    1) Higher Income reduces opportunity costs and risk (liberalism). Lower income increases opportunity cost and risk(conservatism).

    2) Economic velocity is produced by the centralization of rents, which lowers local (productive) transaction costs at the expense of high total cost (taxation).

    3) Once rents are centralized, we seek to obtain or privatize (redistribute) those rents (economic liberalism) through enfranchisement.

    4) In a perfect world we seek to eliminate those rents (anglo classical liberalism).

    5) But the diversity of ability leads to class warfare since meritocracy is valuable only to a minority, and rents, and parasitismare beneficial to the majority..

    6) In a perfect world we pay the less able, parasitic, and rent seeking minority directly for the maintenance of the meritocratic commons, and thereby circumvent the parasitism of the bureaucratic, and political classes. And perhaps more importantly, prevent the misallocation of capital.

    7) To accomplish this perfect world requires we develop institutions that allow us to produce commons, and pay people for producing those commons: meritocracy included.

    GRAPH

    X-Axis: Equalitarian/Socialist-Compromise/Social Democracy – Meritocratic/Classical Liberal Monarchy.
    Y-Axis: Totalitarian- Democratic – Anarchic
    Z-Axis: Wealth (elimination of transaction costs by the suppression of free riding)

    Suppression of parasitism comes first. Centralize it to eliminate it locally. Then outlaw it, and eliminate it from the central bureaucracy. Economic velocity is determined by the suppression of free riding in all its forms at all levels in the polity.

    (Read Emmanuel Todd’s Invention of Europe. Ricardo Duchsene’s Uniqueness of the West, Hayek’s Constitution of Liberty, Hoppe’s Democracy the God that Failed, and follow my humble efforts.)

    Cheers

  • The Evolution of Suppression of Free Riding

    [E]volution:

    1) Higher Income reduces opportunity costs and risk (liberalism). Lower income increases opportunity cost and risk(conservatism).

    2) Economic velocity is produced by the centralization of rents, which lowers local (productive) transaction costs at the expense of high total cost (taxation).

    3) Once rents are centralized, we seek to obtain or privatize (redistribute) those rents (economic liberalism) through enfranchisement.

    4) In a perfect world we seek to eliminate those rents (anglo classical liberalism).

    5) But the diversity of ability leads to class warfare since meritocracy is valuable only to a minority, and rents, and parasitismare beneficial to the majority..

    6) In a perfect world we pay the less able, parasitic, and rent seeking minority directly for the maintenance of the meritocratic commons, and thereby circumvent the parasitism of the bureaucratic, and political classes. And perhaps more importantly, prevent the misallocation of capital.

    7) To accomplish this perfect world requires we develop institutions that allow us to produce commons, and pay people for producing those commons: meritocracy included.

    GRAPH

    X-Axis: Equalitarian/Socialist-Compromise/Social Democracy – Meritocratic/Classical Liberal Monarchy.
    Y-Axis: Totalitarian- Democratic – Anarchic
    Z-Axis: Wealth (elimination of transaction costs by the suppression of free riding)

    Suppression of parasitism comes first. Centralize it to eliminate it locally. Then outlaw it, and eliminate it from the central bureaucracy. Economic velocity is determined by the suppression of free riding in all its forms at all levels in the polity.

    (Read Emmanuel Todd’s Invention of Europe. Ricardo Duchsene’s Uniqueness of the West, Hayek’s Constitution of Liberty, Hoppe’s Democracy the God that Failed, and follow my humble efforts.)

    Cheers

  • THE COST OF REVOLUTION 1) Revolutions are a cost. Not revolting is a cost. The q

    THE COST OF REVOLUTION

    1) Revolutions are a cost. Not revolting is a cost. The question is only which we prefer to pay.

    2) Property rights are obtained by raising the cost of not exchanging property rights. They are lost by failing to pay the cost of making property rights cheaper than their absence.

    3) Liberty is obtained by raising the cost of infringing upon liberty. Liberty is lost by failing to pay the cost of making liberty cheaper than the alternatives.

    4) The common law is obtained by raising the cost of constructing legislative commands and regulations. The common law is lost by failing to pay the cost of making the common law cheaper than its alternatives.

    Western civilization has accumulated a great deal of fragility. We can no longer (like Russians and Ukrainians) return to the farm for survival. There are four hours of energy, one day of water, four to six days of food, three weeks of order, 30 days of economic stability, and 90 days of political stability, in the funnel.

    We no longer need armies, masses in the streets, or a political majority to construct a revolution. What prevents a revolution today, is merely a solution that a minority are willing to fight for, despite paying the highest possible price.

    Property rights are constructed by the threat of violence and predation if they are not constructed.

    All other arguments are acts of free riding: theft by fraud. The attempt to obtain property rights without paying the (high ) cost of them.

    There can be no discount on liberty.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-05 10:50:00 UTC

  • THE SOCIAL CLASSES OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES – Scientific Software desig

    THE SOCIAL CLASSES OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES

    – Scientific Software design and development

    – Operating Systems Design and Development

    – Enterprise Software Product companies

    – Consumer Software Product companies

    – Business Software companies

    – Small Independent software companies

    – Internal Operational software

    – Consulting business operational software.

    – Internal IT staff.

    – Temporary (or long term) staffing.

    – Short term staffing.

    – Independent software consultants.

    – IT independent consultants.

    Varies a bit by company. But basically it’s driven by scarcity.

    (I need to write this list for economists, because it’s pretty funny.)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-16 10:07:00 UTC

  • ADVICE: REFORMING POLICE INCENTIVES (1) Rescind the Federal courts-created “doct

    http://tokyotom.freecapitalists.org/2014/10/15/incentives-matter-ferguson-police-abuse-swat-teams-roving-gangs-forfeiture-powers/#sthash.Qx7toLcY.dpufTOM’S ADVICE: REFORMING POLICE INCENTIVES

    (1) Rescind the Federal courts-created “doctrine” of “qualified immunity” under Federal law for cops;

    (2) Cops must, keep and pay for their own private liability insurance (NO municipal/county/state insurance or other citizen-backed “deep pocket”);

    (3) The pension pool of the relevant police department were required to contribute 10-20% of all judgments/settlements related to police abuse claims.

    – See more at: http://tokyotom.freecapitalists.org/2014/10/15/incentives-matter-ferguson-police-abuse-swat-teams-roving-gangs-forfeiture-powers/#sthash.Qx7toLcY.dpuf

    CURT’S ADVICE

    1) Eliminate Forfeiture

    2) Eliminate Entrapment (stings)

    3) Require Truthful Speech

    4) Require body cameras.

    FOR GOOD MEASURE

    5) Eliminate single-officer patrols.

    6) Require military body fat limits.

    AND POSSIBLY

    4) Separate judgement on arrests from investigation and restraint.

    “Truth Telling Is Enough”


    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-16 04:30:00 UTC

  • TRUTH IN DISCOURSE ON RUSSIAS AGGRESSION AGAINST UKRAINE It is one thing to say:

    TRUTH IN DISCOURSE ON RUSSIAS AGGRESSION AGAINST UKRAINE

    It is one thing to say:

    1) THE CONTRACTUAL:

    –“–“We are obligated to assist those who desire liberty in the construction of liberty, because the exchange of such insurance is the only possible means by which liberty can be constructed. We believe that we cannot win this fight. But our contract with one another for the preservation and expansion of liberty is an inviolable one without self contradiction, and as such, I saddle up, and go to war in the hope the I err in my estimate of the enemy.”–

    2) THE TRUTHFUL AND PRAGMATIC:

    –“We are obligated to assist those who desire liberty in the construction of liberty, because the exchange of such insurance is the only possible means by which liberty can be constructed. However we believe that we cannot win this fight.”–

    3) AN IRRELEVANT JUSTIFICTATION FOR FREE RIDING

    “the USA does not need another war to fight, and it only expands the state and bureaucracy”.

    OR

    “I want americans to withdraw from around the world”

    VERSUS

    4) AN IMMORAL JUSTIFICATION OF FREE RIDING

    –“Russians were justified in the combination of deceit and aggression.”—

    VERSUS

    5) AN OUTRIGHT DECEIT AND CONSPIRATORIAL ACTION

    –“Russians did not commit an act of deceit or aggression”–

    Immoral-tarians choose the fourth and fifth options. Classical liberal pragmatists the third, and aristocracy the first two.

    There is only one liberty possible: aristocracy.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-10 06:09:00 UTC

  • THE NEW CURRICULUM? (worth repeating) I would argue that we should be taught the

    THE NEW CURRICULUM?

    (worth repeating)

    I would argue that we should be taught the following:

    1) Manners, ethics, and Morality under the Golden Rule, Silver Rule, and the one-rule of property and voluntary exchange. The miracle of cooperation. How we insure one another in a multitude of ways.

    2) Truthfulness, Witness and Testimony (Operationalism and Existential Possibility) as well as how to spot errors in truthfulness, witness, and testimony.

    3) Logic, Grammar, Rhetoric, Debate and Oratory (as we once were), including how to spot ignorance, error, bias, deception, and Loading-Framing-Overloading (“Suggestion that overwhelms reason”).

    4) External Correspondence (empirical observation, analysis and testing) with a nod to Instrumentalism. And how to falsify external correspondence. What a pseudoscience is, and how to spot it.

    5) How to use free association (what we call ‘creativity’) “Filling the shelves of your mind, and then ‘playing’. Which is a discipline if you work at it. (It’s my preferred discipline.)

    6) Arithmetic, Accounting, Finance, Economics (in that order)

    7) Mathematics, Algebra, Geometry and Trigonometry, and at least the ‘idea’ of calculus. But taught as the history of the development of these problems that people were solving, instead of as wrote. With far more emphasis on word problems.

    8) Mind. Biology. Chemistry, Physics, (in that order)

    9) The western heroic canon.

    10) As much history – as the narrative of problems people solved – as we can tolerate.

    And honestly, I think all philosophy is discardable except as an interesting inquiry into the intellectual history of the struggle to develop science: Truth telling.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-06 05:01:00 UTC