TRUTH IN DISCOURSE ON RUSSIAS AGGRESSION AGAINST UKRAINE It is one thing to say:

TRUTH IN DISCOURSE ON RUSSIAS AGGRESSION AGAINST UKRAINE

It is one thing to say:

1) THE CONTRACTUAL:

–“–“We are obligated to assist those who desire liberty in the construction of liberty, because the exchange of such insurance is the only possible means by which liberty can be constructed. We believe that we cannot win this fight. But our contract with one another for the preservation and expansion of liberty is an inviolable one without self contradiction, and as such, I saddle up, and go to war in the hope the I err in my estimate of the enemy.”–

2) THE TRUTHFUL AND PRAGMATIC:

–“We are obligated to assist those who desire liberty in the construction of liberty, because the exchange of such insurance is the only possible means by which liberty can be constructed. However we believe that we cannot win this fight.”–

3) AN IRRELEVANT JUSTIFICTATION FOR FREE RIDING

“the USA does not need another war to fight, and it only expands the state and bureaucracy”.

OR

“I want americans to withdraw from around the world”

VERSUS

4) AN IMMORAL JUSTIFICATION OF FREE RIDING

–“Russians were justified in the combination of deceit and aggression.”—

VERSUS

5) AN OUTRIGHT DECEIT AND CONSPIRATORIAL ACTION

–“Russians did not commit an act of deceit or aggression”–

Immoral-tarians choose the fourth and fifth options. Classical liberal pragmatists the third, and aristocracy the first two.

There is only one liberty possible: aristocracy.